ReviewFlexibility products and markets: Literature review
Introduction
Power systems are undergoing deep transformations towards decarbonized, clean and more efficient energy generation and consumption mechanisms. This changing environment is partially characterized by the following topics:
- •
Increasing investments in Renewable Generation (RG, mainly wind and solar), located both at the transmission and distribution grids, are changing the net demand (demand minus nondispatchable generation) hourly patterns as well as the consumption patterns.
- •
RG uncertainty requires stable generation support, increasing reserves and ramping needs from conventional generation, still more adapted to meet these flexibility needs.
- •
Low variable costs of RG are reducing electricity prices in valley hours, discouraging conventional generation from keeping running, reducing their total operation hours, and making costs recovering harder. However, conventional units are still essential for meeting the demand and providing reserves for the security of supply.
- •
Current markets are often price-cap energy markets where RG is not fully integrated due to feed-in tariffs. Additional remuneration mechanisms are then needed to incentivize flexible generation, causing market distortions.
- •
Increasing Distributed Generation (DG) is posing new challenges to the grids operation. At the transmission grid, balancing and frequency regulation are the main issues, and new flexibility markets to guarantee ramping availability are being implemented. At the distribution grid, reverse power flows, new congestion and voltages issues are appearing, and research seeks to provide new flexibility services to Distributed System Operators (DSOs) to optimize the distribution grid operation and defer investments. DSO tasks are then evolving from long-term planning to include also short-term grid operation, and coordination of Transmission System Operators (TSOs) and DSOs becomes essential for efficient resources usage at both systems.
- •
Energy Storage Systems (ESS) are expected to gain importance to integrate RG, smoothing prices variability and providing additional reserves and flexibility services.
- •
Electric Vehicles (EV) are expected to develop, thanks to technological improvements and pollution regulation policies (such as conventional vehicles limitation inside city centers). EVs will increase electricity load, but Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) mechanisms can help to smooth load profiles and even provide reserve and flexibility services.
- •
Consumers, more concerned with climate issues and aware of their potential capabilities, are expected to assume much more active roles, investing in Distributed Energy Resources (DER), including DG for domestic generation, Demand Respond (DR) mechanisms to consume in a more clean, efficient and economical way, ESS to integrate DG and contribute to DR, and EV. They are also expected to partially participate in wholesale markets by grouping under aggregators’ agents to overcome market barriers. Concepts like peer-to-peer energy trading are emerging to empower consumers and boost the large-scale adoption of demand-side management technologies.
- •
Communications and metering improvements, as well as new paradigms such as Smart Grids and Smart Cities, are laying the technological foundations to support the power sector evolution. For example, as an essential part of Smart Cities appear the microgrids as clusters of microgeneration, storage and flexible loads, that act as single controllable entities, able to operate in both grid-connected or island-mode, the later especially fitted for emergencies.
Flexibility needs comes from the increasing RG which is giving place to a net load with larger variability and uncertainty, and larger ramping needs [1], [2]. To date, traditional flexible units (thermal and hydro power plants) connected at the transmission network, have been supplying the net demand and the flexibility needed by means, among others, of intraday and reserves markets [3], [4]. But as some TSOs argue [1], [5], [6], [7], the increasing variability and uncertainty are making more difficult to balance generation and load, and flexible units often lack sufficient ramping capability, forcing the use of real time (RT) automatic reserves (such as spinning or frequency containment reserve [8]), and promoting the design of new flexibility markets. In fact, if enough power and ramping capacity is available in the system, even if the net load could be ramping rapidly, as long as perfectly forecasted, energy only market prices would appropriately reward generators for their flexibility [9], meaning that uncertainty and no variability is the main cause of flexibility needs.
In addition, DG and EV can make the distribution grid operation more complex, with reverse power flows, congestions, voltages drops and losses (regardless the added complexity of allocating grid costs under this consumption patterns changes). However, smart metering and the potential of DR (both as elastic or load shifting responses) could also provide flexibility services to the distribution grid, and from the distribution to the transmission grid, with new flexibility usages (distribution grid management, portfolio optimization, etc.).
Flexibility is a general non-standard concept or product [10], to be procured by different market agents (TSOs, DSOs, Balance Responsible Parties or BRP, see Section 2) and expected to be supplied from different types of agents (supply and consumer side agents), located at the transmission or at distribution grids (with different operation problems), which needs to be integrated into the existing markets designed for more traditional power systems [11]. The literature, while large, tend to focus on particular problems without providing general approaches to flexibility products or markets, being still a matter of research. Indeed, a classification of the different flexibility approaches is needed since they may differ significantly in purposes and implementations.
This paper reviews flexibility products, and classifies and organizes most relevant issues related with flexibility products and flexibility markets. Section 2 introduces the flexibility concept and the main stakeholders involved. Section 3 describes and classifies flexibility products depending on their location and purpose attending at the literature reviewed. Section 4 focus on flexibility metrics, Section 5 on market implementations, Section 6 on TSO–DSO coordination aspects, and Section 7 concludes.
Section snippets
Flexibility and stakeholders
Flexibility is usually defined as the possibility of modifying generation and/or consumption patterns in reaction to an external signal (price or activation signals) to contribute to the power system stability in a cost-effective manner [12], [13], [14]. Flexibility is usually characterized by the following attributes [15], [11], [13], [16], [17]:
- •
Amount of power modulation
- •
Duration
- •
Rate of change
- •
Response time
- •
Location (transmission or distribution grids node)
Other additional attributes are also
Flexibility products
Flexibility products can be offered to TSO for system flexibility [25] (power balancing and frequency control, and to a lesser extend congestion management [14]), and are usually provided by conventional thermal power plants (TPP), hydro power plants (HPP, including pump storage units), zonal interconnections (ZIC, one of the most important balancing resources, limited by the unused lines capacity) or DR of large consumers (LCDR).
Flexibility products can also be offered to DSOs for local
Flexibility metrics
At the system level, measuring the flexibility available is important to determine if the system is able to face the flexibility needed due to the uncertainty of the non-controllable generators and loads, so TSOs can redispatch units to meet their estimated needs. Often the metrics are embedded into the clearing algorithms, so no explicit computation of flexibility is performed, as in the co-optimized clearing approaches [7], [1]. In addition, due to the mathematical complexity, uncertainty is
Flexibility markets design
This section focus on relevant aspects to be considered in the design of flexibility markets, and on literature proposals following the classification of flexibility products of Section 3. Several issues, some already reviewed in this paper, that are relevant for trading flexibility products are:
- •
Type of flexibility product: ramp or energy (short-term) vs capacity (long-term) markets
- •
Providers: conventional or new DG or RES providers
- •
Procurers: TSOs, DSOs or other market agents
- •
Flexibility needs
TSO, DSO and market participants coordination
Electricity services very often compete with one-another within the same level of the grid, but can also compete across the system [60]. While the former could be locally managed by the DSO in coordination with its consumers, the later requires TSO–DSO coordination so that the activation of the flexibility products offered to the TSO from the distribution grid do not cause problems to the distribution grid, especially for future large RES penetration scenarios. As pointed out in Ref. [60], long
Conclusions
This paper presents a literature review on flexibility products and market mechanisms, and classifies the different approaches regarding the purposes of the flexibility products (transmission network balancing and frequency regulation or system flexibility, distribution grid problems solving or network flexibility, or balance responsible parties balancing or market flexibility) and their location (transmission or distribution grids). It also focuses on relevant flexibility aspects such as
Acknowledgments
This work is financed by the ERDF – European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation - COMPETE 2020 Programme, and by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, within project ESGRIDS – Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Rede Elétrica Inteligente/SAICTPAC/0004/2015-POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016434.
José Villar thanks Comillas Pontifical University for madding possible his sabbatical
References (67)
- et al.
Joint energy and reserve markets: current implementations and modeling trends
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
(2014) - et al.
A flexible ramping product: can it help real-time dispatch markets approach the stochastic dispatch ideal?
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Electric vehicle models for evaluating the security of supply
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Modeling consumer flexibility of an aggregator participating in the wholesale power market and the regulation capacity market
Energy Procedia
(2014) - et al.
Assessing low voltage network constraints in distributed energy resources planning
Energy
(2015) - L. Xu, D. Tretheway, Flexible Ramping Products-Draft Final Proposal, California ISO, Draft final proposal, April...
- et al.
A metric and market construct of inter-temporal flexibility in time-coupled economic dispatch
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
(2016) - et al.
Organizing flexibility: how to adapt market design to the growing demand for flexibility
2015 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)
(2015) - Electricity system flexibility | Ofgem. (Online). Available:...
Flexible Ramping Product-Revised Draft Final Proposal
(2015)
Ramp Capability Product Design for MISO Markets
The geographical aspect of flexibility in distribution grids
2015 IEEE Power Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT)
Aggregation of demand side flexibility in a smart grid: a review for European market design
2015 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)
Flexibility Market. Efficient and Sustainable Electricity Market Design
Flexibility: The Role of DSOs in Tomorrow’s Electricity Market
Market design for electricity ensuring operational flexibility
2015 IEEE 5th International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG)
Local market framework for exploiting flexibility from the end users
2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)
Impact on power system flexibility by electric vehicle participation in ramp market
IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
French Capacity Market, Report Accompanying the Draft Rules
Coordination of system needs and provision of services
22nd International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2013)
Study on the Effective Integration of Distributed Energy Resources for Providing Flexibility to the Electricity System
TSO-DSO Data Management Report
Scheduling demand response and smart battery flexibility in a market environment: results from the reflexe demonstrator project
2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech
MicroGrid energy balance management for emergency operation
Ramp Product Design
Market solutions for managing ramp flexibility with high penetration of renewable resource
IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy
Load Participation in Ancillary Services Workshop Report
Cited by (261)
European energy communities: Characteristics, trends, business models and legal framework
2024, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsEffects of end-user participation under a TSO-DSO coordination scheme for Norway
2024, Energy Strategy ReviewsAnalysis of barriers and key enablers toward citizen ESS successful integration
2024, Journal of Energy StorageMultistage distribution expansion planning leveraging load flexibility
2024, Electric Power Systems Research