Influence of inclusion size on fatigue behavior of high strength steels in the gigacycle fatigue regime
Introduction
For low and medium strength steels, specimens do not fail after testing to 107cycles, so the fatigue S–N curve is assumed to be a horizontal asymptote according to the conventional fatigue testing for steels. However, recent investigations have indicated that fatigue failure does occur in the regime of N > 107 cycles when the applied stress amplitude is lower than conventional fatigue strength in high strength steels [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Stickler et al. [8] and Weiss et al. [9] have made the numerous investigation of the fatigue behavior of PM steel and founded that crack initiation occurred mainly at singularities such as single larger, isolated pores or also at pore clusters. For low alloy high strength steels, the fatigue crack generally initiates from a larger non-metallic inclusions and the fracture surface displays a fish-eye pattern [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The stress localization at the interface between the inclusion and matrix is the origin of fatigue cracking. This arises from the differential thermal contraction coefficients of inclusions and matrix during cooling and the concentration of applied stresses due to the different elastic constants between the matrix and the inclusions. As a result of stress concentration due to the factors mentioned above, cracks can initiate easily at the interface between inclusions and matrix [10]. In clean steels the size and number of non-metallic inclusions decrease greatly and mechanical properties can be improved substantially. Kiedssling [11] supposed that crack would not initiate from inclusions when the size of non-metallic inclusion is less than 5 μm in clean steels from the point of view of fracture toughness. Similarly under fatigue conditions, there must be a critical inclusion size, below which the fatigue fracture origins will not initiate from the inclusions. In this paper, a commercial and three clean steels of same strength class containing different inclusion sizes were prepared and the fatigue properties were investigated using an ultrasonic fatigue testing machine in the gigacycle fatigue regime. The effects of inclusion sizes over or below the critical value on fatigue behaviors were discussed.
Section snippets
Materials and experiments
Chemical compositions of four steels are shown in Table 1. The contents of harmful elements of S and P in clean steels (clean 50CrV4, clean 54SiCrV6 and clean 54SiCr6) are much less than that in commercial 50CrV4 steel. The heat-treatment procedure was austenized at 1123 K for 30 min followed by oil quenching and subsequently tempered at 713 K for 1 h for four steels. The microstructure of the four steels is the tempered martensite.
Standard tensile specimens were prepared after the heat-treatment
S–N curves
The S–N curves of four steels in the gigacycle regime are shown in Fig. 2. The open circle represents that the crack initiation site is at the surface matrix of the specimen and the solid circle with an arrow and a number indicates how many specimens pass the fatigue test at 109 cycles without failure. The meaning of other symbols can be seen in the figures. It is shown that at higher stress amplitudes, fatigue fracture origins of three clean steels all initiated from the surface matrix of
Discussions
Generally speaking, for high strength steels, inclusion competes with surface matrix to be the fatigue crack initiation site, the smaller the inclusion size is, the lower the probability of the crack initiation from the inclusion. The fatigue crack will initiate from surface matrix, for example, from the persistent slip bands or grain boundaries at the root of machining trace. Many results indicated that fatigue crack will not originate from the inclusions when inclusion size below the critical
Conclusions
From the fatigue testing results of high strength steels above, some conclusions may be drawn:
- 1.
For clean 50CrV4 steel, the fatigue strength is substantially improved compared with its commercial counterpart due to the average inclusion size decreasing.
- 2.
For clean 54SiCrV6 and clean 50CrV4 steels, in which the inclusion size is smaller than the critical size, the fatigue failure originates from the inclusion clusters.
- 3.
For clean 54SiCr6 steel, in which the inclusion size is smaller than 1 μm, the
Acknowledgement
This work is financially supported by the Project ’Fundamental research of new generation of steels in China. (No. 2004CB619100).
References (21)
- et al.
The fatigue behaviors of zero-inclusion and commercial 42CrMo steels in the super-long fatigue life regime
Acta Mater
(2004) - et al.
Estimation of maximum inclusion size and fatigue strength in high strength the ADF1 steel
Mater Sci Eng A
(2005) - et al.
Characterization of inclusions in clean steels: a review including the statistics of extremes methods
Prog Mater Sci
(2003) Estimating inclusion distributions of hard metal using fatigue tests
Int J Fatigue
(2003)- et al.
The effect of inclusions on the fatigue behavior of fine-grained high strength 42CrMoVNb steel
Int J Fatigue
(2004) - et al.
Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength
Int J Fatigue
(1994) - et al.
Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. I: basic fatigue mechanism and fatigue fracture stress and the size and location of non-metallic inclusions
Int J Fatigue
(1989) - et al.
Estimation of the critical size of inclusion in high strength steel under high cycle fatigue condition
Mater Sci Eng A
(2006) - et al.
How and why the fatigue S–N curve does not approach a horizontal asymptote
Int J Fatigue
(2001) - et al.
Super-long life tension-compression fatigue properties of quenched and tempered 0.46% carbon steel
Int J Fatigue
(1998)
Cited by (159)
Influence of surface condition, cycling frequency and ferritic zones on the high and very high cycle fatigue properties of a pearlitic steel
2024, Materials Science and Engineering: AEffect of primary carbides on rolling contact fatigue behaviors of M50 bearing steel
2024, International Journal of FatigueEffect of microstructure on small fatigue crack initiation and early propagation behavior in super austenitic stainless steel 654SMO
2024, International Journal of FatigueRoles of microstructures in high-cycle fatigue behaviors of 42CrMo high-strength steel under near-yield mean stress
2023, International Journal of FatigueEffect of hydrogen on very high cycle fatigue properties of 17-4 PH martensite stainless steel
2023, International Journal of Fatigue