Urease production by Streptococcus thermophilus
Introduction
Urease (urea amidohydrolase, EC 3.5.1.15) catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to ammonia and carbamate, which spontaneously hydrolyzes to give a further molecule of ammonia and carbonate. Urease production is widespread in prokaryotes: all bacterial ureases are nickel metalloproteins and share significant sequence homology among them and with eucaryotic ureases (Mobley et al., 1995). Regulation of the expression of the urease operon varies in different species. In oral lactic acid bacteria (LAB), like Streptococcus salivarius, it is affected by the presence of urea, pH and sugar availability (Chen and Burne, 1996; Chen et al., 1998). This is in good agreement with the dual role of ureases in response to acid stress and nitrogen metabolism (Chen et al., 2000). In the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori urease is the most important factor contributing to the maintenance of intracellular and periplasmic pH near neutrality under acid stress (Pflock et al., 2006) and is essential for colonization of several animal models.
Acid ureases with pH optima between 2.0 and 4.5 (Mobley et al., 1995) are produced by some species of lactic acid bacteria (Kakimoto et al., 1990a, Kakimoto et al., 1989, Kakimoto et al., 1990b; Yamazaki et al., 1990) and corynebacteria (Miyagawa et al., 1999) and are potentially useful for the reduction of urea content in wine and in other alcoholic beverages, like sake, thus reducing the risk of accumulation of ethyl carbamate (ETC; Kodama, 1996; Butzke and Bisson, 1997; Fidaleo et al., 2006). ETC is a potential carcinogenic agent which is spontaneously produced in wine and other alcoholic beverages in reactions between urea or other compounds containing carbamylic groups (citrulline and carbamyl phosphate) and ethanol (Ough et al., 1988). An acid urease produced by Lactobacillus fermentum is commercialized by several producers (Fidaleo et al., 2006) and the European Commission has expressed a positive opinion on its use in wine (http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out19_en.html).
Among urease-producing species, Streptococcus thermophilus is particularly interesting. It is a moderately thermophilic, food-grade, industrially important microorganism which is used as a starter in the production of fermented milks and cheese and is commonly isolated from artisanal cheeses and natural starter cultures (Parente and Cogan, 2004). Urease production is common in S. thermophilus (Mora et al., 2002) and, although it is important for acid stress resistance (Mora et al., 2005), it slows pH decrease in milk and cheese due to the production of ammonia (Mora et al., 2004; Monnet et al., 2004). The urease operon of S. thermophilus has been recently characterized (Mora et al., 2004) and it has been found to be similar to that of the taxonomically related S. salivarius (Chen and Burne, 1996; Chen et al., 1998).
In order to find alternatives to the commercially available acid ureases, we screened lactic acid bacteria obtained from several food sources. A preliminary study was then conducted on urease-producing S. thermophilus to obtain information on conditions for urease production and urease activity as a function of pH.
Section snippets
Microbial strains
Strains of lactic acid bacteria (205) isolated from milk and dairy products (130), from sourdoughs (41) or obtained from culture collections (34), belonging to different species of the genera Enterococcus (3 E. faecalis strains, 2 E. faecium, 2 E. pseudoavium), Lactobacillus (1 L. alimentarius, 2 L. brevis, 7 L. casei, 2 L. coryniformis, 10 L. curvatus, 1 L. farciminis, 3 L. fermentum, 11 L. helveticus, 22 L. paracasei, 6 L. paraplantarum, 2 L. pentosus, 25 L. plantarum, 6 L. rhamnosus, 2 L.
Results
Out of 205 strains belonging to 27 species of LAB screened for urease production only 34 S. thermophilus strains (79% of the strains belonging to this species) scored positive. Urease activity was measured for whole cells, culture broth supernatants and cell lysates of the urease-positive strains in a quantitative assay. The activity was always intracellular (no measurable activity was found in cell-free supernatants; data not shown). A large variability was observed and urease activity of
Discussion
Although urease production is widespread among prokaryotes (Mobley et al., 1995), with the exception of S. thermophilus (Mora et al., 2002, Mora et al., 2004) and S. salivarius (Chen and Burne, 1996; Chen et al., 1996, Chen et al., 2000, Chen et al., 1998) only a few species of lactic acid bacteria have been tested for urease activity and found positive (Kakimoto et al., 1990a, Kakimoto et al., 1989, Kakimoto et al., 1990b; Yamazaki et al., 1990). Acid urease activity has been found in L.
Conclusions
Urease production by S. thermophilus has been regarded as detrimental for its activity as starter culture in yoghurt and in cheese production (Mora et al., 2004; Monnet et al., 2004) because milk acidification is delayed by the presence of urea. However, growth in the presence of urease, although slower, results in higher cell numbers and may reduce cell damage at acid pH, thus resulting in higher activity. Moreover, urea can be used to keep pH constant during lactic acid fermentation. A
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by a Post-Doc grant to Teresa Zotta from Università degli Studi della Basilicata and by a grant from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica, Rome (PRIN2005 Grant 2005071833). The skilled technical assistance of Antonella Tauriello and Giancarlo Vaccaro is gratefully acknowledged.
References (30)
- et al.
A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(1994) - et al.
Analysis of Streptococcus salivarius urease expression using continuous chemostat culture
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
(1996) Controlled permeabilization of Lactococcus lactis cells as a means to study and influence cheese ripening processes
Int. Dairy J.
(2006)- et al.
Studies on lactate dehydrogenase of Lactobacillus plantarum spp. involved in lactic acid biosynthesis using permeabilizaed cells
Proc. Biochem.
(2000) - et al.
Purification, characterization, and application of an acid urease of Arthrobacter mobilis
J. Biotechnol.
(1999) - et al.
Selection and properties of Streptococcus thermophilus mutants deficient in urease
J. Dairy Sci.
(2004) - et al.
Urease biogenesis in Streptococcus thermophilus
Res. Microbiol.
(2005) - et al.
Starter cultures: general aspects
- et al.
A new method for pH stabilization of the lactoacidic fermentation
Enzyme Microbial. Technol.
(1997) - et al.
Acid-responsive gene regulation in the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori
J. Biotechnol.
(2006)
Use of unsupervised and supervised artificial neural networks for the identification of lactic acid bacteria on the basis of SDS–PAGE patterns of whole-cell proteins
J. Microbiol. Methods
Streptococcus salivarius urease: genetic and biochemical characterization and expression in a dental plaque Streptococcus
Infect. Immun.
Transcriptional regulation of the Streptococcus salivarius 57.I urease operon
J. Bacteriol.
Dual functions of Streptococcus salivarius urease
J. Bacteriol.
Cited by (41)
Ureases in the beverage industry
2024, UreasesProduction and molecular structure of heteropolysaccharides from two lactic acid bacteria
2020, Carbohydrate PolymersShort communication: Lactose utilization of Streptococcus thermophilus and correlations with β-galactosidase and urease
2020, Journal of Dairy ScienceDisruption treatments on two strains of Streptococcus thermophilus: Levels of lysis/permeabilisation of the cultures, and influence of treated cultures on the ripening profiles of Cremoso cheese
2019, International Dairy JournalCitation Excerpt :lactis, despite its enormous economic importance as a lactic culture: it is the second most common lactic starter worldwide. Research on S. thermophilus has been addressed in relation to improving the flavour in cheese (Kebary, Salem, Hamed, & El-Sisi, 1997; Smith et al., 2003) and improving health issues such as lactose intolerance (Somkuti, Dominiecki, & Steinberg, 1996; Somkuti et al., 1998) or carcinogenic risk derived from alcoholic beverage consumption (Zotta, Ricciardi, Rossano, & Parente, 2008). The objective of this study was to assess the performance of different disruption methods, i.e., lysis and permeabilisation, in two strains of S. thermophilus (St1 and St2).