Development of a metal recovery process from Li-ion battery wastes
Introduction
Demand for secondary batteries has steadily increased in recent times as portable electronic appliances such as cellular phones and laptop computers have come into wide use. Along with the development of such portable devices, the technology of secondary batteries–their power source–has rapidly improved in tandem with their applications. In consequence, the amount of secondary battery waste is increasing along with the proliferation of the portable devices. With the disposal of the spent batteries, mostly by landfill, soil contamination follows from the leakage of organic electrolyte as well as heavy metals such as copper and nickel contained in the batteries.
Lithium ion batteries consist of heavy metals, organic chemicals and plastics in the proportion of 5–20% cobalt, 5–10% nickel, 5–7% lithium, 15% organic chemicals and 7% plastics, the composition varying slightly with different manufacturers. When the lithium battery wastes are properly processed, valuable metals such as cobalt and lithium can be recovered. From the viewpoints of environmental preservation and recovery of valuable resources, the recycling of spent lithium ion batteries is highly desirable. The current status of the recycling process has been reviewed in several studies (Bernardes et al., 2003, Bernardes et al., 2004, Espinosa et al., 2004).
Unlike other batteries, lithium ion batteries often blow up during the recycling process due to radical oxidation when lithium metal produced from battery overcharge sustains a mechanical shock from exposure to the air (Contestabile et al., 1999). Therefore, a preliminary separation before recovery of the valuable metals from the waste is necessary. The process also reduces scrap volume, separates battery components and enriches valuable metals. On the other hand, lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2)–an active material used as a cathode–is not dissolved easily with common leaching chemicals. Zhang et al. (1998) performed a study of leaching the lithium cobalt oxide with various leachants, and of the effect of leaching condition such as leachant concentration, temperature, leaching time and solid-to-liquid ratio, in hydrometallurgical recoveries of lithium and cobalt. In that study, hydrochloric acid gave the best performance among the three leachants examined, and it has been utilized in other leaching processes for lithium and cobalt (Contestabile et al., 2001). Nitric acid has also been employed instead of hydrochloric acid in other lithium leaching processes (Catillo et al., 2002). A commercial process was introduced and developed by AEA Technology Batteries, though the leachant in which metal lithium and Co(II) ion were electrochemically generated was not specified (Lain, 2001). A new procedure for nitric acid leaching of lithium and cobalt from lithium ion batteries was proposed by Lee and Rhee (2003), and the procedure was extended to regenerate lithium cobalt oxide electrode from the leachate and to examine the performance of the electrode (Lee and Rhee, 2002). Recently, a procedure for the direct regeneration of lithium cobalt oxide electrode from waste lithium ion batteries has been published by Kim et al. (2004).
In this study, a sulfuric acid leaching process for the recovery of lithium and cobalt from lithium ion battery wastes was proposed and its performance was evaluated. The effects of leaching agent, particle size and incineration on acid leaching were investigated to find the optimum condition for metal recovery. The procedure includes a thoroughgoing process of mechanical separation of lithium cobalt oxide particles, which can be applicable in commercial recycling of lithium ion battery waste. Though the hydrometallurgical process of battery recycling has been well developed, preprocessing by mechanical separation has not been so deeply studied as to facilitate the scale-up of the laboratory process for commercialization.
Section snippets
Chemicals
In this experiment two reagent grade chemicals were used. Sulfuric acid (Junsei Chemical Co., Japan, Code No. 83010-1230) was utilized for leaching, and hydrogen peroxide (Junsei Chemical Co., Japan, Code No. 23150-0350) was employed as a leaching agent.
Experimental procedure
A series of mechanical processes were carried out to yield enriched particles of lithium cobalt oxide. The procedure involves crushing, sieving, magnetic separation, fine crushing and classification in sequence. Because the majority of valuable
Separation of lithium cobalt oxide powder
Lithium ion battery wastes were crushed with a crusher fitted with a set of rotational and fixed blades. A primary crushing was performed with a sieve of 20 mm hole size installed at the inner side of the crusher, and fine crushing was done with a sieve of 10 mm hole size. Materials from the primary crushing were separated with three different sizes of sieve, 106 μm, 200 μm and 850 μm, in order to classify three different groups of particle size, and then to examine the effect of particle size
Conclusion
A novel process for the recovery of metal from spent lithium ion batteries was proposed for possible application to a commercial scale plant. The process includes mechanical separation of lithium cobalt oxide particles and a hydrometallurgical procedure for lithium and cobalt recovery. The performance of the proposed process was examined by an evaluation of leaching efficiency. The effects of leaching agent concentration, particle size and incineration were examined to find an optimum condition
Acknowledgment
Financial support from the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy of Korea through the CANSMC is gratefully acknowledged.
References (12)
- et al.
Recycling of batteries: a review of current processes and technologies
J. Power Sources
(2004) - et al.
A laboratory-scale lithium battery recycling process
J. Power Sources
(1999) - et al.
A laboratory-scale lithium-ion battery recycling process
J. Power Sources
(2001) - et al.
An overview on the current processes for the recycling of batteries
J. Power Sources
(2004) - et al.
Simultaneous separation and renovation of lithium cobalt oxide from the cathode of spent lithium-ion rechargeable batteries
J. Power Sources
(2004) Recycling of lithium ion cells and batteries
J. Power Sources
(2001)
Cited by (430)
Utilization of lithium sulphate electrodialysis for closed-loop LIB recycling: Experimental study and process simulation
2024, Separation and Purification TechnologyThe recovery and separation of lithium by using solvent extraction methods
2024, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsBubbles to batteries: A review of froth flotation for sustainably recycling spent lithium-ion batteries
2024, Journal of Energy StorageA review on the recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries
2024, Journal of Environmental ManagementProgress, challenges, and prospects of spent lithium-ion batteries recycling: A review
2024, Journal of Energy ChemistryA toolbox for improved recycling of critical metals and materials in low-carbon technologies
2024, RSC Sustainability