Elsevier

Energy Policy

Volume 59, August 2013, Pages 931-937
Energy Policy

Communication
A dynamic state-level analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • State-level analysis of carbon dioxide emissions.

  • Dynamic panel estimation to account for time series properties.

  • Feasible environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide emissions.

  • Implications for state environmental policy discussed.

Abstract

As climate change and the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions play an increasingly important role in the global policy debate, careful consideration of the state-level determinants driving emissions must be considered. The importance of state-level determinants in the transmission of carbon dioxide matters especially for a country that differs from coast to coast in energy use and industry makeup like the United States. To add to the policy debate this paper estimates two models that account for the dynamic nature of emissions of carbon dioxide emissions at the state-level from 1980–2010 while taking account of scale, technique, and composition effects. When stochastic trends are taken account of, an environmental Kuznets curve relationship with a feasible turning point is found for carbon dioxide emissions.

Introduction

The regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases has come to the forefront of policy debates taking place on the international and state-level alike. Although there is a robust literature on CO2 emissions from an international perspective, very few authors have considered CO2 emissions at a sub-national level for the United States. Many states are in fact larger than some developed countries and thus produce more emissions through the scale effect alone. There are many underlying factors in aggregate reported data that matter when it comes to CO2 emissions. As Stanton et al. (2010) point out, if per capita CO2 emissions were equal across the United States to that of California, global emissions would fall by 8%. If per capita emissions were equal to Texas, however, global emissions would increase by 7%. Furthermore, state-level analyses of emissions are important because many states have begun to pursue more stringent environmental standards unilaterally than they are required by Federal law (Prasad and Munch, 2012). As a policy tool, some states have implemented renewable portfolio standards that dictate the amount of electricity generated by renewable means. More stringent policies have been adapted, though, such as the cap-and-trade program for CO2 emissions in California and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). RGGI (2012) is in fact a perfect example of states going beyond Federal regulations to limit CO2 emissions because it is a coalition of nine Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states that are trying to reduce carbon emissions from electricity by 10% in 2018.

This paper adds to the diminutive literature on state CO2 emissions by estimating a dynamic state-level model of the determinants of CO2 emissions while accounting for effects due to the scale, technique, and composition of economic activity that stem from the literature on free trade and the environment. Understanding the determinants of CO2 emissions from a state-level is certainly important in the crafting of future legislation, and reconsideration of current policies. This paper also contributes to the wider literature on estimating carbon dioxide emissions because it explicitly takes into account the time series properties of emissions, which are seldom addressed. Continuing on, Section 2 briefly discusses the scale, composition, and technique effects that will be used to add structure to the model as well as discusses papers that specifically account for the time-series properties of emissions. Section 2 then concludes with a discussion of works that look at emissions from a state-level perspective. Section 3 develops the dynamic panel model. Section 4 concludes with a discussion of policy implications that stem naturally from the model estimates Fig. 1.

Section snippets

Background

The environmental impact of trade liberalization and economic growth in general has been at the vanguard of attention in the environmental economic literature for quite some time and has led to many theoretical and empirical mainstays that are useful for analyzing regional effects of economic growth on the environment. Despite the robust literature on the income–environment relationship at international and country levels, and the variance in state and federal policies regarding CO2 emissions,

Data

To appropriately estimate the determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States many factors must be accounted for. In order to add structure to the model, this study incorporates variables that have been shown to be important in measuring the different effects economic growth has on the environment: the scale, technique, and composition effects (Davidsdottir and Fisher, 2011, Frankel, 2003). To account for the scale effect, real disposable personal-income (RDPI) per capita and its

Conclusions and discussion

This paper has furthered research on the relationship between economic growth and the environment by focusing on how CO2 emissions are related to per capita income changes and energy demand changes at the state-level for the United States. Moreover, this paper has accounted for the time-series properties of CO2 emissions that are seldom addressed by estimating both a dynamic panel model, and a fixed effects model with autoregressive errors. Another way in which this paper has advanced research

Acknowledgments

I am thankful for the many thoughtful and helpful comments of two anonymous referees, Dr. Timothy Hubbard, and session participants of the Western Economic Association 87th annual conference. Any remaining mistakes or omissions are naturally my own.

References (43)

  • S. Managi et al.

    Does trade openness improve environmental quality?

    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

    (2009)
  • G. Müller-Fürstenberger et al.

    Exploring the environmental Kuznets hypothesis: theoretical and econometric problems

    Ecological Economics

    (2007)
  • M. Piaggio et al.

    CO2 emissions and economic activity: heterogeneity across countries and non-stationary series

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • M. Prasad et al.

    State-level renewable electricity policies and reductions in carbon emissions

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • U. Soytas et al.

    Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States

    Ecological Economics

    (2007)
  • J. Aldy

    An environmental Kuznets curve analysis of U.S. state-level carbon dioxide emissions

    Environment & Development

    (2005)
  • W. Antweiler et al.

    Is free trade good for the environment?

    American Economic Review

    (2001)
  • M. Arellano et al.

    Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations

    (1991)
  • M. Arellano et al.

    Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error components models

    Journal of Econometrics

    (1995)
  • B. Baltagi et al.

    Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: a survey

  • R. Blundell et al.

    Estimation in dynamic panel data models: improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator

  • Cited by (24)

    • Per capita CO<inf>2</inf> emissions divergence influenced by bilateral trade with china under the belt and road initiative

      2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption
      Citation Excerpt :

      We used the share of the population in tertiary education over the gross school-age population between 18 and 22, denoted as EDU, to measure human capital in the BRI countries. A dynamic panel model was specified and in line with the previous literature (e.g., Roach, 2013; Li et al., 2016; Wu and Chen, 2016; Chen and Wu, 2017; Zhou and Wang, 2018). The model was used to estimate the impact of the export intensity and import intensity of the BRI countries with China on per capita CO2 emissions.

    • Can financial inclusion be an effective mitigation measure? evidence from panel data analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve

      2020, Finance Research Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Grossman and Krueger (1995) developed the concept of EKC by arguing that environmental degradation occurs during the early phase of development; however, after a turning point, the benefits of economic growth are used for environmental preservation. Many other empirical results present different findings on the existence of EKC, and the range of the turning point depends on the period of analysis, environmental index, and estimation methodology (Coondoo and Dinda, 2008; Taguchi, 2012; Roach, 2013; Beck and Joshi, 2015; Kim et al., 2016). Building on the EKC concept, researchers have also examined the relationship between financial development1 and environmental degradation (Shahbaz et al., 2013; Omri et al., 2015; Salahuddin et al., 2018).

    • Modeling the evolutionary nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth

      2019, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the United States, three models were discovered by the symbolic regression: M4, M1 (with the minimum MAE) and M11. Based on state-level data, Roach (2013) concluded that the link between CO2 emissions and the economic growth of the US from 1980 to 2010 supports the conventional EKC model. The results of this paper also show that, aside from the inverted U-shaped model, the cubic inverted N-shaped model is a better fitting model for the United States with a smaller MAE, while the monotonically increasing model fits the United States with a bigger MAE.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text