CommunicationA dynamic state-level analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States
Introduction
The regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases has come to the forefront of policy debates taking place on the international and state-level alike. Although there is a robust literature on CO2 emissions from an international perspective, very few authors have considered CO2 emissions at a sub-national level for the United States. Many states are in fact larger than some developed countries and thus produce more emissions through the scale effect alone. There are many underlying factors in aggregate reported data that matter when it comes to CO2 emissions. As Stanton et al. (2010) point out, if per capita CO2 emissions were equal across the United States to that of California, global emissions would fall by 8%. If per capita emissions were equal to Texas, however, global emissions would increase by 7%. Furthermore, state-level analyses of emissions are important because many states have begun to pursue more stringent environmental standards unilaterally than they are required by Federal law (Prasad and Munch, 2012). As a policy tool, some states have implemented renewable portfolio standards that dictate the amount of electricity generated by renewable means. More stringent policies have been adapted, though, such as the cap-and-trade program for CO2 emissions in California and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). RGGI (2012) is in fact a perfect example of states going beyond Federal regulations to limit CO2 emissions because it is a coalition of nine Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states that are trying to reduce carbon emissions from electricity by 10% in 2018.
This paper adds to the diminutive literature on state CO2 emissions by estimating a dynamic state-level model of the determinants of CO2 emissions while accounting for effects due to the scale, technique, and composition of economic activity that stem from the literature on free trade and the environment. Understanding the determinants of CO2 emissions from a state-level is certainly important in the crafting of future legislation, and reconsideration of current policies. This paper also contributes to the wider literature on estimating carbon dioxide emissions because it explicitly takes into account the time series properties of emissions, which are seldom addressed. Continuing on, Section 2 briefly discusses the scale, composition, and technique effects that will be used to add structure to the model as well as discusses papers that specifically account for the time-series properties of emissions. Section 2 then concludes with a discussion of works that look at emissions from a state-level perspective. Section 3 develops the dynamic panel model. Section 4 concludes with a discussion of policy implications that stem naturally from the model estimates Fig. 1.
Section snippets
Background
The environmental impact of trade liberalization and economic growth in general has been at the vanguard of attention in the environmental economic literature for quite some time and has led to many theoretical and empirical mainstays that are useful for analyzing regional effects of economic growth on the environment. Despite the robust literature on the income–environment relationship at international and country levels, and the variance in state and federal policies regarding CO2 emissions,
Data
To appropriately estimate the determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States many factors must be accounted for. In order to add structure to the model, this study incorporates variables that have been shown to be important in measuring the different effects economic growth has on the environment: the scale, technique, and composition effects (Davidsdottir and Fisher, 2011, Frankel, 2003). To account for the scale effect, real disposable personal-income (RDPI) per capita and its
Conclusions and discussion
This paper has furthered research on the relationship between economic growth and the environment by focusing on how CO2 emissions are related to per capita income changes and energy demand changes at the state-level for the United States. Moreover, this paper has accounted for the time-series properties of CO2 emissions that are seldom addressed by estimating both a dynamic panel model, and a fixed effects model with autoregressive errors. Another way in which this paper has advanced research
Acknowledgments
I am thankful for the many thoughtful and helpful comments of two anonymous referees, Dr. Timothy Hubbard, and session participants of the Western Economic Association 87th annual conference. Any remaining mistakes or omissions are naturally my own.
References (43)
- et al.
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel models
Journal of Econometrics
(1998) Unit root tests for panel data
Journal of International Money and Finance
(2001)- et al.
The odd couple: the relationship between state economic performance and carbon emissions economic intensity
Energy Policy
(2011) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey
Ecological Economics
(2004)- et al.
Income and emission: a panel-data based cointegration analysis
Ecological Economics
(2006) Small sample bias properties of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel models
Economics Letters
(2007)- et al.
Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed
Journal of Econometrics
(1999) An indicator framework for assessing US state carbon emissions reduction efforts (with baseline trends from 1990–2001)
Energy Policy
(2008)- et al.
The environmental Kuznets curve: does one fit all?
Ecological Economics
(1999) - et al.
Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve
Energy
(2009)
Does trade openness improve environmental quality?
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Exploring the environmental Kuznets hypothesis: theoretical and econometric problems
Ecological Economics
CO2 emissions and economic activity: heterogeneity across countries and non-stationary series
Energy Policy
State-level renewable electricity policies and reductions in carbon emissions
Energy Policy
Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States
Ecological Economics
An environmental Kuznets curve analysis of U.S. state-level carbon dioxide emissions
Environment & Development
Is free trade good for the environment?
American Economic Review
Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations
Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error components models
Journal of Econometrics
Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: a survey
Estimation in dynamic panel data models: improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator
Cited by (24)
The assessment of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in China's chemical industry
2023, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionMirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States
2021, Journal of Environmental ManagementPer capita CO<inf>2</inf> emissions divergence influenced by bilateral trade with china under the belt and road initiative
2021, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionCitation Excerpt :We used the share of the population in tertiary education over the gross school-age population between 18 and 22, denoted as EDU, to measure human capital in the BRI countries. A dynamic panel model was specified and in line with the previous literature (e.g., Roach, 2013; Li et al., 2016; Wu and Chen, 2016; Chen and Wu, 2017; Zhou and Wang, 2018). The model was used to estimate the impact of the export intensity and import intensity of the BRI countries with China on per capita CO2 emissions.
How does technological progress promote carbon productivity? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries
2021, Journal of Environmental ManagementCan financial inclusion be an effective mitigation measure? evidence from panel data analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve
2020, Finance Research LettersCitation Excerpt :Grossman and Krueger (1995) developed the concept of EKC by arguing that environmental degradation occurs during the early phase of development; however, after a turning point, the benefits of economic growth are used for environmental preservation. Many other empirical results present different findings on the existence of EKC, and the range of the turning point depends on the period of analysis, environmental index, and estimation methodology (Coondoo and Dinda, 2008; Taguchi, 2012; Roach, 2013; Beck and Joshi, 2015; Kim et al., 2016). Building on the EKC concept, researchers have also examined the relationship between financial development1 and environmental degradation (Shahbaz et al., 2013; Omri et al., 2015; Salahuddin et al., 2018).
Modeling the evolutionary nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth
2019, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :For the United States, three models were discovered by the symbolic regression: M4, M1 (with the minimum MAE) and M11. Based on state-level data, Roach (2013) concluded that the link between CO2 emissions and the economic growth of the US from 1980 to 2010 supports the conventional EKC model. The results of this paper also show that, aside from the inverted U-shaped model, the cubic inverted N-shaped model is a better fitting model for the United States with a smaller MAE, while the monotonically increasing model fits the United States with a bigger MAE.