Importance of the inlet air velocity on the establishment of flameless combustion in a laboratory combustor
Highlights
► Importance of the inlet air velocity on flameless combustion has been evaluated. ► Reaction zone remains in the same region as the inlet air velocity increases. ► OH* intensities decrease as the inlet air velocity increases. ► For high excess air coefficients flameless oxidation could not be established.
Introduction
Under flameless oxidation conditions combustion takes place in a distributed reaction zone rather than in a thin flame front, with relatively uniform and low temperatures and temperature fluctuations, in comparison to conventional flames. The fuel is oxidized in an environment that contains a significant amount of flue gases and a low concentration of oxygen, as a result of internal or external exhaust gas recirculation. The radiative heat fluxes are relatively high and uniform, there is no visible flame, the level of noise is low, soot formation is negligible and NOx and CO emissions are very low.
Flameless combustion is a technology relatively well established for industrial applications where heat is extracted from within the furnace while processing material, and is among the most promising technologies that can meet the stringent demands of reduced pollution and increased efficiency in future gas turbines. Gas turbine would operate lean adiabatic combustion (high oxygen content) while furnaces feature higher equivalence ratio (low oxygen content) [1]. This may pose difficulties in establishing the flameless combustion regime in gas turbines. In this case, there is a need to recirculate, by aerodynamic means, a large amount of hot combustion products, with a relatively high oxygen content, which can make difficult to establish the proper reactants dilution for the onset of the flameless combustion condition. For instance, Li et al. [2] examine this combustion mode in a gas turbine combustor operating at atmospheric conditions. They found that the flameless combustion mode occurred only for a limited range of conditions at fuel lean conditions, high preheat temperature and high air flow rates.
Very recently [3], we examined the operational, combustion and emission characteristics of a small-scale combustor as a function of the excess air coefficient (λ), which implied also changes in the inlet air velocity (Vair). We observed that for λ below 1.5 it was possible to establish the flameless combustion regime, while for higher λ the fuel oxidation occurred in a conventional lean combustion mode. Due to the burner configuration, it was not possible to analyze independently the importance of λ and Vair on the combustion regime. In the present article we examine separately the effect of Vair on the establishment of flameless combustion.
Review articles on flameless combustion, also called flameless oxidation, moderate or intense low oxygen dilution (MILD) combustion, high temperature air combustion or colorless distributed combustion, include those of Wünning and Wünning [4], Cavaliere and de Joannon [5] and Tsuji et al. [6]. The effect of the initial air–fuel jet momentum on the establishment of flameless combustion has been studied by a number of investigators [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Szegö et al. [10] found that a certain fuel jet momentum threshold was needed to achieve flameless combustion conditions in a recuperative furnace. This momentum ensured the penetration of the fuel jets to a region classified as the oxidation zone. Also in a recuperative furnace, Mi et al. [11] reported an investigation on the importance of the initial air–fuel injection momentum rate and the air–fuel premixing on flameless combustion. The authors concluded, numerically, that there is a critical momentum rate of the inlet fuel–air mixture below which the flameless combustion cannot occur. Also, they found, both experimentally and numerically, that, above this critical rate, both the momentum rate and the inlet fuel–air mixedness affect only marginally the stability of and emissions from the flameless combustion. In combustors other than recuperative furnaces, Mancini et al. [7] and Derudi et al. [8] also evidenced the threshold below which flameless combustion cannot occur not only for gaseous hydrocarbon fuels but also for highly reactive fuels, as hydrogen-containing fuel mixtures.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the combustor used in this study. The combustion chamber is a quartz-glass cylinder with an inner diameter of 100 mm and a length of 340 mm. During the tests, the quartz cylinder was well-insulated with a 30-mm-thick ceramic fiber blanket. The burner is placed at the top end of the combustion chamber and the exhaustion of the burned gases is made by the bottom end through a convergent nozzle with a length of 150 mm and an angle of 15°. As seen in Fig. 1, the burner
Results and discussion
Table 1 presents the test conditions used to characterize the flow inside the combustor under non-reacting conditions and Fig. 2 shows the mean velocity vectors and streamlines at the combustor symmetry plane for these conditions. In-plane velocities were quantified at 100 points, but the very near burner region was not covered as a result of restrictions imposed to optical access by structural restraints. It is seen that the central air jet momentum is large enough to generate a strong reverse
Conclusions
The main conclusions from this investigation are as follows.
- 1.
The OH* images showed that as Vair increases at a constant λ = 1.3, the main reaction zone, typical of flameless combustion condition, remains approximately in the same region of the combustor, because of the flow aerodynamics similarity, but the OH* intensities decrease, which indicates higher entrainment ratios of the fuel and burned gases by the central air jet.
- 2.
For λ > 1.7, however, flameless oxidation could not be established
Acknowledgements
This work was developed within the framework of Project PTDC/EME-MFE/102997/2008, which is financially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT). A.S. Veríssimo is pleased to acknowledge the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the provision of the scholarship BEX:3909/05-0 and A.M.A. Rocha is pleased to acknowledge the FCT for the provision of the scholarship SFRH/BPD/40709/2007.
References (15)
- et al.
High resolution imaging of flameless and distributed turbulent combustion
Combust. Flame
(2012) - et al.
Flameless oxidation to reduce thermal NO-formation
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(1997) - et al.
Mild Combustion
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
On mathematical modelling of flameless combustion
Combust. Flame
(2007) - et al.
Imaging of diluted turbulent ethylene flames stabilized on a jet in hot coflow (JHC) burner
Combust. Flame
(2008) - et al.
Operational characteristics of a parallel jet MILD combustion burner system
Combust. Flame
(2009) - et al.
Ignition kernel formation and lift-off behaviour of jet-in-hot-coflow flames
Combust. Flame
(2010)
Cited by (91)
Recent development of heat and power generation using renewable fuels: A comprehensive review
2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsNon premixed operation strategies for a low emission syngas fuelled reverse flow combustor
2022, EnergyCitation Excerpt :Thus, the reaction zone is most volumetric in the MILD case. This corroborates well with the description of MILD combustion reported in the literature, such as in Refs. [18,23,38,39]. The instantaneous OH-PLIF images are shown in Fig. 9.