Comparing appropriate decision support of human resource practices on organizational performance with DEA/AHP model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.066Get rights and content

Abstract

The issue of human resource practices has been widely applied to examine the organizational performance for multiple industries. Few researches have realized that the relationships of human resource practices to organizational performance in different culture types support the meaningful information. In this paper, an Analytical Hierarchical Process/Data Envelopment Analysis (AHP/DEA) model that helps in investigating the associated importance of human resource practices and organizational performance variables is proposed. This research involving 129 companies in the Taiwanese electronics industry and 112 branches in China are used to demonstrate and compare the impact of human resource practices on organizational performance in each organizational type with the proposed AHP/DEA model. The study contains five human resource practice variables and seven organizational performance variables through Linear Structure Relation (LISREL). The main findings suggest: (1) asking employee to participate company activities, because doing so may greatly consume the employees’ relationships in each organizational type for both the Taiwanese and branches electronics industry; and (2) the importance of employee relations is more significant in stratum and rational culture than in development and common culture regardless of Taiwanese companies or branches in China. Discussion and implication with respect to decision support are also addressed.

Introduction

Numerous studies have identified the elements of human resource practices and organizational performance (Delery and Doty, 1996, Fields et al., 2000, Guest et al., 2004, Huselid, 1995, Youndt et al., 1996). These studies have considered various traditional approaches for assessing the human resource practices on organizational performance within various industries. Moreover, Goodman, Zammuto, and Gifford (2001) considered that examining organizational performance in different cultures has more useful information to managers than just exploring performance in each culture. Authors (e.g. Goffee and Jones, 1998, Quinn and Spreitzer, 1991, Wang and Shyu, 2003) thus divided organizational culture, and found that different culture type has its unique impacts on organizational performance. These studies also found that different cultures have different relationships with organizational performance. In addition, few studies have examined the relationship and explored the appropriate decision support of human resource practices on organizational performance in each culture type.

To address this challenge, this study explored and investigated human resource practices and their influence on organizational performance, and compared with the difference of the appropriate decision support in each culture for the Taiwanese electronics industry and subsidiary company in China.

The remainder of this study is organized as follows: Section 1 presents an introduction. The introduction is followed by the key factors of human resource practices, organizational performance and culture category, and the relationships between them. Section 3 then introduces the method used to obtain the sample, data, and measurement. Subsequently, Section 4 shows the reliability and validity test, demonstrating structural model estimation, and calculating and comparing appropriate decision support of human resource practices and organizational performance in each culture type for Taiwanese electronics industry and branches in China using Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)/Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The final section includes concluding remarks, study limitations and future research suggestions.

Section snippets

Literature review

Human resource practices result in human resource outcomes, which in turn influence firm performance (Boselie et al., 2001, Tzafrir, 2005). Numerous studies have demonstrated the widely accepted theoretical basis of the relationship between human resource practices and organizational performance (Appelbaum et al., 2000, Cho et al., 2006, Hoque, 1999, Huselid, 1995, Khatri, 2000, Pfeffer, 1994).

Empirical studies have identified and utilized the significant relationship between human resource

Method

AHP and DEA approaches can resolve the multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information (Hong et al., 1999, Hua et al., 2008, Çelebi and Bayraktar, 2007). Researches have indicated that AHP can be applied form an AHP/DEA ranking model for improving DEA usability (Feng et al., 2004, Sinuany-Stern et al., 2000, Zilla et al., 2000). The advantage of the AHP/DEA ranking model is that the comparative weight can be derived from inputs/outputs via AHP pairwise comparison (

Reliability and validity of human resource practices, organizational performance and culture category

Coefficient alpha (Cronbach, 1951) and item-to-total correlation analysis are initially used to measure reliability and validity. This study calculates the composite reliability estimates, which are directly analogous to the commonly used coefficient alpha statistics. Cronbach α exceeding 0.7 indicates acceptable reliability (Cuieford, 1965). Table 2 lists the reliability of all factors, including human resource practices, organizational performance, and culture category, and reveals high and

Concluding remarks

The research data are directly provided from the questionnaire answered by the employees in electronics companies. This study examines the factors of human resource practices and organizational performance, and their impacts on the individual electronics industries using exploratory factor analysis. This study also identifies the importance of organizational performance based on understanding various factors of human resource practices, and reveals the goodness-of-fit in this research model for

References (80)

  • C.R. Anderson

    Management: Skills, functions, and organization performance

    (1988)
  • J.C. Anderson et al.

    An update paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1988)
  • E. Appelbaum et al.

    Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off

    (2000)
  • J. Armstrong et al.

    Estimating nonresponse bias in mail survey

    Journal of Mark Research

    (1977)
  • J.B. Barney

    Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage

    Journal of Management

    (1991)
  • B. Becker et al.

    The impact of human resource management on organizational performance. Progress and prospects

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1997)
  • Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Evir, T. (2005). Organizational culture as a mediator of CEO values and organizational...
  • P. Boselie et al.

    Human resource management and performance. Lessons from the Netherlands

    International Journal of Human Resource Management

    (2001)
  • D.M. Cable et al.

    Pay preferences and job research decisions: A person-organization fit Perspective

    Personnel Psychology

    (1994)
  • P. Cappelli et al.

    Do high performance work practices improve establishment level outcomes?

    Industrial and Labor Relations Review

    (2001)
  • W.F. Cascio

    Costing human resource. The financial impact of behavior in organizations

    (1991)
  • D. Çelebi et al.

    An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2007)
  • L.L.M. Chan et al.

    In research of sustained competitive advantage: The impact of organizational culture, competitive strategy and human resource management practices on firm performance

    International Journal of Human Resource Management

    (2004)
  • P.L. Chang et al.

    The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance. Empirical evidence from high-tech firms in Taiwan

    International Journal of Management

    (2002)
  • W.W. Chin

    Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling

    Management Information System Quality

    (1998)
  • I.H.-S. Chow et al.

    Business strategy, organizational culture, and performance outcomes in China’s technology industry

    Human Resource Planning

    (2007)
  • L. Cronbach

    Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Psychometrika

    (1951)
  • J.P. Cuieford

    Fundamental statistics in psychology and education

    (1965)
  • W.N. Davision et al.

    Early retirement programs and firm performance

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • J.T. Delaney et al.

    The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • J. Delery et al.

    Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of university contingency and configurational performance predictions

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • D.R. Denison

    Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness

    (1990)
  • D.R. Denison et al.

    Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness

    Organization Science

    (1995)
  • Y.J. Feng et al.

    An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in university

    International Transactions in Operational Research

    (2004)
  • D. Fields et al.

    Organizational context and human resource management strategy: A structural equation analysis of Hong Kong firms

    International Journal of Human Resource Management

    (2000)
  • E. Flamholtz

    Human resource accounting

    (1985)
  • D. Gefen et al.

    Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice

    Communications of the Association for Information Systems

    (2000)
  • B. Gerhart et al.

    Employee compensation: Research and practice

  • R. Goffee et al.

    The character of a corporation. How your company’s culture can make or break your business

    (1998)
  • E.A. Goodman et al.

    The competing values framework: Understanding the impact of organizational culture on the quality of work life

    Organization Development Journal

    (2001)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Operating efficiency of accounting firms based on different perspectives of human resource structures

      2023, Asia Pacific Management Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      DEA is a classical and prevailing tool for estimating the relative efficiencies of multiple DMUs (Jiang, Feng, & Li, 2022). The DEA method has been widely used to assess the performances of different industries, such as banking (e.g., Bonin, Hasan, & Wachtel, 2005; Boubaker, Do, Hammami, & Ly, 2022; Hammami, Ngo, Tripe, & Vo, 2022; Lin, Lee, & Chiu, 2009; Paradi, Rouatt, & Zhu, 2011; Portela, Thanassoulis, & Simpson, 2004; Staub et al., 2010), insurance (e.g., Noulas, Hatzigayios, Lazaridis, & Lyroudi, 2001; Wu, Yang, Vela, & Liang, 2007), human resource development (e.g., Despotis, 2005; Tseng & Lee, 2009), public services (e.g., Ali & Mohammad, 2022; Cooper & Ray, 2008; Pathak, Kulshrestha, & Kulshreshtha, 2021; Smith & Street, 2005), hotels (e.g., Morey & Dittman, 2003; Sigala, Jones, Lockwood, & Airey, 2005), teaching and learning effectiveness (e.g., Montoneri, Lee, Lin, & Huang, 2011; Montoneri, Lin, Lee, & Huang, 2012; Montoneri et al., 2013), medicare (e.g., Pulina et al., 2010; Shimshak, Lenard, & Klimberg, 2009; Somayeh, Mozaffari, Mohsen, & Hosseinzadeh, 2022; İlgün & Şahin, 2022), high-tech (e.g., Gupta, Mehlawat, & Mahajan, 2022; Kozmetsky & Yue, 1998), information technology (e.g., Chou & Shao, 2014; Sueyoshi & Goto, 2013), pharmaceuticals (e.g., Saranga & Banker, 2010), and accounting firms (e.g., Banker, Chang, & Natarajan, 2005; Banker, Chang, & Natarajan, 2007; Chang, Chen, Duh, & Li, 2011; Chen & Lin, 2007; Cheng et al., 2000; Chiu, 2009; Dopuch, Gupta, Simunic, & Stein, 2003; Lee, 2009; Lee, 2014). Jerris and Pearson (1997) indicate that the big 5 CPA firms continue to produce the most revenues; however, they are not necessarily as efficient or effective as smaller CPA firms in their use of firm resources.

    • Social networks, technology ties, and gatekeeper functionality: Implications for the performance management of R&D projects

      2017, Research Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      SmartPLS v.2 software by Ringle et al. (2005) (SmartPLS, Hamburg, Germany) was used to test the measurement and convergent validity of the social networks, technology ties, and gatekeeper functionality. Additionally, SmartPLS software was used to test whether the three facets of an R&D team significantly influence its performance (Tseng and Lee, 2009). Zhang et al. (1991) and Purvis et al. (2001) have argued that the bootstrapping process, which is a sampling approach using random resampling from the original sample, is efficient for enhancing construct validity for a small sample.

    • HR 4.0 in Industry 4.0: Dynamics of human resource management in agile organizations

      2023, Agile Leadership for Industry 4.0: An Indispensable Approach for the Digital Era
    • E-Learning and Organizational Support: Investigation of Quality and Behavior

      2023, 2023 8th International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2023
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +886 6 2710302; fax: +886 6 2362162.

    View full text