On the modeling of an airlift reactor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.01.015Get rights and content

Abstract

A model of an airlift reactor in the cases of interphase mass transfer between gas and liquid in the riser and chemical reaction in the liquid phase has been done. The model equations permit to obtain the vertical distribution of the average concentrations of an active gas component in gas and liquid phases and average concentration of the active liquid component, using average velocities and effective diffusivities in the riser and downcomer zones. The proposed model allows scale-up problem solution. An hierarchical approach for model parameter identification on the bases of experimental data has been proposed.

Introduction

The hydrodynamic behavior of the gas and liquid flows in airlift reactors is very complicated. In these conditions the convective and diffusive transfer with volume reactions are realized simultaneously. The convective transfer is result of a laminar or turbulent (large-scale pulsations) flows. The diffusive transfer is molecular or turbulent (small-scale pulsations). The volume reactions are mass sources as a result of chemical reaction and interphase mass transfer [1].

The scale-up theory [2] show, that the scale-effect in mathematical modeling is result of the radial nonuniformity of the velocity distribution in the columns. In many papers [3], [4], [5], [6] are used diffusion models, where the scale-effect is considered as an increase of the axial mixing.

The creation of the models in these conditions and solving of the scale-up problem [1] require construction of a suitable diffusion model.

Section snippets

Mathematical model

The investigation of the airlift reactors shows [7], [8], [9] that convection–diffusion equation with volume reaction may be use as a mathematical structure of the model.

Let us consider airlift reactor [10], [11], [12], [13] with a cross-section area F0 for the riser zone and F1 for the downcomer zone. The length of the working zones is l (Fig. 1). The gas flow rate is Q0 and the liquid flow rate, Q1. The gas and liquid hold-ups in the riser are ε and (1  ε).

The concentrations of the active gas

Average concentration models

Let us consider Eq. (4). The velocity u0(x, r) and concentration c(x, r, t) in cylindrical coordinates practical do not depend on the angular coordinate. In this case the average function values areu¯0(x)=2r020r0ru0(x,r)dr,v¯0(x)=2r020r0rv0(x,r)dr,c¯(x,t)=2r020r0rc(x,r,t)dr,where u¯0(0)=u¯¯0. The expressions (12) permit to present the velocities and concentration asu0(x,r)=u¯0(x)u˜0(r,x),v0(x,r)=v¯0(x)v˜0(r,x),c(x,r,t)=c¯(x,t)c˜(r,x),where u˜0,v˜0 and c˜ express radial nonuniformities of the

Hierarchical approach

The problems (19), (21), (23), (24), (26), (28) are mathematical model of an airlift three phase reactor. The model parameters are five types:

  • beforehand known (c(0),c2(0),R0,r0);

  • beforehand obtained (ε, χ, α1, α2, k0);

  • obtained without chemical reaction (k, D, D0, A, B, A0, B0, G, G0);

  • obtained with chemical reaction (D1, D2, D3, M, M0);

  • obtained in the modeling and specified in the scale-up (A, A0, A1, A2, A3, B, B0, B1, B2, B3, G, G0,  G1, G2, G3, M, M0).

The problems (19), (21), (23) permit to obtain (k, D, D0, A, B, A0, B0, G, G0)

Conclusions

The result obtained shows a possibility to build airlift reactor models, using average velocities and concentrations. This approach permits to solve the scale-up problem as a result to the radial nonuniformity of the velocity and concentration, using radius dependent parameters. The model parameter identification on the bases of average concentration experimental data leads to big priority in comparison with the local concentration measurements.

Acknowledgement

This work was completed with the financial support of the National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Bulgaria, under Contract 1 TH-1506/2005.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (12)

  • On the column apparatuses modeling

    2012, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
    Citation Excerpt :

    For the modeling of interphase mass transfer processes in gas–liquid and liquid–liquid systems must be used two equations models [7–9] and ωi(i = 1, 2) are the parts of gas (liquid) and liquid in the small (elementary) column volume (ω1 + ω2 = 1). Diffusion types of models are used in the cases of chemical reaction in the liquid phase [7–10], two-phase absorbents [11] (SO2 absorption with CaCO3/H2O suspension), for modeling of an airlift photobioreactor [12], an airlift three-phase catalytic reactor [13] and a spouted bed reactor [14]. The presented diffusion types of models permit to be made a qualitative analysis of the models for to be obtained the slight simple physical effects and to be rejected the corresponding mathematical operators.

  • Wicke-Kallenbach and Graham's diffusion cells: Limits of application for low surface area porous solids

    2008, Chemical Engineering Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    For porous solids this pressure difference is a source of additional gas transport mechanism—permeation. Particularly for large pores permeation flux distorts the diffusion flux to such an extent that the experimentally determined fluxes cannot be considered as the result of pure counter-current diffusion and therefore the evaluated effective diffusion coefficients include a significant error, which can significantly influence not only chemical and/or biochemical process studies, but also many clinical and biological researches, polymer studies, etc., where diffusion takes a part (Boyadjiev, 2006; Gao et al., 2006; Gigova, 2006; Reignier and Huneault, 2006; Ohara et al., 1972; Petrissans et al., 2006; Shum et al., 2005). In this contribution we try to find in a simplified way the pore-size limits for which the small pressure difference can be neglected.

  • Some problems in the column apparatuses modeling

    2015, Bulgarian Chemical Communications
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text