Determining guests’ willingness to pay for hotel room attributes with a discrete choice model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Hotel managers need to understand the marginal utility customers associate with a specific attribute of a hotel in order to effectively set up rate fences and to price their rooms accordingly. This study adopted a stated choice experiment and discrete choice modeling method to obtain hotel guests’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a specific set of room attributes within a single hotel property. The attributes include room views, hotel floor, club access, free mini-bar items, smartphone service, and cancellation policy. The study discovered that leisure travelers versus business travelers, and first-time visitors versus repeat visitors, perceive different WTP values for various attributes. These findings provide valuable information for hotel managers to segment their market and conduct revenue management practices in order to maximize revenue and profit. The results also demonstrate the value of discrete choice modeling in obtaining WTP for hotel room attributes.

Introduction

On a daily basis, hotel managers and revenue managers face these questions: how much are our guests willing to pay for a higher floor room? How much should we charge for a room with an ocean view? The answers to these questions can help the managers set up appropriate rate fences and hopefully maximize the hotel’s revenue and profit. Many times, hotel managers rely on personal experience, trial-and-error, benchmarking with competitors, or rule-of-thumb to determine the degree of variations in price (Coltman, 1992). As a result, their decisions may not be theoretically sound nor generalizable.

Picking a hotel room is usually an intrinsically complex and idiosyncratic task (Pan et al., 2013): one guest may prefer a soft bed while the other may like a hard one. However, certain attributes are almost universally desirable by all guests – larger room space, free services, a quieter room, etc. Knowing customers’ perceived utility of these attributes, hoteliers can up-sell rooms, cross-sell other products, offer product bundling, or add free service to attract more guests.

A technique to obtain marginal values of hotel and room attributes adopts hedonic regression models on room rates (Monty and Skidmore, 2003, Chen and Rothschild, 2010). Although abundant studies have been conducted on pricing issues in the hospitality literature, only relatively limited studies focused on the relationship between hotel attributes and hotel room pricing from a customer’s perspective. Other past studies in the hospitality field mostly focus on the selection of hotels among a number of alternatives (Chan, 1998, Chu and Choi, 2000, Law and Hsu, 2005, Lewis, 1985, Zins, 1998). To the best of our knowledge, no published studies have addressed the choice of a hotel room within a specific property.

In this study, we used stated choice experiment and discrete choice modeling to investigate the marginal utilities of several hotel room attributes applicable to a specific hotel in Hong Kong. By manipulating attributes associated with hotel rooms’ floor level, room view, club access, free mini-bar items, smartphone service, and cancellation policy, and presenting different attribute combinations to the guests, we modeled the utility contribution of each attribute. In addition, we combined the choice of hotel rooms with trip characteristics to analyze and reveal different utility values between leisure versus business travelers, and first-time versus repeat visitors. The study is the first of its kind in investigating hotel room attributes with a discrete choice modeling technique. Individual hotel managers can also use the method to determine appropriate levels of prices and rate fences for their services and products.

Section snippets

Hotel attributes and pricing

The factors affecting guests’ choice of a hotel are complicated (Lockyer, 2005), but recognizing the hotel attributes that influence hotel choice and the features that are perceived as being important by guests helps hoteliers to make optimal decisions for hotel development and pricing strategy. Many studies in the tourism and hospitality literature have investigated the key attributes which affect guests’ hotel selection. For example, a study by Atkinson (1988) showed that the most important

Experimental design

The experimental research was conducted in a medium-sized and luxury hotel in the downtown area of Hong Kong, a major East Asian city. The Hotel has 262 guestrooms, a harbour view swimming pool, a spa and health club, three restaurants, a ballroom, and business conference rooms.

In the first stage of the study, a meeting with hotel managers was arranged in order to better identify the attributes and attribute levels to be used in the stated choice experiment so that the study could be beneficial

Data modeling method

The data from the stated choice experiment is modeled through discrete choice analysis. Discrete choice models explain the choice of individuals among alternatives and are specified within the random utility model framework (McFadden, 1974). In particular, an individual is assumed to choose the alternative that maximizes his utility, which is composed by a systematic part (observable) and an error term (unobservable). The utility function associated with subject n for the alternative j in the

Model results

Three mixed logit models are estimated including a base model and two models that segment the sample according to predefined key characteristics. In particular, the base model (MBase) provides a single coefficient for each attribute investigated, whereas the second model (MPurpose) distinguishes between leisure and business travelers while the third model (MFamiliarity) separates first-time and repeat visitors to Hong Kong. Table 3 reports the results for the three models. Random parameters are

Conclusions and implications

This study adopted a discrete choice modeling technique to investigate hotel guests’ perceived marginal utilities for hotel room attributes at a single hotel property. The researchers conducted a large-scale stated choice experiment on the actual customers of a real property in Hong Kong. The results revealed the monetary values of six different unique hotel room attributes: floor levels, room views, access to clubs, cancellation policy, free smartphone service, and free alcoholic drinks in

Limitations and future studies

The limitation of the study lies in four aspects, which also offer future research directions: one, the large amount of data (more than 800 interviews) collected in this study is hard to achieve in a regular hotel without a dedicated research team. This may limit the wide application of the technique to more hotels. Two, the discriminative pricing strategies based on the guests’ WTP for room attributes might be perceived as unfair, and thus, guests’ responses and levels of acceptance need

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Z0GX).

References (56)

  • J.L. Nicolau et al.

    The influence of distance and prices on the choice of tourist destinations: the moderating role of motivations

    Tourism Manage.

    (2006)
  • A.M. Ryan et al.

    Is WTP an attitudinal measure?: empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values

    J. Econ. Psychol.

    (2011)
  • L. Wilensky et al.

    A multivariate analysis of hotel benefit bundles and choice trade-offs

    Int. J. Hospitality Manage.

    (1988)
  • I. Ajzen

    From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior

  • A. Apostolakis et al.

    A choice modeling application for greek heritage attractions

    J. Travel Res.

    (2005)
  • Ananth, M., DeMicco, F.J, Moreo P.J., & Howey R.M. (1992). Marketplace lodging needs of mature travelers. The Cornell...
  • A. Atkinson

    Answering the eternal question, what does the customer want?

    The Cornell Hotel And Restaurant Administration Quarterly

    (1988)
  • K. Backhaus et al.

    An empirical comparison of methods to measure willingness to pay by examining the hypothetical bias

    Int. J. Market Res.

    (2005)
  • R. Chan

    Choice processes of luxury hotels in china

    J. Hospitality Marketing Manage.

    (1998)
  • C. Chen et al.

    An application of hedonic pricing analysis to the case of hotel rooms in taipei

    Tourism Econo.

    (2010)
  • C. Cobanoglu et al.

    A comparative study of the importance of hotel selection components by turkish business travelers

    Int. J. Hospitality Tourism Administration

    (2003)
  • G. Coenders et al.

    Predicting random level and seasonality of hotel prices: a latent growth curve approach

    Tourism Anal.

    (2003)
  • Coltman, M.M. (1992). Financial Control for Your Hotel. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New...
  • Crouch, G.I., & Louviere, J.J. (2001). A review of choice modeling research in tourism, hospitality and leisure. In:...
  • Cross, R.G., (1997). Revenue management: Hard-core tactics for market domination. Broadway Books, New...
  • J.M. Espinet et al.

    Effect on prices of the attributes of holiday hotels: a hedonic prices approach

    Tourism Econ.

    (2003)
  • S.M. Goldberg et al.

    Conjoint analysis of price premiums for hotel amenities

    J. Business

    (1984)
  • Gov. HK, (2014). Hong Kong: The Facts. Available at: http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/tourism.pdf,...
  • Cited by (97)

    • Narrowing the intention-behavior gap: The impact of hotel green certification

      2022, International Journal of Hospitality Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text