Analysis of a typical railway turnout sleeper system using grillage beam analogy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.08.007Get rights and content

Abstract

A simplified grillage beam analogy was performed to investigate the behaviour of railway turnout sleeper system with a low value of elastic modulus on different support moduli. This study aimed at determining an optimum modulus of elasticity for an emerging technology for railway turnout application - fibre composites sleeper. The finite element simulation suggests that the changes in modulus of elasticity of sleeper, Esleeper and the sleeper support modulus, Us have a significant influence on the behaviour of turnout sleepers. The increase in Us from 10 to 40 MPa resulted in a 15% reduction in the bending moment while the increase in Esleeper from 1 GPa to 10 GPa has resulted in almost 75% increase in the bending moment. The shear forces in turnout sleepers is not sensitive to both the changes of the Esleeper and Us while the sleeper with low Esleeper tend to undergo greater settlement into the ballast. An Esleeper of 4 GPa was found optimal for an alternative fibre composite turnout sleeper provided that the Us is at least 20 MPa from the consideration of sleeper ballast pressure and maximum vertical deflection. It was established that the turnout sleeper has a maximum bending moment of 19 kN-m and a shear force of 158 kN under service conditions.

Highlights

► The simplified grillage beam analogy is reasonable to model a complex railway turnout system. ► The behaviour of sleepers in a railway turnout is most critical between the switch and the frog. ► Modulus of elasticity and support stiffness has a significant influence on the behaviour of sleepers. ► The FEM analysis provided a basis for an optimum design of composite turnout sleeper alternative.

Introduction

Hardwood has been the preferred material for railway sleepers and maintenance work on existing timber sleeper track is continued to be provided by hardwoods [1]. In recent years, hardwood timber for railway sleepers is becoming more expensive, less available and is of inferior quality compared to the timber previously available. This problem has resulted in most railway industries searching for alternative materials for replacing timber sleepers. A review conducted by Manalo et al. [2] suggested that the advantages of hardwood timber sleeper can be simulated using fibre composite materials with the added advantages. Furthermore, fibre composites could be a more competitive sleeper material in specific application such as railway turnout as it has been increasingly difficult to get larger, longer and good quality hardwood timber. As the design of structures using fibre composite materials has been driven by the stiffness requirement rather than strength [3] and the cost of fibre composites are relatively higher than the traditional materials like timber, steel and concrete, it is important to ascertain the optimum stiffness of a fibre composite alternative suitable for turnout application. Such an investigation is very important to arrive at the best possible sleeper section that will satisfy both strength and serviceability requirements.

Turnout is a part of the railway where track crosses one another at an angle to divert a train from the original track [4]. Special sleepers laid on a turnout are called turnout sleepers [5]. A turnout consists of individual sleepers with varying lengths and fastening locations [6]. Because of the special nature of the turnout sleepers, their manufacturing procedure is different from that of the mainline sleepers which makes their maintenance more costly. The turnout sleepers are also produced with larger dimensions than the mainline sleepers to cope with the complex loadings due to the crossing of the train. It is important therefore to understand how the turnout sleepers respond to these forces to efficiently design an alternative sleeper from fibre composite materials. However, the complex structure of a railway turnout system makes the analysis of the behaviour of the turnout sleepers more complicated than the mainline sleepers.

Several researchers have analysed the railway track as a beam on elastic foundation and their results showed a very good agreement between the theoretical and the experimental results [7]. Kohoutek [8] analysed the railway sleeper as a longitudinal beam resting on an elastic foundation which is loaded by a pair of equivalent static load representing the train. In such a model, the contribution of the rail and the adjacent sleepers is represented by a distribution factor which is applied to the wheel load to determine the equivalent static load. This distribution factor is based on the type of rail gauge and the spacing of the sleepers [9]. The investigation conducted by Shahin [10] concluded that a 3-dimensional finite element analysis rather than a 2-dimensional simulation is a more accurate method to investigate the behaviour of a ballasted railway foundation, but the higher number of elements using this method greatly increased the computational effort. A 2-D beam model which further accounts for variation of subgrade within the length of individual sleeper was developed by Kohoutek and Campbell [11]. This model, which statically analyses the sleeper on elastic foundation, has the possibility to investigate different lengths, different ballast moduli or different parts of the sleepers with different sectional properties.

Shokreih and Rahmat [12] investigated the effects of Young's modulus on the response of railway sleepers as there are many materials being used for railway sleepers. In their work, sleepers were modelled as beams on Winkler's elastic foundation with a constant foundation modulus. The results showed that when the modulus of the beam is higher than that of the foundation, changing Young's modulus of the beam has little effects on the response of the sleepers but has considerable effects for lower modulus. Similarly, Shahu et al. [13] indicated that sleeper support modulus can change dramatically with track construction and this variation can have greater influence on the behaviour of sleepers. Further investigation conducted by Ticoalu [14] showed that using higher support modulus will create smaller rail seat bending moment on the turnout sleepers. These studies have shown that the analysis of beams on elastic foundation has been employed extensively and has been found to be appropriate for analysing railway structures. The results of these studies have also indicated that the bending rigidity and the sleeper support modulus directly influence the behaviour of railway sleepers. However, the finite element analyses of the abovementioned studies are implemented using only a single railway sleeper. The presence of at least two sets of continuous rails which connects the sleepers makes the inclusion of the entire turnout essential in the analysis. For this reason, the behaviour of turnout sleepers should be determined for a group of sleepers instead of a single sleeper, as the contribution of the neighbouring sleepers should be taken into account due to the joining effects of the rails.

In this study, a simple and rational structural model which considers the rail, sleeper, ballast, and subgrade in a railway turnout system is developed. The model also considers the effect of the adjacent sleepers on the behaviour of turnout sleepers through the rails secured to the sleepers. Subsequently, the response of the sleepers due to wheel load of a train passing in a railway turnout is investigated. The behaviour of sleepers with different moduli of elasticity and the influences of changes in the support modulus in the performance of turnout sleepers are analysed. Furthermore, the effect on the behaviour of timber turnout sleepers when one of the sleepers is replaced with a fibre composite sleeper to simulate the spot replacement maintenance strategy is investigated. The result of this parametric investigation could lead to an optimised section for an alternative composite sleeper in a railway turnout.

Section snippets

Theoretical model for railway turnout

A railway turnout consists of a number of sleepers and rails acting together. Thus, the AS 1085.14 [6] suggests that the turnout sleepers can be analysed by a more complex grillage model. However, there has been no reported study on the use of such a model to analyse a railway turnout in the literature. The commonly available literature on grillage system is on the analysis of slabs, foundations and complex bridge structures. Tan et al. [15] introduced the grillage analysis method for

Railway turnout geometry

A standard 1 in 16 right-hand turnout geometry consistent with the existing Australian railway using 60 kg/m rail and a narrow gauge rail line (1067 mm) commonly used in Queensland, Australia is considered [20]. Distance between rail centres is taken as 1137 mm and the spacing of sleepers is 600 mm on centres. Sleeper dimensions were set at 230 mm×150 mm in consideration of the replacement of deteriorating timber turnout sleepers [21]. The typical range of sleeper support modulus, Us is taken as

Finite element model of the railway turnout

A simplified three dimensional grillage model consisting of longitudinal and transverse beam elements has been developed to analyse the behaviour of railway turnout structure. The model consists of the rails, sleeper plates, sleepers, ballast, and subgrade. The finite element model considers the rails as long beams continuously supported by equally spaced sleepers. The model consists of a total of 107 sleepers including 10 transition sleepers before the switch and after the longest sleeper as

Parametric study

A parametric study was conducted to determine the behaviour of sleepers in a railway turnout with varying elastic modulus resting on materials with different sleeper support moduli. The axle load configuration in Fig. 2 was placed on sleepers 1–107 simulating the passing of the train to determine the location of the equivalent static wheel load that will cause the maximum bending moments, shear forces and vertical deflection on the sleepers.

Results of the parametric study

The results of the numerical simulations of the behaviour of railway turnout sleepers with different combinations of elastic and support moduli are presented here.

Bending moments in sleepers

The plot of the maximum positive and negative bending moments in sleepers due to 3 sets of symmetrical wheel load of a train (in Fig. 2) placed onto rails in the diverging route of the railway turnout is shown in Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10. The results of the FE model show that the maximum positive bending moment occurred under the rail seat region where each axle is placed for both the transition and the turnout sleepers. The magnitude of the positive bending moment is higher for Esleeper

Shear forces in sleepers

The shear forces are critical for beams subjected to high concentrated loads. In a railway turnout, the change in direction of a passing train causes the maximum shear to occur at the sleepers. Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13, Fig. 14 show the relationship of the maximum shear force in sleepers resting on different Us due to the applied wheel load on the railway turnout. The results show that the magnitude of shear force does not vary significantly with all the investigated support moduli. Only a

Vertical deflection of sleepers

Fig. 15, Fig. 16 present the vertical deflection of sleepers for all Us considered when Esleeper=1 GPa and 10 GPa, respectively. The FEM results show that the maximum settlements of the sleepers occurred under the rail seats when the wheel load, R1 is placed directly over the sleeper. It can be seen clearly from the figures that the vertical deflection of sleepers decreases as the support modulus increases. The lower settlement of sleepers between the switch and the frog is due to the presence of

Discussion

The effects of the different Esleeper and varying Us on the behaviour of sleepers in a railway turnout are discussed in this section. An evaluation was also conducted to determine if the behaviour of sleepers using the practical range of values for various track parameters satisfies the technical requirements for turnout application.

Conclusion

A simplified three dimensional grillage beam model was used to investigate the behaviour of turnout sleepers with different moduli of elasticity resting on different support moduli. Turnout sleepers with modulus of elasticity from 1 to 10 GPa for all fibre composites and 10, 15, 20 and 25 GPa for spot replacement and support modulus of 10–40 MPa were considered. The maximum bending moment, shear force and displacement occurred in a sleeper when the wheel load is directly above that sleeper. In all

References (40)

  • H.V.S. Gangarao et al.

    Reinforced Concrete Design with FRP Composites

    (2007)
  • H. Pfeil, J.R. Broadley, Turnouts—“The hungry asset”. in: Proceedings of the Railway Engineering Conference, Adelaide,...
  • C. Andersson et al.

    Wheel/rail impacts at a railway turnout crossing.

    J. Rail Rapid Transit

    (1998)
  • Standards Australia, AS1085.14-2003, Railway track material, Part 14: prestressed concrete...
  • K. Hetenyi

    Beams on Elastic Foundation: Theory with Applications in the Fields of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

    (1976)
  • R. Kohoutek, Dynamic and static performance of interspersed railway track, in: Proceedings of the Railway Engineering...
  • T. Jeffs et al.

    A Review of Track Design Procedures: Volume 2—Sleepers and Ballast

    (1991)
  • M.A. Shahin, Investigation into some design aspects of ballasted railway track substructure. in: Proceedings of the...
  • R. Kohoutek, K.D. Campbell, Analysis of spot replacement sleepers. in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Heavy...
  • J.T. Shahu, A. Sharma, K.G. Sharma, Numerical modelling pf railway tracks with ballast and sub-ballast layers using...
  • Cited by (25)

    • Behaviour of timber-alternative railway sleeper materials under five-point bending

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      A recent study has already indicated the material and reinforcement type affects the screw pullout behaviour of sleepers [7]. Analyses conducted by Manalo et al. [8] also suggest that the changes in modulus of elasticity of sleepers have a significant influence on the behaviour of railway sleeper systems. As their research was based on numerical analysis only, this motivates more research to experimentally compare the behaviour of sleepers having distinct bending modulus.

    • Effect of bending and compressive modulus of elasticity on the behaviour of timber-alternative railway sleepers supported by ballast

      2021, Case Studies in Construction Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      A comparison of these studies indicates that the behaviour of these alternative sleepers is significantly different from each other that could be because of their stiffness variations. For example, Manalo et al. [10] found that the change in MOE of turnout railway sleepers from 1 GPa to 10 GPa would increase the bending moment by 75 %. Shokrieh and Rahmat [11] highlighted that deflection and bending moment are sensitive to change in the MOE of sleepers with lower values of MOE having a greater effect.

    • Static behaviour of glass fibre reinforced novel composite sleepers for mainline railway track

      2021, Engineering Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the purpose of developing alternative composite sleepers is to replace existing timber sleepers, the stiffness of the newly proposed composite sleeper should be similar to timber so that they will carry almost similar load when interspersed with a timber sleeper in an existing railway track. The bending stiffness of the existing softwood timber sleeper can be as low as 7 GPa in the Australian rail track [28]. To determine the bending stiffness of the proposed three sleeper concepts, a non-destructive bending test (Fig. 6a depicts sleeper Concept-1) has been conducted for each sleeper at 1130 mm span in accordance with Australian standard AS1085.14 (second cycle of the load–displacement curve was used to determine bending stiffness) [29].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text