Elsevier

Environmental Pollution

Volume 151, Issue 3, February 2008, Pages 621-630
Environmental Pollution

Effect of spatial variation on salinity tolerance of macroinvertebrates in Eastern Australia and implications for ecosystem protection trigger values

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Salinisation of freshwater has been identified as a serious environmental issue in Australia and around the world. Protective concentrations (trigger values) for salinity can be used to manage salinity impacts, though require locally relevant salinity tolerance information. 72-h acute salinity tolerance values were determined for 102 macroinvertebrates collected from 11 locations in four biologically distinct freshwater bio-regions in Northeast Australia and compared with sensitivities observed in Southeast Australia. The salinity tolerance of individual taxa was consistent across Northeast Australia and between Northeast and Southeast Australia. However, two distinct communities were identified in Northeast Australia using distributions of the acute tolerance values and a calculated index of salinity sensitivity. Salinity trigger values should therefore be representative of local or regionally relevant communities and may be adequately calculated using sensitivity values from throughout Eastern Australia. The results presented provide a basis for assessing salinity risk and determining trigger values for salinity in freshwater ecosystems at local and regional scales in Eastern Australia.

Introduction

Salinisation is one of Australia's most serious environmental issues. Although dissolved salts are natural components of freshwater and some inland aquatic systems have naturally high salinity levels, it is now well recognised that impacts from excessive anthropogenic related increases in concentrations of dissolved salts can have profound and measurable effects on freshwater aquatic ecosystems (Hart et al., 1991, Williams et al., 1991, James et al., 2003, Kefford et al., 2003, Marshall and Bailey, 2004, Dunlop et al., 2005). In Australia, an estimated 5.6 million hectares of land is at high risk from induced dryland salinity and by the year 2050, estimates indicate that 17 million hectares of land may be salt affected (National Land and Water Resources Audit, 2000). In areas already affected, salinity has resulted in social, economic and environmental impacts (Land and Water Australia, 2002). It is therefore clear that there is an urgent need to manage salinity impacts in Australia.

Establishment of trigger values (guidelines) for salinity can provide a basis for its management but there are currently no widely acceptable, biologically based guidelines applicable at local or regional scales. Probabilistic risk assessment techniques can be used to determine salinity concentrations or trigger values protective of particular taxa or a proportion of taxa (Hart et al., 2003). This can be achieved by modelling a distribution of laboratory derived salinity sensitivity values (species sensitivity distribution (SSD) or taxa sensitivity distributions (TSD)) from which a percentile, or ecosystem protection value (trigger value) can be calculated to ensure the protection of a pre-defined proportion of taxa. Salinity sensitivity data can be derived from either concentration–response laboratory experiments (resulting in ≤96-h LC50 values) using a standard composition of dissolved salts and/or the maximum salinity at which taxa have been observed to occur in the field (resulting in Fmax values). Laboratory experiments provide a direct causal link between a concentration of exposure and a measured effect (Goetsch and Palmer, 1997, Berezina, 2003, Kefford et al., 2003, Kefford et al., 2004) and are preferred for use in the determination of water quality guidelines (ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000). Despite a clear need to determine biological effects based ecosystem protection values, there is limited salinity tolerance information available from freshwater organisms in Australia, and in particular there is a lack of such data in Northern Australia as most studies have been conducted either outside of Australia or in Southeastern Australia (Kefford et al., 2003, Kefford et al., 2005a, Kefford et al., 2006a). It is also not known whether the existing salinity tolerance information provides adequate representation of the variation in salinity tolerance in Eastern Australia. This study evaluates the sensitivity of a broad range of macroinvertebrates in Northeast Australia to a standard synthetic marine salt and compares these tolerance values with those observed across Eastern mainland Australia.

Section snippets

Methods

Macroinvertebrates are an important component of freshwater ecosystems forming vital links in aquatic food webs. Macroinvertebrates are known to respond at the community level to salinity impacts (Horrigan et al., 2005) and some are known to be salinity sensitive (Kefford et al., 2003) and are thus useful indicators of salinity impacts. For these reasons macroinvertebrates are an ideal taxonomic group to assess broad geographical trends in salinity sensitivity. To assess macroinvertebrate

Salinity tolerance of macroinvertebrates in Northeast Australia

Sufficient data was available to determine 102 estimates of 72-h LC50 values. The acute salinity tolerance of macroinvertebrates was highly variable between those tested ranging from 6.9 to >55 mS cm−1. Modelled sensitivity values with their respective lower 5th and upper 95th percentiles are shown in Table 2 and non-modelled, assigned 72-h LC50 values are shown in Table 3. The number of individuals tested is given as an indication of the confidence in the estimate. The mean of all recorded 72-h

Conclusion

Freshwater macroinvertebrates in Northeast Australia were found to have variable responses to salinity with 72-h LC50 values ranging between 6.9 and >55 mS cm−1. This range in tolerance is consistent with previous studies in Southeast Australia by Kefford et al., 2003, Kefford et al., 2006a. The large variation in the salinity tolerance observed in freshwater crustaceans and molluscs may be attributable to their classification as either freshwater or marine. The distinction between freshwater

Acknowledgements

This study was funded under the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality State level Investment Program. The program has input from the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water. BJK appreciated the supported by Land and Water Australia and the Murray Darling Basin Commission under the National Rivers Contaminants Program (LWA project No. RMI 12) and from the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, and Water. The authors

References (36)

  • B.J. Kefford et al.

    Growth of the Damselfly Ischnura heterosticta is better in saline water than freshwater

    Environmental Pollution

    (2006)
  • V.H. McNeil et al.

    Assessment of chemical water types and their spatial variation using multi-stage cluster analysis, Queensland, Australia

    Journal of Hydrology

    (2005)
  • ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, Australia and New...
  • Banarescu, P., 1990. Zoogeography of Fresh Waters, vol. 1. General Distribution and Dispersal of Freshwater Animals....
  • N.A. Berezina

    Tolerance of freshwater invertebrates to changes in salinity

    Russian Journal of Ecology

    (2003)
  • D.R. Cox

    The analysis of exponentially distributed life-times with two types of failures

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

    (1959)
  • Dassanayake, H., Warne, M.S.J., Lim, R.P., 2003. Interactive effects of salinity on the toxicities of Atrazine,...
  • Dunlop, J., McGregor, G., Horrigan, N., 2005. Potential impacts of salinity and turbidity in riverine ecosystems....
  • P.A. Goetsch et al.

    Salinity tolerance of selected macroinvertebrates of the Sabie River, Kruger National Park, South Africa

    Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

    (1997)
  • J. Gooderham et al.

    The Water Bug Book, A Guide to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Temperate Australia

    (2002)
  • L.W.J. Hall et al.

    The influence of salinity on the toxicity of various classes of chemicals to aquatic biota

    Critical Reviews in Toxicology

    (1995)
  • C.J. Hall et al.

    Mortality and growth responses of Daphnia carinata to increases in temperature and salinity

    Freshwater Biology

    (2002)
  • B.T. Hart et al.

    A review of the salt sensitivity of the Australian freshwater biota

    Hydrobiologia

    (1991)
  • B.T. Hart et al.

    Ecological risk to aquatic systems from salinity increases

    Australian Journal of Botany

    (2003)
  • K.L. Hassell et al.

    Sub-lethal and chronic salinity tolerances of three freshwater insects: Cloeon sp., Centroptilum sp. (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) and Chironomus sp. (Diptera: Chironomidae)

    Journal of Experimental Biology

    (2006)
  • N. Horrigan et al.

    Response of stream macroinvertebrates to changes in salinity and the development of a salinity index

    Marine and Freshwater Research

    (2005)
  • K.R. James et al.

    Responses of freshwater biota to rising salinity levels and implications for saline water management: a review

    Australian Journal of Botany

    (2003)
  • E.L. Kaplan et al.

    Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1958)
  • Cited by (69)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text