Environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil
Introduction
Current liquid biofuel production processes rely on first-generation conversion pathways and comprise two distinct products: bioethanol and biodiesel. Policies worldwide have stimulated biofuel demand by setting targets and blending quotas and have aided its development by establishing support mechanisms (such as subsidies and tax exemptions in the starting point of the programmes) (Bringezu et al., 2009). In this context, over the past 5 years, liquid biofuel production increased at an average annual rate of 17% for bioethanol and 27% for biodiesel, reaching over 107.5 million m3 (21.4 and 86.1 million m3 of biodiesel and bioethanol, respectively) in 2011 (REN21, 2012). Biodiesel accounted for approximately 5% of the world biofuel production in 2000, but this share has been rising and, in 2011, biodiesel represented about 20% of the total biofuel production.
Fig. 1 shows the growth in biodiesel production since the year 2000. The columns in the figure represent the contribution of different world regions for biodiesel production of the five most important countries. Europe was the dominant region with increasing production since 2005. North America was a distant second producer led by the United States of America (USA) until 2009 when production in USA fell by over 10,000 barrels per day (mainly due to the economic downturn, incentives changes for biodiesel and foreign trade policies), while growth continued in Central and South America and Asia and Oceania. The five most important countries (55% of world production in 2010) were Germany, Brazil, France, Argentina and USA (EIA, 2012).
In Brazil, the federal government created in 2004 the National Biodiesel Production and Use Program (PNPB). The objective of the PNPB was to implement, in a sustainable way, in technical and economic aspects, the production and use of biodiesel and to allow initially the blend of 2% biodiesel (in volume) with diesel (B2) on a voluntary basis. Federal law 11,097 (Brasil, 2005) was approved in 2005 to establish a mandatory target of 2% and 5% of biodiesel addition to diesel oil in 2008 and 2013, respectively. In July 2008, the National Council of Energy Policy (CNPE) adopted 3% of biodiesel as the compulsory blend, which was raised to 5% (B5) in January 2010, anticipating in 3 years the goal set in 2005 (MME, 2013).
The fast growing interest and production of biodiesel worldwide has led to increasing concern about the environmental, economic and social impacts, especially regarding competition for land, air and water emissions, biodiversity and the ‘fuel versus food’ debate, also in Brazil (e.g., Padula et al., 2012, GEA, 2012, Janssen and Rutz, 2011, Diaz-Chavez, 2011, Lange, 2011, Lynd et al., 2011, Schaffel and La Rovere, 2010, Santos and Rathmann, 2009). To counterbalance these potential negative effects, it is crucial to establish an overview of current and future trends of biodiesel in Brazil, including characterisation of the production chain, main impacts and several policies, standards and certification schemes in place to help biodiesel sustainability assessment and development.
This article provides an overview of the key challenging factors towards environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil, based on an overview of the biodiesel production chain and environmental impacts. It is organised in five sections, including this introduction. Section 2 presents a characterisation of the biodiesel chain in Brazil, focussed on the main feedstocks (soybean oil and beef tallow). Section 3 analyses the main environmental impacts of biodiesel. The key drivers and barriers for the environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil are discussed in Section 4. Section 5 sets forth the concluding remarks.
This article aims to address only the environmental impacts of biodiesel from soybean and beef tallow in Brazil; however, it must be taken into account that the economic aspects of biodiesel are the main reason for choosing these two raw materials for biodiesel in Brazil. Other feedstocks such as palm and castor oil present high opportunity costs (NAE, 2005) as they are used in the food industry and others (more interesting in economic terms). Soybean oil is the main raw material because it is the by-product of the production of soybean meal for animal feed (to be exported together with the grains). In a similar way, beef tallow is the by-product of meat production to be exported. However, it must be observed that, even in the case of soybean and tallow biodiesel, most biodiesel is commercialised in auctions by Petrobras (the Brazilian oil company), which pays prices much higher that the final price of biodiesel blended with diesel oil in the country (diesel oil prices are controlled by Federal Government as a tool against inflation rates).
Section snippets
Biodiesel production in Brazil
Biodiesel production in Brazil has grown from 736 m3 in 2005 to approximately 2.7 million m3 in 2011 (ANP, 2012). The effective production in 2011 represented only 44% of the actual total nominal capacity of biodiesel production (6.0 million m3) (MME, 2012). The regions with a higher nominal capacity (which produced over 76% of the biodiesel in Brazil) are the Central-West (the states of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás and Distrito Federal) and the South (the states of Rio Grande do Sul,
Environmental impacts
Biofuel production has attracted the attention of stakeholders because of concerns related with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (particularly from land conversion), food production, water security and biodiversity (Ravindranath et al., 2011). In this context, a country-specific approach to life-cycle assessment (LCA) is vital when evaluating the environmental impacts of bioenergy systems. Local conditions, such as agricultural practices, land-use changes (LUCs) and transport infrastructures,
Environmental sustainability of biodiesel: key drivers and barriers in Brazil
Environmental sustainability is a difficult concept to explain, but it can be defined as “the maintenance of natural capital” (Goodland, 1995). The two fundamental environmental services (the source and the sink functions) must be maintained unimpaired during the period over which sustainability is required. In this context, the environmental sustainability of biodiesel is critically related to LC impacts associated with air (GHG emissions and others), water and soil, energy balance and
Concluding remarks
Biodiesel production in Brazil is an emergent bioenergy for which it is important to guarantee environmental sustainability. Aiming at contributing to this discussion, this article characterised the biodiesel production chain in Brazil, identified potential environmental impacts and analysed key drivers and barriers for biodiesel environmental sustainability, focussing on the main biodiesel feedstocks in Brazil: soybean oil and beef tallow. The main environmental impacts of soybean and beef
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to CNPq (BIOACV Project – 558733/2010-7) for the financial support. The research presented in this article was also supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation, FCT) projects: MIT/SET/0014/2009 (Capturing Uncertainty in Biofuels for Transportation. Resolving Environmental Performance and Enabling Improved Use) and PTDC/SEN-TRA/117251/2010 (Extended ‘well-to-wheels’ assessment of biodiesel for heavy transport
References (116)
- et al.
Changes in organic carbon stocks upon land use conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado: A review
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
(2010) - et al.
A Quantitative Assessment of the Determinants of the Net Energy Value of Biofuels
Energy Policy
(2010) - et al.
Greenhouse gas assessment of soybean: implications of land use change and different cultivation systems
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2013) - et al.
Emergy, nutrients balance and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2009) - et al.
Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2010) - et al.
Carbon storage in clayey Oxisol cultivated pastures in the Cerrado region, Brazil
Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment
(2004) Assessing biofuels: Aiming for sustainable development or complying with the market?
Energy Policy
(2011)- et al.
Net energy balance of small-scale on-farm biodiesel production from canola and soybean
Biomass and Bioenergy
(2011) - et al.
Are biofuels a feasible option?
Energy Policy
(2009) - et al.
The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane
Energy Policy
(2008)
Sustainability of biofuels in Latin America: Risks and opportunities
Energy Policy
RD-Rural Development: The Energy Balance of Sunflower Production for Biodiesel in Greece
Biosystems Engineering
The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change
Energy Policy
Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): assessing the implications of allocation
Energy – The International Journal
Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
The emergence of the biodiesel industry in Brazil: Current figures and future prospects
Energy Policy
Calculating land use change in carbon footprints of agricultural products as an impact of current land use
Journal of Cleaner Production
Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios
Journal of Environmental Management
Biofuel production and implications for land use, food production and environment in India
Energy Policy
Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans
JCleanProd
Future biomass energy supply: The consumptive water use perspective
International Journal of Water Resources Development
Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels
Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Greenhouse gas mitigation options in Brazil for land-use change, livestock and agriculture
Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)
Persistência de palhada e liberação de nutrientes do nabo forrageiro no plantio direto
Pesq. Agropec. Bras.
The Cerrado vegetation of Brazil
Bot. Rev.
Cited by (58)
Will Brazil's push for low-carbon biofuels contribute to achieving the SDGs? A systematic expert-based assessment
2022, Cleaner Environmental SystemsA comparative study of biodiesel in Brazil and Argentina: An integrated systems of innovation perspective
2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The fact that soybean oil production in Brazil and Argentina is increasing faster than food demand means that production is more than capable of covering domestic demand. Additionally, use of genetically modified organism applications experiences significantly better acceptance rates in Latin America than for example in Europe, further promoting soybean production [163], which has, especially in Brazil and Argentina, therefore received great societal acceptance, avoiding the biofuel controversy suggesting their expansion could reduce food availability and increase food prices, negatively impacting food security [164]. However, recent biofuel market expansion presents additional challenges in balancing, through proper policy initiatives, negative impacts like deforestation—which has since 2013 been rising again in Brazil [165]—and food security without burdening producers [11], especially considering that Brazilian agriculture feeds around 800 million people globally [166].
Opportunities and challenges for bioenergy-livestock integrated systems in Brazil
2021, Industrial Crops and ProductsPolicy, regulation, development and future of biodiesel industry in Brazil
2021, Cleaner Engineering and Technology