Elsevier

Fungal Ecology

Volume 12, December 2014, Pages 10-13
Fungal Ecology

Commentary
Plant–fungal symbioses as ecological networks: the need to characterize more than just interaction patterns

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2014.05.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Network-based tools are increasingly used to study plant–fungal symbioses.

  • Such an approach can provide little information if used improperly.

  • More focus should be placed on biological drivers of interactions.

  • Attention should be paid to the assumptions of network-based numerical tools.

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing technologies are providing us with new opportunities to characterize plant–fungal communities in more depth and with better replication than ever before. The application of network concepts and numerical tools to analyze those extensive data sets is also rapidly increasing. Here we show, however, that network-based tools will further advance our understanding of the ecology of plant–fungal symbioses if (1) researchers characterize both the interaction patterns among species, and investigate the likely biotic and abiotic drivers of such interactions (e.g. species' abundance, functional traits, environmental conditions) and (2) researchers make sure that the assumptions made by their network-based numerical tools are met by their data sets.

References (22)

  • M. Bahram et al.

    Network perspectives of ectomycorrhizal associations

    Fungal Ecology

    (2014)
  • P.-L. Chagnon et al.

    A trait-based framework to understand life history of mycorrhizal fungi

    Trends in Plant Science

    (2013)
  • E.A. Lilleskov et al.

    Detection of forest stand-level spatial structure in ectomycorrhizal fungal communities

    FEMS Microbiology Ecology

    (2004)
  • M. Almeida-Neto et al.

    A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement

    Oikos

    (2008)
  • J. Besag

    Discussion of Dr Ripley's paper

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B

    (1977)
  • J. Bascompte

    Disentangling the web of life

    Science

    (2009)
  • N. Blüthgen et al.

    What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits?

    Ecology

    (2008)
  • N. Blüthgen et al.

    Measuring specialization in species interaction networks

    BMC Ecology

    (2006)
  • P.-L. Chagnon et al.

    Using ecological network theory to evaluate the causes and consequences of arbuscular mycorrhizal community structure

    New Phytologist

    (2012)
  • A.J. Dumbrell et al.

    Relative roles of niche and neutral processes in structuring a soil microbial community

    ISME Journal

    (2010)
  • R. Heleno et al.

    Ecological networks: delving into the architecture of biodiversity

    Biology Letters

    (2014)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Seeing networks for what they are in mycorrhizal ecology

      2016, Fungal Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies based on a single network-level pattern may only explore biological mechanisms directly related to it and miss some important component of network assembly rules. As a whole, this stresses the importance of directly collecting biological data potentially related to network assembly instead of relying only on speculations arising from network patterns (Chagnon et al., 2014). For example, in the mycorrhizal literature, modular patterns of mycorrhizal interactions could be linked to plant traits (Chagnon et al., 2015), host life-style (Martos et al., 2012) or environmental filtering based on soil characteristics (Torrecillas et al., 2014).

    • Spatial ecology of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities

      2016, Molecular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text