Simulation of bench blasting considering fragmentation size distribution

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An equivalent blasting load considering the detonation gas pressure was adopted.

  • Artificial joints with same parameters to rock were used to avoid adverse impacts.

  • Blasting fragmentation size is preset according to the Harries' theory.

  • The muck-pile profile of bench blasting is more sensitive to the burden distance.

Abstract

Reasonable simulation of the bench blasting has great significance on designing of rock blasting, and the proper consideration of blasting fragmentation size has strong influence on the simulation accuracy. This paper presents a new approach based on the three dimension Distinct Element Code (3DEC) method (Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. 2003) to model the dynamic cracking and casting process of bench blasting with reasonable consideration of blasting fragmentation size. Firstly, an equivalent blasting load consisting of the stress wave pressure and the detonation gas pressure was introduced into the 3DEC model, and it was applied on the outer boundary of blast-induced crushed zone to guarantee the simulation efficiency. Then, the whole numerical model was divided into discrete blocks by several sets of artificial joints to enable the rock to crack, fragment and cast, and at last form a muck-pile, and the artificial joints were assigned with the same mechanical parameters to rock mass itself to avoid the impact of them on stress wave propagation. Different from general discrete schemes which discretize the model with uniform blocks or random balls, the discrete size adopted in this paper gradually increases with distance from the blast source according to the Harries' model (Harries, 1973). At last, the proposed method was examined and verified by simulation of a blasting crater comparing to the field experiment, and then applied to explore the casting process of bench blasting. The simulated muck-pile profile agrees well with the result predicted by the traditional ballistics theory. The simulation also indicates that the casting distance of bench blasting increases with the bench height (H), but decreases with the burden distance (W), while the height of muck-pile increases with both the W and H. So the muck-pile profile of bench blasting is more sensitive to the W than H after consideration of rock fragmentation size, and the optimization of blasting designs can be significantly enhanced by utilizing the full capabilities of this approach.

Introduction

The bench blasting has been widely used in the mining, construction of the hydropower engineering and traffic engineering all over the world [1], and the fragmentation size distribution is an important parameter for prediction of the profile of bench blasting muck-pile, which not only reflects the rationality of blasting design, but also influences the transportation efficiency of rocks and mining/excavation economic benefit directly [2].

Based on the statistics of the field tests carried out by researchers from different countries in the past 50 years, several empirical or semi-empirical formulae have been established for bench blasting design and the prediction of rock fragmentation size distribution [1], [2], [3], [4]. But the application of these methods was limited for the variation of the engineering geology conditions and blasting configurations. Because the field bench blasting tests are very expensive and time consuming, the numerical simulation method has become a powerful means for researching of the muck-pile profiles of bench blasting and their influencing factors, especially the Discrete Element Method (DEM) [5], [6]. Compared with commonly used continuous numerical method (such as the finite element method (FEM) including the LS-DYNA [7], ANSYS (a FEM software developed by the ANSYS Inc), ABAQUS [8] and so on), the DEM is more suitable for simulation of cracking and casting process for its capability of modeling the large deformation, failures, motion and rotating or dispersing of elements during blasting [5], [6], [9], [10].

The main branches of the DEM family include the discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) developed by Shi in 1988 [11], the particle flow code (PFC) proposed by Cundall and Strack in 1999 [12] and several kinds of the finite-discrete element method [9].

Based on the DDA code, Mortazavi and Katsananis [13] introduced a dynamic blast-hole expansion model to consider the effects of the physical properties of the intact rock, blast geometry and existing discontinuities, and the distribution and orientation of pre-existing discontinuities. Ning et al. [14] further extended the DDA code in the simulation of blast-induced rock mass failure by tracking the blast chamber volume dynamically, and an instant explosion gas pressure was derived from the chamber volume using a simple polytrophic gas pressure equation.

For the PFC method, the explosion was modeled as a time-varying pressure applied at the edge of a cylindrical region 3 times the diameter of the original borehole to account for the region of crushed rock which would develop near the center of the detonation [15], [16].

Minchinton and Lynch [17] used the combined finite-discrete element program MBM2D to simulate dynamic stress field development, and crack penetration as well as the motion and stacking of the rock fragments. The Distinct Motion Code (DMC) has also been developed for modeling gas flow and rock motion during blasting [18].

Although DDA and PFC and other discrete or finite-discrete methods have achieved great success in blasting simulation, there are also some limitations. For example, the treatment of natural joints in DDA need to be further improved because the joints in DDA are rigid [9]. The methods of determining the rock mechanics parameters in PFC and MBM2D and DMC are very complex, and it is difficult to control the joints attitude [19]. But the discreteness of the numerical model is an important part in discontinuous numerical methods, which probably affects the simulation result [20]. The rock mass was usually dispersed into uniform blocks in common blasting simulation models, as there are no appropriate methods for determining the distribution of joints [5], [6], [9], [10].

In addition, except for FEM and DEM, all kinds of extended FEMs and mesh-free methods have also been developed for civil engineering applications [21], [22], [23]. In these methods, the numerical model is discretized by scattered set of points, which can allow interpolation of field variables to be accomplished at a global level without meshes [24]. These methods are ideal for simulation of fracture problems and large deformation problems, but much higher CPU time than the FEMs should be consumed [22], [23], [24], [25], [26].

The 3DEC is also a numerical program based on the DEM [9], [27]. Compared with the DDA, PFC and mesh-free methods, the 3DEC is more flexible in numerical model discreteness and has a strong advantage to simulate deformation and failure of jointed rock mass [19]. The 3DEC has been widely used to study blast wave propagation in jointed rock masses [28], [29], but it has not been fully explored for simulation of formation of blasting muck-pile and its profile.

In this paper, an equivalent blasting load considering the stress wave pressure as well as the quasi-static load of detonation gas was introduced into the 3DEC model, and it was applied on the outer boundary of blast-induced crushed zone to improve the simulation efficiency. The numerical model is divided into discrete blocks by several sets of artificial joints with the same mechanical parameters to the rock mass itself, and the discrete size gradually increases from the blast source to faraway according to the theory of Harries on the distribution of blasting fragmentation sizes [30]. The proposed discrete method was verified by simulating the rock cracking and casting process of a blasting carter, and the results are in good agreement with the field test. Then the method was adopted to simulate the bench blasting, and the mimetic muck-pile and the characteristic parameters of the profiles are investigated in this paper.

Section snippets

Strategy of blasting simulation with the 3DEC

The rock mass is modeled as an assemblage of 3D deformable blocks in 3DEC, and the boundaries of these blocks are regarded as the discontinuities, which can be either natural joints or artificial joints that do not exist in the real geometry. Under the action of blasting load, the rock mass will be fragmented into individual block along their boundaries to form a muck-pile at last. So, there are two main strategies need to be adopted for blasting simulation with the 3DEC code:

  • (1)

    The equivalent

Discretization according to the Harries' Blasting Model

The discrete block size has strong impaction simulation results, so it is necessary to propose an appropriate method to determine the spacing of artificial joints to control the fragmentation size distribution. Because the blasting process is highly complex due to the transient detonation of explosive, the heterogeneity and anisotropy of rock mass, the blast fragmentation distribution is influenced by many parameters. It is impossible to derive an equation for prediction of fragmentation

Numerical model

For large-scale open-pit excavation, the deep-hole bench blasting is commonly used. As shown in Fig. 11, the typical model of single row bench blasting is selected according to the Specifications of Excavation Blasting for Hydropower and Water Conservancy Project (DL/T 5135-2001) [49] in China. The model has a height of 8 m and a burden distance w of 3 m. The basic blasting design parameters are shown in Table 6, and the mechanical parameters of rock mass and artificial joints are shown in

Determining factors of the blasting muck-pile profile

There are three main parameters for bench blasting: the bench height, burden distance and the unit explosive consumption [1], [13]. After considering the rock fragment size, the bench blasting muck-pile mainly depends on the former two parameters (the bench height and burden distance), while the last one (the unit explosive consumption) determined by rock mass structure and rock lithology may mainly influence the blasting fragmentation size [1], [16], [38]. Because the rock fragmentation size

Conclusions

This paper has presented a numerical study on the fragmentation casting process of bench blasting. A new approach based on the 3DEC code was built in this paper to model the cracking and casting process of the crater blasting and bench blasting with consideration of fragmentation size. The main conclusions are as follows:

  • (1)

    In order to reasonably model the blast casting process with the 3DEC method, the rock mass should be divided into discrete blocks by preset artificial joints which do not exist

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 Program) (2011CB013501), Chinese National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51125037), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51179138, 51279135 and 51279146), the Science and technology promotion project of MWR (Ministry of Water Resources) of China (TG1522). The authors wish to express their thanks to all supporters.

References (51)

  • N. Vu-Bac et al.

    A unified framework for stochastic predictions of Young's modulus of clay/epoxy nanocomposites (PCNs)

    Comput Mater Sci

    (2015)
  • O. Yilmaz et al.

    Three dimensional numerical rock damage analysis under blasting load

    Tunnelling Undergr Space Technol

    (2013)
  • S. Esen et al.

    Modelling the size of the crushed zone around a blasthole

    Int J Rock Mech Min Sci

    (2003)
  • MaG.W. et al.

    Modeling of wave propagation induced by underground explosion

    Comput Geotechnics

    (1998)
  • ChenS.G. et al.

    A study of UDEC modelling for blast wave propagation in jointed rock masses

    Int J Rock Mech Min Sci

    (1998)
  • LuW.B. et al.

    Dynamic response of rock mass induced by the transient release of in-situ stress

    Int J Rock Mech Min Sci

    (2012)
  • WangW.H. et al.

    3DEC modeling on effect of joints and interlayer on wave propagation

    Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China

    (2006)
  • P.A. Persson et al.

    Rock blasting and explosives engineering

    (1993)
  • W.A. Hustrulid

    Blasting principles for open pit mining: general design concepts

    (1999)
  • V.M. Kuznetsov

    The mean diameter of the fragments formed by blasting rock

    J Min Sci

    (1973)
  • P.A. Cundall

    A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movements in blocky rock systems

    (1971)
  • P.A. Cundall et al.

    A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies

    Geotechnique

    (1979)
  • J.O. Hallquist

    LS-DYNA

    (2002)
  • Abaqus FEA. Simula web site. Dassault Systèmes....
  • The three Dimensional Distinct Element Code User's Guide

    (2003)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Numerical study on blast-induced fragmentation in deep rock mass

      2022, International Journal of Impact Engineering
    • Influences of the burden on the fracture behaviour of rocks by using electric explosion of wires

      2022, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of numerical simulations, Zhu [6] used a planar model to assess the crack distribution in rocks after blasting under different burdens. Yan et al. [12] obtained results showing that the maximum throwing distance of rocks reduces while the height of muck-piles increases with increasing burden. Tao et al. [13] found that the larger the burden, the larger the fragments caused by blasting and the more widely the fragments are distributed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text