Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Significant indicators from the LMS data on course achievement were identified.

  • Measures of self-regulated learning were significant to course achievement.

  • An elaborated time-based measure was useful to capture self-regulated learning.

  • The potential use of early prediction by employing LMS data was revealed.

Abstract

This study sought to identify significant behavioral indicators of learning using learning management system (LMS) data regarding online course achievement. Because self-regulated learning is critical to success in online learning, measures reflecting self-regulated learning were included to examine the relationship between LMS data measures and course achievement. Data were collected from 530 college students who took an online course. The results demonstrated that students' regular study, late submissions of assignments, number of sessions (the frequency of course logins), and proof of reading the course information packets significantly predicted their course achievement. These findings verify the importance of self-regulated learning and reveal the advantages of using measures related to meaningful learning behaviors rather than simple frequency measures. Furthermore, the measures collected in the middle of the course significantly predicted course achievement, and the findings support the potential for early prediction using learning performance data. Several implications of these findings are discussed.

Introduction

Online learning has become a conventional mode of learning in higher education. Not only has the number of online educational institutions increased, but an increasing number of traditional universities are offering online courses to meet students' needs. Furthermore, massive open online courses (MOOCs) are now being offered to the public. Thus, online learning has attracted many students and provides additional learning opportunities.

Several researchers have studied the factors that are important to improving online learning and have found self-regulation to be a crucial factor in this regard (Rakes and Dunn, 2010, Sun et al., 2008, You and Kang, 2014, Yukselturk and Bulut, 2007). Online learners are responsible for initiating, planning, and conducting their studies, but many online learners have expressed how difficult it is to maintain their motivation and persistence throughout a course (Elvers et al., 2003, Levy and Ramin, 2012, Michinov et al., 2011). Previous research has shown that failure to study regularly leads to poor academic achievement, and procrastination and withdrawals have proven to be persistent problems in online learning. Therefore, the ways in which strategic support and the self-regulation of online learners influence learning should be investigated to keep students motivated, regulated, and participating in their courses.

In many studies of self-regulated learning, a self-report questionnaire is generally used to measure the level of self-regulation (Hadwin, Nesbit, Jamieson-Noel, Code, & Winne, 2007), which raises concerns regarding whether self-reported data properly represent actual self-regulated learning behaviors in authentic learning contexts. However, self-regulated learning in an online learning environment can be traced because students' learning behaviors are automatically recorded by learning management systems (LMSs). At present, LMS use has become common in most institutions, and LMSs provide new opportunities to monitor students' learning participation and progress (You, 2015). Furthermore, analyzing LMS data allows instructors to discover meaningful patterns (Gašević, Dawson, & Siemens, 2015), to identify at-risk students, to provide proactive feedback, and to adjust instructional strategies (Dietz-Uhler & Hurn, 2013). This approach is called learning analytics, and it enables data-driven decision making while improving institutional productivity. Several researchers have predicted that educational data mining will be extensively employed to optimize institutional decision making, to resolve academic problems, and to enhance students' performances in higher education within a few years (Johnson et al., 2014, Reyes, 2015).

Although the field of learning analytics is still in its infancy, prior research regarding online learning has attempted to use log or LMS data to examine online learning success. According to studies that have utilized students' log data, frequency measures, such as the number of content views, the frequency of logins, and the time spent reading pages, are the most typical measures used to explain individual differences in online learning (Morris et al., 2005, Qu and Johnson, 2005). Numerous studies (Campbell et al., 2006, Johnson, 2005, Morris et al., 2005, Wang and Newlin, 2002) have reported a significant relationship between active participation in online courses and academic performance.

However, several studies (Hadwin et al., 2007, Misanchuk and Schwier, 1992) have claimed that frequency counts of events are minimally relevant to engaged learning and that such measures are limited to suggesting instructional interventions and providing practical learning guidance. From this perspective, researchers need to use LMS data to identify more meaningful measures that are congruent with learning and instructional theories. Hadwin et al. (2007) suggested that the use of elaborated time-based indicators from students' log data, rather than the simple time spent on a specific issue, enables descriptions of students' self-regulated learning. However, notably few attempts have been made to identify appropriate measures of self-regulated learning and to examine the effects on course success.

In this context, the present study aims to identify significant LMS data indicators, including self-regulated learning indicators, to predict course achievement. Additionally, this study examines whether the data collected in the middle of the course can successfully predict final course achievement, which would contribute to the possibility of early prediction based on the learning analytics approach.

Section snippets

Self-regulated online learning

Self-regulation is defined as setting one's goals and managing one's own learning and performance (Driscoll, 2000), and self-regulated students are described as “metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally active participants in their own learning process” (Zimmerman & Martinez-Pons, 1988, p. 284). Many self-regulated learning studies in traditional learning contexts have generally indicated that learners who frequently use self-regulated learning strategies exhibit better academic

Participants and context

The data used in the current study were collected at a mid-sized, four-year university near Seoul, South Korea. Although the university is a campus-based university, it provides several e-learning courses every semester. Among the e-learning courses available, one elective course that was open to a large number of students was chosen: “Introduction to Color”. The course did not require any prerequisite, and 575 undergraduate students were registered. Twenty-five students who officially withdrew

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

The descriptive statistics for the study variables are presented in Table 2. The high mean of the regular study variable indicated that the participants visited and studied on a regular basis, but their total viewing times varied widely. However, the small number of messages created indicated that only a few students posted or emailed their questions. The class was very large, and it was designed more for individual learning than for collaborative learning. The results of the correlation

Discussion and conclusions

The present study was conducted to investigate the significant behavioral indicators of learning in LMS data and their effects on course achievement. Because self-regulated learning is essential to online learning, measures that reflect the degree of self-regulation were specifically used. Regular study, total viewing time, sessions, late submissions, proof of reading the course information packets, and messages created were chosen as predictors. The results revealed that regular study was the

Limitations and future research

Although the present study demonstrates the benefits of identifying significant measures from LMS data to facilitate successful online learning, several limitations should be noted. First, the online course in this study was a very large class that was designed for individual learning. Although the messages created did not significantly affect course achievement in the present study, these results could be different if the discussions were a central part of the instruction. Future studies

References (56)

  • A.R. Artino

    Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation: Practical guidelines for online instructors

    TechTrends

    (2008)
  • C.J. Asarta et al.

    Access patterns of online materials in a blended course

    Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

    (2013)
  • D. Baugher et al.

    Student hits in an internet-supported course: How can instructors use them and what do they mean?

    Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

    (2003)
  • J.E. Beck

    Using response times to model student disengagement

  • Campbell, J. P. (2007). Utilizing student data within the course management systems to determine undergraduate student...
  • J.P. Campbell et al.

    Academic analytics: Using the CMS as an early warning system

  • J.P. Campbell et al.

    Academic analytics: A new tool for a new era

    Educause Review

    (2007)
  • S. Chong

    Models of asynchronous computer conferencing for collaborative learning in large college classes

  • D. Clow

    An overview of learning analytics

    Teaching in Higher Education

    (2013)
  • N. Dabbagh et al.

    Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments

    International Journal on E-Learning

    (2004)
  • S. Dawson et al.

    Current state and future trends: a citation network analysis of the learning analytics field

  • B. Dietz-Uhler et al.

    Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: A faculty perspective

    Journal of Interactive Online Learning

    (2013)
  • M.P. Driscoll

    Psychology of learning for instruction

    (2000)
  • G.C. Elvers et al.

    Procrastination in online courses: Performance and attitudinal differences

    Teaching of Psychology

    (2003)
  • R. Ferguson

    Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges

    The International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning

    (2012)
  • D. Gašević et al.

    Let's not forget: Learning analytics are about learning

    TechTrends

    (2015)
  • P.J. Goldstein et al.

    Academic analytics: The uses of management information and technology in higher education

    (2005)
  • A.F. Hadwin et al.

    Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning

    Metacognition Learning

    (2007)
  • Cited by (275)

    • MulOER-SAN: 2-layer multi-objective framework for exercise recommendation with self-attention networks

      2023, Knowledge-Based Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      This section introduces a review of the existing literatures that focuses on how to develop the exercise recommendation procedure and diversity optimization algorithms. Recently, some researchers have explored many methods to construct exercise recommendation models with different platforms (e.g., MOOC and Coursera [21,22]) and goals (e.g., performance prediction, learning experience, dropout rate, and participation [23–26]). In general, the existing exercise recommendation methods can be divided into three types as follows.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text