Long-term reinforcement strains for column supported embankments with viscous reinforcement by FEM
Introduction
Columns installed by the deep-mixing-method (DMM) have been widely acknowledged as a cost-effective and speedy means of supporting roadway embankments constructed over soft soil (e.g., Bergado et al., 1999, Lin and Wong, 1999, Igaya et al., 2011, Chai and Carter, 2011, Jamsawang et al., 2011, Voottipruex et al., 2011a, Chandra, 2012, Dahlström and Wiberg, 2012, Kamruzzaman et al., 2012, Bruce et al., 2013, Chai et al., 2015, Liu et al., 2015). To minimize column construction costs and improve embankment stability, geosynthetic reinforcement is increasingly used as basal reinforcement in combination with columns to control embankment deformations including both vertical and horizontal displacements (e.g., Forsman et al., 1999, Parmantier et al., 2005, Lai et al., 2006, Pooranampillai et al., 2012, Borges and Gonçalves, 2016, Chen et al., 2016, Zhang et al., 2016).
It is well known that geosynthetics typically made of polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) are prone to experience creep/relaxation (e.g., Bathurst and Cai, 1994, Leshchinsky et al., 1997, Jones and Clarke, 2007, Kongkitkul et al., 2007, Yeo and Hsuan, 2010, Franca and Bueno, 2011, Miyata et al., 2014). Some researchers (e.g., Li and Rowe, 2001, Li and Rowe, 2008, Rowe and Taechakumthorn, 2011, Karim et al., 2012, Taechakumthorn and Rowe, 2012a, Taechakumthorn and Rowe, 2012b, Taechakumthorn and Rowe, 2012c) have demonstrated that reinforcement viscosity is of importance to the interpretation of time-dependent behaviour of basally reinforced embankments without columns. Also, a few recent studies (e.g., Ariyarathne et al., 2013, Liu and Rowe, 2015a, Liu and Rowe, 2016) have shown that it is necessary to consider the viscous nature of reinforcement for reinforced embankment supported by rigid piles and or semi-rigid DMM columns.
Geosynthetic reinforcement has been reported to play an important role in improving the performance of DMM column supported embankments, particularly reducing the embankment's lateral spreading through some numerical analyses (e.g., Huang and Han, 2010, Yapage and Liyanapathirana, 2014, Liu and Rowe, 2016). Two mainstream design codes (BSI, 2010; EBGEO, 2011) suggest that a practical upper limit of 6% reinforcement strain be imposed for reinforced and pile/column supported embankments although the measured maximum reinforcement strains in some laboratory tests (e.g., Van Eekelen et al., 2012a, Van Eekelen et al., 2012b) and calculated maximum reinforcement strains in many numerical analyses (e.g., Huang and Han, 2010, Yapage and Liyanapathirana, 2014) were all lower than 3%. There is currently no publication investigating how the choice of maximum reinforcement strain can influence the behaviour of embankments supported by columns. There is a need to improve understanding of this issue. Furthermore, although it is common practice to design geosynthetic reinforced embankments based on short-term (end-of-construction) analyses some have proposed use of long-term reinforcement strength and evaluated embankment performance with the concept of long-term service height suggested by recent publications (e.g., Rowe and Taechakumthorn, 2011, Taechakumthorn and Rowe, 2012a, Taechakumthorn and Rowe, 2012b, Taechakumthorn and Rowe, 2012c). Therefore, the objectives of this paper are: (i) to explore the suitable selection of long-term (at 99% degree of consolidation) reinforcement strain for DMM column supported embankments with viscous reinforcement constructed over two soft foundations so that embankment deformations can be controlled to modest levels while their long-term service heights can be maximized; (ii) to investigate the correlation between maximum end-of-construction and long-term reinforcement strain for aforementioned cases using the fully 3D coupled finite element method (FEM) that has been calibrated by successfully modelling the performance of reinforced and piled embankment in the field with respect to piles and soil settlements, pressures, excess pore pressure, and reinforcement strains (Rowe and Liu, 2015).
Section snippets
Mesh discretization details
The granular roadway embankments examined in this paper had 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) side slopes with 56 m width at the base and were numerically constructed over two types of 15 m-thick soft clay underlain by the rigid and permeable layer, which are similar to those studied for basal reinforcement only by Rowe and Taechakumthorn (2011).
Although the reinforced embankment with a lateral slope supported by a square grid of DMM columns is fully 3D, to minimize the computational cost, it can be
Constitutive models and model parameters
The constitutive models for all materials including geosynthetic reinforcement, subsoil, DMM columns, embankment fills and associated interfaces related in this paper are listed in Table 1.
Results and discussion
Both the British design code (BSI, 2010) and the German design code (EBGEO, 2011) suggest that the reinforcement strain should be controlled within 6%. To explore a suitable selection of long-term reinforcement strain for DMM column-supported embankments, a series of G1-reinforced embankments supported by 2 m centre-to-centre spacing columns installed in Soil A (Scenario I) were numerically constructed up to heights providing maximum long-term reinforcement strains occurring at the edge of
Conclusions
The influence of the selection of maximum long-term strain in two viscous geosynthetic reinforcements (G1: polypropylene geotextile; G2: High density polyethylene geogrid) on the time-dependent behaviour of DMM column supported embankments over two foundation soils (with and without a crust) was investigated by a series of 3D coupled elasto-plastic Biot consolidation finite element analyses. By taking account of the creep strain in the reinforcement developed after embankment construction, this
Acknowledgements
The first author would like to acknowledge the funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51608461), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2682016CX019), the State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Grant No. SKLGDUEK1726). Also, a grant (A1007) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada awarded to the corresponding author is
List of notations
- DMM
- deep mixing method
- HD
- High density polyethylene
- PP
- Polypropylene
- EOC
- end-of-construction
- RS
- reinforcement strain
- total strain tensor for reinforcement model
- total strain rate tensor for reinforcement model
- elastic strain tensor for reinforcement model
- elastic strain rate tensor for reinforcement model
- viscoelastic strain tensor for reinforcement model
- viscoelastic strain rate tensor for reinforcement model
- individual spring modulus for reinforcement model
- reference spring
References (70)
- et al.
Jet-grout column-reinforced soft soils incorporating multilayer geosynthetic-reinforced platforms
Soils Found.
(2016) - et al.
Performance of reinforced embankment on Muar clay deposit
Soils Found.
(1993) - et al.
2D and 3D analyses of an embankment on clay improved by soil–cement columns
Comput. Geotech.
(2015) - et al.
Tensile force of geogrids embedded in pile-supported reinforced embankment: a full-scale experimental study
Geotext. Geomembr.
(2016) - et al.
3D coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of a geosynthetic-reinforced deep mixed column-supported embankment
Geotext. Geomembr.
(2009) - et al.
Two-dimensional parametric study of geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported embankments by coupled hydraulic and mechanical modeling
Comput. Geotech.
(2010) - et al.
The residual strength of geosynthetic reinforcement subjected to accelerated creep testing and simulated seismic events
Geotext. Geomemb
(2007) - et al.
Viscous behaviour of geogrids: experiment and simulation
Soils Found.
(2007) - et al.
Numerical study of the effects of geosynthetic reinforcement viscosity on behaviour of embankments supported by deep-mixing-method columns
Geotext. Geomembr.
(2015) - et al.
Numerical modelling of prefabricated vertical drains and surcharge on reinforced floating column-supported embankment behaviour
Geotext. Geomembr.
(2015)
Performance of reinforced, DMM column-supported embankment considering reinforcement viscosity and subsoil decreasing hydraulic conductivity
Comput. Geotech.
Reliability analysis of geogrid creep data in Japan
Soils Found.
Model experiments on piled embankments, part I
Geotext. Geomembr.
Model experiments on piled embankments, part II
Geotext. Geomembr.
Behaviour and simulations of deep cement mixing (DCM) and stiffened deep cement mixing (SDCM) piles under full scale loading
Soils Found.
Numerical simulations and parametric study of SDCM and DCM Piles under full scale axial and lateral loading
Comput. Geotech.
Analytical solution for the consolidation of a composite ground reinforced by partially penetrated impervious columns
Comput. Geotech.
Evaluation of creep behaviour of high density polyethylene and polyethylene-terephthalate geogrids
Geotext. Geomemb
Arching in geogrid-reinforced pile-supported embankments over silty clay of medium compressibility: field data and analytical solution
Comput. Geotech.
Evaluation of effect of basal geotextile reinforcement under embankment loading on soft marine deposits
Geotext. Geomembr.
Effect of geosynthetic creep on reinforced pile-supported embankment systems
Geosynth. Int.
In-isolation cyclic load-extension behaviour of two geogrids
Geosynth. Int.
Deep soil mixing used to reduce embankment settlement
Ground improv..
Performance of pile-supported embankment over soft soil: full-scale experiment
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. ASCE
Deep Soil Stabilization: Design and Construction of Lime and Lime/Cement Columns
Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and LRFD Design Methods
An Introduction to the Deep Mixing Methods as Used in Geotechnical Applications—vol. III: the Verification and Properties of Treated Ground
Federal Highway Administration Design Manual: Deep Mixing for Embankment and Foundation Support
BS8006–1: 2010 Code of Practice for Strengthened/Reinforced Soils and Other Fills
Deformation Analysis in Soft Ground Improvement
Settlement prediction for soft ground improved by columns. Ground Improv
Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. U. K.
Deep mixing for support of approach embankments for light rail overcrossing in urban setting
Nonlinear Analysis in Soil Mechanics - Theory and Implementation
Foundation Design: Principles and Practices
Dry soil mixing and vibro replacement in combination for a high embankment
Cited by (28)
Model tests on 3D soil arching in pile-supported embankments with and without geotextile
2024, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsReinforcement load in geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported model embankments
2022, Geotextiles and GeomembranesCitation Excerpt :Since the subsoil between piles deforms and consolidates with time, soil arching is mobilized with time. Recent studies have focused on the evolution of soil arching in piled embankments (Guo and Zhou, 2013; Yu et al., 2016; Rui et al., 2016, 2019; Moorak, 2017; Liu et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2021) and the stability of soil arching under dynamic forces (Zhuang and Li, 2015; Zhuang and Wang, 2015; Taha et al., 2015; Han et al., 2015; Cardile et al., 2017). These studies have led to advances in the serviceability design of GRPS embankments.
A simple design approach to analyse the piled embankment including tensile reinforcement and subsoil contributions
2021, Geotextiles and GeomembranesStability analysis of stone column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced embankments on soft ground
2020, Geotextiles and GeomembranesCitation Excerpt :The influences of various reinforcement strength parameters have been investigated in prior numerical and experimental investigations (Christoulas et al., 1997; Chen et al., 2015). Geosynthetic reinforcement is widely used to improve embankment performance on soft soil (Liu et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). A basal geosynthetic reinforcement can serve to resist the earth pressure within an embankment and to prevent the lateral deformation of its foundation, thereby increasing the bearing capacity and stability (Chai et al., 2016; Leshchinsky, 1987; Rowe and Li, 2005; Rowe and Liu, 2015 ).
A 3D-DEM investigation of the mechanism of arching within geosynthetic-reinforced piled embankment
2020, International Journal of Solids and StructuresCitation Excerpt :Soil arching has a significant effect on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankments due to its complex mechanics. Even though several studies have been carried out in this area as Rowe and Li (2002), Jennings and Naughton (2012), Yapage et al. (2013), Ariyarathne et al. (2013), Zhuang et al. (2013), Lai et al. (2014), Bhasi and Rajagopal (2015), Liu and Rowe (2015), Zhuang and Wang (2016), Liu and Rowe (2016), King et al. (2016), Liu et al. (2017) and Zhuang and Wang (2018), the exact behavior of GRPS embankments is yet to be understood. The Ground Reaction Curve (GRC) which is defined as the amount of support from the piles is divided into four parts: the initial arching phase, the maximum arching (minimum loading) condition, the loading recovery stage, and the ultimate state.