Effects of heterogeneous elasticity coupled to plasticity on stresses and lattice rotations in bicrystals: A Field Dislocation Mechanics viewpoint
Graphical abstract
Highlights
► Infinite bicrystal with heterogeneous anisotropic elasticity and plasticity. ► Explicit closed-form solutions of stress and lattice misorientation fields. ► Elastic–plastic coupling incompatibilities may have consequent effects.
Introduction
Many studies coupling experiments and theoretical investigations (e.g., Gemperlova et al., 1989; Hirth, 1972; Liang and Dunne, 2009; Mayama et al., 2009; Ohashi et al., 2009; Rey and Zaoui, 1980, Rey and Zaoui, 1982; Saada, 2006; Sun et al., 1998; Sutton and Balluffi, 1995; Vehoff et al., 1987, Vehoff et al., 2004) have been carried out on bicrystals in order to get a better understanding of the specific role of grain boundaries during the deformation of polycrystals. At a material surface of discontinuity (grain, twin or phase boundary), incompatibility stresses can develop due to material elastic anisotropy. Much theoretical work (e.g., Gemperlova et al., 1989; Qamar and Husain, 1989; Tewary et al., 1989), including Finite Element simulations (e.g., Schick et al., 2000; Vehoff et al., 2004), has been devoted to estimate these elastic incompatibility stresses in order to predict crack initiation and propagation path. When plasticity enters into play, plastic strain incompatibilities add to the picture and yield additional stresses and lattice rotations. Among these fields, it may actually be distinguished between those uniquely due to a difference in plastic distortions and those arising from a coupling between elastic and plastic heterogeneities. Many models make an assumption of homogeneous isotropic elasticity or of pure rigid viscoplastic behaviour (no elasticity) and thus overlook the contribution of both elastic and elastic–plastic coupling incompatibilities. The present paper aims notably at underlying the potentially significant role of coupling incompatibilities. For this purpose, explicit closed-form solutions of stress and lattice misorientation fields are derived for two semi-infinite crystals undergoing uniform plastic distortions in the general context of heterogeneous anisotropic elasticity. The derivation is performed by means of the concepts of the elastic theory of continuously distributed dislocations (ECDD) initiated by Kröner, 1958, Kröner, 1981 and Willis (1967). It deals with the Nye's tensor α (Nye, 1953) which reflects only the so-called geometrically necessary dislocations (GND) densities following Ashby (1970), also referred to as “excess” or “polar” dislocation densities in the literature. The Nye's tensor α is a continuous rendition of the collective arrangements of dislocations and the associated lattice incompatibility. This theory was rethought some years ago by Acharya (2001) (see also Acharya, 2004; Acharya and Roy, 2006) in considering the permanent deformation arising due to dislocation motion. In the Field Dislocation Mechanics (FDM) theory of Acharya (2001), the elastic distortions are uniquely decomposed into compatible and incompatible parts whereas the evolution equation for the GNDs (Mura, 1963) is added within an efficient numerical set-up.
Incompatibility problems constitute a long-standing issue of materials mechanics (see the pioneering works of Bilby, 1955; Frank, 1950; Indenbom, 1966; Kröner, 1958; Willis, 1967). Different techniques have been envisaged to address these issues and determine stresses and lattice rotations: Green functions (Berveiller and Zaoui, 1980; Berveiller et al., 1987; Kröner, 1989), stress potential functions for plane problems (Kröner, 1981; Berveiller, 1978) or Fourier Transforms (Berbenni et al., 2008; Rey and Saada, 1976; Saada, 1979). In the case of bicrystals, Gemperlova et al. (1989) imagine the total stresses as a sum of the applied and compatibility stresses and the total strains as a sum of elastic strains in relation with applied stresses, elastic strains in relation with compatibility stresses and plastic strains. Then, they consider boundary conditions for stresses and compatibility conditions for strains at the interface to find out the stresses. For three-dimensional heterogeneous elasticity problems, Michelitsch and Wunderlin (1996) have extended the Kröner stress function method. It is also noteworthy that some homogenization schemes for laminates microstructures were derived to calculate the stresses using elastic stress concentration and influence tensors (e.g., Franciosi and Berbenni, 2007, Franciosi and Berbenni, 2008; Stupkiewicz and Petryk, 2002). Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge, no explicit closed-form formulas of stresses have been given for bicrystals with completely anisotropic elasticity and heterogeneous plasticity. In addition, the context of the present paper is different from the preceding approaches since it aims at directly applying the FDM theory (Acharya, 2001) in its static form.
The paper outline is as follows. In Section 2, notation conventions are settled. The static FDM theory is recalled in Section 3 and formulated for heterogeneous elasticity and plasticity with respect to a reference homogeneous medium. Conventional continuity conditions at surfaces of discontinuity are also recalled in this section, in addition to the expression of the surface-dislocation density tensor and the jump condition ensuring the conservation of the Burgers vector. Section 4 deals with the issue of an infinite bicrystal with planar boundary undergoing piecewise uniform plastic distortions and elastic properties. The static FDM theory is accordingly used to derive analytical expressions of stress and lattice rotation fields in the general case of heterogeneous anisotropic elasticity. The validations of these explicit formulae are checked in Section 5 from Crystal Plasticity Finite Element simulations on a bicrystal with periodic boundary conditions assuming each crystal has a cubic symmetry (fcc metals). The contribution of the different sources of incompatibilities is further analysed. In Section 5, analytical expressions of residual stresses and lattice misorientations are also used to perform comparisons with results derived from the isotropic approximation. Finally, concluding remarks follow.
Section snippets
Notations
A bold symbol denotes a tensor and the tensorial product of tensors v and w. We denote Av the action of the second-order tensor A on the vector v, producing a vector. The symbol AB represents tensor multiplication of the second-order tensors A and B and a “:” denotes the contracted product between two tensors. The operation × is the tensorial cross product, defined as: , the symbol ∀ being shorthand for “for all” and the superscript T denoting the transpose of a matrix. If
Field equations
The initial static elastic theory of continuously distributed dislocations (ECDD) as initiated by Kröner, 1958, Kröner, 1981, Indenbom (1966), Willis (1967), and reworked by Acharya (2001) includes the following set of field equations (Acharya, 2001, Acharya, 2004; Acharya and Roy, 2006)where u is the displacement field and β the total distortion field (i.e. the displacement gradient) which
Piecewise uniform plastic distortions
Here, we follow the static theory of continuously distributed dislocations described in Section 3. The objective is to give the stress fields and lattice misorientations (i.e. elastic rotation jumps) in both crystals of an infinite medium assuming uniform plastic distortion and elastic constants in each crystal. The static configuration is represented in Fig. 2 where the infinite grain boundary plane spreads in the (O, x1, x3) plane. To be consistent with the Frank–Bilby procedure (Frank, 1950;
Application to bicrystals deformation
The first part of this section aims at checking the correctness of the analytical formulas established in Section 4 from Crystal Plasticity Finite Element simulations and then at showing the relative contribution of the different sources of incompatibilities. The second part of the section deals with elastic/plastic bicrystals and displays the values of residual stresses and residual lattice misorientations for different orientations of the elastic crystal. Systematic comparisons with the
Conclusions
The present paper considered the issue of bicrystal elasto-plasticity assuming an infinite planar grain boundary. The bicrystal is considered as a heterogeneous elastic–plastic solid undergoing piecewise uniform plastic distortions (where plasticity is not restricted to be incompressible) and elastic properties. Explicit closed-form solutions of stress and lattice misorientation fields in the general context of heterogeneous anisotropic elasticity (with and without plastic distortion tangential
Acknowledgements
TR is grateful to the French Agence nationale de la Recherche (ANR) for financial support under contract “PHIRCILE” (ANR 2010 JCJC 0914 01).
References (55)
A model of crystal plasticity based on the theory of continuously distributed dislocations
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
(2001)Constitutive analysis of finite deformation field dislocation mechanics
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
(2004)- et al.
Size effects and idealized dislocation microstructure at small scales: predictions of a phenomenological model of mesoscopic field dislocation mechanics: part I
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
(2006) - et al.
Spatial correlation in grain misorientation distribution
Acta Mater.
(2009) - et al.
Intra-granular plastic slip heterogeneities: discrete vs. mean field approaches
Int. J. Solids Struct.
(2008) - et al.
The problem of two plastic and heterogeneous inclusions in an anisotropic medium. Int
J. Eng. Sci.
(1987) - et al.
Heterogeneous crystal and polycrystal plasticity modeling from transformation field analysis within a regularized Schmid flow law
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
(2007) - et al.
Multi-laminate plastic-strain organization for non-uniform TFA modeling of poly-crystal regularized plastic flow
Int. J. Plast.
(2008) - et al.
GND accumulation in bi-crystal deformation: crystal plasticity analysis and comparison with experiments
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Continuity in the plastic strain rate and its influence on texture evolution
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
(2010)
Geometrically necessary dislocation structure organization in FCC bicrystal subjected to cyclic plasticity
Int. J. Plast.
Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals
Acta Metall.
X-ray microdiffraction and strain gradient crystal plasticity studies of geometrically necessary dislocations near a Ni bicrystal grain boundary
Int. J. Plast.
Material rate dependence and localized deformation in crystalline solids
Acta Metall.
A tangent modulus method for rate dependent solids
Comput. Struct.
Mechanical response of multicrystalline thin films in mesoscale field dislocation mechanics
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
Incompatibility stresses at the boundary of a bicrystal of an elastically anisotropic solid
Scripta Metall.
Slip heterogeneities in deformed aluminium bicrystals
Acta Metall.
Grain boundary effects in deformed bicrystals
Acta Metall.
Continuity constraints at interfaces and their consequences on the work hardening of metal-matrix composites
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
Elastic field of dislocation networks and grain boundaries
Acta Metall.
Planar dislocation arrays and crystal plasticity
Modelling of laminated microstructures in stress-induced martensitic transformations
J. Mech. Phys. Solid.
Behaviour of elastic constants in Cu-14wt.% Al-4.2wt.% Ni alloy in the close vicinity of Ms-point
Scripta Metall.
Mesoscale investigation of the deformation field of an aluminium bicrystal
Scripta Metall. Mater.
Size effects on the hardening of channel-type microstructures: a field dislocation mechanics-based approach
Acta Mater.
The effect of hydrogen and segregation on fatigue crack nucleation at defined grain boundaries in nickel bicrystals
Acta Metall.
Cited by (19)
A microstructure-based three-scale homogenization model for predicting the elasto-viscoplastic behavior of duplex stainless steels
2023, International Journal of PlasticityCoupling in situ experiments and modeling – Opportunities for data fusion, machine learning, and discovery of emergent behavior
2020, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials ScienceCitation Excerpt :Moreover, a closer coupling between in situ experiments and modeling is achieved, based on characterization techniques that quantify the crystallography of the material, as opposed to focusing on the individual defects. As opposed to DDD, there are several modeling approaches that track the net micromechanical fields produced by dislocations, but treat these defects by a continuum description, including phase field dislocation mechanics [75,76], continuum dislocation theory [77–83], and field dislocation mechanics [84–91]. Continuum dislocation theory has been used to model the dislocation patterning of cell formation [92,93], which form during large deformation or cyclic loading, and has been qualitatively compared to observations made via TEM.
Mechanical derivation of elastic constants of ε-martensite
2019, Scripta MaterialiaElastic fields due to dislocations in anisotropic bi- and tri-materials: Applications to discrete dislocation pile-ups at grain boundaries
2019, International Journal of Solids and Structures