Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 248, Issue 3, 15 September 2007, Pages 143-152
Forest Ecology and Management

Growth and biomass of Populus irrigated with landfill leachate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.045Get rights and content

Abstract

Resource managers are challenged with waste disposal and leachate produced from its degradation. Poplar (Populus spp.) trees offer an opportunity for ecological leachate disposal as an irrigation source for managed tree systems. Our objective was to irrigate Populus trees with municipal solid waste landfill leachate or fertilized well water (control) (N, P, K) during the 2005 and 2006 growing seasons and test for differences in tree height, diameter, volume, and biomass of leaves, stems, branches, and roots. The trees were grown at the Oneida County Landfill located 6 km west of Rhinelander, Wisconsin, USA (45.6°N, 89.4°W). Eight clones belonging to four genomic groups were tested: NC13460, NC14018 [(Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray × Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh) × P. deltoides ‘BC1’]; NC14104, NC14106, DM115 (P. deltoides × Populus maximowiczii A. Henry ‘DM’); DN5 (P. deltoides × Populus nigra L. ‘DN’); NM2, NM6 (P. nigra × P. maximowiczii ‘NM’). The survival rate for each of the irrigation treatments was 78%. The total aboveground biomass ranged from 0.51 to 2.50 Mg ha−1, with a mean of 1.57 Mg ha−1. The treatment × clone interaction was not significant for tree diameter, total volume, dry mass of the stump or basal roots, or root mass fraction (P > 0.05). However, the treatment × clone interaction was significant for height, total tree dry mass, aboveground dry mass, belowground dry mass, and dry mass of the leaves, stems + branches (woody), and lateral roots (P < 0.05). There was broad clonal variation within the BC1 and DM genomic groups, with genotypes performing differently for treatments. In contrast, the performance of the NM and DN genomic groups was relatively stable across treatments, with clonal response to irrigation being similar regardless of treatment. Nevertheless, selection at the clone level also was important. For example, NC14104 consistently performed better when irrigated with leachate compared with water, while NC14018 responded better to water than leachate. Overall, these data will serve as a basis for researchers and resource managers making decisions about future leachate remediation projects.

Introduction

Poplars (Populus spp.) have been extensively studied in short rotation woody biomass production systems for multiple uses such as fiber, fuel and environmental benefits (Dickmann, 2001, Isebrands and Karnosky, 2001, Coleman and Stanturf, 2006). Exemplary traits that have contributed to the success of such uses include: ease of rooting, quick establishment, fast growth, and elevated rates of photosynthesis and water usage (Ceulemans et al., 1992, Pontailler et al., 1999, Zalesny et al., 2006). Broad genetic diversity among poplar genomic groups and selection of specific genotypes within such groups increase the potential enhancement of growth and establishment for various uses across heterogeneous sites (Heilman and Stettler, 1985, Heilman et al., 1994). The combination of appropriate cultural practices and well-suited genotypes helps to maximize poplar performance for improved biomass yields (Buhler et al., 1998, Stanturf et al., 2001).

Environmental benefits have been realized from poplar culture when used as components in riparian buffers along streams (Schultz et al., 2004) and as vegetative filters for phytoremediation applications (Licht and Isebrands, 2005). Several phytoremediation projects utilized wastewater in the form of landfill leachate as an irrigation and fertilization source for poplar trees (Shrive et al., 1994, Erdman and Christenson, 2000, Zalesny and Bauer, in press). Proper clonal selection practices must be utilized given the genetic variability within the genus Populus (Rajora and Zsuffa, 1990, Eckenwalder, 1996) and the variable concentrations of inorganic and organic components in the leachate (Gettinby et al., 1996). Leachate production occurs through natural degradation processes aided by the movement of water through the landfill profile (Christensen and Kjeldsen, 1989). Due to the variation associated with residential, commercial, and industrial waste material, the leachate is highly variable and compositional changes occur seasonally and annually (Shrive et al., 1994, Kjeldsen et al., 2002).

A great deal of information has been reported using poplars for short rotation forestry (Heilman, 1999, Riemenschneider et al., 2001), but there are relatively fewer reports about using poplars for leachate phytoremediation systems. Thus, researchers and resource managers need information that is currently lacking about tree establishment with leachate irrigation. Such information will help increase the success of using poplars for remedial benefits, especially with ecologically damaging contaminants such as those found in most leachate. Overall, the use of short rotation woody crop management for remediation supports improved environmental quality and secondary benefits such as carbon sequestration, a harvestable product, aesthetic improvements, and erosion control (Isebrands and Karnosky, 2001, Duggan, 2005).

This project expands on our previous work investigating phyto-recurrent selection, which was defined as a method using crop and tree improvement strategies to identify and select superior performing clones for remediation projects (Zalesny et al., in press). Clonal selections were made after three successive cycles of evaluation (i.e. three separate greenhouse studies) testing 23 traits relating to height growth, leaf development, and root initiation at 14 (cycle 1; 25 clones), 45 (cycle 2; 12 clones), and 30 (cycle 3; 12 clones) days after planting. The best eight clones were selected for testing in the current in situ study (cycle 4) out of the original 25 genotypes belonging to six distinct genomic groups: (1) (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray × Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh) × P. deltoides ‘BC1’; (2) P. deltoides × P. deltoides ‘DD’; (3) P. deltoides ‘D’; (4) P. deltoides × Populus maximowiczii A. Henry ‘DM’; (5) P. deltoides × Populus nigra L. ‘DN’; (6) P. nigra × P. maximowiczii ‘NM’.

The overall objective of all phyto-recurrent selection cycles was to test the effectiveness of poplars for uptake of inorganic and organic contaminants found in landfill leachate. More specifically, the objective of the current study was to test for differences in growth and biomass distribution of eight Populus clones when irrigated with municipal solid waste landfill leachate or fertilized well water (control) (N, P, K) for two growing seasons. In addition to actual phytoremediation success, tree growth and biomass accumulation are important for evaluating the overall effectiveness of the biological attenuation system. These data will serve as a basis for researchers and resource managers making decisions about future leachate remediation projects.

Section snippets

Site and leachate description

The study was conducted at the Oneida County Landfill (municipal solid waste) located 6 km west of Rhinelander, Wisconsin, USA (45.6°N, 89.4°W). Temperature, precipitation, and growing degree days across the experimental period are listed in Table 1. The landfill soils are classified as mixed, frigid, coarse loamy Alfic Haplorthods (Padus Loam, PaB), with 0–6% slopes, and are considered well to moderately well drained with loamy deposits underlain by stratified sand and gravel glacial outwash.

Tree growth

The survival rate of the trees at the time of harvest was the same for each treatment at 78% (50/64). Height did not differ between leachate and well water (control) treatments, but there were differences among clones. The treatment × clone interaction was significant (Table 4). Populus nigra × P. maximowiczii “NM’ clones NM2 and NM6 had the greatest height across both irrigation treatments (Fig. 1). Despite substantial clonal variation among genotypes belonging to the P. deltoides × P. maximowiczii

Discussion

Although leachate irrigation did not enhance tree growth and biomass for most genotypes in the current study, significant productivity reductions associated with the leachate also were not observed. Therefore, there is a great potential for remediation of landfill leachate using Populus. Selection within the clonal variation that resulted from variable responses to leachate or well water (control) treatments will serve as a basis for researchers and resource managers making decisions about

Conclusion

Overall, given that every leachate source should be regarded as unique, there is an essential need for initial genotype screening followed by the establishment and evaluation of test plots to ascertain clonal performance prior to large-scale deployment. The lack of overall differences in response to treatments in the current study was a result of extensive genotypic screening during phyto-recurrent selection cycles 1–3 that reduced the variability among the clones deployed, relative to the

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Iowa State University – Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station – Research Work Unit RWU-NRS-4158, and a Grant-in-Aid of Research from Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society. We are grateful to Neil Nelson and Adam Wiese for continual support throughout all stages of the project. In addition, we thank Bart Sexton (Oneida County Solid Waste Department) for detailed collaboration and for assistance at the

References (58)

  • J.B. Baker et al.

    Biomass and nutrient accumulation in a cottonwood plantation—the first growing season

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1977)
  • K.R. Brown et al.

    Growth and nutrition of hybrid poplars over 3 years after fertilization at planting

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (2002)
  • K.R. Brown et al.

    Effects of nitrogen and phosphorous fertilization on the growth and nutrition of hybrid poplars on Vancouver Island

    New For.

    (2005)
  • J.G. Burken et al.

    Uptake and metabolism of atrazine by poplar trees

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (1997)
  • R. Ceulemans et al.

    Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. I. Clonal comparisons of 4-year growth and phenology

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1992)
  • R. Ceulemans et al.

    First- and second-year aboveground growth and productivity of two Populus hybrids grown at ambient and elevated CO2

    Tree Physiol.

    (1996)
  • T.H. Christensen et al.

    Basic biochemical processes in landfills

  • M.D. Coleman et al.

    Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developing Populus deltoides plantation

    Tree Physiol.

    (2004)
  • A. DesRochers et al.

    Nitrogen fertilization of trembling aspen seedlings grown on soils of different pH

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (2003)
  • D.I. Dickmann

    An overview of the genus Populus. Part A

  • J.E. Eckenwalder

    Systematics and evolution of Populus. Part I

  • J.A. Erdman et al.

    Elements in cottonwood trees as an indicator of ground water contaminated by landfill leachate

    Ground Water Monit. Remed.

    (2000)
  • A.L. Friend et al.

    Quantification of two-year-old hybrid poplar root systems: morphology, biomass, and 14C distribution

    Tree Physiol.

    (1991)
  • J.H. Gettinby et al.

    The composition of leachate from landfilled refuse

    Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Mun. Eng.

    (1996)
  • E.A. Hansen

    Root length in young hybrid Populus plantations: its implications for border width of research plots

    For. Sci.

    (1981)
  • E.A. Hansen et al.

    Biomass and nutrient dynamics of hybrid poplar on two different soils: implications for fertilization strategy

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1988)
  • C.A. Harrington et al.

    Leaf characteristics reflect growth rates of 2-year-old Populus trees

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1997)
  • P.E. Heilman

    Planted forests: poplars

    New For.

    (1999)
  • P.E. Heilman et al.

    Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. II. Biomass production in a 4-year plantation

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Irrigation management in poplar (Populus spp.) plantations: A review

      2021, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Using treated wastewater for irrigation may also help to pay for the costs of wastewater purification (Stewart and Salmon, 1986; Cozzi et al., 2015). Now, the success of irrigating with treated wastewater requires selecting suitable poplar species and clones, reducing the distance between stands and wastewater treatment plants, and determining the optimal stand area and irrigation method and management (Stewart and Salmon, 1986; Zalesny, 2007; Cozzi et al., 2015). For instance, in Victoria, Australia, when using wastewater to irrigate poplars through a fixed-sprinkler irrigation system, it was not profitable at financial interest rates between 3% and 7%.

    • Willow and poplar for the phyto-treatment of landfill leachate in Mediterranean climate

      2021, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In other cases the leachate used in the field was pre-treated in a nitri/denitrification facility at the landfill site, thereby starting with a very different composition from leachate emanating directly from an actual landfill (Aronsson et al., 2010). Moreover, most available information on the phyto-treatment of this pollutant comes from Northern Temperate Regions (Godley et al., 2004; Smesrud et al., 2012; Zalesny, 2007) where the actual composition of LL is very different compared to that originated under Mediterranean climate conditions, where the combination between low precipitation and high temperature (i.e. high evapotranspiration) often results in more concentrated (i.e. higher electro-conductivity, pH, Cl, and NH4–N) LL (Vadillo et al., 1999). Therefore, information on the safe use of LL is still incomplete especially for Mediterranean countries, where the wide range of leachate types makes it difficult to draw a reliable picture of the potential of using green approaches for such applications.

    • Poplar rotation coppice at a trace element-contaminated phytomanagement site: A 10-year study revealing biomass production, element export and impact on extractable elements

      2020, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Different genotypes of the same poplar species may exhibit variable tolerance to trace elements (TE) because of intraspecific genetic dissimilarity (Castiglione et al., 2009). For instance, a large variation in poplar genotypic responses to leachate irrigation has been found (Zalesny et al., 2007), and high variability occurs in foliar trace element concentrations within a selection of 14 poplar genotypes (Pottier et al., 2015). A number of works have been dedicated to the study of poplar responses to soil contamination in controlled pot or hydroponic (Cicatelli et al., 2010; De Oliveira and Tibbett, 2018; Langer et al., 2012; Lingua et al., 2008; Migeon et al., 2012), tank (Zalesny and Bauer, 2007), or lysimeter (Dimitriou and Aronsson, 2011, 2010) set ups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text