Elsevier

Engineering Geology

Volume 80, Issues 3–4, 30 August 2005, Pages 282-291
Engineering Geology

Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

An earthquake of magnitude of 7.6 (Mw 7.6) occurred in Bhuj, India on January 26, 2001. This event inflicted damages of varying extents to a large number of small to moderate size multi-zone earth dams in the vicinity of the epicenter. Some of the distress was due to the liquefaction of saturated alluvium in foundation. Liquefaction was relatively localized for the majority of these dams because the earthquake struck in the middle of a prolonged dry season when the reservoirs behind these dams were nearly empty and shallow alluvium soils underneath the downstream portions of the dams were partly dry. Otherwise, liquefaction of foundation soils would have been more extensive and damage to these dams more significant. Six such dams have been examined in this paper. Four of these facilities, Chang, Shivlakha, Suvi, and Tapar were within the 50 km of epicenter region. These dams underwent free-field ground motion with peak ground accelerations between 0.28g to 0.52g. Of these Chang Dam underwent severe slumping, whereas Shivlakha, Suvi, and Tapar Dams were affected severely especially over the upstream sections. Fatehgadh Dam and Kaswati Dam were affected relatively less severely. Foundation conditions underneath these dams were first examined for assessing liquefaction potential. A limited amount of subsurface information available from investigations undertaken prior to the earthquake indicates that, although the foundation soils within the top 2.0 to 2.5 m underneath these dams were susceptible to liquefaction, Bhuj Earthquake did not trigger liquefaction because of lack of saturation of these layers underneath the downstream portions of these dams. These dams were then analyzed using a simple sliding block procedure using appropriate estimates of undrained soil strength parameters. The results of this analysis for these structures were found to be in general agreement with the observed deformation patterns.

Introduction

An earthquake of magnitude of 7.6 (Mw 7.6) occurred on January 26, 2001. The epicenter of the main shock of the event was located near Bachau at latitude 23.36°N and longitude 70.34°E with a focal depth of about 23.6 km. The event, commonly referred to as the Bhuj Earthquake, was among the most disastrous earthquakes that have affected India.

Bhuj Earthquake affected a large number of small- to moderate-size water-retaining earthen dams and reservoirs, constructed to fulfill the water demand of the area. Most of these dams are embankment dams typically constructed across discontinuous ephemeral streams. Although a number of such structures were within 150 km of the epicenter (Fig. 1), the consequences of the damage caused by the earthquake to these dams and ancillary structures were relatively light. This is primarily because of the low reservoir levels during the earthquake. The nature of damage to the embankment dams within the epicentral region is summarized in Table 1.

The performance of six embankment dams affected by Bhuj Earthquake is examined here. Among these, Chang Dam underwent almost a complete collapse because of liquefaction of shallow foundation soils. Shivlakha Dam was also severely damaged leading the failure of the upstream slope presumably because of liquefaction underneath the upstream portion of the dam. Damages to Suvi, Tapar, Fatehgadh, and Kaswati Dams were relatively less severe and confined near the upstream toe, upstream slope, and dam crest.

Limited subsurface data available from investigations prior to Bhuj Earthquake were analyzed using the simplified procedure for assessment of liquefaction potential (Youd et al. 2001). These analyses indicate a likelihood of widespread liquefaction of shallow alluvium soils underneath Chang Dam, while for Shivlakha, Tapar, Suvi, Fatehgadh, and Kaswati Dams liquefaction could only have occurred underneath the upstream slope because the foundation soils were partially dry at the time of the earthquake or because of overburden pressure due to the dam structure.

The dams were subsequently analyzed using the sliding block method originally developed by Newmark (1965) and the design charts developed by Hynes-Griffin and Franklin (1984) facilitating the use of the Newmark procedure for estimating the magnitude of deformation. The deformations estimated from the sliding block procedure were compared with the observed deformation patterns following the Bhuj Earthquake to check the predictive capability of this simple procedure. The results indicate a reasonable agreement between the deformations estimated from the sliding block procedure and observed distress pattern. However, it should be noted that these analyses are based on limited sub-surface data from investigations undertaken before the occurrence of Bhuj Earthquake and ground motion estimates in a setting where site-specific earthquake records are not available.

Section snippets

Observed dam performance

A brief summary of the performance of the six dams examined in this study is provided in the following subsections. For a more detailed account of the post-earthquake damage survey at dam sites reference may be made to the EERI (2001) Reconnaissance Report.

Assessment of liquefaction potential

Essential details of the procedure for assessing liquefaction potential and the results of this assessment are presented in the following subsections.

The sliding block method

The sliding block method was used in this study to estimate the deformation potentials for Chang, Shivlakha, Tapar, Fatehgadh, Kaswati, and Suvi Dams. Procedural details and results from these analyses are as follows.

Analyses and results

Computer program XSTABL version 5.2 (Interactive Software Designs, Inc., 1994) and the Modified Bishop method were used in the pseudo-static slope stability analyses. The input parameters used in the analyses are listed in Table 3. For the semi-pervious shell within dam body, the assumed soil properties of Table 3 reflect typical shear strengths of materials used in Dam construction in the study area (Nadpura and Ramchand, 2005). The strength parameters of the liquefied and non-liquefied

Conclusions

A simple method of analysis has been used to estimate the permanent deformations within six earth dams due to Bhuj Earthquake. These dams partially fulfill the irrigation and drinking water needs of a semi-arid area that was affected by the Mw 7.6 earthquake. Although these facilities were within 150 km from the epicenter of the earthquake, only one of the three dams collapsed because of the earthquake. The performance could, however, have been worse had the reservoirs been full when the

References (11)

  • E.L. Krinitzsky et al.

    The Bhuj, India, earthquake: lessons learned for earthquake safety of dams on alluvium

    Engineering Geology

    (2002)
  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 2001. Bhuj, India Republic Day January 26, 2001. Earthquake...
  • Hynes-Griffin, M.E., Franklin, A.G., 1984. Rationalizing the Seismic Coefficient Method. Miscellaneous Paper GL-84-13,...
  • I.M. Idriss

    Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes

  • Interactive Software Designs, Inc., 1994. XSTABL: An integrated slope stability analysis program for personal...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (53)

  • Probabilistic seismic analysis for liquefiable embankment through multi-fidelity codes approach

    2021, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Soil liquefaction continues to be considered one of the most devastating and complex behaviours that affects the soil due to earthquake loading. Due to the combined effects of excess pore pressure generation, permanent soil deformation induced by the ground shaking, a large number of geotechnical structures, such as river dikes, highway embankments, and earth dams, founded on saturated loose sandy ground have been frequently damaged during past major earthquakes in the last few decades [1–6], among others]. Numerical and experimental studies (e.g. centrifuge tests) have shown that the induced damage to such embankments is principally due to the liquefaction of foundation soil, resulting in excessive settlements, lateral spreading and slope instability.

  • Cyclic and postcyclic behaviour of silts and silty sands from the Indo Gangetic Plain

    2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    In such scenarios, shear strength and stiffness reduction are likely occurrences. Bearing capacity failure due to soil softening was observed during earthquakes such as the 1999 Izmit earthquake [9], the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake [10], the 2001 Bhuj earthquake [11,12]) and the 2004 Great Sumatran earthquake [13] among others. In a laboratory environment, the strength loss and deformation behavior due to undrained cyclic loading is often studied by conducting post cyclic monotonic load tests on soil samples, with or without a reconsolidation stage [62–65].

  • Natural frequency of earthen dams at different induced strain levels

    2019, Engineering Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Dams and levees are among the most crucially important engineered structures that serve the society by primarily providing flood protection, hydroelectric power, water for irrigation purposes and as recreation sites (FEMA, 2017). They are stable under normal operating conditions, but are susceptible to failure when subjected to seismic excitations (Krinitzsky and Hynes, 2002; Singh et al., 2005). Not all earthquake events cause significant damage to existing structures; however, the occurrence of near resonance condition, where the predominant frequency of an earthquake excitation is close to the natural frequency of the structure, may result in amplified vibrations that may cause extensive structural damage (Banerjee, 2017; Chakraborty et al., 2018a, 2018b; Chakraborty et al., 2017; Dakoulas and Gazetas, 1985; Gazetas, 1987; Jibson, 2007; Parish et al., 2009; Zhu and Zhou, 2010).

  • Fuzzy evaluation on seismic behavior of reservoir dams during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China

    2015, Engineering Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The damage phenomena of dams were the most real and the most direct response to the great earthquake. Thus, the seismic damage investigations on the reservoir dams have always attracted great attentions from researchers all over the world (Elgamal et al., 1990; Tani, 2000; Raghvendra et al., 2005; Ozkan et al., 2006; Yoshikazu et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014). The reservoir dams suffered from Wenchuan earthquake exhibited rich seismic damage phenomena.

  • Seismic damage and behavior analysis of earth dams during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China

    2014, Engineering Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Besides, the damage of ancillary facility accounted for 60.6% of all the damaged dams. The dam cracks are the most common type among the earthquake damage of earth dams (Krinitzsky and Hynes, 2002; Raghvendra et al., 2005), which could be found in almost all the damaged dams at dam-break risk or at high risk. There were a large number of longitudinal cracks at the dam crest, and most are located in the middle segment of dam crest as well as both sides near the dam slope (see Figure 7).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text