Elsevier

Energy Policy

Volume 65, February 2014, Pages 680-691
Energy Policy

Environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.062Get rights and content

Abstract

Biodiesel production in Brazil has grown from 736 m3 in 2007 to 2.7 Mm3 in 2012. It is an emergent bioenergy for which it is important to guarantee environmental sustainability. The objective of this article is to characterise the biodiesel production chain in Brazil, to identify potential environmental impacts and to analyse key drivers and barriers for biodiesel environmental sustainability. This article explores these aspects and focusses on the increasing demand for the main feedstocks for biodiesel production in Brazil: soybean oil and beef tallow. The impacts of land use and land-use change on greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity and water, as well as the energy balance, were found to be critical for the environmental sustainability assessment and development of biodiesel chains. Increasing agriculture yields, diversifying feedstocks and adopting ethyl transesterification can contribute to minimise environmental impacts. It was also found that environmental impacts could be mitigated by appropriate policies aiming at an integrated optimisation of food and bioenergy production and through agro-economic–ecological zoning, allowing adequate use of land for each purpose. Despite the limitation and weakness of some sustainability tools and initiatives, certification and zoning can play an important role in the sustainability of the emerging biodiesel production in Brazil.

Introduction

Current liquid biofuel production processes rely on first-generation conversion pathways and comprise two distinct products: bioethanol and biodiesel. Policies worldwide have stimulated biofuel demand by setting targets and blending quotas and have aided its development by establishing support mechanisms (such as subsidies and tax exemptions in the starting point of the programmes) (Bringezu et al., 2009). In this context, over the past 5 years, liquid biofuel production increased at an average annual rate of 17% for bioethanol and 27% for biodiesel, reaching over 107.5 million m3 (21.4 and 86.1 million m3 of biodiesel and bioethanol, respectively) in 2011 (REN21, 2012). Biodiesel accounted for approximately 5% of the world biofuel production in 2000, but this share has been rising and, in 2011, biodiesel represented about 20% of the total biofuel production.

Fig. 1 shows the growth in biodiesel production since the year 2000. The columns in the figure represent the contribution of different world regions for biodiesel production of the five most important countries. Europe was the dominant region with increasing production since 2005. North America was a distant second producer led by the United States of America (USA) until 2009 when production in USA fell by over 10,000 barrels per day (mainly due to the economic downturn, incentives changes for biodiesel and foreign trade policies), while growth continued in Central and South America and Asia and Oceania. The five most important countries (55% of world production in 2010) were Germany, Brazil, France, Argentina and USA (EIA, 2012).

In Brazil, the federal government created in 2004 the National Biodiesel Production and Use Program (PNPB). The objective of the PNPB was to implement, in a sustainable way, in technical and economic aspects, the production and use of biodiesel and to allow initially the blend of 2% biodiesel (in volume) with diesel (B2) on a voluntary basis. Federal law 11,097 (Brasil, 2005) was approved in 2005 to establish a mandatory target of 2% and 5% of biodiesel addition to diesel oil in 2008 and 2013, respectively. In July 2008, the National Council of Energy Policy (CNPE) adopted 3% of biodiesel as the compulsory blend, which was raised to 5% (B5) in January 2010, anticipating in 3 years the goal set in 2005 (MME, 2013).

The fast growing interest and production of biodiesel worldwide has led to increasing concern about the environmental, economic and social impacts, especially regarding competition for land, air and water emissions, biodiversity and the ‘fuel versus food’ debate, also in Brazil (e.g., Padula et al., 2012, GEA, 2012, Janssen and Rutz, 2011, Diaz-Chavez, 2011, Lange, 2011, Lynd et al., 2011, Schaffel and La Rovere, 2010, Santos and Rathmann, 2009). To counterbalance these potential negative effects, it is crucial to establish an overview of current and future trends of biodiesel in Brazil, including characterisation of the production chain, main impacts and several policies, standards and certification schemes in place to help biodiesel sustainability assessment and development.

This article provides an overview of the key challenging factors towards environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil, based on an overview of the biodiesel production chain and environmental impacts. It is organised in five sections, including this introduction. Section 2 presents a characterisation of the biodiesel chain in Brazil, focussed on the main feedstocks (soybean oil and beef tallow). Section 3 analyses the main environmental impacts of biodiesel. The key drivers and barriers for the environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil are discussed in Section 4. Section 5 sets forth the concluding remarks.

This article aims to address only the environmental impacts of biodiesel from soybean and beef tallow in Brazil; however, it must be taken into account that the economic aspects of biodiesel are the main reason for choosing these two raw materials for biodiesel in Brazil. Other feedstocks such as palm and castor oil present high opportunity costs (NAE, 2005) as they are used in the food industry and others (more interesting in economic terms). Soybean oil is the main raw material because it is the by-product of the production of soybean meal for animal feed (to be exported together with the grains). In a similar way, beef tallow is the by-product of meat production to be exported. However, it must be observed that, even in the case of soybean and tallow biodiesel, most biodiesel is commercialised in auctions by Petrobras (the Brazilian oil company), which pays prices much higher that the final price of biodiesel blended with diesel oil in the country (diesel oil prices are controlled by Federal Government as a tool against inflation rates).

Section snippets

Biodiesel production in Brazil

Biodiesel production in Brazil has grown from 736 m3 in 2005 to approximately 2.7 million m3 in 2011 (ANP, 2012). The effective production in 2011 represented only 44% of the actual total nominal capacity of biodiesel production (6.0 million m3) (MME, 2012). The regions with a higher nominal capacity (which produced over 76% of the biodiesel in Brazil) are the Central-West (the states of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás and Distrito Federal) and the South (the states of Rio Grande do Sul,

Environmental impacts

Biofuel production has attracted the attention of stakeholders because of concerns related with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (particularly from land conversion), food production, water security and biodiversity (Ravindranath et al., 2011). In this context, a country-specific approach to life-cycle assessment (LCA) is vital when evaluating the environmental impacts of bioenergy systems. Local conditions, such as agricultural practices, land-use changes (LUCs) and transport infrastructures,

Environmental sustainability of biodiesel: key drivers and barriers in Brazil

Environmental sustainability is a difficult concept to explain, but it can be defined as “the maintenance of natural capital” (Goodland, 1995). The two fundamental environmental services (the source and the sink functions) must be maintained unimpaired during the period over which sustainability is required. In this context, the environmental sustainability of biodiesel is critically related to LC impacts associated with air (GHG emissions and others), water and soil, energy balance and

Concluding remarks

Biodiesel production in Brazil is an emergent bioenergy for which it is important to guarantee environmental sustainability. Aiming at contributing to this discussion, this article characterised the biodiesel production chain in Brazil, identified potential environmental impacts and analysed key drivers and barriers for biodiesel environmental sustainability, focussing on the main biodiesel feedstocks in Brazil: soybean oil and beef tallow. The main environmental impacts of soybean and beef

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to CNPq (BIOACV Project – 558733/2010-7) for the financial support. The research presented in this article was also supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation, FCT) projects: MIT/SET/0014/2009 (Capturing Uncertainty in Biofuels for Transportation. Resolving Environmental Performance and Enabling Improved Use) and PTDC/SEN-TRA/117251/2010 (Extended ‘well-to-wheels’ assessment of biodiesel for heavy transport

References (116)

  • R. Janssen et al.

    Sustainability of biofuels in Latin America: Risks and opportunities

    Energy Policy

    (2011)
  • L. Kallivroussis et al.

    RD-Rural Development: The Energy Balance of Sunflower Production for Biodiesel in Greece

    Biosystems Engineering

    (2002)
  • M. Lange

    The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change

    Energy Policy

    (2011)
  • J. Malça et al.

    Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): assessing the implications of allocation

    Energy – The International Journal

    (2006)
  • J. Malça et al.

    Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues

    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

    (2011)
  • A.D. Padula et al.

    The emergence of the biodiesel industry in Brazil: Current figures and future prospects

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • T.C. Ponsioen et al.

    Calculating land use change in carbon footprints of agricultural products as an impact of current land use

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2012)
  • V. Prudêncio da Silva et al.

    Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios

    Journal of Environmental Management

    (2010)
  • N.H. Ravindranath et al.

    Biofuel production and implications for land use, food production and environment in India

    Energy Policy

    (2011)
  • L. Reijnders et al.

    Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans

    JCleanProd

    (2008)
  • ABIOVE, 2011. Brasil – Complexo Soja: Evolução das Cotações FOB-Brasil. Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Óleos...
  • Andrade Filho, M., 2007. Aspectos técnicos e econômicos da produção de biodiesel: o caso do sebo bovino como...
  • ANP, 2011. Anuário Estatístico Brasileiro do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis-2011. Ministério de Minas e...
  • ANP, 2012. Produção Nacional de Biodiesel Puro - B100 (metros cúbicos) por produtor e estado 2005-2012. Ministério de...
  • Barber, A., Campbell, A., Hennessy, W., 2007. Primary energy and net greenhouse gas emissions from biodiesel made from...
  • Beer, T., Grant, T., Morgan, G., Lapszewicz, J., Anyon, P., Edwards, J., Nelson, P., Watson, H., and Williams, D.,...
  • G. Berndes

    Future biomass energy supply: The consumptive water use perspective

    International Journal of Water Resources Development

    (2008)
  • Berndes, G., Bird, N.D., Cowie, A., 2010. Bioenergy, Land Use Change and Climate Change Mitigation. IEA Bioenergy....
  • Brander, M., Hutchison, C., Sherrington, C., Ballinger, A., Beswick, C., Baddeley, A., Black, M., Woods, J., Murphy,...
  • Brasil, 2005. Lei federal n.11097, de 13 de janeiro de 2005. Dispõe sobre a introdução do biodiesel na matriz...
  • S. Bringezu et al.

    Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels

    (2009)
  • Bruyninckx, I., 2010. The use of tallow-sourced biodiesel in New Zealand. Master of Engineering Studies. Department of...
  • J.A. Burney et al.

    Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2010)
  • Castanheira, É.G., Freire, F., 2012. Life-cycle GHG assessment of soybean biodiesel. Proceedings of the International...
  • Cederberg C., Meyer D., Flysjö A., 2009. Life cycle inventory of greenhouse gas emissions and use of land and energy in...
  • CENBIO, 2013. Comparação da ACV de Biodiesel produzido a partir de Óleo de Soja e Gordura Bovina via rota Metílica e...
  • CEO, 2012. Roundtable on Responsible Soy - the certification smokescreen. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO), May 22,...
  • C.C. Cerri et al.

    Greenhouse gas mitigation options in Brazil for land-use change, livestock and agriculture

    Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)

    (2010)
  • Cezar, I.M., Queiroz, H.P., Thiago, L.R., Cassales, F., Costa, F.P., 2005. Sistema Produção de Gado de Corte no Brasil:...
  • Coelho, S.T., Agbenyega, O., Agostini, A., Erb, K.; Haberl, H., Hoogwijk, M., Lal, R., Lucon, O., Masera, O., Moreira,...
  • Coelho, S.T., Silva, G.A., Freire, F., Grisoli, R., Castanheira, E., Garcilasso, V.P., Nogueira, A. A comparative Life...
  • CONAB, 2012. Levantamento de safras. CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (National Company for Food Supply),...
  • C.A.C. Crusciol et al.

    Persistência de palhada e liberação de nutrientes do nabo forrageiro no plantio direto

    Pesq. Agropec. Bras.

    (2005)
  • DeFelice, M.S., Carter, P.R., Mitchell, S.B., 2006. Influence of tillage on corn and soybean yield in the United States...
  • EIA, 2012. International Energy Statistics. Prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Available at:...
  • G. Eiten

    The Cerrado vegetation of Brazil

    Bot. Rev.

    (1972)
  • Elobeid, A.E., Tokgoz, S., Yu, T.-H., 2009. Assessment of Biofuel Resource Elasticity in APEC Economies. APEC Energy...
  • Elobeid, A.E., Tokgoz, S., Yu, T.-H., 2010. Mitigating Land Use Changes From Biofuel Expansion: An Assessment of...
  • EMBRAPA - Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. Agro-ecological Sugarcane Zoning, 2009. Available at:...
  • Cited by (58)

    • A comparative study of biodiesel in Brazil and Argentina: An integrated systems of innovation perspective

      2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      The fact that soybean oil production in Brazil and Argentina is increasing faster than food demand means that production is more than capable of covering domestic demand. Additionally, use of genetically modified organism applications experiences significantly better acceptance rates in Latin America than for example in Europe, further promoting soybean production [163], which has, especially in Brazil and Argentina, therefore received great societal acceptance, avoiding the biofuel controversy suggesting their expansion could reduce food availability and increase food prices, negatively impacting food security [164]. However, recent biofuel market expansion presents additional challenges in balancing, through proper policy initiatives, negative impacts like deforestation—which has since 2013 been rising again in Brazil [165]—and food security without burdening producers [11], especially considering that Brazilian agriculture feeds around 800 million people globally [166].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text