Elsevier

Harmful Algae

Volume 62, February 2017, Pages 104-112
Harmful Algae

Effects of Lyngbya majuscula blooms on the seagrass Halodule wrightii and resident invertebrates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2016.11.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Cyanobacterial blooms have been increasing worldwide due to increased nutrients associated with urban, industrial, and agricultural development. Blooms that occur in the Indian River Lagoon (IRL), Florida may be increased by nutrient-laden runoff from storm water and non-point sewage pollution due to alterations to the watershed. In the IRL, during the summer of 2006, extensive blooms of the marine cyanobacterium, Lyngbya majuscula, were observed forming mats throughout beds of the seagrass Halodule wrightii in Fort Pierce, Florida. The effects of cyanobacterial blooms were compared to artificial shading of H. wrightii to assess the shading potential of L. majuscula. The combined effects of L. majuscula removal and artificial shading showed increases in the below ground biomass of H. wrightii. However, leaf length increased in the presence of L. majuscula. In response to artificial shading, H. wrightii decreased in density, but showed similar leaf elongation. A common bivalve in our study area, Macoma constricta, increased in density when L. majuscula was removed. Therefore, when L. majuscula blooms occur, light limitation is one of the mechanisms altering H. wrightii density and leaf lengths in the IRL. Loss of H. wrightii biomass due to shading from cyanobacterial mats may further damage the diversity and habitat value of the IRL.

Introduction

In coastal ecosystems, seagrass foundation species form habitat and stabilize local conditions (Dayton, 1972, Dawes et al., 1995, Bruno and Bertness, 2001, Duffy, 2006). They provide valuable ecosystem services, including acting as nursery habitat and refugia, providing a food source, recycling nutrients, and are highly productive (Dawes et al., 1995, Williams and Heck, 2001, Duarte, 2002, Heck et al., 2003, Duffy, 2006, van Tussenbroek et al., 2006). Worldwide seagrasses are declining due to a series of natural and anthropogenic stressors that have created poor conditions for seagrass success (Short and Wyllie-Echeverria, 1996, Orth et al., 2006, Waycott et al., 2009). It is estimated that 29% of the known areas of seagrasses have disappeared, and continue to decline at a rate of 7% per year (Waycott et al., 2009).

Anthropogenic pressures on coastal ecosystems are increasing worldwide (Halpern et al., 2008), which is one of the primary causes of seagrass losses (Orth et al., 2006, Waycott et al., 2009). Global increases in human populations have increased the frequency and magnitudes algal, phytoplankton, and cyanobacterial blooms, including harmful algae blooms (HABs) as a result of increased eutrophication (Hallegraeff, 1993, Anderson et al., 2002, Heisler et al., 2008). The occurrence and density of blooms can depend on the type of nutrients, availability of nutrients, density of grazers or suspension feeders, and local hydrodynamics (Cloern, 2001, Pittman and Pittman, 2005, Ahern et al., 2006, Ahern et al., 2007, O’Neil et al., 2012, Lapointe et al., 2015). HABs have produced deleterious effects on seagrasses by overgrowing and smothering of seagrasses that lead to reduced light availability and inhibited gas exchange, ultimately decreasing photosynthetic rates (Watkinson et al., 2005, O’Neil et al., 2012, Lapointe et al., 2015, Morris et al., 2015). Therefore, the severity of the HABs is strongly related to seagrass losses.

Lyngbya majuscula is a potential HAB-forming species in marine ecosystems that has been increasing in frequency since the early 2000s (Paul et al., 2005, Paul, 2008, O’Neil et al., 2012). It is a filamentous benthic cyanobacteria found growing attached to sediment, seagrasses, and corals (Albert et al., 2005, Paul et al., 2005, Arthur et al., 2006, Ahern et al., 2007, Martín-García et al., 2014, O’Neil et al., 2012). The extensive benthic mats can become detached and blanket large areas due to oxygen bubbles trapped in their filaments following active photosynthesis (Albert et al., 2005, O’Neil et al., 2012). Toxicity of secondary compounds produced by L. majuscula have been shown to have adverse effects on humans, with severe skin and eye irritations and hampered respiratory functions (Osborne et al., 2001, Watkinson et al., 2005, O’Neil et al., 2012). Effects of Lyngbya spp. on coral reefs are also primarily a function of toxicity rather than shading by the cyanobacterial mats (Titlaynov et al., 2007). In animal communities, L. majuscula produces compounds that act as strong feeding deterrents (Osborne et al., 2001, Paul et al., 2005, Paul, 2008). When L. majuscula grows epiphytically on seagrasses, animals, such as green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas), are negatively impacted by exposure to potentially harmful toxins when ingesting L. majuscula with seagrass leaves (Arthur et al., 2006, Arthur et al., 2008). Fish and meiofaunal communities (i.e. nematodes, copepods, polychaetes) abundances decreased in the presence of L. majuscula (Pittman and Pittman, 2005, García and Johnstone, 2006). Infaunal species also altered their sediment depth distribution, although this effect was less prominent in polychaete species (García and Johnstone, 2006).

Anthropogenic nutrient loading can cause algal blooms which in turn lead to dramatic decreases in seagrass abundance and distribution (Dennison et al., 1989, Hauxwell et al., 2001, Hauxwell et al., 2003, McGlathery, 2001, Lamote and Dunton, 2006, Lapointe et al., 2015, Morris et al., 2015). When algae grows in epiphytic associations with seagrass species, their presence can result in reduced light absorption, nutrient absorption, and gas exchange by seagrasses (Brush and Nixon, 2002, Drake et al., 2003, Brodersen et al., 2015, Costa et al., 2015). Bloom scale events have also lead to decreases in maximum depth limits, coverage, and stability (McGlathery, 2001, Lapointe et al., 2015, Breininger et al., 2016) and can exacerbate the negative effects of other stressors such as grazing (Maciá, 2000). Lyngbya majuscula blooms have caused declines in seagrass biomass, attributable to light reduction, although the extent of decline is highly variable between seagrass species (Watkinson et al., 2005). These reductions in light can be a key factor affecting seagrass distribution (Duarte, 1991, Ralph et al., 2007, Steward et al., 2005, Choice et al., 2014). Due to their high light requirement, seagrasses can be sensitive to shading from algal and cyanobacterial blooms (Duarte, 1991, Orth et al., 2006, Ralph et al., 2007). Duarte (1991) estimated that seagrasses had an average minimum light requirement of 11% of surface light. However, light requirements are highly variable among species due to morphological and physiological differences, ranging from 4.4 to 29.4% of surface light (Dennison et al., 1993). The physical presence of L. majuscula may create barriers that alter light availability and photosynthetic potential for seagrasses, particularly when attached to seagrass leaves (Arthur et al., 2006, Ahern et al., 2007, O’Neil et al., 2012, Fabbri et al., 2015). This light reduction impedes photosynthetic activity of seagrasses (Duarte, 1991, Ralph et al., 2007) resulting in reduced growth and biomass (Tomasko, 1992, Czerny and Dunton, 1995, Shafer, 1999, Biber et al., 2009).

The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) is diverse estuary in Florida that extends 251 km from Ponce Inlet to Jupiter Inlet (Gilbert and Clark, 1981, Zimmermann and Montgomery, 1984, Dawes et al., 1995, Steward et al., 2005). The IRL watershed has drastically changed due to rapid urbanization and population growth and creation of canals that increased the amount of freshwater input into the estuary (Kim et al., 2002, Duncan et al., 2004). As a result, eutrophication of this shallow estuary increased due to the presence of land-based sources of nutrients (Sigua et al., 2000, Sigua and Tweedale, 2003, Lapointe et al., 2015). Point-source sewage pollution was eliminated by 1996 as per the Indian River Lagoon Act of 1990 (sensu Lapointe et al., 2015) to protect the estuary. However, nutrient inputs remain, primarily sourced by storm water and non-point sewage pollution (Belanger et al., 2007, Lapointe et al., 2012, Lapointe et al., 2015). Residency time of water in the lagoon can be extensive, greater than one year, particularly in the northern IRL which has restricted water exchange (Smith, 1993). As a result recent evidence of nutrient accumulation in the IRL has been linked non-point sewage pollution, leading to increases in algal blooms (Phlips et al., 2002, Phlips et al., 2010, Phlips et al., 2011, Phlips et al., 2015, Lapointe et al., 2015). Blooms in the IRL are indicative of these eutrophication events (Benz et al., 1979, Virnstein and Carbonara, 1985) and have resulted in decreases in seagrass abundance and distribution as a result of reduced light availability in the IRL (Lapointe et al., 2015, Morris et al., 2015). Recently, approximately 45% of seagrasses in the northern IRL have been loss since a series of algal and phytoplankton blooms in 2011 and subsequent years (Morris et al., 2015).

One of the dominant seagrass species in the IRL is Halodule wrightii Ascherson, a pioneer seagrass species, found in shallow intertidal and sub-tidal waters (Dawes et al., 1995, Steward et al., 2005). As a foundation species, seagrasses like H. wrightii strongly influences community composition, including benthic infauna abundance (Orth et al., 1984, Coen and Heck, 1991, Omena and Creed, 2004, Johnson and Heck, 2007). Halodule wrightii is also considered to have relatively broad environmental tolerances to factors such as salinity (up to 65 PSU) and temperature (2 °C–39 °C), compared to other seagrass species (McMillan, 1979, McMillan, 1984, Björk et al., 1999, Koch et al., 2007, Mazzotti et al., 2007). As a result H. wrightii is known as a swift colonizer, particularly after stressors, compared to other species (De Oliveria et al., 1983). However, light requirements of H. wrightii are relatively high, at 20 ± 14% surface photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) (Steward et al., 2005). As a result, H. wrightii is known to have rapid responses to light attenuation as observed by changes in morphological traits, reductions in biomass and increased mortality (Tomasko, 1992, Czerny and Dunton, 1995, Shafer, 1999, Biber et al., 2009). In the IRL, H. wrightii abundance has been negatively impacted by series of algal, phytoplankton, and cyanobacterial blooms since 2011 and recovery has been slow (Morris et al., 2015). However, impacts of algal and cyanobacterial blooms on H. wrightii and its associate communities are still largely unknown.

The objective of this study was to test if L. majuscula affects H. wrightii communities and if those effects are a result of shading by L. majuscula mats on seagrass beds. This will provide insight into seagrass persistence in response to blooms. We hypothesize that (i) the presence of L. majuscula will reduce seagrass size and abundance, (ii) artificial shading will cause similar seagrass responses as the effect of L. majuscula presence and (iii) the abundance of macroinfaunal species (the bivalve, Macoma constricta, and two polychaetes Clymenella mucosa and Nereis succinea) will respond negatively L. majuscula presence and artificial shading. These infauna species are abundant bioturbators in H. wrightii meadows and are considered to have a random distribution (Coen and Heck, 1991, Omena and Creed, 2004).

Section snippets

Study area

In the summer of 2006 (April to August), widespread blooms of L. majuscula occurred in the central IRL and were observed from Fort Pierce Inlet (27°28′22.002N, 80°17′16.691W) to Vero Beach (27°35′13.176N, 80°21′50.068W), Florida (Capper and Paul, 2008; personal observations). Our field experiment was established at Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute (HBOI), located in Fort Pierce, FL (27°31′57.87N, 80°20′53.673W). This area is part of the central IRL, approximately 10 km from the Fort Pierce

Lyngbya majuscula biomass

In June 2006, Lyngbya majuscula average dry biomass in non-shaded plots was 105.53 ± 11.62 g m−2 (Mean ± SE) and in shaded plots was 78.81 ± 14.09 g m−2 (Mean ± SE) before initiation of shading or removal treatments. By the end of the experiment (August 2006), L. majuscula average biomass in non-shaded plots was 17.65 ± 26.17 g m−2 (Mean ± SE) and in shaded plots was 15.77 ± 14.50 g m−2 (Mean ± SE), indicating a decline in the bloom over time. By September of 2006 the bloom had run its course (Capper and Paul, 2008,

Discussion

Harmful cyanobacterial and algal blooms can result in phase shifts in foundation species when seagrasses are replaced by algal-dominated communities (Anderson et al., 2002, Duarte, 2002, Heisler et al., 2008). Our field experiment suggests that HABs can produce complex responses in seagrass communities when coupled with secondary stressors like that produced by artificial shading. We observed changes in the relative amounts of below ground biomass and changes in leaf length over very small

Conclusion

Seagrass communities throughout Florida undergo a barrage of stresses from natural causes such as species interactions or human induced environmental changes such as large-scale releases of freshwater into the IRL. Understanding seagrasses responses to changes in nutrients and light penetration, especially during recovery after a disturbance period will provide valuable information in the recovery and restoration of seagrasses in Florida estuaries. The compounding effects of shading by harmful

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Devlin for helping with experimental design, field work, identification of polychaetes, and for substantive comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. J. Moore provided useful comments on early stages of this paper. We appreciate field assistance by G. Coldren. D. Hanisak provided the LI-COR used for PAR measurements.[CG]

References (97)

  • J. Heisler et al.

    Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus

    Harmful Algae

    (2008)
  • M.S. Koch et al.

    Tropical seagrass species tolerance to hypersalinity stress

    Aquat. Bot.

    (2007)
  • M. Lamote et al.

    Effects of drift macroalgae and light attenuation on chlorophyll fluorescence and sediment sulfides in the seagrass Thalassia testudinum

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (2006)
  • B.E. Lapointe et al.

    Evidence of sewage-driven eutrophication and harmful algae blooms in Florida's Indian River Lagoon

    Harmful Algae

    (2015)
  • K. Lee et al.

    Effect of in situ light reduction on the maintenance, growth and partitioning of carbon resources in Thalassia testudinum banks ex König

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (1997)
  • S. Maciá

    The effects of sea urchin grazing and drift algal blooms on a subtropical seagrass bed community

    J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.

    (2000)
  • L. Martín-García et al.

    Predicting the potential habitat of the harmful cyanobacteria Lyngbya majuscula in the Canary Islands (Spain)

    Harmful Algae

    (2014)
  • C. McMillan

    The distribution of tropical seagrasses with relation to their tolerance of high temperatures

    Aquat. Bot.

    (1984)
  • K.A. Moore et al.

    Seasonal variations in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) responses to nutrient enrichment and reduced light availability in experiment ecosystems

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (2000)
  • J.M. O’Neil et al.

    The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms: the potential roles of eutrophication and climate change

    Harmful Algae

    (2012)
  • N.J.T. Osborne et al.

    The toxins of Lyngbya majuscula and their human and ecological health effects

    Environ. Int.

    (2001)
  • E.J. Phlips et al.

    Factors affecting the abundance of phytoplankton in a restricted subtropical lagoon the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA

    Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2002)
  • E.J. Phlips et al.

    Scales of temporal and spatial variability in the distribution of harmful algae species in the Indian River Lagoon Florida, USA

    Harmful Algae

    (2011)
  • S.J. Pittman et al.

    Short-term consequences of a benthic cyanobacterial bloom (Lyngbya majuscula Gomont) for fish and penaeid prawns in Moreton Bay (Queensland, Australia)

    Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2005)
  • W.M. Pulich

    Seasonal growth dynamics of Ruppia maritima L., and Halodule wrightii Aschers. in southern Texas and evaluation of sediment fertility status

    Aquat. Bot.

    (1985)
  • P.J. Ralph et al.

    Impact of light limitation on seagrasses

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (2007)
  • G. Roca et al.

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2016)
  • G.C. Sigua et al.

    Watershed scale assessment of nitrogen and phosphorus loadings in the Indian River Lagoon basin, Florida

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2003)
  • S. Stielow et al.

    Benthic cyanobacterial, Microcoleus lyngbyaceus, blooms in shallow, inshore Puerto Rican seagrass habitats, Caribbean sea

    Harmful Algae

    (2003)
  • R.K.F. Unsworth et al.

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2015)
  • R.W. Virnstein et al.

    Seasonal abundance and distribution of drift algae and seagrasses in the mid-Indian River Lagoon, Florida

    Aquat. Bot.

    (1985)
  • A.J. Watkinson et al.

    Ecophysiology of the marine cyanobacterium, Lyngbya majuscula (Oscillatoriaceae) in moreton bay, Australia

    Harmful Algae

    (2005)
  • K.S. Ahern et al.

    Investigating the potential for groundwater from different vegetation soil and land uses to stimulate blooms of the cyanobacterium, Lyngbya majuscula, in coastal waters

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2006)
  • T. Alcoverro et al.

    Resource allocation and sucrose mobilization in light-limited eelgrass Zostera marina

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (1999)
  • T. Alcoverro et al.

    Annual metabolic carbon balance of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: the importance of carbon reserves

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2001)
  • D.M. Anderson et al.

    Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences

    Estuaries

    (2002)
  • T.V. Belanger et al.

    Submarine groundwater discharge in the Indian River Lagoon Florida. How important is it?

    Fla. Sci.

    (2007)
  • M.C. Benz et al.

    Seasonal occurrence and variation in standing crop of a drift algal community in the Indian River, Florida

    Bot. Mar.

    (1979)
  • M. Björk et al.

    Photosynthetic tolerances to desiccation of tropical intertidal seagrasses

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (1999)
  • D.R. Breininger et al.

    Effects of surrounding land use and water depth on seagrass dynamics with attention to a catastrophic algal bloom

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2016)
  • K.E. Brodersen et al.

    Epiphyte-cover on seagrass (Zostera marina L.) leaves impedes plant performance and radial O2 loss from the below-ground tissue

    Front. Mar. Sci.

    (2015)
  • J.F. Bruno et al.

    Habitat modification and facilitation in benthic marine communities

  • M.J. Brush et al.

    Direct measurements of light attenuation by epiphytes on eelgrass Zostera marina

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2002)
  • J.E. Cloern

    Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2001)
  • M.M. Costa et al.

    Epiphytes modulate Posidonia oceanica photosynthetic production, energetic balance, antioxidant mechanisms, and oxidative damage

    Front. Mar. Sci.

    (2015)
  • A.B. Czerny et al.

    The effects of in situ light reduction on the growth of two subtropical seagrasses, Thalassia testudinum and Halodule wrightii

    Estuaries

    (1995)
  • C.J. Dawes et al.

    Seagrass biodiversity in the indian river lagoon

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (1995)
  • P.K. Dayton

    Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica

  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present Address: Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M – Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., Corpus Christi, Texas, 78412, USA.

    View full text