Synchronous firing patterns of neuronal population with excitatory and inhibitory connections

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.11.020Get rights and content

Abstract

A stochastic model of neuronal population with excitatory and inhibitory connections is proposed, where excitatory synaptic dynamics is considered. Oscillatory synchronized firing patterns of a neuronal population by means of firing density are investigated. Numerical simulations using Fokker–Planck equation show that slow inhibitory connection contributes to oscillatory synchronized firing of the neuronal population, and synchronous activity is enhanced due to inhibitory connection. The effect of time delay on the oscillatory synchronized firing in the neuronal population using phase mode is explored. Numerical simulation indicates that short synaptic transmission delay can suppress oscillatory synchronized firing, but this suppression is instable.

Introduction

Oscillatory synchronized firing is a widespread phenomenon occurring in different parts of the mammalian cerebral cortex, e.g., in the visual cortex [1], olfactory bulb [2], the hippocampus [3], [4], and the auditory neocortex [5]. For instance, experimental evidences have shown that neurons in the cat visual cortex responding to two independent images of a bar on a serene fired asynchronously when two short bars are moving in different directions, but these neurons are fired synchronously when the same bars are moving together [6]. It seems likely that oscillatory synchronized firing is an essential mechanism for the binding of visual information [7]. The visual-binding problem can be stated as follows: how are the different attributes of an object brought together in a unified representation provided that its various features, e.g., edges, color, movement, shape, depth, and so on. One proposed solution is based on the idea that visual objects are coded by neuronal assemblies that fire synchronously [8], [9]. However, it is unknown whether the oscillations are caused by the properties of single neurons or by intra-cortical network interactions. As for the theory that the oscillation is caused by the properties of single neurons, it is suggested that chattering cells in visual cortex show periodic bursts of gamma frequency, which might be related to the generation of oscillatory responses [10]. On the other hand, many physiological evidences support the theory that the oscillations are generated by intra-cortical network interactions [7], [11]. In particular, in neocortical and hippocampal networks, recent experimental studies have suggested that GABA-ergic interneurons play an important role in the emergence of various types of synchronous oscillatory patterns of neuronal activity in the central nervous system [12], [13].

On the basis of oscillatory synchronized firing of neurons, it is justified that a neuron is modeled as a limit cycle oscillator, and a neuronal network is often modeled as a network of globally coupled oscillators. Moreover, the background noise in the nervous system is ubiquitous, e.g., ion channels in cell membranes randomly open and close in response to voltage and chemical changes in a cell's environment, the release of neurotransmitter is probabilistic, and so on. Therefore, the theory of stochastic phase resetting is often used in investigating the dynamical behaviors of the nervous systems [14], [15]. Winfree first proposed to approximate the dynamics of a population of limit cycle oscillators by means of the dynamics of a population phase oscillators [16]. The dynamics of a population of oscillators interacting uniformly via mean-field coupling were investigated by Kuromoto [17]. Since then, many theoretical studies and numerical simulations have been carried out on the phase model of neuronal oscillators [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Synchronization in a population of neuronal oscillators has been observed using phase model [18], [20], [21], [22]. However, neocortical and hippocampal networks in vivo are composed of a mixture of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Taking into account different types of neurons, which means modeling two different subpopulations of coupled neuronal oscillators. As yet, a theory investigating the dynamical properties of a neuronal population with excitatory and inhibitory connections is still lacking, although synchronizations in two interacting populations of heterogeneous neuronal oscillators have been investigated using the phase model, in which the coupling strengths were chosen as fixed constant [28], [29]. For real biological neuronal networks, synaptic coupling strength changes in an activity-dependent manner, and is modified by presynaptic and postsynaptic activities [30]. It is clear that we cannot understand neural coding and neural information processing without taking synaptic dynamics into account. In order to explore the mechanism for oscillatory synchronized firings in the neuronal network, we study the neuronal networks that are composed of excitatory neurons and inhibitory neurons, in which synaptic dynamics is taken into account.

An important property of neural interactions is that they involve time delay because of the finite propagation velocities of action potentials along neurites, synaptic transmission delays at chemical synapses and dendritic processing [31]. It is thus important to understand the effects of time delay on the synchronized firing [32]. This paper also investigates the effect of time delay in the interaction on the synchronized firing in the population of coupled neuronal oscillators using Fokker–Planck equations.

Section snippets

Stochastic phase model

Some experimental studies have shown that excitatory synapses are very sensitive to the activities of presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons [33]. Therefore, we assume that the strengths of excitatory coupling are activity-dependent, whereas the strengths of slower inhibitory coupling remain relatively constant.

We consider the dynamics of a neuronal population of excitatory and inhibitory oscillators interacting through phase coupling functions. The dynamics of the neuronal population composed of

Numerical simulations

The coupling functions M(x), Q(x), and H(x) are all 2π-periodic functions, which can be expanded in Fourier modes for numerical simulation. For the sake of simplicity, we take M(x)=sin(x), Q(x)=cos(x), and H(x)=cos(x). Since the coupling strength of excitatory coupling cannot increase unboundedly, we assume that the variation of coupling strength K is bounded between 0 and 2.

Fig. 1 displays the evolution of the firing density of the neuronal population without inhibitory connection over time.

Conclusions

The firing density of a neuronal population has been introduced to investigate the oscillatory synchronized firing in the neuronal population using Fokker–Planck equation. Numerical simulations have shown that the firing pattern of the neuronal population is low-frequency and regular synchronization in the neuronal population without inhibitory connection, whereas slower inhibitory connection is considered, the firing pattern of the neuronal population becomes stochastic oscillations. Moreover,

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 10672057, the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 10872086 and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province under Grant 070416231.

References (34)

  • S.H. Strogatz

    From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators

    Physica D

    (2000)
  • C.M. Gray et al.

    Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillation in orientation columns of cat visual cortex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (1989)
  • G. Laurent et al.

    Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies

    Science

    (1994)
  • A. Bragin et al.

    Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat

    J. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • H. Wagatsuma et al.

    Neural dynamics of the cognitive map in the hippocampus

    Cogn. Neurodyn.

    (2007)
  • R.D. Traub et al.

    Persistent gamma oscillations in superficial layers of rat auditory neocortex: experiment and model

    J. Physiol.

    (2005)
  • A.K. Kreiter et al.

    Stimulus dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • C.M. Gray

    Synchronous oscillations in neuronal systems: mechanisms and functions

    J. Comput. Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • F. Varela et al.

    The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • H. Haken

    Towards a unifying model of neural net activity in the visual cortex

    Cogn. Neurodyn.

    (2007)
  • C.M. Gray et al.

    Chattering cells: superficial pyramidal neurons contributing to the generation of synchronous oscillations in the visual cortex

    Science

    (1996)
  • B. Jagadeesh et al.

    Visually evoked oscillations of membrane potential in cells of cat visual cortex

    Science

    (1992)
  • K. MacLeod et al.

    Distinct mechanisms for synchronization and temporal patterning of odor-encoding neural assemblies

    Science

    (1996)
  • J. Igarashi et al.

    Theta phase coding in a network model of the entorhinal cortex layer II with entorhinal–hippocampal loop connections

    Cogn. Neurodyn.

    (2007)
  • P.A. Tass

    Resetting biological oscillators—a stochastic approach

    J. Biol. Phys.

    (1996)
  • P.A. Tass

    Phase Resetting in Medicine and Biology

    (1999)
  • A.T. Winfree

    The Geometry of Biological Time

    (2002)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Firing patterns in a random network cellular automata model of the brain

      2015, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
    • Network activity in a Morris-Lecar population density model

      2014, Neurocomputing
      Citation Excerpt :

      These were extended to several studies of two-dimensional population density approach for the integrate-and-fire-or-burst (IFB) model [4,9–11]. In the limit of small voltage jump, the population density approach can be reduced to Fokker–Planck (diffusion) approximation to analyze the dynamics of the distribution of neuron potentials [12–18]. In order to describe the neuron dynamics precisely, a probability density approach that takes into consideration the effects of slow ionic currents was proposed by Chizhov et al. [19].

    • Cooperative dynamics in neuronal networks

      2013, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
      Citation Excerpt :

      Zhou et al. reported synchronization dynamics in the cortical brain network of the cat, which displays a hierarchically clustered organization [35,36]. Wang’s group has analyzed the phase synchronization in neuronal systems based on phase equations [45–48]. Phase synchronization transition from burst synchronization to spike synchronization was studied in two coupled HR neurons with gap junction [49].

    • Neural coding in networks of multi-populations of neural oscillators

      2012, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, it offers additional advantages to the study of the transmission of neural information and neural coding on the basis of the theory of phase resetting dynamics. There is already a body of knowledge in neural information processing adopting the theory of stochastic phase resetting dynamics [5,11,12,18,21]. In addition, application of such theory has also benefited the study of neurodegenerative diseases [10,13].

    • Temporal association based on dynamic depression synapses and chaotic neurons

      2011, Neurocomputing
      Citation Excerpt :

      And the chaotic dynamics has been suggested to be crucial to the information processing capabilities of natural neuronal systems. Many results [11,24–28] indicate that dynamic depression synapses and chaotic neurons are the two kinds of drive for the pattern switching phenomenon in neural networks. It is believed that the investigations of the dynamics characters of dynamic depression synapses and chaotic neural systems are helpful to understand the memory rules of the brain.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text