Decision support system for service quality management using customer knowledge in public service organization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.021Get rights and content

Abstract

As the service quality has been reconsidered in the public sector as well as private enterprises, the need for public sectors to adopt principle and practices of private sectors is concerned with customer-focused approach. However, the different business culture of public service organizations makes it difficult to improve service quality. It is required to establish a structured framework that leads employees to make efforts to improve their service delivery processes and supports continuous improvement of service delivery processes based on the data about the process performance from the customer-perceived value-oriented viewpoint.

In this paper, we propose a structured framework that identifies the key service processes, validates from customer perspectives and establishes the measurements to monitor based on the data about the process performance. It uses periodic customer satisfaction index (CSI) surveys (S.C. Park) for understanding customer-perceived values. The proposed framework consists of three phases; the questionnaire design, the key process (KP) identification from the integrated viewpoints of importance and contribution, and the key process indicator (KPI) derivation and management. For the application, we established a web-based decision support system for a public service organization for tourism in Korea.

Introduction

In the early 1990s, quality improvement has been applied in the public sector as well as private enterprises (Carr & Littman, 1990). At the same time, there are tendencies to reclassify citizens as customers (Pollitt & Bouckaert, 1995). The development of information technology makes citizens to want faster, more convenient and efficient service at lower cost (Yang, Kim, Nam, & Lee, 2004). Leaders of public sectors urge to set standards of services with help of technology advances in private sector. The need for public sectors to adopt principles and practices of private sectors is concerned with customer-focused approach (or citizen-oriented services), which aims at improving the quality of public services (Mwita, 2000). However, the difference of business culture between public sectors and private service industries makes it difficult to improve service quality in public sectors as follows:

  • 1.

    Lack of urgency for improvement: Usually there is no competitor and the goal of public service organizations is not an increase of profit. Most public service organizations are not willing to adopt changes have a tendency to “playing it safe” (Sherman, 1989; Skelcher, 1992). Organizational bureaucracy and lack of collaboration culture are some difficult problems to resolve. Employees are usually content to work to a standard with considerable commitment to rules, regulations and precedents. So, employees should be urged to improve their service delivery processes and their improvement efforts should be managed. The measurements or indicators for efforts can be a strong incentive for improvement.

  • 2.

    Unstructured management of service quality: In practice, processes are mostly managed based on experts’ experiences, leaders’ insights, or political strategies. These ad hoc management activities often rouse employees’ antipathies and make them to refuse the changes. Or non-value added processes are sometimes over-controlled. It is required to support continuous improvement of service delivery processes based on the data about the process performance. So, selecting the measurements or indicators of the performance results is very important.

  • 3.

    Disconnection to value creation: In non-quality oriented companies, employees usually perceive that “I just do this”. It is often totally unrelated to the services. Within the public service organizations, this divorce between the value of the organization’s output and an individual employee’s input is even greater. Furthermore, the value should be considered from the customer perspectives including internal customers (employees). It is required to make employees recognize the value of their daily work and to investigate the desired value by customers.

Therefore, in order to provide customer-oriented (or citizen-oriented) services and improve the service quality, the public service organization should identify the key service processes and key customers and validate the value of employees’ work from customer perspectives. The prioritization of constrained resources for improvement should be accompanied. Furthermore, the measurements to monitor and the management framework based on the data about the process performance are required so as to continuously encourage the employees to keep the efforts for improvement.

In this paper, we use periodic customer satisfaction index (CSI) surveys in order to understand customer and markets and assess the service quality. A CSI survey is not just a tool to measure customers’ satisfaction level. The main purpose is to discover the strengths and areas required to be improved, and to provide guidelines for improvement from customer perspectives. The analysis of CSI surveys enables organizations to take further continuous improvements in order to meet, or even exceed, customer requirements, and hence to raise the customer satisfaction (Eklof & Westlund, 1998).

In the next section we will briefly review the previous studies on customer satisfaction measurements and shortcomings of analysis methods. Then, for service quality improvement based on CSI surveys, we will present the structured framework that designs questionnaires, analyzes, identifies key processes that are valuable to increase of customer satisfaction, and finally sets measurements for monitoring. We will apply the proposed framework to a public service organization for tourism in Korea. Finally, we make conclusions about the framework for service quality improvement based on CSI surveys and propose some directions for future research.

Section snippets

Literature review: customer satisfaction measurements

Customer satisfaction has traditionally been focused in marketing. In order to measure customer satisfaction, the various models have been presented so that they establish objective measures for the outcomes of the confirmation/disconfirmation process (Flint et al., 1997, Peter and Olson, 1996). The quality models in service marketing research and TQM have been under the discussion. The dimensions of quality have been determined by the researchers such as Garvin (1988) and Gronroos (1990).

There

Methodology

We propose a framework of service quality management that uses customer knowledge from periodic customer satisfaction index surveys. It consists of five phases as shown in Fig. 1. We exclude detail descriptions about the second and the third phase because they can be executed as usual. First of all, the questionnaire should be designed to provide fully customer knowledge. It reflects all customer-related processes in a consistent viewpoint over all departments and includes customer information

Application

We applied our methodology in a public service organization for tourism in Korea. The organization has been controlled under the government department for the culture and tourism. The main businesses of the tourism organization are pioneering the overseas markets, an inducement of foreign tourists and international conferences, services for domestic tourism information, developments of tourism attractions and the cooperation with local governments.

In the circumstance that the need for tourism

Conclusion and further research

As the service quality has been reconsidered in the public sector as well as private enterprises, the need for public sectors to adopt principle and practices of private sectors is concerned with customer-focused approach. However, the different business culture of public service organizations, which is such as the lack of urgency for improvement, the contentment of status quo, unstructured management of service quality based on the experts’ experiences or insights, and the divorce between the

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Risk assessment and management via multi-source information fusion for undersea tunnel construction

    2020, Automation in Construction
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the practice of quality management, the factors that are used to measure the quality levels can be classified into five categories: (hu)man, material, machine, method, and environment, which are referred to as 4M1E. This classification of quality factors is a widely accepted framework in quality management [22–24]. Consequently, the risk factors in construction also can be classified as 4M1E and identified and assessed correspondingly.

  • Large-scale group decision making with multiple stakeholders based on probabilistic linguistic preference relation

    2019, Applied Soft Computing Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    LGDM methods can be roughly classified into four types, namely, clustering-based LGDM, consensus-reaching LGDM, LGDM methods and LGDM support systems. Labella et al. [4] performed a comparative analysis for different classical consensus-reaching processes applied to LGDM problems. Palomares et al. [6] proposed a graphical monitoring tool to manage LGDM.

  • A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups

    2016, Information Fusion
    Citation Excerpt :

    Large group decision-making (LGDM) is a very common human activity, which refers to the selection of the best option from a set of feasible alternatives according to the opinions of a large number of persons. In reality, since decision-making results for some problems relate to the benefits of a large number of stakeholders, it is necessary for a large number of persons from multiple groups of stakeholders to take part in the decision process [1–5]. For example, a large number of teachers from different schools in a university are allowed to take part in the decision process of reforming the promotion system, a large number of citizens from different professional groups are invited to provide their opinions on the adjustment of subway fares and so on.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Tel.: +82 42 869 5920; fax: +82 42 869 3110.

View full text