Nowcasting Turkish GDP and news decomposition
Introduction
Policy makers and market participants need to infer the current state of the economy in order to inform their policy decisions and investment strategies. One of the main indicators that they look at is the real gross domestic product (GDP), which shows the overall health of the economy. However, it is usually released with a delay relative to the reference quarter. In particular, for the Turkish economy, GDP is released between 10 and 13 weeks after the end of the reference quarter. This very long delay in the release of the Turkish GDP relative to developed economies is because no early or advance estimates are produced. For example, early estimates of the US and euro-area GDPs are released four and six weeks after the end of the reference quarter, respectively. Therefore, the usual practice in Turkey is to infer the current state of the economy by analyzing data that are released in a more timely manner than GDP, at a higher frequency. For example, two real variables, the industrial production index and the unemployment rate, are released six and 10 weeks after the end of the reference month, respectively, making them more timely than GDP. Moreover, surveys such as the capacity utilization rate, the consumer confidence index, and the real sector confidence index are released a few days before the end of the reference month, while financial data such as the real effective exchange rate are released a few days after the reference month. Inferring the state of the economy by interpreting numerous variables that are characterized by differences in definitions, frequencies, and lags is a difficult task. However, we can overcome this challenge using an econometric framework that translates all sorts of data into a nowcast of GDP, summarizing scattered information into a unique index of the overall health of the Turkish economy.
Following the seminal paper of Giannone, Reichlin, and Small (2008), this study nowcasts GDP using a dynamic factor model (DFM). DFMs are natural tools for nowcasting variables such as the GDP because they allow us to exploit the more timely variables in order to predict those released with longer delays, by capturing the co-movement among a potentially large set of variables. Indeed, these models have been applied successfully to the nowcasting of GDP for various different countries: Belgium by de Antonio Liedo (2014), Brazil by Bragoli, Metelli, and Modugno (2015), China by Giannone, Agrippino, and Modugno (2013) and Yiu and Chow (2010), the Czech Republic by Arnostova, Havrlant, Rùžièka, and Tóth (2011), France by Barhoumi, Darné, and Ferrara (2010), Indonesia by Luciani, Pundit, Ramayandi, and Veronese (2015), Ireland by D’Agostino, McQuinn, and O’Brien (2013), Mexico by Caruso (2015), the Netherlands by de Winter (2011), New Zealand by Matheson (2010), Norway by Aastveit and Trovik (2012), and the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries and Mexico by Dahlhaus, Guénette, and Vasishtha (2015).1 Moreover, the same framework has also been applied to the nowcasting of variables other than real GDP; see D’Agostino, Modugno, and Osbat (2015) for euro area trade variables and Modugno (2013) for US inflation, among others.
One crucial point when using DFMs for nowcasting is the choice of an estimation methodology that suits the needs of the task at hand: dealing with a dataset that is characterized by different frequencies, time spans, and delays. We follow the procedure proposed by Bańbura and Modugno (2014); i.e., a modified version of the expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation.2 This procedure has two important advantages over competing procedures for estimating a DFM. First, the methodology of Bańbura and Modugno (2014) can easily address mixed-frequency datasets with an arbitrary pattern of data availability, exploiting their information content fully for both the parameter estimations and the signal extraction. Second, maximum likelihood estimation is more efficient for small samples. Turkey is a young, newly industrialized economy, so institutions have only recently started collecting economic data. As a result, our dataset is short and contains data that cover different time periods.
We nowcast both seasonally adjusted (SA) quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) GDP growth rates and non-SA (NSA) year-on-year (YoY) GDP growth rates between 2008:Q1 and 2013:Q4 with a medium-scale mixed frequency dataset that includes 15 variables. The dataset is constructed using publicly available time series that are followed by the media, economists, and financial sector practitioners. We perform two out-of-sample exercises. In the first exercise, we nowcast the SA QoQ GDP and NSA YoY GDP. We abstract from data revisions, but require our dataset to replicate the data availability as it was at the time when the forecast would have been generated. This is a “pseudo real-time” exercise, and we show that the GDP nowcasts obtained with our model in this context outperform those obtained with univariate and “partial” models.3 In the second exercise, we nowcast NSA YoY GDP growth rates and compare our predictions with those produced by (1) the International Monetary Fund (IMF), available in the World Economic Outlook Database (WEOD); (2) the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), available in the Economic Outlook (EO), and (3) the Central Bank of Turkey (CBRT), collected in the survey of expectations (SoE). This comparison shows that our DFM outperforms the professional forecasters. In order to have a fair comparison with the nowcasts produced by these institutions, we construct a “partial” real-time dataset to account for the effects of data revisions on the nowcast accuracy. The dataset is a “partial” real-time one because we have vintages for the sample that we analyze for only eight of the variables included in our dataset. The other series are included following the “pseudo” real-time approach.4
Only two studies in the literature have nowcasted Turkish GDP growth rates. Akkoyun and Günay (2012) used a dynamic one-factor model with a small-scale dataset, including three real variables and one survey, to nowcast SA QoQ GDP growth rates between 2008:Q1 and 2012:Q2, and compare their model with an autoregressive (AR) model. They find that their model outperforms the benchmark model. We use a more comprehensive dataset than Akkoyun and Günay (2012), which allows us to understand which variables are informative for nowcasting Turkish GDP. We find that financial variables such as the REER and financial accounts, which are monitored closely by both policy makers and the market practitioners, are as important as surveys such as the CCI, the RSCI, and the CUR for nowcasting SA QoQ GDP growth rates. None of these financial and survey variables are considered by Akkoyun and Günay (2012).5Ermişoğlu, Akçelik, and Oduncu (2013) nowcast QoQ GDP growth rates for the period between 2011:Q1 and 2012:Q4 by forming bridge-type single equations that include the purchasing manufacturing index (PMI) and credit data. To form bridge equations, monthly variables are converted into quarterly variables. Then, a regression or series of regressions that includes the GDP as a dependent variable and other economic indicators as explanatory variables is formed. However, as was noted by Bańbura et al. (2013), “partial” models, such as bridge equations, do not allow one to interpret how new data releases revise the nowcast of the target variable, for two reasons. First, single-equation models do not produce forecasts of the input variables, and therefore, it is not possible to isolate the surprise component, i.e., the difference between the realization of the input variable and what the model predicted. As Bańbura and Modugno (2010) showed, it is only the surprise component, or “news”, that revises the nowcast of the target variable when new information arrives. Second, single-equation models have to be parameterized to account for the varying availability of the input data and the forecasting horizon for the target variable. This parametrization makes it even more difficult to interpret why the new release of an input variable would revise the nowcast of the target variable. The methodology adopted in this paper can address these issues in a comprehensive unifying framework. Our study computes the “news” and finds that, in line with the findings for other economies, real variables play the most important role in nowcasting GDP. However, contrary the findings for other economies, we find that financial variables play a crucial role in nowcasting SA QoQ GDP growth rates, as important as the role played by surveys.
The remainder of this paper is as follows. Section 2 explains the dataset. Section 3 presents the methodology. Section 4 shows nowcast results of SA QoQ and NSA YoY GDP growth rates. Section 5 presents nowcast results of annual GDP growth rates. Section 6 analyzes the effect of news, and Section 7 concludes.
Section snippets
The dataset
We construct a medium-scale dataset for nowcasting Turkish GDP. The literature shows that large-scale DFMs do not necessarily lead to better forecasting performances than smaller DFMs (e.g., Alvarez, Camacho, & Pérez-Quirós, 2012; Boivin & Ng, 2006), and Bańbura and Modugno (2014) found the forecasting accuracies of medium-scale DFMs to be higher than those of large-scale DFMs for euro-area GDP.
Fig. 1 displays the evolution of the annual real GDP growth rates in Turkey between 1990 and 2013.
The methodology
We use a DFM to produce nowcasts of both SA QoQ GDP and NSA YoY GDP growth rates. Adopting a DFM allows us to obtain a parsimonious representation of macroeconomic data, because a small number of dynamic factors is enough to drive most of the co-movement among macroeconomic data series.11 Our DFM has the following representation: where are our monthly
Nowcasting SA QoQ and NSA YoY GDP growth rates
This section uses the final figures as of November 2014 and ignores historical data revisions. However, we replicate the historical data availability when estimating the model, using only the data that were available at that specific time when producing our nowcasts.
Turkish real GDP data are typically released with a two-quarter delay from the beginning of the reference period. We produce our nowcasts once per month, at the time when labor force statistics are released, i.e., around the 15th
Nowcasting NSA YoY GDP
As Table 2 shows, the DFM easily beats the simple forecast models that are chosen as benchmarks. Although the use of more sophisticated forecast models or alternative nowcast models as benchmarks would seem to provide a more appropriate evaluation, an analysis that is more interesting from a policy perspective can be provided by comparing the predictions of DFM with those of institutions and experts. However, it is difficult to find public SA QoQ or NSA YoY GDP forecasts for Turkey.16
The effects of news and model re-estimation
The previous out-of-sample forecasting evaluation updated GDP nowcasts each month based on the new data releases. Because our DFM produces forecasts for all of the variables used in the dataset, instead of only for GDP, only the news or “unexpected” component from the newly released data should be used to revise nowcasts of GDP. In other words, the change between two consecutive nowcasts of GDP can be the result of both news from all variables, i.e., the unpredicted component of the dataset,
Conclusion
This paper nowcasts SA QoQ, NSA YoY, and annual GDP growth rates by using the methodology of Bańbura and Modugno (2014). In addition to handling mixed-frequency datasets with an arbitrary pattern of missing data efficiently, the adopted methodology also offers a comprehensive unifying solution that allows us to compute news. For nowcasting, we adopt a medium-scale dataset consisting of 15 variables and perform sample forecasts recursively between 2008:Q1 and 2013:Q4.
We compare SA QoQ and NSA
Acknowledgments
The opinions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Modugno is an economist at the Federal Reserve Board, in Washington DC.
References (48)
- et al.
Do macro variables, asset markets, or surveys forecast inflation better?
Journal of Monetary Economics
(2007) - et al.
- et al.
A look into the factor model black box: Publication lags and the role of hard and soft data in forecasting GDP
International Journal of Forecasting
(2011) - et al.
Are more data always better for factor analysis?
Journal of Econometrics
(2006) - et al.
Inflation targeting and the exchange rate: Does it matter in Turkey?
Journal of Policy Modeling
(2010) - et al.
Pass-through of oil prices to domestic prices: Evidence from an oil-hungry but oil-poor emerging market
Economic Modelling
(2014) - et al.
Nowcasting GDP growth with credit data: Evidence from an emerging market economy
Borsa Istanbul Review
(2013) - et al.
Nowcasting: The real-time informational content of macroeconomic data
Journal of Monetary Economics
(2008) - et al.
Maximum likelihood estimation for dynamic factor models with missing data
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
(2011) An analysis of the informational content of New Zealand data releases: the importance of business opinion surveys
Economic Modelling
(2010)
Now-casting inflation using high frequency data
International Journal of Forecasting
Alternative algorithms for the estimation of dynamic factor, mimic and varying coefficient regression models
Journal of Econometrics
Nowcasting Norwegian GDP: The role of asset prices in a small open economy
Empirical Economics
Observations on Turkey’s recent economic performance
Atlantic Economic Journal
Estimating and forecasting the Euro area monthly national accounts from a dynamic factor model
OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis
Short-term forecasts of Euro area GDP growth
The Econometrics Journal
Short-term forecasting of czech quarterly GDP using monthly indicators
Czech Journal of Economics and Finance
Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models
Econometrica
Maximum likelihood estimation of factor models on datasets with arbitrary pattern of missing data
Journal of Applied Econometrics
Are disaggregate data useful for factor analysis in forecasting french GDP?
Journal of Forecasting
Cited by (35)
Back to the present: Learning about the euro area through a now-casting model
2024, International Journal of ForecastingForecasting industrial production and inflation in Turkey with factor models
2018, Central Bank ReviewCitation Excerpt :By using survey data, authors improve over the benchmark and obtain relatively successful nowcasts. Modugno et al. (2016) also use factor models for nowcasting Turkish GDP Growth. They find that financial variables can be as important as survey variables for accurate short term forecasts.
Evaluating nowcasts of bridge equations with advanced combination schemes for the Turkish unemployment rate
2018, Economic ModellingCitation Excerpt :We also include surveys which are released much earlier than real data to nowcast both unemployment rates. They are found to be beneficial in nowcasting GDP in many of studies due to their timeliness (see Angelini et al., 2011; Bańbura and Rünstler, 2011; Giannone et al., 2008; Modugno et al., 2016). Following Yüncüler et al. (2014), we also use credit data.
Macroeconomic news and market reaction: Surprise indexes meet nowcasting
2019, International Journal of ForecastingNowcasting and forecasting GDP in emerging markets using global financial and macroeconomic diffusion indexes
2019, International Journal of ForecastingCitation Excerpt :Thus, the usefulness of so-called big data is not a foregone conclusion. For further discussions of nowcasting using big data, see Banbura, Giannone, Modugno, and Reichlin (2013), Bragoli, Metelli, and Modugno (2014), Caruso (2017), Dalhaus, Guénette, and Vasishtha (2017), Foroni and Marcellino (2014), Hindrayanto, Koopman, and de Winter (2016), Luciani, Pundit, Ramayandi, and Veronese (2017), and Modugno, Soybilgen, and Yazgan (2016), as well as the references cited therein. In addition to the statistical procedures above, we also utilize a judgmental variable selection method that yields the so-called Bloomberg Relevance Index (BRI).
Big data financial transactions and GDP nowcasting: The case of Turkey
2024, Journal of Forecasting
Michele Modugno is an economist at the Federal Reserve Board, in Washington DC.
Barış Soybilgen is a researcher at Bilgi University, in Istanbul.
Ege Yazgan is full professor of Economics at at Bilgi University, in Istanbul.