An emotion based approach to assessing entrepreneurial education

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2014.06.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A novel emotion-based assessment strategy for entrepreneurial education has been outlined.

  • Presents early empirical evidence for three effective pedagogical design principles.

  • Outlines a large number of links between emotional events and entrepreneurial competencies.

  • Contains frameworks for emotional events and entrepreneurial competencies.

  • Confirms venture creation programs as suitable for studying entrepreneurship as experience.

Abstract

This study investigates links between emotional events and developed entrepreneurial competencies in an action-based entrepreneurship education program where students create real-life ventures. It represents a novel approach to assessing entrepreneurial education. A longitudinal design was applied following three engineering students during nine intensive months. Students were equipped with a mobile smartphone app used to report emotional events and critical learning events. Reports were followed up quarterly with semi-structured interviews. Links were identified through data analysis software NVIVO.

Findings indicate a large number of links between emotional events and developed entrepreneurial competencies. Three kinds of emotional events strongly linked to developed entrepreneurial competencies were interaction with outside world, uncertainty and ambiguity and team-work experience. These emotional events were linked to formation of entrepreneurial identity, increased self-efficacy, increased uncertainty and ambiguity tolerance and increased self-insight. These links represent early empirical evidence for three effective design principles of entrepreneurial education, and can also be used as indirect measures in assessment. This study also confirms venture creation programs as a suitable environment for studying entrepreneurship as experience.

Limitations of this study include a small number of interviewees, unknown transferability of results to other contexts, and risk for individual bias in data coding.

Introduction

There is no shortage in the domain of entrepreneurship and enterprise education (i.e. entrepreneurial education, see Erkkilä, 2000) of prescriptive literature advocating for action-based and experiential approaches to developing entrepreneurial competencies (See for example Gibb, 2008, Heinonen and Hytti, 2010, Mwasalwiba, 2010, Neck and Greene, 2011, Pittaway and Thorpe, 2012). A group oriented, project based, hands-on and context laden approach with facilitated reflection is often recommended. Fewer articles empirically account for when, how and why such learning environments contribute to the development of entrepreneurial competencies. This is essentially an assessment challenge that remains largely unsolved in the domain of entrepreneurial education.

Psychologists often divide the human mind into three parts; thoughts, actions and emotions (Hilgard, 1980). The assessment of entrepreneurship and enterprise education has hitherto relied primarily on two of these three parts, i.e. on thoughts or on actions, largely neglecting emotions as a potential indicator variable. Scholars have investigated students' thoughts by probing for perceived willingness and ability to act entrepreneurially before and after an educational intervention, leaning primarily on the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991, Krueger and Carsrud, 1993). Former students' entrepreneurial actions have been probed for by investigating the prevalence of actual entrepreneurial behavior, such as business plan writing, venture start-up and venture success among alumni (Martin, McNally, & Kay, 2013). Both of these approaches to assessing entrepreneurial education have important shortcomings, leading to the evidence base of entrepreneurial education outcomes being rather inconclusive to date (Bae et al., 2014, Lautenschläger and Haase, 2011, Martin et al., 2013).

The thought based assessment strategy is indeed easy to apply, but only tells us if entrepreneurial competencies have been developed or not, and does not answer crucial questions such as how, when and why entrepreneurial competencies are developed through educational interventions. Another problem is the unreliability of students' perceptions due to their naïve views of work life in general and entrepreneurship in particular, especially before the entrepreneurial education intervention studied (Cox et al., 2002, Liñán et al., 2011).

The action based assessment strategy can reliably identify entrepreneurial behavior. The difficulty here is to prove that it is entrepreneurial education that has caused successful entrepreneurial behavior. Venture creation takes many years to reach financial success, making it difficult to isolate the role of entrepreneurial education (Fayolle, Gailly, & Lassas-Clerc, 2006). Self-selection bias aggravates this problem, making it difficult to rule out the possibility that already entrepreneurial people are attracted to entrepreneurial education, causing these higher levels of entrepreneurial activity (Bager, 2011).

An explicit emotion based assessment strategy has not previously been tried in the domain of entrepreneurial education, but is the aim of this study. Studies empirically examining the role of emotions in entrepreneurial education are very scarce in general. One of the very few studies so far was performed by Pittaway and Cope (2007), and emphasized the role of emotional and risk-laden events and processes where students resolve uncertain, complex and ambiguous situations in authentic settings. They concluded that emotional exposure plays a major role in how students learn to become entrepreneurial. A few quantitative studies have also included emotional aspects as a minor part of their study design and/or outcome (Lepoutre et al., 2010, Rosendahl Huber et al., 2012, Souitaris et al., 2007).

The purpose of this study is to increase our understanding of the impact action-based entrepreneurial education can have on students' development of entrepreneurial competencies. It is a longitudinal and in-depth exploratory and primarily qualitative study following three master level students during nine intensive months, exploring what emotionally laden experiences can be linked to entrepreneurial competency development. This linkage attempt represents a new approach to the assessment challenges in entrepreneurial education. It could spur development of new test items for use in future quantitative impact studies, and could also open up new methodological avenues for future impact studies. The study asks the question: How are emotional events linked to development of entrepreneurial competencies in an action-based entrepreneurial education program?

The article proceeds as follows. Relevant literature within general and entrepreneurial learning, emotions in entrepreneurial education and assessment of entrepreneurial competencies is explored. Then the mixed methods study design, empirical setting and underlying methodological assumptions are described, followed by the resulting data. This is then discussed and analyzed, followed by implications for practitioners and scholars.

Section snippets

Review of literature

A framework that has been instrumental in the design of this study consists of the three categories of the human mind; thoughts, emotions and actions. A philosophical underpinning has been identified as the tripartite division of mind (Hilgard, 1980), stipulating that “the study of mind could be divided into three parts: cognition, affection, and conation” (Hilgard, 1980, p. 107); or thoughts, emotions and actions respectively (see for example Jarvis, 2006); or knowledge, attitudes and skills

Methodology

This study applied a mixed methodology consisting of both quantitative and qualitative research methods. A quantitative approach was used to capture emotional events as they occurred through a mobile app based survey, data which then informed the qualitative approach consisting of semi-structured interviews aiming to reveal underlying mechanisms. This could be labeled as an “app-informed interview technique”, where an adjusted interview template is produced for each new interview, informed by

Quantitative data – mobile app based survey engine

The mobile survey engine resulted in a total of 55 reports; 16 critical learning events, 13 negative emotional events, 3 neutral emotional events and 23 positive emotional events (see Table 3). The mobile survey reports were predominantly done by the participating students in the two first months of the study, indicating that a certain reporting fatigue occurred for all three participants. One hypothesized way to counter this was to send out reminders by e-mail to the participants, but attempts

Discussion

Some of the methods for assessing entrepreneurial competency development advocated by Bird (1995) have been used in this study, such as “self-reflective diaries”, “retrospective construction of events and behavior”, “critical event interviewing” and “oral histories” (Bird, 1995, p. 61). This study can confirm them as productive ways to link educational interventions to developed entrepreneurial competencies, provided that one agrees that the emotional events reported in this study are indeed

Conclusions

Through a longitudinal mixed methods approach, this study has investigated links between emotional events and developed entrepreneurial competencies in an action-based entrepreneurship education program applying a venture creation approach (Ollila & Williams-Middleton, 2011), i.e. requiring student teams to start a real-life venture. A large number of links between emotional events and developed entrepreneurial competencies have been uncovered and/or confirmed. These findings represent a novel

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Ph.D. advisors Dr Karen Williams Middleton and Professor Mats Lundqvist for feedback and constructive comments which helped guide the study. The author also would like to thank the participating students for their open candor in sharing their experiences, Ewa-Lena Lackéus for transcription support, and two anonymous reviewers that provided helpful comments leading to a clearer articulation of this paper’s contribution.

References (144)

  • I.M. Arievitch et al.

    Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperin's approach

    Educational Psychologist

    (2005)
  • R.-L. Arpiainen et al.

    The sources and dynamics of emotions in entrepreneurship education

    Trames

    (2013)
  • T.J. Bae et al.

    The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: a Meta – Analytic review

    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

    (2014)
  • T. Bager

    Entrepreneurship education and new venture creation: a comprehensive approach

  • G. Biesta

    Why “what works” won't work: evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research

    Educational Theory

    (2007)
  • B. Bird

    Towards a theory of entrepreneurial competency

    Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth

    (1995)
  • J. Burgoyne

    Creating the managerial portfolio: building on competency approaches to management development

    Management Learning

    (1989)
  • N. Cantor et al.

    12-Life task participation and well-being: the importance of taking part in daily life

  • A. Charney et al.

    The impact of entrepreneurship education: An evaluation of the berger entrepreneurship program at the University of Arizona, 1985–1999

    (2000)
  • D. Collier et al.

    Insights and Pitfalls – selection bias in qualitative research

    World Politics

    (1996)
  • T. Conner

    Experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment with mobile phones

    (2013)
  • J. Cope

    Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection

    Management Learning

    (2003)
  • J. Cope

    Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship

    Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

    (2005)
  • J. Cope et al.

    Learning by doing – an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning

    International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research

    (2000)
  • J. Corbin et al.

    Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques

    (1990)
  • J. Cotton

    Enterprise education experience: a manual for school-based in-service training

    Education + Training

    (1991)
  • L. Cox et al.

    The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial self-efficacy

    International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education

    (2002)
  • M. Csikszentmihalyi

    Flow: The psychology of optimal experience

    (1991)
  • Å. Lindholm Dahlstrand et al.

    Linking innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education: a study of swedish schools of entrepreneurship

  • N.K. Denzin

    On understanding emotion

    (1984)
  • D. Derryberry et al.

    Motivating the focus of attention

  • J. Dewey

    Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education

    (1916)
  • R.L. Dilworth

    Action learning in a nutshell

    Performance Improvement Quarterly,

    (1998)
  • J.M. Dirkx

    The power of feelings: emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning

    New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education

    (2001)
  • M.C. Draycott et al.

    The assessment of enterprise education in the secondary education sector: a new approach?

    Education + Training

    (2011)
  • A.C. Edmondson et al.

    Methodological fit in management field research

    Academy of Management Review

    (2007)
  • K. Erkkilä

    Entrepreneurial education: Mapping the debates in the United States, the United Kingdom and Finland

    (2000)
  • P. Eynde et al.

    Students' emotions: a key component of self-regulated learning

  • A. Fayolle et al.

    Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology

    Journal of European Industrial Training

    (2006)
  • S. Fisher et al.

    Starting from scratch: understanding the learning outcomes of undergraduate entrepreneurship education

  • A. Gibb

    In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge

    International Journal of Management Reviews

    (2002)
  • A. Gibb

    Entrepreneurship and enterprise education in schools and colleges: insights from UK practice

    International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education

    (2008)
  • G. Gilder

    Moral sources of capitalism

    Society

    (1981)
  • D. Goleman

    Emotional intelligence: Bantam books

    (1995)
  • S.M.G. Gondim et al.

    Affections in learning situations: a study of an entrepreneurship skills development course

    Journal of Workplace Learning

    (2011)
  • A. Hargreaves

    Emotional geographies of teaching

    The Teachers College Record

    (2001)
  • A. Hargreaves

    The emotions of teaching and educational change

    Extending Educational Change

    (2005)
  • J. Hattie et al.

    The power of feedback

    Review of Educational Research

    (2007)
  • J. Heinonen et al.

    Back to basics: the role of teaching in developing the entrepreneurial university

    The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation

    (2010)
  • J.M. Hektner et al.

    Experience sampling method – Measuring the quality of everyday life

    (2007)
  • Cited by (133)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text