Relationships between common forest metrics and realized impacts of Hurricane Katrina on forest resources in Mississippi
Introduction
Hurricane Katrina made landfall in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana on 29 August 2005. Katrina has been termed one of the most costly natural disasters in United States history, as well as one of the strongest hurricanes to make landfall on the U.S. coast in the last century (Graumann et al., 2005). In addition to hurricane-strength winds, Katrina brought massive amounts of rainfall over a very short timeframe, a storm surge of up to 8.5 m across southern Louisiana and Mississippi; extensive wind, rain, and related tornado damage throughout Mississippi, Western Tennessee and Western Kentucky; and extended hurricane-associated precipitation as far north as New York State (Graumann et al., 2005). Peak wind gusts associated with Katrina exceeded 80 km/h throughout the State of Mississippi (Graumann et al., 2005).
Damage assessment was an immediate priority for federal, State, and local governments. The U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis program (USFS-SRS-FIA), among others, developed maps of damage zones using models developed by Jacobs (2007) to aid in damage assessment tasks (Fig. 1). Forest inventory data from 1994 were used in combination with the mapped damage zones to estimate damage potential and possible economic impacts across the State of Mississippi. Subsequently, zone maps and damage estimates were used by researchers and policy makers to aid in the development of recovery and salvage logging plans. Maps and estimates were used to further model hurricane effects on forest stands from the standpoint of individual-tree effects in order to suggest methods for reducing vulnerability to forests in hurricane impact zones (Stanturf et al., 2007). Therefore, estimates derived from models using available ground data, climate data, and remote sensing are important tools for forest management in a post-natural-disaster environment.
Initial estimates generated by USFS-SRS-FIA utilizing spatial models and 1994 inventory data indicated potential timber losses of up to 84.9 million m3 (3 billion ft3) across 1.4 million ha of damaged forest land in Mississippi (USDA Forest Service, 2005). This equates to about 90% of standing timber in severe damage zones, and an average of 37% of standing timber across all damage zones (USDA Forest Service, 2005). Initial estimates (based on 1994 inventory data) suggested that more softwood volume was damaged than hardwood volume.
Using the USFS-derived damage zone information, combined with additional information from the Texas Forest Service, Stanturf et al. (2007) simulated equivalent hurricane forces to forecast stem breakage in a hypothetical set of nine softwood forest stands spanning an array of stand structure and density combinations. The resulting simulations suggested that stand spacing and tree height were more important in softwoods for determining stem-breakage potential than species, indicating that manipulating stand structure to reflect the least vulnerable conditions could aid landowners in decreasing the damage potential of forests in hurricane-impact zones (Stanturf et al., 2007).
Following Hurricane Katrina, the USFS-SRS-FIA began systematically sampling the forest resource across the entire State, following protocols outlined in the FIA sampling field guide (USDA Forest Service, 2005). One goal of the inventory was to determine the actual damage caused by Hurricane Katrina at the forest landscape and individual tree level. Here, we compare and contrast hurricane-related damage recorded across the Mississippi landscape in the 2 years following Katrina with initial damage assessments based on modeled parameters by USFS. We also use logistic and multiple regression to evaluate the influence of stand characteristics on tree damage probability to see if our data reflect the findings of Stanturf et al. (2007). Specifically, we address four primary questions related to post-hurricane damage:
- 1.
Do inventory data substantiate damage zone estimates made using remotely sensed and climate data following Hurricane Katrina?
- 2.
Were softwoods or hardwoods more susceptible to hurricane damage and does that susceptibility change as distance from landfall increases?
- 3.
What are the primary stand-level factors influencing vulnerability to damage, based on observed damage and measured stand characteristics?
- 4.
Is tree-level damage related to tree species, and do damage types (bole, branch, lean, or windthrow) differ by species?
Section snippets
FIA field methods
The USDA Forest Service FIA program collects data on systematically arranged plots at the scale of roughly one plot for every 2428 ha of land base. Each field plot consists of four subplots about 0.016 ha in size (for a total of 0.06 ha for each complete plot). Each plot is designated as “sampled” or “not sampled” and each subplot within each plot is similarly designated. Subplots may be divided if they are partially forested, a procedure referred to as “condition mapping” (Bechtold and Patterson,
Measured hurricane damage
A total of 1581 entirely forested single-condition plots had been collected in the state of Mississippi at the time of analysis. Of those plots, a total of 693 (44%) experienced some degree of wind-related damage. Eighty-seven percent of plots in zone 1 (the zone encompassing landfall) experienced hurricane damage, and the percent of plots experiencing damage decreased as distance from landfall increased, with the exception of zone 5 (Fig. 1). The amount of damage sustained on plots differed by
Landscape level damage
Initial estimates of the damage caused by Hurricane Katrina were based on models produced by the USDA Forest Service and others (Jacobs, 2007). These models utilized data from the most recent FIA surveys in the effected States combined with maps of the hurricane storm track. The USFS-FIA initially estimated that 90% of timberland area within the approximately 8-county zone (zone 1) surrounding landfall had been damaged, and 37% of the entire State's timberland had been damaged. Our results
Conclusions
Our study illustrates the effectiveness of spatial models using remotely sensed data and USDA Forest Service FIA data to forecast damage following severe weather events. Models developed using 11-year-old data in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina were still comparable to results derived from field data collected immediately following the storm. However, this study also illustrates the need to appropriately interpret the results to the general public. For example, stating that damage occurred
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dennis Jacobs for the use of his shapefile depicting Hurricane Katrina damage zones, as developed in the fall of 2005 and published in 2007. In addition, the authors thank John Coulston and John Stanturf for their candid reviews of the manuscript. Special thanks to FIA field crews in the State of Mississippi for their dedication to quality data collection.
References (13)
- et al.
Development of an individual tree-based mechanical model to predict wind damage within forest stands
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2004) Consistent influence of tree diameter and species on damage in nine eastern North America tornado blowdowns
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2007)- et al.
Disturbance and coastal forests: a strategic approach to forest management in hurricane impact zones
For. Ecol. Manage.
(2007) - Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L. (Eds.), 2005. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program—national sampling...
Species and stand response to catastrophic wind in central New England, U.S.A.
J. Ecol.
(1988)- Graumann, A., Houston, T., Lawrimore, J., Levinson, D., Lott, N., McCown, S., Stephens, S., Wuertz, D., 2005. Hurricane...
Cited by (23)
Tree, stand, and landscape factors contributing to hurricane damage in a coastal plain forest: Post-hurricane assessment in a longleaf pine landscape
2021, Forest Ecology and ManagementCitation Excerpt :However, two issues arise when thinking about how and why trees are affected by windstorms. First, studies often use proportional analysis (i.e., contingency tables) to evaluate whether the fraction of downed trees is greater than expected based on each species’ sample abundance (Derr and Enghardt, 1957; Duryea et al., 2007; Oswalt and Oswalt, 2008). Because large trees are generally more susceptible to wind, differences in size structure among species populations can confound inferences related to the susceptibility of each species.
Remote sensing and statistical analysis of the effects of hurricane María on the forests of Puerto Rico
2020, Remote Sensing of EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Negrón-Juárez et al., (2014a, 2014b) suggested a possible association between disturbance severity and wind speed. In this study, we hypothesized that high wind speeds over a certain threshold caused massive forest disturbance, and the forest disturbance lessened as the wind speed decreased along the storm track (Ayala-Silva and Twumasi, 2004; Oswalt and Oswalt, 2008; Boose et al., 2004). Most of the highly affected forests were within 40 km of the landfall of hurricane María.
Can professionals gauge likelihood of failure? – Insights from tropical storm Matthew
2020, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningCitation Excerpt :Of these, none failed – though small sample contributed to a lack of statistical significance (Table 3). Numerous works look at the role tree species plays in predicting tree failure following intense wind events (Gibbs and Greig, 1990; Putz and Sharitz, 1991; Francis and Gillespie, 1993; Everham and Brokaw, 1996; Jim and Liu, 1997; Francis, 2000; Duryea et al., 2007a, b; Kane, 2008; Oswalt and Oswalt, 2008). Notable among these efforts, Everham and Brokaw (1996) conducted a review and synthesis of 42 studies and compiled wind resistance ratings for 242 temperate and tropical tree species – 8 of which overlapped with our modelled species.
Sustainability of forest management under changing climatic conditions in the southern United States: Adaptation strategies, economic rents and carbon sequestration
2014, Journal of Environmental ManagementA framework for identifying carbon hotspots and forest management drivers
2013, Journal of Environmental ManagementMapping potential carbon and timber losses from hurricanes using a decision tree and ecosystem services driver model
2013, Journal of Environmental ManagementCitation Excerpt :The aboveground carbon in the high forest damage risk zone was 31% of the total estimated for the watershed, with a 30% of the amount in the zone 2 because most forested areas are within this zone (93%). Oswalt and Oswalt (2008) estimated atht 8% of FIA plots were damaged by hurricane Katrina across all damage zones (closest and furthest from landfall). Wang and Xu (2009) found that 60% of the total forest area in the region was damaged by Hurricane Katrina.