Original research articleMore than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out”
Section snippets
Introduction – the missing middle
Keeping the ‘lights on’, the ‘cars moving’ and the ‘economy growing’ are seen by many as vital indicators for a thriving and healthy modern society. These rely on well-functioning energy systems, which we define as the set of technologies, physical infrastructures, institutions, policies and practices which enable the generation, delivery, and use of energy and its services. At the same time mitigating climate change requires a transition to a low-carbon society which entails fundamental and
On agency, capacity and change
In sociology, individuals’ actions, behaviors and behavioral change are explained, among other things, by their ‘agency’ and by ‘structure’. In short, ‘agency’ refers to the individuals’ capabilities to act independently and make their own free choices, while ‘structure’ refers to factors that shape or limits individuals’ opportunities to act on those choices. ‘Structure’ includes variables such as social class, religion, gender and ethnicity [17]. For many years ‘agency’ and ‘structure’ were
Middle actors and energy
Energy systems present particular challenges for policy and governance as they tend to reflect long-term historical forces and crisis events, and tend to lead to lock-in rather than change [45]. Transforming energy systems requires coordinated efforts and changes amongst numerous actors and institutions [7]. Coordinated efforts are also needed in order to meet the challenge of changing the energy behavior of end-users.
The type of interventions needed to mobilize and support such changes in the
Middle-out approach and strategy
Similar to the literature on intermediaries, middle actors serve mediating functions between the top and the bottom. We argue that in addition, middle actors might be better ‘equipped’ than intermediaries with qualities that top actors lack (or are perceived of lacking) and bottom actors appreciate, such as trustworthiness, legitimacy, and ability to shape social norms and practices. They might also have resources essential for action, which the bottom lacks, such as pre-established procedures
Middle actors: creating change from the middle out
So far our discussion on agency, capacity, middle actors and the middle-out approach has been rather theoretical and conceptual. Below we apply these concepts to the examination and analysis of three specific examples of middle actors – congregations, building professionals, and commercial building communities – in terms of their agency, capacity and middle-out roles in changing energy systems. The middle actors discussed below are not the ‘usual suspects’ when it comes to energy policy.
More than filler: middles versus intermediaries
In a previous section, we reviewed some of the literature on intermediaries, drawing particularly on van Lente, Hekkert [41], Hodson et al. [38], and Backhaus [44]. We noted there is an overlap between middle actors and the literature on intermediaries. In this section, we argue that our concept of ‘the middle’ is also distinct from that literature. Based on our examples of congregations, building professionals, and commercial building communities, we argue the case for using middle and
Summary, discussion and policy implications
In a time when urgent and large scale changes are called to stabilize the climate, we should take advantage of all the routes in which new ideas, behaviors and practices might be introduced. Policies that focus either on top-down or bottom-up approaches are often introduced, while the full potential and roles of the middle and middle actors tend to be overlooked. Similar to but more strongly than the literature on intermediaries (e.g., [11]) we argued and demonstrated here that the middle is
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2011 European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ECEEE) Summer Study. This work has been supported by the UK Energy Research Centre under its Demand Theme (http://www.ukerc.ac.uk). UKERC is funded by the UK Research Councils’ Energy Programme.
References (80)
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
Energy Res Soc Sci
(2014)Emerging in between: the multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions
Energy Policy
(2007)Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study
Res Policy
(2002)- et al.
Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions
Energy Policy
(2005) Promoting household energy conservation
Energy Policy
(2008)- et al.
A behavioral model of residential energy use
J Econ Psychol
(1983) - et al.
From if only to social potential in schemes to reduce building energy use
Energy Res Soc Sci
(2014) Building communities and social potential: between and beyond organisations and individuals in commercial properties
Energy Policy
(2014)Twixt cup and lip: organizational behavior, technical prediction, and conservation practice
Energy Policy
(1992)Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments
Energy Policy
(1993)