Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 284, 15 November 2012, Pages 222-229
Forest Ecology and Management

Comparing carbon sequestration and stand structure of monoculture and mixed mangrove plantations of Sonneratia caseolaris and S. apetala in Southern China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.058Get rights and content

Abstract

Mangroves are one of the most carbon-rich tropical ecosystems. Two fast-growing mangrove species of the genus Sonneratia, the native S. caseolaris and non-native S. apetala, have been widely used for mangrove reforestation in China; however their ability to sequester carbon is still unclear. The present study aimed to estimate the growth, carbon accumulation in biomass and carbon sequestration in sediments of these two species, in both mixed (50% S. caseolaris; 50% S. apetala) and monoculture plantations, in the intertidal zones of Shenzhen Bay, Guangdong Province, China. Twenty-five months of observation showed strong competition between the two species in the mixed plantation, with the native S. caseolaris outcompeting the non-native S. apetala due to a faster growth rate. Although S. caseolaris in the mixed plantation had lower carbon storage in biomass than in monoculture, carbon accumulation in sediment was higher in the mixed plantation. Thus, the relative advantage of the mixed plantation was in sequestering more carbon in sediment, as opposed to high carbon accumulation to biomass. These results indicated that the mixed plantation could be a good option for mangrove restoration and carbon sequestration of sediment. However, the two and a half years of this study may not indicate long-term trends, so more research on long-term species performance is essential for successful mangrove reforestation.

Highlights

► We set up a field manipulation experiment for two restoration mangrove species in China. ► The mixed plantation of both Sonneratia exhibited strong inter-specific competition. ► Fast-growing S. caseolaris out-competed S. apetala in the mixed plantation. ► The mixed plantation accumulated more carbon in both biomass and sediment than other species/plantation types.

Introduction

“Blue carbon”, as defined in a recent United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report, refers to carbon captured by living organisms and stored in sediments of coastal wetlands including mangroves, salt marshes and seagrasses (Nellemann et al., 2009). The global net primary production (NPP) of mangroves is estimated to be 218 Tg a−1 of carbon, accounting for nearly half of the total NPP of all coastal wetlands (Bouillon et al., 2008). Thus, mangroves are one of the most carbon-rich forest types in the tropics (Donato et al., 2011), in addition to supporting numerous important ecosystem services such as protecting coastlines and providing food or nursery grounds for birds and coastal animals (Chapman, 1976, Lin, 1988, Tomlinson, 1986). However, mangrove areas are becoming smaller or more fragmented, and their ecosystem services are functionally disappearing worldwide (Duke et al., 2007). Mangroves in China have likewise been degraded seriously with a great reduction in area during the last three decades due to human disturbance (Chen et al., 2009). The total mangrove area in China in 2002 was estimated at approximately 22,700 ha, less than 10% of the historical extent (Chen et al., 2009). Consequently, the Chinese government has invested greatly in mangrove reforestation since the 1990s.

In China, some non-native mangrove species have been used extensively in mangrove reforestation projects because of their high survival and fast growth rates (Chen et al., 2009). Sonneratia apetala Buch. Ham was introduced from Bangladesh in 1985 and has been planted in many locations along the coastline of China over the last three decades. The total area of S. apetala forests is estimated at more than 80% of the total area of mangrove plantations in China (Chen et al., 2009). Sonneratia caseolaris (Linn.) Engl., a congener of S. apetala indigenous to Hainan Province, China, has also been widely used in mangrove replanting projects not only in Hainan but also in other regions beyond its historical range, such as in Shenzhen Bay, Guangdong Province (Wang et al., 2002, Chen et al., 2008).

In forest ecosystems, the two largest carbon pools are the living tree biomass and organic matter stored in soil (Fahey et al., 2009, Sharma et al., 2010). Therefore, increased carbon sequestration in these two parts directly enhances the total carbon sequestration ability of the forest ecosystem. The productivity of mangrove forests (e.g., aboveground carbon) has been widely studied all over the world (reviewed in Komiyama et al., 2008). Belowground carbon in mangroves, on the other hand, is still quite uncertain, but the average for estuarine sites in general is 71–98% of total ecosystem carbon (Donato et al., 2011). As an important part of belowground carbon, the amount of carbon stored in belowground biomass varies greatly among species (Komiyama et al., 2008). Furthermore, forest plantations with different carbon sequestration rates resulted in different carbon gains in the soil (Fahey et al., 2009). The amount of carbon stored in sediments of the individual mangrove ecosystems varies greatly, from 0.5% to 40% (Kristensen et al., 2008, Laffoley and Grimsditch, 2009). The carbon can be derived from local mangrove production or imported by tide or rivers from adjacent coastal environments and deposited within mangroves (Bouillon et al., 2003, Laffoley and Grimsditch, 2009). Furthermore, mangrove afforestation not only results in direct carbon inputs of mangrove production to the sediment pool, but also increases sedimentation rates (Perry and Berkely, 2009). As sedimentation rates increase, more and more carbon from adjacent environments is deposited. Ren et al. (2010) concluded that the planting of non-native S. apetala in Leizhou, China, had great potential to sequester carbon in sediment. However, we know less about sediment carbon sequestration of the native S. caseolaris, although it has been shown to have higher aboveground productivity than S. apetala (Wang et al., 2002).

Although monoculture forests frequently have low biodiversity and ecological value (Sayer et al., 2004, Kelty, 2006), the vast majority of plantations globally are monocultures (FAO, 2001). In China, many mangrove reforestation programs likewise utilize a monoculture approach, aiming for simplicity of stand management and a homogenous appearance of the planted trees. Such programs include planting S. apetala in Guangdong and Fujian Provinces, and Kandelia obovata in Fujian Province (Chen et al., 2009). Mixed mangrove plantations have recently been recommended to increase biodiversity, food web connectivity and net ecosystem production (Alongi, 2011). For example, in a small-scale mangrove plantation program in China, the non-native S. apetala was planted together with native mangrove species, such as S. caseolaris (Zan et al., 2003). Both Sonneratia species have high tolerance to environmental stresses and can thrive in low inter-tidal zones where other indigenous species have difficulty surviving (Liao et al., 2004), however little is known about their effects on ecosystem biogeochemistry. In the present study, we set up a field manipulation experiment in both monocultures and a mixed plantation of these two Sonneratia species in an intertidal mudflat in Shenzhen Bay. We compared carbon accumulation and eco-physiological traits in order to test the hypothesis that the mixed plantation consisting of both Sonneratia species will exhibit strong inter-specific competition and will accumulate more carbon in both biomass and sediment compared to monocultures of either species. Such information will increase our knowledge of best practices for design and species selection in mangrove afforestation.

Section snippets

Study site

The study was carried out in Futian Mangrove Nature Reserve (22°31′N, 114°05′E), located in Shenzhen Bay in Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China. The area is characterized by a subtropical monsoonal climate, with 1927 mm of annual precipitation and a rainy season from May to September. The mean annual relative humidity is approximately 80% and the mean air temperature is 22 °C, with a maximum average of 38.7 °C in July and minimum of 0.2 °C in January. Tides are irregular semidiurnal, with the

Growth

After 25 months of growth, each plantation formed a closed canopy, with tree heights of almost 3.0 m for S. caseolaris and 2.3 m for S. apetala (Table 1). The basal stem diameter per tree of S. caseolaris showed minor differences between the monoculture and mixed plantations, while trees in the S. apetala monoculture plots were significantly larger than in the mixed plots. The total LAI of the mixed plantation was significantly higher than that of the monoculture S. apetala, but was lower (not

Growth and competitive mechanisms of the two Sonneratia species

In general, juvenile growth rates, as measured by height, are negatively correlated to shade tolerance in mixed culture forests (Kelty, 2006). Intolerant species grow rapidly in height, allocate more growth to stems and branches, and have crowns with low leaf area density (Haggar and Ewel, 1995, Canham et al., 1994, Sheil et al., 2006). In the mixed plantation, growth of S. apetala was inhibited, as indicated by lower tree height, basal stem diameter, total leaf area and total biomass, apparent

Conclusion

Strong competition between the two Sonneratia mangrove species in the mixed plantation were found after 25 months of growth, with the native S. caseolaris outcompeting the non-native S. apetala due to a faster growth rate. Although S. caseolaris in the mixed plantation had lower carbon storage in biomass than in monoculture, carbon accumulation in sediment was higher in the mixed plantation. Therefore, the relative advantage of the mixed plantation was in sequestering more carbon in sediment, as

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Lan H.L. for assistance in the field, and Mr. Wang Y.J., Dr. Zan Q.J., Dr. Xu H.L. and Dr. Yang Q. of the Futian Mangroves Nature Reserve, Mr. Xiang C., and Ms. Xiong Y.Y. in Xiamen University for their help with the experiment. We are grateful to Prof. Lin G.H. in Xiamen University for his suggestions on this study. We also appreciate Ms. A. Lunstrum for her assistance with English. This study was supported by an NSFC Grant under Contract No: 30700092 and the Key Project

References (39)

  • J. Sayer et al.

    The restoration of forest biodiversity and ecological values

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2004)
  • C.M. Sharma et al.

    Tree diversity and carbon stocks of some major forest types of Garhwal Himalaya, India

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2010)
  • Bouillon, S., Borges, A.V., Castañeda-Moya, E., Diele, K., Dittmar, T., Duke, N.C., Kristensen, E., Lee, S.Y.,...
  • S. Bouillon et al.

    Sources of organic carbon in mangrove sediments: variability and possible implications for ecosystem functioning

    Hydrobiologia

    (2003)
  • C.D. Canham et al.

    Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1994)
  • V.J. Chapman

    Mangrove Vegetation

    (1976)
  • L.Z. Chen et al.

    Recent progresses in mangrove conservation, restoration and research in China

    J. Plant Ecol.

    (2009)
  • C.D. Donato et al.

    Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics

    Nat. Geosci.

    (2011)
  • N.C. Duke et al.

    A world without Mangroves?

    Science

    (2007)
  • Cited by (72)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These two authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first author.

    2

    Present address (X. Zeng): Department of Community Ecology (BZF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany.

    View full text