Dynamics of organic and inorganic arsenic in the solution phase of an acidic fen in Germany

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.01.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Wetland soils play a key role for the transformation of heavy metals in forested watersheds, influencing their mobility, and ecotoxicity. Our goal was to investigate the mechanisms of release from solid to solution phase, the mobility, and the transformation of arsenic species in a fen soil. In methanol–water extracts, monomethylarsonic acid, dimethylarsinic acid, trimethylarsine oxide, arsenobetaine, and two unknown organic arsenic species were found with concentrations up to 14 ng As g−1 at the surface horizon. Arsenate is the dominant species at the 0–30 cm depth, whereas arsenite predominated at the 30–70 cm depth. Only up to 2.2% of total arsenic in fen was extractable with methanol–water. In porewaters, depth gradient spatial variation of arsenic species, pH, redox potentials, and the other chemical parameters along the profile was observed in June together with high proportion of organic arsenic species (up to 1.2 μg As L−1, 70% of total arsenic). Tetramethylarsonium ion and an unknown organic arsenic species were additionally detected in porewaters at deeper horizons. In comparison, the arsenic speciation in porewaters in April was homogeneous with depth and no organic arsenic species were found. Thus, the occurrence of microbial methylation of arsenic in fen was demonstrated for the first time. The 10 times elevated total arsenic concentrations in porewaters in June compared to April were accompanied by elevated concentrations of total iron, lower concentrations of sulfate and the presence of ammonium and phosphate. The low proportion of methanol–water extractable total arsenic suggests a generally low mobility of arsenic in fen soils. The release of arsenic from solid to solution phases in fen is dominantly controlled by dissolution of iron oxides, redox transformation, and methylation of arsenic, driven by microbial activity in the growing season. As a result, increased concentrations of total arsenic and potentially toxic arsenic species in fen porewaters were found in the growing season, suggesting an enhancing risk of arsenic transport of ground- and surface-waters under these conditions.

Introduction

Arsenic is a ubiquitous trace metalloid and is found in virtually all environmental media through natural and anthropogenic processes (Adriano, 2001). Arsenic occurs mainly inorganic in the environment with the dominance of arsenate (As(V)) under aerobic and arsenite (As(III)) under anaerobic environments. Methylation of inorganic As species by aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms produce monomethylarsonic acid (MMA), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA), and trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO) (Cullen and Reimer, 1989, Sadiq, 1997, Bentley and Chasteen, 2002). Tetramethylarsonium ion (TETRA), arsenobetaine (AsB), arsenocholine (AsC), and arsenosugars, are thought to be originated from biosynthesis, e.g., by alga or microorganisms (Pongratz, 1998, Geiszinger et al., 2002). The toxicity and mobility of As species depends on their chemical forms: inorganic As species are more toxic and less mobile than organic As species (Wauchope, 1975, Holm et al., 1980, Chiu and Hering, 2000, Mandal and Suzuki, 2002). Thus, investigation on the total As (Astotal) is not sufficient for risk assessment of As in the environment.

The release of As into ground water is thought to be linked to the redox chemistry of iron and sulfur. Under oxic conditions, the release of As may be driven by dissolution of As-rich pyrites through oxidation (Chatterjee et al., 1995, Zheng et al., 2004). The occurrence of sulfide under anoxic condition may immobilize As by its high affinity to sulfide minerals or by the formation of As-sulfide minerals (Bostick and Fendorf, 2003). Under anoxic conditions, the release of As associated with Fe and Mn oxides may be important (Nickson et al., 1998, Bhattacharya et al., 2003). Under oxic conditions, As species are immobilized by Fe and Mn oxides by adsorption and coprecipitation (Wilkie and Hering, 1996, Bednar et al., 2005). Wetland soils are characterized by high content of organic matter. The probable interactions of organic matter with As are through the mobilization and immobilization of As species due to the microbial transformation of Fe and S species as controlled by availability of organic matters (Kirk et al., 2004, O’day et al., 2004), through the probably strong affinity of As species to organic matters (Thanabalasingam and Pickering, 1986, Anawar et al., 2003) and through fueling the redox transformation and methylation of As by microorganisms (Oremland et al., 2004). However, the mechanisms of As release and accumulation in wetland soils are still unknown.

In the case of Hg, wetland soils are of special importance for transformation reactions (Weber et al., 1998, Roulet et al., 2001). Reduction or methylation resulting in the formation of methylmercury or volatile compounds like Hg0 and dimethylmercury influence strongly the mobility and export of organic Hg species from terrestrial catchments (Wallschläger et al., 1995, Lindberg et al., 2001). Methylation of As in soils is a strictly biological processes (Turner, 1949, Wood, 1974) and can be influenced by abiotic factors, such as pH and temperature (Cox, 1975, Huysmans and Frankenberger, 1991) and several methylated As species and AsB were detected in soils (Takamatsu et al., 1982, Tlustoš et al., 2002, Geiszinger et al., 2002). Methylation of As was demonstrated for different aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, i.e., methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria (Bentley and Chasteen, 2002, Kühnelt and Gössler, 2003). Therefore, the activity of methanogenic and sulfate reducing bacteria in wetland soils (Horn et al., 2003, Küsel and Alewell, 2004) suggests the occurrence of organic As species.

The chemistry of As in the aqueous environment is complex because of its multiple oxidation states and its association with a variety of minerals through adsorption and precipitation. The lack of knowledge about the behavior of As in wetland soils makes it difficult to estimate the transformation between organic and inorganic As species and mobility of As species in wetland soils. Therefore, this investigation focuses on As speciation in the solid phase and in porewaters in a fen soil with the objectives (i) to estimate the occurrence of As methylation, (ii) to identify the release mechanisms of As, (iii) to evaluate the mobility of As species, and (iv) to estimate the environmental relevance of As in wetland soils.

Section snippets

Site description

The investigated site, Schlöppnerbrunnen I, is a part of Lehstenbach catchment (4.2 km2 size) in the German Fichtelgebirge Mountains, located at an elevation of 700–880 m a.s.l. at 50° 08′ N, 11° 52′ E. The mountains are located in North East Bavaria. They are North East of Bayreuth and close to the border with the Czech Republic. Mean annual air temperature is 5 °C, and mean annual precipitation is about 1150 mm. The Lehstenbach catchment is dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.)

Arsenic speciation in fen

The methanol–water extractable concentrations of all As species were highest at the surface horizons with concentrations of 83 ng As g−1, representing 2.2% of Astotal concentrations (Fig. 2). The percentage of methanol–water extractable As was lowest at 70 cm depth (0.5%).

Inorganic As species predominated in the methanol–water extracts (Fig. 2). Arsenate was the dominant As species at the upper 30 cm, whereas As(III) dominated at the deeper horizons. Therefore, the ratios of As(III) to As(V) at the

Methylation of arsenic in fen

The methylation of As in fen is demonstrated here for the first time by the abundance and variety of organic As species in porewaters. The absence of NO3, an order of magnitude lower concentrations of SO42− and the much higher concentrations of Fetotal in porewaters in June compared to those in April reflect the microbial activity for consumption and oxidation of organic matters, resulting in anoxic conditions (O’day et al., 2004). The pH values close to neutral in porewaters in June, which

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the central analytical department of BayCEER for analytical support, especially Dr. Gunter Ilgen and Uwe Hell helped with the sample preparation. Thanks also due to Dr. Christian Blodau for providing the dialysis chamber. Financial support came from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

References (55)

  • R. Pongratz

    Arsenic speciation in environmental samples of contaminated soil

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (1998)
  • P.L. Smedley et al.

    A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters

    Appl. Geochem.

    (2002)
  • P. Thanabalasingam et al.

    Arsenic sorption by humic acids

    Environ. Pollut. B

    (1986)
  • J.H. Weber et al.

    Conversion of mercury(II) into mercury(0), monoethylmercury cation, and dimethylmercury in saltmarsh sediment slurries

    Chemosphere

    (1998)
  • M. Wolthers et al.

    Arsenic mobility in the ambient sulfidic environment: sorption of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) onto disordered mackinawite

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • X.-P. Yan et al.

    Distribution of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) and total arsenic in porewaters from a thick till and clay-rich aquitard sequence, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2000)
  • Y. Zheng et al.

    Redox control of arsenic mobilization in Bangladesh groundwater

    Appl. Geochem.

    (2004)
  • D.C. Adriano

    Trace elements in the terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability and risks of metals

    (2001)
  • R. Bentley et al.

    Microbial methylation of metalloids: arsenic, antimony, and bismuth

    Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R.

    (2002)
  • Bhattacharya, P., Tandukar, N., Mukherjee, A.B., Valero, A.A., Jacks, G., 2003. Redox chemistry of arsenic in...
  • M. Bissen et al.

    Arsenic—a review. Part I: occurrence, toxicity, speciation, mobility

    Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol.

    (2003)
  • A.D. Chatterjee et al.

    Arsenic in ground water in 6 districts of West Bengal, India—the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. A. Arsenic species in drinking water and urine of the affected people

    Analyst

    (1995)
  • V.Q. Chiu et al.

    Arsenic adsorption and oxidation at manganite surfaces. 1. Method for simultaneous determination of adsorbed and dissolved arsenic species

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2000)
  • Cox, D.P., 1975. Microbiological methylation of arsenic. In: Woolson, E.A. (Ed.), Arsenical pesticides, ACS Symp. Ser...
  • W.R. Cullen et al.

    Arsenic speciation in the environment

    Chem. Rev.

    (1989)
  • A. Geiszinger et al.

    Organoarsenic compounds in plants and soil on top of an ore vein

    Appl. Organomet. Chem.

    (2002)
  • P. Gerstberger et al.

    The Lehstenbach and Steinkreuz catchments in NE Bavaria, Germany

    Ecol. Stud.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Arsenic agronomical-related aspects and bioremediation

      2023, The Role of Gasotransmitters in the Amelioration of Arsenic Toxicity in Plants: Biology and Biotechnology
    • Assessment and validation of ICP-MS and IC-ICP-MS methods for the determination of total, extracted and speciated arsenic. Application to samples from a soil-rice system at varying the irrigation method

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also the amount of inorganic arsenic (iAs) measured is constant in all soils. Interestingly, the concentration of DMA and MMA are always below than the relevant LoDs in all soils considered, and this is consistent with the observations of many research groups (Takamatsu et al., 1982; Huang and Matzner, 2006, 2007; Huang et al., 2010b). Furthermore, it is also interesting to observe that the column recovery measured in CF soil is slightly lower (i.e. 96%) than that measured in both SA and SP soils.

    • Potential of high pH and reduced sulfur for arsenic mobilization – Insights from a Finnish peatland treating mining waste water

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most common As species in aquatic environments are arsenate (HxAsVO4x-3, x = 0–3) and arsenite (HxAsIIIO3x-3, x = 0–3) (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002). In addition, methylated As species, monomethylarsenate (MMA) and dimethylarsenate (DMA), which have been reported to form with the involvement of sulfate-reducing bacteria (Bentley and Chasteen, 2002; Chen et al., 2019), can be found in peatland pore water (Bauer et al., 2008; Blodau et al., 2008; Huang and Matzner, 2006; Mikutta and Rothwell, 2016). The main retention mechanisms for As in peatlands are (co-)precipitation and sorption (Lizama et al., 2011; Sheoran and Sheoran, 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text