The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.007Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of supplier innovativeness on supply chain collaboration and agility. The paper applies the diffusion of innovation theory to explain how supplier innovativeness has been diffused into the supply chain and how global sourcing moderates the relationship among supplier innovativeness, information sharing, strategic sourcing, and supply chain agility. This research analyzes 272 survey responses from supply and purchasing executives and managers in the manufacturing industry. The research results indicate that supplier innovativeness positively affects information sharing and supply chain agility but has no significant relationship with strategic sourcing. Both information sharing and strategic sourcing play a positive role on improving supply chain agility. This study also offers empirical evidence that impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on supply chain agility in domestic sourcing become stronger that in global sourcing. This research provides meaningful insights for academics and industry by filling an important gap in the literatures and showing managers the positive impact of supplier innovativeness in order to facilitate collaborations in the supply chain.

Introduction

Innovating in products, organizations, and supply chains is crucial to success and competitive advantage. In supply chains, organizations expect their supply partners to adopt innovation from internal motivation in order to produce various benefits. However, organizations in supply chains also attempt to drive innovation externally, improving the firms’ core competencies and performance and reducing investments and Research & Development (Ellis et al., 2012, McIvor and Humphreys, 2004). More importantly, while suppliers play an important role in effective supply chain management, suppliers are becoming increasingly responsible for encouraging innovation and innovativeness practices such as product and new product development and alliances for fostering innovation, design, and process innovation (Azadegan and Dooley, 2010).

Buyer firms in the supply chain attempt to encourage suppliers to adopt innovation, but supplier innovativeness faces many challenges, such as customer power in the supply chain, cultural and geographical differences, increased business risks, and coordination costs (Henke and Zhang, 2010). The responsibilities that which organization is in charge for driving innovation in the supply chain have created issues between suppliers and buyers regarding that innovation results that benefit supply chain relationships. In addition, forcing innovation on outsourcing companies via buyer companies generates the risk of losing control and crucial knowledge and of reducing capacity (Jean et al., 2012). Suppliers recognize the drawbacks of adopting innovation in the supply chain, which appear to be greater than the benefits suppliers and buyers could hope to gain.

Supplier innovativeness is defined as suppliers’ ability to develop new processes or introduce new products (Azadegan and Dooley, 2010). Supplier innovativeness generates various benefits for manufacturers. Supplier innovativeness positively impacts manufacturers’ performance in cost, quality, delivery, flexibility, and product development (Azadegan, 2011). Supplier innovation helps improve manufacturers’ product technology (Gianiodis et al., 2010). Supplier innovative capability has a significant purchasing role in product development (Wynstra et al., 2003). Supplier innovativeness also increases information processing capability and information fit in the supply chain (Stock and Tatikonda, 2004). Manufacturers with innovative suppliers are better able to respond to changes in environments (Swink and Mabert, 2000). Supplier innovativeness provides various benefits to manufacturers. By examining these benefits throughout the whole supply chain, this research investigates the impact of supplier innovativeness on supply chain collaboration activities such as information sharing, supply chain procurement like strategic sourcing, and supply chain agility.

Supplier innovativeness has expanded throughout the whole supply chain system. However, this innovativeness has been adopted by suppliers as well as buyers and manufacturers at different rates. Therefore, this study applies the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI) to explain the impact of supplier innovativeness in the supply chain. According to Rogers (1995), innovations have been transferred in the system, and individuals are now willing to adopt them. He divides innovators into early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards according to their adoption speed. Following this theory, this research applies the information system diffusion model to establish a research framework for the impact of supplier innovativeness on the supply chain system with information sharing, strategic sourcing and supply chain agility.

Prior studies have discussed the impacts of supplier innovativeness on firms. Several studies show the positive link between supplier innovativeness and manufacturers’ performance and relationship performance (Azadegan and Dooley, 2010, Chiesa et al., 2004, Jean et al., 2012, Stock and Tatikonda, 2004). Unlike the previous research, this study attempts to fill the gap in the literature by investigating the role of supplier innovativeness in the whole supply chain, including aspects such as supply chain agility, buyer–supplier relationship, and supply chain collaboration and cooperation. This study examines the relationships among those supply chain practices based on the diffusion model to identify the antecedents of improved supply chain agility in terms of information sharing and strategic sourcing. More importantly, this research also asks how global sourcing influences information sharing and strategic sourcing to improve supply chain agility.

This research contributes to both scholarship and industry. First, this study fills a gap in the operations and supply chain management literature by setting up a research model of the impact of supplier innovativeness on supply chain practices based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Second, the study applies this research framework to global sourcing by investigating its moderating effects on the relationships among supplier innovativeness, information sharing, strategic sourcing, and supply chain agility. Finally, this study informs managers that the impact of supplier innovativeness is positively diffused throughout the supply chain and that manufacturers need to help their suppliers adopt innovation in order to improve supply chain collaboration and agility.

Section snippets

Theoretical background

The diffusion of innovation theory explains how innovations are diffused into systems through communication channels (Rogers, 1995). This process involves a time lag because the adoption of innovation focuses on the individual level (Rogers, 1995); thus, the communication channel needs to be an interpersonal one, in order to develop the necessary perceptions of innovation. More importantly, this individual innovativeness positively impacts the intention to use new technology (Agarwal and

Research model and hypotheses

Supplier involvement has been deemed important in the development of innovation in the supply chain. Suppliers play a pivotal role due to their knowledge of and capabilities regarding the products as well as their focus on supply chain members’ core competencies (Hamel and Prahalad, 1994, Sobrero and Roberts, 2001). More importantly, suppliers themselves need to use their capability and their will to innovate. They must also consider their relationship with customers in organizing tier

Instrument development

To validate our research model with the data, we developed survey questionnaires with measurement items drawn from the previous literature. All measurement items are modified to fit the supply chain management context. Supply innovativeness is measured as suppliers’ capability to develop and adopt innovations (This supplier has introduced more creative and useful products and services in the past five years than have its competitors. This supplier aggressively markets its product

Measurements

A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted by PLS; the results are described in Table 2. We also established our measurement models using PLS. First, Cronbach's alpha and factor loadings were examined to assess the reliability of all constructs in this study. As Table 2 shows, all factor loadings for construct measurements are greater than 0.7 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). The values of Cronbach's alpha for all measurement items in out constructs are also greater than 0.7 in Table 1.

Discussion and conclusion

Our research provides useful implications for both academic researchers and managers in the industry. We applied the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI) to explain how supplier innovativeness is diffused into the supply chain. This study established a conceptual model to examine the relationship between supplier innovativeness and supply chain management practices such as information sharing and strategic sourcing in buyers’ perspective. It also establishes a research framework regarding the

References (89)

  • T.C. Du et al.

    Willingness to share information in a supply chain: a partnership-data-process perspective

    Inf. Manag.

    (2012)
  • S.C. Ellis et al.

    The effect of buyer behaviors on preferred customer status and access to supplier technological innovation: an empirical study of supplier perceptions

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2012)
  • R.A. Eltantawy et al.

    An empirical examination of strategic sourcing dominant logic: strategic sourcing centricity

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2013)
  • D.M. Gligor et al.

    An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: the role of a firm's orientations

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2016)
  • A. Hajji et al.

    Toward valuable prediction of ERP diffusion in North American automotive industry: a simulation based approach

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2016)
  • R.B. Handfield et al.

    Key issues in global supply base management

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2004)
  • J. Holmström

    Business process innovation in the supply chain–a case study of implementing vendor managed inventory

    Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (1998)
  • M. Holweg et al.

    On risk and cost in global sourcing

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2011)
  • A. Inemek et al.

    The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: an empirical study in cross-border supply networks

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2013)
  • M. Khan et al.

    Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2016)
  • R. McIvor et al.

    Early supplier involvement in the design process: lessons from the electronics industry

    Omega

    (2004)
  • M.J. Meixell et al.

    Global supply chain design: a literature review and critique

    Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev.

    (2005)
  • D. Prajogo et al.

    Supply chain integration and performance: the effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2012)
  • A. Sarkar et al.

    Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: a method for supply base reduction

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2006)
  • H. Schiele

    How to distinguish innovative suppliers? Identifying innovative suppliers as new task for purchasing

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2006)
  • H. Sharifi et al.

    A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: an introduction

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (1999)
  • C. Steinle et al.

    Limits to global sourcing?: Strategic consequences of dependency on international suppliers: cluster theory, resource-based view and case studies

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2008)
  • P.M. Swafford et al.

    The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2006)
  • M.L. Swink et al.

    Product development partnerships: balancing the needs of OEMs and suppliers

    Bus. Horiz.

    (2000)
  • F. Wynstra et al.

    Exploring purchasing integration in product development

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2003)
  • H. Zhou et al.

    Supply chain practice and information sharing

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2007)
  • R. Agarwal et al.

    A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology

    Inf. Syst. Res.

    (1998)
  • M.K. Ahuja et al.

    Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use

    MIS Q.

    (2005)
  • T.B. Aune et al.

    Supplier involvement in innovation process: a taxonomy

    Int. J. Innov. Manag.

    (2011)
  • A. Azadegan

    Benefiting from supplier operational innovativeness: the influence of supplier evaluations and absorptive capacity

    J. Supply Chain Manag.

    (2011)
  • A. Azadegan et al.

    Supplier innovativeness and the role of interorganizational learning in enhancing manufacturer capabilities

    J. Supply Chain Manag.

    (2008)
  • C. Blome et al.

    Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective

    Int. J. Prod. Res.

    (2013)
  • Cai, S., Wang, Y., Miao, Z., 2012. Exploring key antecedents of supply chain agility: An empirical study, Service...
  • A.S. Carr et al.

    Communication methods, information sharing, supplier development and performance: an empirical study of their relationships

    Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.

    (2007)
  • H. Cavusoglu et al.

    Value of and interaction between production postponement and Information sharing strategies for supply chain firms

    Prod. Oper. Manag.

    (2012)
  • A. Charles et al.

    A model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: building on humanitarian experience

    Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag.

    (2010)
  • C.-Y. Chiang et al.

    An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility

    Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.

    (2012)
  • V. Chiesa et al.

    The externalisation of R&D activities and the growing market of product development services

    R&D Manag.

    (2004)
  • Chin, W., 2000. Partial least squares for IS researchers: an overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS...
  • Cited by (259)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text