The effect of experience and absorptive capacity on foreign market knowledge☆
Introduction
The international expansion of a firm is a complicated task because the differences in markets are not very transparent. For instance, Canadian retailers expanded into the US because they considered the markets very similar, and had to face losses, re-organise operations, or even retreat because they underestimated the differences (O’Grady & Lane, 1996). This illustrates the implications of a lack of market knowledge in doing an international assignment.
Researchers have also placed great importance on lack of market knowledge, and incorporate it as an important element in studies and more theoretical models (Barkema, Bell and Pennings, 1996, Inkpen and Beamish, 1997, Johanson and Vahlne, 1977, Li, 1995). Lack of market knowledge is linked to modes of establishment so that those incorporating more resource commitments also acquire deeper local market knowledge (Inkpen & Beamish, 1997). It has also been shown that lack of market knowledge implies lower performance (Li, 1995) and difficulties in overcoming obstacles associated with cultural distance (Barkema et al.). According to the internationalisation process model, the lack of foreign market knowledge is reduced as a firm increases its market commitment (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977).
A firm’s lack of knowledge relates to a wide variety of issues handled in international business exchange, such as the transferability of knowledge (Kogut & Zander, 1993), institutional conditions (North, 1990), and organisational structure of the firms engaged in exchange (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989). International business exchange has been found to take place within the frame of international business relationships (Blankenburg Holm, Eriksson, & Johanson, 1996). Consequently, one approach to capture the firm’s lack of knowledge is to study its lack of knowledge about international business relationships. Such relationships have been found to be interdependent with other relationships in networks (Blankenburg Holm, Eriksson and Johanson, 1996, Chen and Chen, 1998, Coviello and Munro, 1997). Lack of foreign market knowledge can therefore be considered as lack of knowledge on networks of business relationships that are connected to each other (Johanson & Vahlne, 1990). This study builds on these findings and studies foreign market knowledge as the knowledge of a network of connected business relationships. Through their networks, firms obtain general knowledge such as marketing, technological, cultural and competitive information that enhances the success rate of a firm (Mohrman & Von Glinow, 1990). Knowledge of specific relationships in a network is different from generalised market information. General market information is gathered through market research and country reports, which is objective knowledge that can be easily transferred. Knowledge of specific relationships in a network is, however, learned by doing and is tacit and hard to transfer. This can be illustrated by the fact that conducting international business relies on experiential learning, which emerges from accumulated experiences of specific relationships (Barkema and Vermeulen, 1998, Delios and Beamish, 1999).
Lane and Lubatkin (1998) have found that internationalisation is a cumulative process, where prior experiences form the base for an ongoing business. The term ‘absorptive capacity’ can be used to explain a firm’s ability to turn experiences into useful knowledge in an ongoing business (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990). Cohen and Levinthal (1990: p. 1) define absorptive capacity as: ‘the ability of a firm to recognise the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends’. The firm’s ability to evaluate this external information is determined by its prior related knowledge. A firm’s learning is seen as the ability of a firm to use its prior related knowledge and diverse background to identify the value of new information and to develop this into something creative.
It can therefore be expected that market knowledge developed in the past affects how a lack of foreign market knowledge is perceived as an obstacle to carrying out the ongoing foreign business activities. A firm’s prior related knowledge can be increased when it operates in diverse foreign markets, as it is exposed to different ideas and experiences (Abrahamson and Fombrun, 1994, Barkema and Vermeulen, 1998, Eriksson, Johanson, Majkgård and Sharma, 2000, Miller and Chen, 1994, Miller and Chen, 1996). This absorptive capacity refers to procedural knowledge that can be transferred from one market to another in the firm’s international expansion (Peteraf, 1993, Teece, 1982). A firm’s prior related knowledge can also be developed within the context of one specific market, where the firm acquires depth of knowledge on how to integrate the needs and resources of the network into the firm’s ongoing business. The increased absorptive capacity can thus be influenced by both experiences from diverse markets, on how to internationalise, and the extensive knowledge of a specific market’s unique features (Eriksson, Johanson, Majkgård and Sharma, 1997, Eriksson, Johanson, Majkgård and Sharma, 2000). Even though there has been conceptual development on learning through collaboration in foreign markets (Johanson and Vahlne, 1977, Johanson and Vahlne, 1990, Madhok, 1997), to our knowledge there has been no empirical studies on how a firm uses its previous experiences when conducting ongoing business in a foreign market. The purpose of this paper is therefore to develop and empirically test a model of how depth and diversity of experience affect absorptive capacity. This includes a detailed study of how absorptive capacity affects the manner in which a lack of foreign market knowledge is perceived as an obstacle to carrying out the ongoing business. The term ‘ongoing business’ is used for an activity that is well underway and the firm has already started doing business with its counterparts. Examples of this ongoing business are as follows:
- •
A contract with a new distributor or agent in a new country.
- •
A considerable expansion of business with an existing customer.
- •
Doing business with one or more new customers within an existing market.
- •
Entering new country markets with your existing customers.
- •
Doing business with new customers within a new market.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: first, it reviews the literature to develop hypotheses and a conceptual model. This section is as follows: lack of foreign market knowledge, the effect of absorptive capacity on lack of foreign market knowledge, and the effect of depth and diversity of experience on absorptive capacity. Second, it describes the empirical investigation and the results. Third, the conclusions drawn from this study. Fourth, the managerial implications of this study. The paper ends with recommendations for future research.
Section snippets
Lack of foreign market knowledge
Foreign market knowledge is often acquired by firms through collaboration with others who have this knowledge (Bell, 1995, Chetty and Blankenburg Holm, 2000). By collaborating with other firms, they gain access to various sources of information thus offering more opportunities to learn rather than relying on knowledge from within the firm (Grabher, 1993). The new information that the firm is exposed to in these relationships enable it to improve its understanding of its business partners in
Data and method
Our operationalisation of the effect of experience and absorptive capacity on the ongoing business is developed from the perspective that the prior related knowledge facilitates learning from new experiences (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990). The questionnaire used in this study has three sections. The first section asks respondents about the lack of knowledge of certain factors as an obstacle in a selected ongoing foreign business assignment. This operationalisation hinges on the fact that a firm only
Results
The hypothesised structural relation in Fig. 1 presented lack of foreign market knowledge as the outcome of absorptive capacity, and absorptive capacity as a mediating variable, since its antecedents are the depth and diversity of the firm’s international experience. However, construct analysis revealed that the absorptive capacity construct was not valid. Instead, it had to be partitioned into two constructs, dyadic and customer network absorptive capacity. As a result, absorptive capacities
Conclusion
The findings indicate that a firm’s perceived lack of foreign market knowledge involves not only the business between a domestic supplier and a foreign customer, but also their respective networks. In an ongoing business, the network is perceived to be inseparable from the partners that do business with each other. This suggests that the cognitive map of decision-makers is such that an ongoing foreign business should not be seen in isolation, but studied in its network context. This paper
Managerial implications
The results are consistent with the findings of O’Grady and Lane (1996) that the lack of foreign market knowledge can create obstacles in doing an international assignment. As O’Grady and Lane show, a firm might believe it has knowledge on a specific market but will soon realise it lacks this knowledge. The reason is that market knowledge often occurs through trial and error and cannot always be learnt in advance.
Indeed, one way of overcoming the lack of foreign market knowledge is through
Recommendations for future research
The dyadic relationship versus network issue could be studied in more detail in future studies. While our results show that the experiences of dyadic relationships and networks are used differently in an ongoing business, there are some questions. First, our measurements concern relationships with a foreign customer and customer networks. To shed further light on our findings, networks can be measured by including the supplier’s as well as the customer’s networks. Furthermore, the international
References (73)
- et al.
Managing network connections
Scandinavian International Business Review
(1992) - et al.
The character of bridgehead relationships
The International Business Review
(2000) - et al.
Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: a network approach
International Business Review
(2000) - et al.
Mutual commitment and experiential knowledge in mature international business relationships
International Business Review
(2002) - et al.
Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms
International Business Review
(1997) - et al.
Stability and change in network relationships
International Journal of Research in Marketing
(1987) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm
Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation
(1982)- et al.
Macrocultures: determinants and consequences
Academy of Management Review
(1994) - et al.
The environment of marketing channel dyads: a framework for comparative analysis
Journal of Marketing
(1983) - et al.
Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach
Psychological Bulletin
(1988)
Dyadic business relationships within a business network context
Journal of Marketing
A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships
Journal of Marketing
Foreign market entry—the textbook vs. the network view
Foreign entry cultural barriers and learning
Strategic Management Journal
International expansion through start-up or acquisition: a learning perspective
Academy of Management Journal
Managing across borders: The transnational solution
The coming of post industrial society
The internationalisation of small computer software firms—a further challenge to “stage” theories
European Journal of Marketing
Business networks and cooperation in international business relationships
Journal of International Business Studies
Value creation through mutual commitment to business network relationships
Strategic Management Journal
The usefulness of network relationship experience
Structural equations with latent variables
Testing structural equation models
Alternative ways of assessing model fit
Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment
Journal of International Business Studies
Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D
Economic Journal
Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation
Administration Science Quarterly
Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks
American Sociological Review
Ownership strategy of Japanese firms, transactional, institutional and experience influences
Strategic Management Journal
Creating and maintaining a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case
Strategic Management Journal
Social exchange theory
Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalisation process
Journal of International Business Studies
Effect of variation on knowledge accumulation in the internationalisation process
International Studies in Management and Organisation
The experience factor in foreign market entry behavior of service firms
Journal of International Business Studies
Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations
Cited by (125)
How do the source and context of experiential knowledge affect firms’ degree of internationalization?
2022, Journal of Business ResearchUnveiling the black box of IJV innovativeness: The role of explicit and tacit knowledge transfer
2022, Journal of International ManagementCo-location with marketing value activities as manufacturing upgrading in a COVID-19 outbreak era
2022, Journal of Business ResearchThe Effect of Outward and Inward Internationalisation on Different Types of Innovation: Evidence from UK SMEs
2022, Journal of International ManagementCitation Excerpt :Lastly, we find that outward-inward internationalisation operation has a stronger effect on introducing product innovation and a combination of product and process innovation in the sample of all SMEs and in the different-sized sub-sample estimates. We argue that our results are consistent with the literature on organisational learning in its emphasis on the role of knowledge acquisitions for the development of absorptive capacity (e.g., Cohen and Levinthal, 1990; Zahra and George, 2002; Eriksson and Chetty, 2003). It is suggested that firms that look beyond their national borders have the ability to acquire internationalisation and market knowledge (Eriksson et al., 1997).
- ☆
Both authors have contributed equally to this paper