Time two-mesh algorithm combined with finite element method for time fractional water wave model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.118Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The new TT-M algorithm combined with finite element method is proposed.

  • The TT-M method can save the CPU-time.

  • The TT-M method have some applications in solving nonlinear PDEs.

  • The TT-M method can be combined with other numerical methods.

Abstract

In this article, a new time two-mesh (TT-M) finite element (FE) method, which is constructed by a new TT-M algorithm and FE method in space, is proposed and analyzed. The numerical theories and algorithm are shown by solving the fractional water wave model including fractional derivative in time. The TT-M FE algorithm mainly covers three steps: firstly, a nonlinear FE system at some time points based on the time coarse mesh ΔtC is solved by an iterative method; further, based on the obtained numerical solution on time coarse mesh ΔtC in the first step, some useful numerical solutions between two time coarse mesh points are arrived at by the Lagrange’s interpolation formula; finally, the solutions on the first and second steps are chosen as the initial iteration value, then a linear FE system on time fine mesh ΔtF<ΔtC is solved. Some stable results and a priori error estimates are analyzed in detail. Furthermore, some numerical results are provided to verify the effectiveness of TT-M FE method. By the comparison with the standard FE method, it is easy to see that the CPU time can be saved by our TT-M FE method.

Introduction

Fractional partial differential equations (FPDEs) have been found in the fields of engineering and science. In view of the difficulty for solving the analytic solutions, increasing scholars have started to study some effective numerical methods for solving complex FPDEs with time, space and space-time fractional derivatives, which include finite difference methods [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], FE methods [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], DG methods [27], [28], [29], [30], spectral methods [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], finite volume (element) methods [36], [37], [38], meshless methods [39], wavelets method [40], collocation method [41], reproducing kernel algorithm [42] and so forth.

In these mentioned numerical methods, FE methods play a significant role in finding the numerical solutions for three classes of FPDEs. So far, many researchers have given FE studies for FPDEs such as space FPDEs (Ma et al. [17] for space fractional differential equations; Zhang et al. [18] for symmetric space-fractional partial differential equations; Roop [23] for space fractional advection dispersion problem; Bu et al. [25] for Riesz space fractional diffusion equations; Zhao et al. [43] for space-fractional advection-dispersion equations; Zheng et al. [44] for space-fractional advection diffusion equation; Zhu et al. [45] for the Riesz space-fractional Fisher’s equation), time FPDEs (Li et al. [16] for maxwell’s equations with time fractional derivative; Jin et al. [19] for fractional order parabolic equations; Ford et al. [22] for time FPDEs; Liu et al. [24] for a time-fractional fourth-order problem; Zhuang et al. [46] for the fractional cable equation; Liu et al. [47] for a nonlinear time-fractional reaction-diffusion problem with fourth-order derivative) and space-time FPDEs (Li et al. [15] for nonlinear subdiffusion and superdiffusion equation with space-time fractional derivatives; Liu et al. [48] for space-time fractional diffusion equation; Deng [49] for the space and time fractional Fokker-Planck equation; Li and Huang [50] for the time-space fractional diffusion-wave equation). In addition to the researches on FE method for FPDEs, recently, finite element methods with two-grid algorithms [51], [52] are developed for a nonlinear reaction-diffusion problem with time-fractional derivative and fourth-order derivative [53] and a nonlinear Cable equation with time-fractional derivative [54]. As there are a large number of literatures on FE methods’ applications in solving FPDEs, we cannot list them all.

In this article, motivated by spatial two-grid method presented by Xu [51], [52], we propose a new time two-mesh (TT-M) FE algorithm holding the advantage of saving CPU time, which includes three main computing steps: firstly, we construct a nonlinear FE system at some time points based on the time coarse mesh ΔtC, then solve this nonlinear system by an iterative method; further, we use interpolation formula to give useful points between any two points obtained time coarse mesh solution on the first step; finally, based on the initial iterative value computed time coarse mesh solutions, we establish a linear iterative scheme with time fine mesh ΔtF, then obtain TT-M solutions.

Here, we apply the new TT-M FE algorithm to solving the nonlinear time fractional water wave model [31], [56]ut+ux-β3ux2t+ν12Γ(1/2)0tu(x,τ)τdτ(t-τ)12+γf(u)x-α2ux2=0,(x,t)Ω×J,with boundary conditionu(xL,t)=u(xR,t)=0,tJ,and initial conditionu(x,0)=u0(x),xΩ,where f(u)=u2/2,J=(0,T] is the time interval with the positive constant T,Ω=[xL,xR](R) is the spatial domain. u0(x) is the initial function, the coefficients α>0,β>0,γ>0,ν0 are given constants. In particular, when the coefficient ν is taken as 0, the time fractional water wave model (1.1) can be transformed into important RLW-Burgers equation. As said by Kakutani and Matsuuchi in [55], the fractional water wave model includes nonlocal pseudo-differential operators and reflects diffusive and dispersive effect stemming from the viscous layer in the fluid. In view of the importance of fractional water wave model, some researchers have done some studies with numerical algorithms. Zhang and Xu [31] gave numerical solution and theories for a water wave model with a nonlocal viscous term by using the spectral methods. Wang et al. [56] looked for the numerical solutions for fractional water wave model by combining finite difference method in time with H1-Galerkin MFE procedure in space.

In this article, we will discuss the detailed numerical theories of new TT-M FE method by solving numerically nonlinear fractional water wave model. We will give the detailed analysis on the stability and error estimates in L2-norm, then provide some numerical calculations to test and verify the effectiveness and feasibility for our TT-M FE method. From our calculating results with comparison to standard nonlinear FE method, ones can see that the TT-M FE method not only maintains the computational accuracy, but also save the CPU time.

The structure of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, we give the numerical scheme for new TT-M FE method. In Section 3, we prove the stability on time coarse mesh and TT-M FE method. In Section 4, we derive the error estimates on both time coarse mesh method with ΔtC and TT-M FE method. In Section 5, we implement the numerical calculation by using TT-M FE method and standard nonlinear FE method, and make some comparisons between two numerical methods. Finally, in Section 6, we make some conclusions and future advancements for our methods. In the full text, we use some constants C, which are free of space mesh h, time coarse mesh ΔtC, time fine mesh ΔtF and may be different in different places.

Section snippets

Numerical scheme

In order to arrive at the fully discrete TT-M FE scheme, we need to split the time interval [0,T] into uniform partition with the nodes tn=nΔt(n=0,1,2,,N), which satisfies 0=t0<t1<t2<<tN=T with mesh length Δt=T/N for some positive integer N. Now we define ϕn=ϕ(tn) for a smooth function ϕ on [0,T] and the notation Δt[ϕn+1]3ϕn+1-4ϕn+ϕn-12Δt used in [47].

For formulating the discrete scheme, we give the following equality for the 1/2-order fractional derivative at time t=tn+11Γ(1/2)0tn+1u(x,τ)

The analysis of stability

For the need of analysis, we introduce two lemmas as follows.

Lemma 3.1

See [32], [57]

For series {vj}, the following equality holdsk=0nQk1/2vn+1-k-vn-kΔt1/2,vn+1=Δt-1/2vn+12-k=0n-1(Qk1/2-Qk+11/2)(vn-k,vn+1)-Qn1/2(v0,vn+1).

Lemma 3.2

See [47]

The following inequality holdsΔt[vn+1],vn+114Δt[Π(vn+1)-Π(vn)],where Π(vn+1)vn+12+2vn+1-vn2.

Based on the above two lemmas, we analyze the stability for TT-M FE system (2.9), (2.10), (2.11), (2.12).

Theorem 3.3

For the coarse mesh system (2.9), (2.10), the following stable inequality holdsUCn+β12UCxn

Error analysis

For giving a priori error analysis, we introduce a projection operator in Lemma 4.1.

Lemma 4.1

There exists an elliptic projection PhuVh such that for the variable uH01ux-Phux,vhx=0,vhVhwhich covers the following estimatesu-Phu+ut-Phut+hu-Phu1Chk+1(uk+1+utk+1).

To help analyze the stability, we now write the errors asu(tn)-UGn=(u(tn)-Phun)+(Phun-UGn)=EGn+EGn,G=ForC.

Now we give the following estimate theorem.

Theorem 4.2

Let un be the solution of weak formulation (2.3), (2.4) and UCn be the solution of FE

Numerical tests

In this section, we give a lot of computing data to test the effectiveness and feasibility of the TT-M FE algorithm. For this purpose, we take the initial value u(x,0)=3sech2[(0.5)32(x-x0)], where x0 is the midpoint of spatial domain [xL,xR], and different parameters α,β,γ, and ν in the system (1.1), (1.2), (1.3).

In the computing process, we use piecewise linear basis function in space, TT-M method with second-order backward difference method and L1-approximation in time. To calculate the

Conclusions and future advancements

In this article, our aim is to propose new time two-mesh (TT-M) algorithm with FE method to solve nonlinear time fractional water wave equation. The stability and convergence are proved in details. Finally, some numerical results are computed to give the tests for the effectiveness. For the comparison between TT-M FE method and standard nonlinear FE method, we find that the CPU time can be saved by our method.

In the near future, we will consider the TT-M FE method for solving nonlinear space

Conflict of interest

We would like to confirm that it does not conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank the reviewers and editor very much for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving our work. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11661058, 11761053), Natural Science Fund of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2016MS0102, 2017MS0107), program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (NJYT-17-A07).

References (57)

  • F.H. Zeng et al.

    Fast difference schemes for solving high-dimensional time-fractional subdiffusion equations

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2016)
  • M.M. Meerschaert et al.

    Finite difference approximations for two-sided space-fractional partial differential equations

    Appl. Numer. Math.

    (2006)
  • S.B. Yuste et al.

    An explicit finite difference method and a new von Neumann-type stability analysis for fractional diffusion equations

    SIAM J. Numer. Anal.

    (2005)
  • S. Vong et al.

    A compact difference scheme for a two dimensional fractional Klein-Gordon equation with Neumann boundary conditions

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2014)
  • H.G. Sun et al.

    Finite difference schemes for variable-order time fractional diffusion equation

    Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos

    (2012)
  • H. Wang et al.

    A fast finite difference method for three-dimensional time-dependent space-fractional diffusion equations and its efficient implementation

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2013)
  • Z.B. Wang et al.

    Finite difference schemes for two-dimensional time-space fractional differential equations

    Int. J. Comput. Math.

    (2016)
  • X.L. Li et al.

    A two-grid block-centered finite difference method for the nonlinear time-fractional parabolic equation

    J. Sci. Comput.

    (2017)
  • A. Atangana

    On the stability and convergence of the time-fractional variable order telegraph equation

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2015)
  • Y.N. Zhang et al.

    Finite difference methods for the time fractional diffusion equation on non-uniform meshes

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2014)
  • C. Li et al.

    Efficient numerical schemes for fractional water wave models

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2016)
  • H.F. Ding et al.

    High-order compact difference schemes for the modified anomalous subdiffusion equation

    Numer. Methods Partial Diff. Eq.

    (2016)
  • B.P. Moghaddam et al.

    A stable three-level explicit spline finite difference scheme for a class of nonlinear time variable order fractional partial differential equations

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2017)
  • B. Yu et al.

    A novel compact numerical method for solving the two-dimensional nonlinear fractional reaction-subdiffusion equation

    Numer. Algor.

    (2015)
  • C.P. Li et al.

    Numerical approximation of nonlinear fractional differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2011)
  • J.C. Li et al.

    Developing finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations in a cole-cole dispersive medium

    SIAM J. Sci. Comput.

    (2011)
  • J.T. Ma et al.

    Convergence analysis of moving finite element methods for space fractional differential equations

    J. Comput. Appl. Math.

    (2014)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Galerkin finite element approximation of symmetric space-fractional partial differential equations

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2010)
  • B. Jin et al.

    Error estimates for a semidiscrete finite element method for fractional order parabolic equations

    SIAM J. Numer. Anal.

    (2013)
  • B. Jin et al.

    Error analysis of semidiscrete finite element methods for inhomogeneous time-fractional diffusion

    IMA J. Numer. Anal.

    (2015)
  • M. Zhao et al.

    A preconditioned fast Hermite finite element method for space-fractional diffusion equations

    Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B

    (2017)
  • N.J. Ford et al.

    A finite element method for time fractional partial differential equations

    Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.

    (2011)
  • J.P. Roop

    Computational aspects of FEM approximation of fractional advection dispersion equations on bounded domains in R2

    J. Comput. Appl. Math.

    (2006)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    A mixed finite element method for a time-fractional fourth-order partial differential equation

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2014)
  • W.P. Bu et al.

    Galerkin finite element method for two-dimensional Riesz space fractional diffusion equations

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2014)
  • W.P. Fan et al.

    A novel unstructured mesh finite element method for solving a two dimensional time-space fractional wave equation on an irregular convex domain

    Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.

    (2017)
  • K. Mustapha et al.

    Superconvergence of a discontinuous Galerkin method for fractional diffusion and wave equations

    SIAM J. Numer. Anal.

    (2013)
  • Y.W. Du et al.

    Local discontinuous Galerkin method for a nonlinear time-fractional fourth-order partial differential equation

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (53)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text