Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 211, September 2017, Pages 165-171
Field Crops Research

Difference of selenium uptake and distribution in the plant and selenium form in the grains of rice with foliar spray of selenite or selenate at different stages

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The delay of spraying stage decreased the proportions of organic Se and protein Se in brown rice.

  • The proportions of organic Se and protein Se in brown rice showed no differences between selenite and selenate treatments.

  • Foliar spray of Se contributes to a relatively high conversion of Se to organic and protein forms in rice grains.

Abstract

Foliar spray of selenium (Se) has increasingly been applied to improve Se concentrations in crops. There is a lack of systematic and in-depth study comparing the effects of foliar spray with different Se sources at different growth stages. In this study, selenite or selenate (75 g Se ha−1) was sprayed to the foliage of rice plants at the late tillering or full heading stage. Se concentrations in different parts of rice plants were determined to assess the effects of foliar spray with different Se sources at different growth stages on Se distribution in the plant, Se metabolism in the grains, and Se recovery efficiency in the brown rice. At the same spraying stages, total Se, organic Se, and protein Se concentrations in brown rice obtained with selenate were ∼2-fold those obtained with selenite. With the same Se sources, total Se, organic Se, and protein Se concentrations in brown rice treated at full heading were 2-fold higher than those treated at late tillering. The delay of spraying stage decreased the distribution ratio of Se in straw and roots, while it increased the distribution ratio of Se in grain; this trend was more evident with selenate. The proportions of organic Se and protein Se in brown rice showed no differences between selenite and selenate treatments at the same stages. The delay of spraying stage decreased the proportions of organic Se and protein Se in brown rice (still up to 80% and 44%, respectively), whereas the recovery efficiency of Se was improved in brown rice by more than 1-fold. In conclusion, appropriately delaying the spraying stage and selecting selenate as the Se source can be more efficient for producing Se-enriched rice.

Introduction

Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient in human body and a non-essential element for plants. Although the human demand for Se is not high, the abundance of Se is very low in the Earth’s crust. Thus, Se deficiency is still recognized as a global health problem that needs to be addressed (Valdiglesias et al., 2010). Increasing the production of Se-enriched dietary sources is necessary, because Se supplementation from natural food sources is considered safer than directly ingesting inorganic Se (Liu et al., 2012). Rice is a staple food in at least 33 countries and it provides ∼80% of the daily caloric intake to 3 billion people (Boldrin et al., 2013). The average Se concentration of rice is only 95 μg kg−1 in the major rice production areas of the world (Williams et al., 2009). Therefore, increasing Se concentrations in rice by application of Se fertilizer has great implications for improving Se nutrition in human beings (Giacosa et al., 2014, Hu et al., 2014).

Selenite and selenate are the two major types of exogenous Se fertilizer. When applied into the soil, selenite is less bioavailable due to adsorption onto ferric soil minerals or accumulation in plant tissue that is not part of human diet (Carey et al., 2012a, Keskinen et al., 2011, Li et al., 2015b). More than 80% of the Se applied as selenite exists in the forms of Fe-Mn oxide-bound Se, organic bound Se, and residual Se within a month, which are difficult for uptake and utilization by crops in the current season (Liu et al., 2015). Soil application of selenate is potentially a wasteful method of Se biofortification, as 80–95% of the Se added as selenate may be leached out by irrigation or rainfall (Keskinen et al., 2011). In addition, the antagonistic effect between sulfur and Se in soil can significantly reduce Se concentrations in crops (Liu et al., 2015, Liu et al., 2017). In particular, rice grows in flooded and anaerobic conditions for a long term, which could accelerate selenite fixation and selenate leaching. Therefore, soil application of Se fertilizer is considered disadvantageous for increasing Se concentrations in crops.

Numerous studies have shown that foliar spray of Se significantly improves Se concentrations in crops such as rice, wheat, maize, lentil, and table grape (Boldrin et al., 2013, Nawaz et al., 2015a, Rahman et al., 2015, Wang et al., 2013a, Zhu et al., 2017). However, the choice of the Se form supplied to plants strongly influences the amount of bioavailable Se in human and animal foodstuffs (Longchamp et al., 2015). For instance, there exists a huge difference in the uptake of selenite and selenate by crop roots. Selenate can migrate into the roots and immediately translocate to the shoots via high-affinity sulfate transporters, whereas selenite is mostly assimilated into organic Se in the roots and unlikely to translocate to the shoots (Sors et al., 2005). What are the differences in the translocation and distribution of Se in various parts of crops with foliar spray compared to soil application of Se? Do these differences vary with the spraying stage or not, and what are the differences in the results of foliar spray with different Se forms, such as selenite or selenate? A systematic report regarding these questions is still lacking.

The bioavailability of Se for humans and animals largely depends on the forms of Se in the edible parts rather than the total Se concentration in the plant (Premarathna et al., 2012), because the anti-cancer effects of selenium depend on its speciation (Carey et al., 2012b). Compared with inorganic Se, organic Se is more bioavailable for human health (Longchamp et al., 2015). Organic Se generally constitutes more than 80% of the total Se in crop grains (Eiche et al., 2015). Protein Se is the major form of organic Se in crops. It has been reported that organic Se accounts for more than 90% of the total Se in wheat grains, while protein Se accounts for more than 70% of the total Se (Cubadda et al., 2010). In potato tubers, 49–65% of the Se is present in protein components (Turakainen et al., 2006). The above results of Se analysis are mainly obtained from crops grown in Se-rich soils. However, the process of Se metabolism and assimilation by the roots differs from that by the leaves. Additionally, after Se uptake by the roots, there is sufficient time to assimilate inorganic Se into organic Se within the growth period of crops (Premarathna et al., 2012). Then, are there any differences in the assimilative capacity of plants for Se with foliar spray compared to soil application of Se? What are the differences in the assimilative capacity of plants for Se after foliar spray with different Se sources at different stages? Addressing these two questions is of great importance for safe production of Se-enriched rice.

Assuming foliar spray of Se is an effective approach to increase Se concentrations in crops and mitigate the environmental risks, then, elucidating the effect of foliar spray with different Se sources at different stages on the recovery efficiency of Se in rice is critical for commercial operations of Se-enriched rice in implementing efficient production. To this end, we sprayed selenite or selenate to the foliage of rice plants at the late tillering or full heading stage in the actual field conditions. The objectives were to determine the effects of time of foliar application and form of Se on 1) Se accumulation and distribution in rice plants; 2) organic and protein Se concentrations in brown rice; and 3) Se recovery efficiencies in the whole plant and brown rice.

Section snippets

Experimental site

A replicated field experiment was conducted for two seasons (2015 and 2016) in the Shekou village of Qianjiang, Hubei Province, China (30°33′17′′ N, 112°53′23′′ E). The annual precipitation was ∼1113 mm. The soil was fluvo-aquic soil with the following properties: pH, 8.19 (soil/water ratio = 1:2.5); organic matter, 28.39 g kg−1; available nitrogen, 91.07 mg kg−1; Olsen phosphorous, 6.14 mg kg−1; available potassium, 83.00 mg kg−1; and total Se, 0.35 mg kg−1. The seeds of rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety

Grain yield and total biomass

The average grain yield and total biomass of rice with no Se application were 6.8 and 16.6 t ha−1 in 2015, and 7.4 and 18.4 t ha−1 in 2016, respectively. Foliar spray of selenite or selenate at either growth stage exerted a significantly positive effect on grain yield and total biomass compared to CK. The resultant increases in average grain yield and total biomass were 5.1% and 4.4%, respectively. No significant difference was found between LT and FH treatments in terms of grain yield and total

Discussion

Whether the yield-increasing effect of Se on crops is significant or not is strongly influenced by the experimental conditions and management methods. Zhang et al. (2014) reported that soil application of 50 g Se ha−1 as selenite significantly improved grain yield in rice. Boldrin et al. (2013) observed no significant effects of soil application of selenite or selenate on grain yield in rice; rather, foliar spray of either Se source markedly improved grain yield in rice. In the present study,

Conclusions

Se source and spray stage significantly influenced the recovery efficiency of Se in the plant. The foliage of plants showed a significantly better absorption efficiency of selenate than selenite. An appropriate delay of spraying stage for Se application will facilitate the uptake and accumulation of Se in the edible portions of plants. It is worth noting that the spray of the two Se sources contributes to a relatively high conversion of Se to organic and protein forms in rice grains.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662016QD015), and the Rich Selenium Fertilization System of the Main Staple Crop in Jianghan Plain and Key Technology Research of Rich Selenium Product Processing (XKJ201501-21).

References (49)

  • J. Wang et al.

    Increasing Se concentration in maize grain with soil- or foliar-applied selenite on the Loess Plateau in China

    Field Crop. Res.

    (2013)
  • Y.D. Wang et al.

    Generation of selenium-enriched rice with enhanced grain yield,selenium content and bioavailability through fertilisation with selenite

    Food Chem.

    (2013)
  • M. Zhang et al.

    Selenium uptake, dynamic changes in selenium content and its influence on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2014)
  • S. Zhu et al.

    Spraying foliar selenium fertilizer on quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) from different source varieties

    Sci. Hortic.

    (2017)
  • S.D. Bao

    Soil Agrochemical Analysis

    (2000)
  • M.R. Broadley et al.

    Selenium biofortification of high-yielding winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by liquid or granular Se fertilisation

    Plant Soil

    (2010)
  • A.M. Carey et al.

    Grain accumulation of selenium species in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • A.M. Carey et al.

    A review of recent developments in the speciation and location of arsenic and selenium in rice grain

    Anal. Bioanal. Chem.

    (2012)
  • J. Chu et al.

    The effects of selenium on physiological traits, grain selenium content and yield of winter wheat at different development stages

    Biol. Trace Elem. Res.

    (2013)
  • F. Cubadda et al.

    Changes in selenium speciation associated with increasing tissue concentrations of selenium in wheat grain

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2010)
  • D. de Souza et al.

    Characterization of rice starch and protein obtained by a fast alkaline extraction method

    Food Chem.

    (2016)
  • S.K. Dhillon et al.

    Phytoremediation of selenium-contaminated soils: the efficiency of different cropping systems

    Soil Use Manage.

    (2009)
  • L. Ducsay et al.

    Possibility of selenium biofortification of winter wheat grain

    Plant Soil Environ.

    (2016)
  • Y. Fang et al.

    Identification of selenium compounds using HPLC-ICPMS and nano-ESI–MS in selenium-enriched rice via foliar application

    J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (97)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text