Ground handling services at European hub airports: Development of a performance measurement system for benchmarking
Introduction
Today's aviation industry is characterized by a highly dynamic and volatile business environment (Doganis, 2001, Doganis, 2002). On the one hand it holds high growth potential (Air Transport Association, 2006; Bernabai, 2001), but on the other hand competition is intensifying (Garvens, 2005) and margins are decreasing (Francis et al., 2005).
Changes in the aviation business affect all members along the value chain (SAS, 2005). Competitive pressures not only occur on the “air side” of the value chain but are especially increasing on the “ground side” (Albers et al., 2005). In this context ground handlings’ logistics are one of the biggest challenges and a main factor that determines sustainable success (Gonnord and Lawson, 2000; Wyld et al., 2005). Efficient and customized processes in the field of passenger, baggage and freight handling are therefore gaining paramount importance for airports and other logistics service providers (Oum et al., 2003).
The ground handling market has been facing a trend towards liberalization, which was induced by deregulation mechanisms implemented at the European level, such as the EU (European union) directive 96/67/EC which increases competition and cost pressure especially in the ramp handling sector (Fuhr, 2006; SH&E, 2002).
Ramp handling, as a major part of ground handling, can be seen as one of the primary functions of airports, subsuming all handling activities on the apron. It encompasses the activities of loading and unloading aeroplanes as well as the transport of passengers, crew, baggage, freight and mail between aeroplanes and terminal buildings. It represents the interface to the airlines on the one hand and the interface to airports infrastructure on the other hand.
Historically, air transportation used to be a highly regulated sector. Mobility was regarded as a good of public interest and regulation by the state was considered necessary. EU directive 96/67/EG was the basis for today's market structure and was published in the beginning of the 90 s to liberalize air transportation in Europe. The main goal was to induce a step-wise liberalization and to achieve a unified regulation of ground handling, particularly affecting the air side, so-called ramp handling. By opening the market a further aim was to reduce operating costs of air transportation and improving the quality of aircraft handling. Today the EU directive determines the number of ground handlers, which have to be enabled to enter the market (Soames, 1997). It makes limiting the number of providers only possible in exceptional cases. Moreover, changes in line with the latest discussion about a revision of the EU directive (European Commission, 2003) will further enforce liberalization of the ramp handling market.
Due to this increased competitive pressure, ground handlers and in particular ramp handlers will also have to rethink their strategies and structures as well as their scope of work (Müller et al., 2005) in order to maintain or gain long-term competitive advantage. As seen in other liberalized markets, today's ramp handling organizations need to become more competitive, market-oriented and customer-driven (Chan et al., 2006).
Therefore, it is particularly important for them to improve their ability to assess their own performance relative to that of their competitors (Oum et al., 2003). To achieve this, performance measurement can be seen as an adequate approach that permits a holistic analysis of their efficiency and effectiveness (Kennerley and Neely, 2002; Neely et al., 1995). As a sole usage of a performance measurement system (PMS) would not be “[…] able to answer one of the most fundamental questions of all—what are our competitors doing?” (Neely et al., 1995), benchmarking is considered as an appropriate tool that should be combined with performance measurement for the identification of best practice solutions among the industry (Francis et al., 2002). As such, the performance gaps provide an initial basis for targeting radical changes, as well as continuous improvement, both aimed at providing a long term competitive advantage.
Although benchmarking has been criticized to be limited Gregory (1993) and mainly provides information that helps to get on a par with other companies, it is an important method to take the first step in strategically positioning the company, identify the relative competitive position of a company (McIvor, 2003) and lay the foundations for a sustainable competitive advantage.
Within the scope of this article, performance measurement and benchmarking are seen as integrative approaches, whereby the PMS acts as the source of information for benchmarking activities. Nevertheless, such a system has not yet been developed for ramp handling businesses. Therefore, the research objectives of this article are twofold: The first objective is to develop an adequate PMS for analyzing the effectiveness and efficiency of ramp handling businesses. The second objective is to test its practical applicability for performing a benchmarking.
The next two sections provide a background on performance measurement, considering also the context of airport logistics. Based on this background, a conceptual PMS is presented. Then the action research methodology followed here is explained. The conceptually developed PMS was applied in a benchmarking study with several ramp handling organizations of EU hub airports. The article closes with a summary of the main findings, suggestions for further research and managerial implications.
Section snippets
The need for a ramp handling PMS
Although it has been put forward that a PMS is required, it remains unclear how ramp handling service business units can adapt and implement such a system to improve their efficiency. As ramp handling encompasses the activities of loading and unloading aeroplanes as well as the transport of passengers, crew, baggage, freight and mail between aeroplanes and terminal buildings, it can be classified as a logistics service. This service is provided by a third party ground handler, the airline (self
Conceptual background
The topic of performance measurement is often discussed but rarely defined (Neely et al., 1996). Performance can be seen in various ways, but there is a consensus that when evaluating performance, and also especially logistics performance, it can generally be distinguished between effectiveness and efficiency (Glaeson and Barnum, 1986; Neely et al., 1996; Rafele, 2004). Effectiveness refers to the extent to which customer requirements are met, whereas efficiency is a measure of how economically
Research design: action research
The literature review highlighted a lack of specific PMSs for ramp handling and the novelty of our research question for this field. According to Yin (2003), qualitative research methods should be used to answer “how”, “why” and open questions (Burrell and Morgan, 1985; Silverman, 2004; Yin, 2003). Furthermore, it is also a method, which helps to address research objectives within a natural setting, which would otherwise be expensive, difficult, or impossible to replicate in a laboratory
Development of the ramp handling PMS
The ramp handling PMS was developed in several steps, as explained in the conceptual background section. According to the action research method outlined in the previous section, expert workshops, site visits, document analysis as well as the literature review were all feeding into the development. In this process researchers worked with each hub airport for itself, but with the shared goal to come up with a single BSC for all participating airports.
Identification of performance gaps as a result of the measurement phase
After developing the final PMS, a benchmarking was performed using this system. Herein, the jointly developed measurement system was applied to all cases. The aim of this was to identify the biggest performance gaps among the EU hub airports and to guarantee a “[…] process of improving performance by continuously identifying, understanding, and adapting outstanding practices and processes found inside and outside the organization and implementing the results” (Jarrar and Zairi, 2001, p. 901).
Summary and conclusions
Noting the growing relevance of this topic in practice, and addressing a general research gap in airport logistics, we set out with the objectives of developing and applying a PMS for ramp handling businesses.
Based on a conceptual model of a phase-based framework of performance measurement, action research was conducted together with EU hub airports in order to determine how a PMS should be designed to ensure a holistic basis for benchmarking ramp services (summarized in Fig. 1). This PMS
References (111)
- et al.
Measuring airport quality from the airlines’ viewpoint: An application of data envelopment analysis
Transport Policy
(2001) - et al.
Strategic alliances between airlines and airports
Journal of Air Transport Management
(2005) Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexity and situation
Leadership Quarterly
(1996)- et al.
The benchmarking of airport performance
Journal of Air Transport Management
(2002) - et al.
The nature and prevalence of the use of performance measurement techniques by airlines
Journal of Air Transport Management
(2005) - et al.
Airports: A precious resource of the aviation network
Air and Space Europe
(2000) - et al.
Environmental sustainability, airport capacity and European air transport liberalization: Irreconcilable goals?
Journal of Transport Geography
(1999) Integrated performance measurement: A review of current practice and emerging trends
International Journal of Production Economics
(1993)- et al.
Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process
International Journal of Production Economics
(2002) - et al.
Implementation of Deming's style of quality management: An action research study in a plastics company
International Journal of Production Economics
(2006)