Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mobile devices offer a variety of ways to learn, communicate and collaborate.

  • Frustrations arise when there is a lack of institutional support or training.

  • Students "blur the lines" between social networking tools and mobile devices.

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to explore teaching and learning when mobile computing devices, such as cellphones and smartphones, were implemented in higher education. This paper presents a portion of the findings on students' perceptions of learning with mobile computing devices and the roles social media played. This qualitative research study focused on students from three universities across the US. The students' teachers had been integrating mobile computing devices, such as cellphones and smartphones, into their courses for at least two semesters. Data were collected through student focus group interviews. Two specific themes emerged from the interview data: (a) advantages of mobile computing devices for student learning and (b) frustrations from learning with mobile computing devices. Mobile computing devices and the use of social media created opportunities for interaction, provided opportunities for collaboration, as well as allowed students to engage in content creation and communication using social media and Web 2.0 tools with the assistance of constant connectivity.

Introduction

The Educause Center for Applied Research [ECAR] (2012) survey on Mobile IT in higher education states that students are driving the adoption of mobile computing devices, such as cellphones, smartphones, and tablet computers, in higher education, and 67% of surveyed students believe mobile devices are important to their academic success and use their devices for academic activities. The increased ubiquity of mobile computing devices on college campuses has the potential to create new options for higher education students and the exploration of mobility and social media as an instructional strategy.

Mobile computing devices can provide educational opportunities for students to access course content, as well as interact with instructors and student colleagues wherever they are located (Cavus and Ibrahim, 2008, Cavus and Ibrahim, 2009, Kukulska-Hulme and Shield, 2008, Nihalani and Mayrath, 2010, Richardson and Lenarcic, 2008, Shih and Mills, 2007). These facile interactions are made even more accessible by using mobile devices in conjunction with social media, free web tools that allow for communication and enhance learning (Rodriguez, 2011).

Because mobile computing devices and social media are still rather new and evolving, research has tended to focus on evaluating the effectiveness of implementing mobile computing devices (Wu et al., 2012). Some of the most rigorous research used survey methods in order to depict students' intentions (cf., Cheon et al., 2012, Liu et al., 2010b). However, there is little applied research into how these tools are actually being used to support teaching and learning with few descriptions of how mobile computing devices and social media are used by university students.

The purpose of this research was to explore how higher education teaching and learning were affected by the integration of mobile computing devices. As mobile devices continue to grow as part of the higher education landscape, mobile computing devices present both opportunities and challenges to higher education institutions (Kim et al., 2006, Looi et al., 2010). The goal of our broader research was to present in-depth perspectives of instructors and students about their experiences of implementing mobile computing devices. However, this present paper will focus only on students' experiences and perceptions mobile computing devices brought to learning and the roles social media played. The primary research question for this study was, “What are students' experiences when mobile computing devices are integrated into higher education courses?”

Section snippets

Foundations of mobile learning

Technically still in its infancy in higher education, learning with mobile computing devices has been described and defined in a variety of ways. Mottiwalla (2007) stated that mobile learning “combines individualized learning with anytime and anywhere learning” (p. 2). Additional researchers have defined mobile learning as learning facilitated by mobile devices (Herrington and Herrington, 2007, Mobile Learning Network (MoLeNET), 2009; Mobile Learning Network (MoLeNET), 2007, Valk et al., 2010).

Social media

Higher education students and faculty members typically use the term social media interchangeably with Web 2.0. Web 2.0 is typically defined by the characteristics, or technical design patterns, set forth by O'Reilly (2005). Social media, a term coined in 2005 after the term Web 2.0, is defined more specifically as “a group of Internet based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, and that allow the creation and exchange of user generated content” (

Applications of mobile learning & social media

In this section, we describe applications of mobile computing devices and social media around three broad themes that reoccur in published studies and cases. These characteristics include (a) engaging learners with constant connectivity, (b) fostering collaborative learning and (c) enabling authentic learning on the move.

Methodology

The goal of the research was to present students' in-depth perspectives of experiences with implementing mobile computing devices. Therefore, Merriam's (1998) characterization and process of a general qualitative study were used, where transcripts were read several times to identify themes and categories. The qualitative approach allowed for the representation of reality through the eyes of the individuals interviewed in order to share their stories and hear their voices.

Findings and interpretations

Two specific themes emerged from the student focus group interviews depicting the impacts mobile computing devices had on student learning and social media's roles. These themes include: (a) advantages of mobile devices for student learning and (b) frustrations from learning with mobile computing devices. Quotations used within each theme indicate verbatim remarks by the participants, and pseudonyms are used to denote the participants and institutions.

Discussion & implications

Much of the current literature on mobile computing devices focuses on using the device to disseminate information or focuses on accessing university resources. Admittedly, these practices emphasize the transmission model of teaching and learning. In addition, some initial studies have stressed components of direct instruction, such as student practice with content (cf., Cavus and Ibrahim, 2008, Cavus and Ibrahim, 2009). The current findings, however, provide examples of using mobile computing

Conclusion

Mobile computing devices and the use of social media allow student interaction with content. Furthermore, potential learning occurs regardless of location. Educational literature focuses on a variety of places where learning happens including collaboratively in the work place and situated in a specific environment. Learning occurs wherever a learner is and is not tied to a space inside a brick and mortar building or even confined to a space inside an online course management system. Learning

References (84)

  • L. Archambault et al.

    Professional development 2.0: Transforming teacher education pedagogy with 21st century tools

    Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education

    (2010)
  • S. Billett

    Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work

    Studies in the Education of Adults

    (2002)
  • R.C. Bogdan et al.

    Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods

    (2003)
  • T. Brown

    Towards a model for m-learning in Africa

    International Journal on E-Learning

    (2005)
  • N. Cavus et al.

    The opinions of information technology students on using mobile learning

  • N. Cavus et al.

    A mobile tool for learning English words

  • N. Cavus et al.

    M-learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words

    British Journal of Educational Technology

    (2009)
  • J. Choi et al.

    Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design

    Educational Technology Research and Development

    (1995)
  • R.S. Cobcroft et al.

    Mobile learning in review: Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers and institutions

  • T. Cochrane et al.

    Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0

    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

    (2010)
  • H. Colley et al.

    Informality and formality in learning: A report for the learning and skills research centre

    (2003)
  • J. Cook et al.

    Bridging the gap: Mobile phones at the interface between informal and formal learning

    Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology

    (2008)
  • J.W. Cresswell

    Qualitative inquiry & research design

    (2007)
  • Educause Center for Applied Research [ECAR]

    Study of undergraduate students and information technology research study, 6. Boulder, CO: Educause center for applied research

  • Educause Center for Applied Research [ECAR]

    ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology

    (2012)
  • Educause Mobile Computing 5-Day Sprint

    Day 2 recap — Teaching and learning

  • K. Eisele-Dyrli

    Mobile goes mainstream: A more broadly accepted concept than ever, the arrival of ubiquitous mobile learning in K12 is well under way

  • W.H. Geoghegan

    Whatever happened to instructional technology

  • B. Glaser et al.

    The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research

    (1967)
  • C. Greenhow

    Youth, learning, and social media

    Journal of Educational Computing Research

    (2011)
  • S. Halliday-Wynes et al.

    Informal learning at a glance

    (2009)
  • M. Hanley

    Smart phones displace computers for more college students

  • B.P. Heath et al.

    Project Numina: Enhancing student learning with handheld computers

    IEEE Computer Society

    (2005)
  • P. Hernández-Ramos

    Web logs and online discussions as tools to promote reflective practice

    The Journal of Interactive Online Learning

    (2004)
  • A. Herrington et al.

    Authentic mobile learning in higher education

  • E. Hoffman

    Social media and learning environments

    Shifting perspectives on the locus of control. in education

    (2009)
  • S. Hrastinski

    A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes

    EDUCAUSE Quarterly

    (2008)
  • K. Jubas

    Everyday scholars: Framing informal learning in terms of academic disciplines and skills

    Adult Education Quarterly

    (2010)
  • C.J. Kainz

    Mobile agility and the anytime, anywhere impact on IT

  • D. Keegan

    The incorporation of mobile learning into mainstream education and training

  • J. Keller

    The slow-motion mobile campus

  • S.H. Kim et al.

    An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education

    Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal

    (2006)
  • Cited by (822)

    • Why do students disengage from online courses?

      2024, Internet and Higher Education
    • Navigating virtual worlds and the metaverse for enhanced e-learning

      2024, Navigating Virtual Worlds and the Metaverse for Enhanced E-Learning
    • Rapid learning in the teaching of physical education and sport

      2024, Navigating Virtual Worlds and the Metaverse for Enhanced E-Learning
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: + 1 901 678 4918.

    View full text