Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 90, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 713-718
Fuel

Gasoline alkylation desulfurization over Amberlyst 35 resin: Influence of methanol and apparent reaction kinetics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Gasoline desulfurization is receiving attention worldwide due to the increasing stringent regulations on sulfur content for environmental protection purpose. As conventional hydrotreating technology leads to significant octane number loss and processing costs, the gasoline alkylation desulfurization process, which consists of weighing down the sulfuric compounds by catalytic alkylation with olefins present in the feed and distillation followed by, is a rather attractive way. In this paper, firstly alkylation of thiophenic compounds was researched over macroporous sulfonic resin Amberlyst 35 in methanol presence to increase the selectivity of catalyst, then kinetics of thiophenic sulfurs alkylation in FCC gasoline was researched without and with methanol. Results found that appropriate methanol (⩽2 wt.% methanol in model gasoline and ⩽1 wt.% methanol in FCC gasoline) could inhibit olefins oligomerization significantly without influence on the conversions of thiophenic compounds. The alkylation of thiophenic sulfurs could be described as pseudo first order reaction regardless of the existence of methanol. The introduction of methanol decreases the reaction rate constant and increases the activation energy of alkylation reactions.

Introduction

Sulfur present in the fuels leads to SOx air pollution generated by vehicle engineers. Moreover, sulfur is a well-known poison for catalytic converters [1]. In order to minimize the negative health and environmental effects of automotive exhaust emissions, the sulfur level in motor fuels is minimized [2]. Sulfur limits of <150 ppm by weight (ppmw) for gasoline have been introduced into China from January 1, 2010, and the European Union has issued regulations that required refineries to reduce the sulfur content of gasoline to <10 ppmw in 2009 [3]. However, the issues of gasoline deep desulfurization are becoming more serious because the crude oils refined are getting higher in sulfur contents and heavier in density [4].

At present, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) is the most commonly used method of sulfur reduction of fossil fuels in refineries, which can remove most sulfur compounds by converting them to hydrogen sulfide [5]. The major problem for deep desulfurization of gasoline is that the conventional hydrotreating technology results in a significant reduction of octane number due to saturation of olefins in naphtha from fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), which also causes higher hydrogen consumption [4]. Therefore, the most recent gasoline desulfurization studies have considered desulfurization processes circumventing the need of the use of hydrogen, which includes alkylation, extraction, precipitation, oxidation, adsorption, etc. [2], [4], [6], [7].

Among the most promising non-hydrodesulfurization technologies, the alkylation of thiophenic compounds with olefins contained in the same feed, which was first patented by Mobil Oil Corporation [8], is an interesting way to eliminate the heavier alkylated sulfur molecules by further distillation [9]. As is well known that the alkylation of thiophenic compounds occur through the formation of carbocation [3], acid catalysts are needed to achieve the reactions. Previous researches have proposed different catalysts either with Brönsted or Lewis acidity, including various zeolites (HY, USY, HMCM-22, Hβ) [3], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], silica-supported phosphoric acid (SPA-11) [15], supported heteropolyacids (HPW/SiO2) [9], [16], etc.

However, even though the nature of the acid catalyst and the alkylation conditions have been chosen very carefully, the secondary reactions such as olefins oligomerization are almost unavoidable, since they take place via the same mechanism as thiophene alkylation. The oligomerization byproduct such as C15 + hydrocarbons with boiling point exceeding the boiling range of gasoline would decrease the product yield of gasoline, therefore, the formation of oligomers with high boiling point should be inhibited while decreasing olefins conversions.

Oxygenated compounds such as ethers which are produced by the reaction of methanol and tertiary olefins have good potential for use as environmental enhancing additives for transportation fuels [17]. As both methanol etherification and thiophene alkylation reactions could be catalyzed by macroporous sulfonic resins, the combination of the two reactions could obtain gasoline with high octane number and low sulfur content in theory. Previous researchers [18], [19], [20] have investigated the influence of etherification on olefins dimerization, and found that alcohol could improve the selectivity of dimerization significantly. However, no papers about the influence of etherification on thiophene alkylation have been published. Therefore, in this paper, alkylation of thiophene with isoamylene using Amberlyst 35 resin as catalysts was carried out in a batch stirred tank reactor in methanol presence, and then the influence of methanol on alkylation reactions of thiophenic compounds in FCC gasoline was also evaluated. Furthermore, kinetics of thiophenic sulfurs alkylation with olefins present in FCC gasoline was researched without and with methanol, including the determination of reaction rate constant and activation energy, and a comparison of reaction kinetics parameters under the two kinds of conditions was also made.

Section snippets

Materials and catalysts

The FCC gasoline used in this paper has a sulfur content of 289 mg L−1, with its composition: olefins (37.4 wt.%), aromatics (15.3 wt.%) and saturated hydrocarbons (47.3 wt.%). The model gasoline was self-made with its composition: isoamylene (37.4 wt.%), toluene (15.3 wt.%), octane (47.3 wt.%) and thiophene (300 μg g−1), which were representative of olefins, aromatics, alkanes and sulfur in real FCC gasoline. Isoamylene (>99 wt.%, contained 7.2 wt.% 2-methyl-1-butene and 92.8 wt.%

Influence of methanol in model gasoline

The experiments were firstly carried out in model gasoline with the mole ratio of methanol to isoamylene 1:1 at 373 K. It was found that only tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) was formed during the reaction and no alkylated thiophene or isoamylene oligomers were detected. As methanol was well known to adsorb strongly on such macroporous sulfonic resins, thiophene alkylation and isoamylene oligomerization were completely inhibited at high content of methanol.

Then the methanol concentration in model

Conclusion

Through the research of experiments in model gasoline, methanol could benefit the alkylation desulfurization process by the following three ways. Firstly, appropriate methanol could inhibit isoamylene oligomerization significantly while keep thiophene conversion constant, which suggests a new way to increase the selectivity of catalyst. Secondly, methanol could decrease the selectivity to trimers and above, which is beneficial to the product yield. Thirdly, as a component with high octane

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to China’s National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC 2008R&D017) and Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20976129) for financial support.

Cited by (41)

  • Melting-type acidic quaternary ammonium ionic liquids as catalysts for alkylation desulfurization of FCC gasoline

    2020, Catalysis Communications
    Citation Excerpt :

    In terms of Fluid Catalytic Cracking gasoline (FCC), most of the sulfides appear as thiophene and its derivatives, which are difficult to remove by conventional HDS due to their large steric hindrance [2–5]. Therefore, non-hydrodesulfurization (NHDS) technologies are still actively pursued in research, to mention the extraction [6–8], oxidation [9–11], adsorption [12] and alkylation [13–16]. Among them, olefin alkylation thiophenic sulfur (OATS) appears to be a promising method and which is studied widely due to the advantages offered, such as simple operation, mild reaction conditions and almost no damage to the fuel's octane number.

  • Desulfurization Materials

    2018, Comprehensive Energy Systems
  • Desulfurization Materials

    2018, Comprehensive Energy Systems: Volumes 1-5
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text