On the plastic anisotropy of an aluminium alloy and its influence on constrained multiaxial flow
Highlights
► Experiments at small and large stress triaxialities performed on the AA7075-T651 alloy. ► A 18 parameter anisotropic material model calibrated from tensile and shear tests. ► Numerical simulations of notched tensile tests performed for two different radii. ► The numerical over estimation usually found with isotropic models is reduced.
Introduction
Structural components in various aluminium alloys are widely used by the automotive and aircraft industries. A variety of different extrusion techniques, rolling processes and forming operations is used to manufacture these components. Because of the extreme deformations taking place during processing, such components may have highly anisotropic properties. This anisotropy is an important material factor determining the magnitude of local deformations and may have significant effects on the final shape of the component and local strain instabilities during operation. Thus, the anisotropic behaviour during deformation must be taken into account if one wants to correctly predict the mechanical behaviour of an aluminium component.
The plastic behaviour of a metallic material is usually described through a yield surface in stress space, the associated plastic flow rule and an isotropic hardening law. The modelling of plastic anisotropy is still a difficult task for macroscopic models and particularly for complex multiaxial paths. The use of crystal plasticity theories can help in this direction, but their use is restricted by computational limitations and the observation that they do not predict the flow stresses and the plastic flow simultaneously, as shown for instance in Darrieulat and Montheillet, 2003, Lopes et al., 2003. Since the pioneering work of Hill (1948), a tremendous effort has been made during the last two decades to improve the modelling of anisotropy in macroscopic models (Hill, 1987, Hill, 1990, Van Houtte et al., 1989, Arminjon and Bacroix, 1991, Barlat and Chung, 1993, Karafillis and Boyce, 1993, Arminjon et al., 1994, Barlat et al., 2003, Bron and Besson, 2004, Van Houtte and Van Bael, 2004, Choi et al., 2006, Leacock, 2006, Aretz et al., 2007, Hu, 2007, Kim et al., 2007, Monchiet et al., 2008, Soare and Barlat, 2010).
Most theories of plasticity assume that the hydrostatic pressure has no or very limited effect on the strain hardening of metals and metallic alloys. Another common assumption in these theories is plastic incompressibility. Since the beginning of the 1980s, Richmond and Spitzig, 1980, Brownrigg et al., 1983, Spitzig and Richmond, 1984, Brünig, 1999 reported pressure dependence of the flow stress for metals such as steel and aluminium. The effect of this observation is an increase in flow stress of metals with hydrostatic pressure. In these studies (despite the claimed dependence of the flow stress on the hydrostatic pressure), the plastic dilatancy is negligible and not related to the normality rule. Even though the effect of hydrostatic pressure was not directly studied, Freed and Sandor (1985) observed plastic volume change in uniaxial tension on the aluminium alloy AA7075-T651. They found elastic and plastic volume changes of similar magnitude and suggested plastic anisotropy to be the prime cause of this plastic compressibility. More recently, Bai and Wierzbicki (2008) proposed a new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and lode dependence.
The ductility of aluminium alloys is also found anisotropic (e.g. Chen et al., 2009), which reveals the influence of the microstructure on the damage process. It is well established that fracture in ductile materials is due to the nucleation, growth and coalescence of voids (see e.g. Thomason, 1990, Anderson, 1991). Under such circumstances, the stress triaxiality and the strain intensity are considered as the most important factors that control the initiation of fracture. Therefore, the deformation and loading history is important to correctly predict failure. In that context, using an appropriate anisotropic model for aluminium alloys is an essential step to enable a proper description of the damage leading to fracture. For instance, a numerical representation of the microstructure coupled with damage models enabled Steglich et al. (2008) to represent the complexity of the fracture mode with anisotropy. Although fracture is the final goal of this work, the current paper is limited to the plastic behaviour only.
Rolled plates of AA7075 aluminium alloy in temper T651 are studied in this paper. This alloy belongs to the AlZnMg series and contains precipitates which increase the mechanical properties such as the yield limit and the tensile strength. Due to the rolling, the grains are flat and elongated along the rolling and transverse directions, the alloying particles are organized in the plane of the plate, and a strong crystallographic texture is engendered. The anisotropy caused by this complex microstructure is observable on the yield limit and the ductility through tensile tests in different directions regarding the rolling direction of the plate (see Børvik et al., 2010, Pedersen et al., 2011). However, by constraining the deformation (e.g. by varying the initial stress triaxiality in the specimens), the properties are affected differently by anisotropy.
The objective of this study is to analyse in detail the effects of anisotropy on the mechanical behaviour and constrained plastic flow of the AA7075-T651 plate. Here, the anisotropy is only considered to affect the yielding behaviour of the alloy. Though some works (see e.g. Stoughton and Yoon, 2009, Rousselier et al., 2010) have studied the effect of anisotropy on the strain hardening of aluminium alloys, the elastic behaviour and the strain hardening are in our study assumed isotropic. The yield surface is represented by the linear transformation-based yield function Yld2004-18p proposed by Barlat et al. (2005), and a corotational formulation (Belytschko et al., 2000) was adopted to simplify the formulation of plastic anisotropy. The stress measure is defined with respect to the un-rotated configuration and expressed in the rectangular Cartesian coordinate system given by the principal axes of anisotropy of the material. These axes are assumed to remain orthogonal during deformation. This formulation was successfully used by Grytten et al. (2008) to model the plastic behaviour of the aluminium alloy AA5083-H116. The used yield function together with the associated flow rule presumes pressure insensitivity. The yield criterion is identified through tension tests on smooth tensile specimens with longitudinal axes aligned at different directions with respect to the rolling direction of the plate and upsetting test in the thickness direction of the plate. Both measured directional yield stresses and the ratios of transverse to thickness plastic strain increments are used to identify the coefficients of the yield function. The hardening parameters are identified from tensile tests in the rolling direction of the plate. In addition, shear and upsetting tests were used to identify the coefficients of the yield function. The model is then applied in non-linear finite element simulations to reproduce the plastic behaviour of different type of specimens (notched axisymmetric specimens, butterfly shear specimens and cylindrical specimens for upsetting tests) cut from different material directions. It will be shown that the effects of anisotropy must be taken into account for a good representation of the mechanical behaviour of the alloy at various stress states.
Section 2 describes the aluminium alloy, the experimental procedures and the test programme applied in this investigation. Section 3 presents the constitutive model used for the modelling of the anisotropic behaviour of the material and the procedures allowing the identification of the different parameters. In Section 4, the numerical procedures are presented which allow the simulation of the plastic behaviour of the different specimens. Sections 5 Discussion, 6 Conclusions contain discussions of the main results and concluding remarks, respectively.
Section snippets
The material
The material studied in this paper is the high strength AA7075-T651 aluminium alloy. All material specimens were taken from a 20 mm thick plate obtained by a combined cold and hot rolling process. In the rolling direction, the plate has nominal yield and tensile strengths of 505 and 570 MPa, respectively. The nominal chemical composition of the AA7075 alloy is given in Table 1. Temper T651 implies that the alloy is slightly stretched and aged to peak strength. The grain structure of the
Constitutive model
A hypoelasto-plastic constitutive model based on the yield surface representation Yld2004-18p proposed by Barlat et al. (2005) is used to describe the anisotropic behaviour of the AA7075-T651 aluminium alloy. The model accounts for isotropic elasticity, anisotropic yielding, associated plastic flow and isotropic strain hardening. The elastic strains are assumed small while the plastic strains may be finite. A corotational formulation is adopted to simplify the formulation of plastic anisotropy.
Numerical procedures and finite element models
The constitutive relations described in Section 3 were implemented as a user-defined material subroutine (see Grytten et al., 2008) in the non-linear finite element code LS-DYNA (LSTC, 2007). All tests presented in Section 2 were simulated using the explicit solver of LS-DYNA and 8-node solid elements with one integration point and stiffness-based hourglass control. To reduce the computational time, affected both by the element size and the number of elements, the mesh was refined in the area
Discussion
The effect of anisotropy on the behaviour of AA7075-T651 aluminium alloy has been investigated in this paper. In particular, it was found that the anisotropic material model provides a more accurate description of the notch-strengthening effect in the numerical simulations of the notched specimen tensile tests. The model is able to reproduce the experimental observations despite the assumptions of non-evolution of the anisotropy, incompressibility and pressure insensitivity.
To explain this
Conclusions
In this study the plastic anisotropy of the aluminium alloy AA7075-T651 has been characterized using material tests in different directions with respect to the rolling direction of the plate. Tests were performed with specimens providing a wide range of stress states. The tests showed that the crystallographic texture and grain morphology gave rise to a strong plastic anisotropy in the rolled aluminium plate. One interesting observation is that the effect of the plastic anisotropy is less for
Acknowledgements
The financial support of this work from the Structural Impact Laboratory (SIMLab), Centre for Research-based Innovation (CRI) at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Torodd Berstad at SINTEF Materials and Chemistry for help with the numerical simulations.
References (45)
Fracture Mechanics (Fundamentals and Applications)
(1991)- et al.
Yield function calibration for orthotropic sheet metals based on uniaxial and plane strain tensile tests
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
(2007) - et al.
On plastic potentials for anisotropic metals and their derivation from the texture function
Acta Mechanica
(1991) - et al.
A fourth-order plastic potential for anisotropic metals and its analytical calculation from the texture function
Acta Mechanica
(1994) - et al.
A new metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and lode dependence
International Journal of Plasticity
(2008) - et al.
On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
(2004) - et al.
Six-component yield function for anisotropic materials
International Journal of Plasticity
(1991) - et al.
Anisotropic potentials for plastically deformation metals
Modelling and Simulation in Material Science and Engineering
(1993) - et al.
Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets – Part 1: theory
International Journal of Plasticity
(2003) - et al.
Linear transformation-based anisotropic yield functions
International Journal of Plasticity
(2005)
Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures
A yield function for anisotropic materials – application to aluminum alloys
International Journal of Plasticity
The influence of hydrostatic pressure on the flow stress and ductility of a spherodized 1045 steel
Acta Metallurgica
Numerical simulation of the large elastic–plastic deformation behavior of hydrostatic stress-sensitive solids
International Journal of Plasticity
Quasi-brittle fracture during structural impact of AA7075-T651 aluminium plates
International Journal of Impact Engineering
An experimental study on the dynamic fracture of extruded AA6xxx and AA7xxx aluminium alloys
Materials Science and Engineering A
Modelling multiaxial deformation of planar anisotropic elasto-plastic materials, part I: Theory
International Journal of Plasticity
A texture based continuum approach for predicting the plastic behaviour of rolled sheet
International Journal of Plasticity
The plastic compressibility of 7075-T651 aluminum-alloy plate
Experimental Mechanics
Evaluation of identification methods for Yld2004-18p
International Journal of Plasticity
A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Cited by (56)
Anisotropic ductile fracture of a stainless steel under biaxial loading: Experiments and predictions
2024, International Journal of PlasticityAnisotropic behavior of as-extruded 7003 aluminum alloy under quasi-static compression and high-speed impact
2024, International Journal of Impact EngineeringAnisotropic mechanical response of AA7475-T7351 alloy at different loading rates and temperatures
2023, Thin-Walled StructuresAnisotropic Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman model considering the anisotropic void behaviors
2023, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesAnisotropic yield surfaces of additively manufactured metals simulated with crystal plasticity
2022, European Journal of Mechanics, A/SolidsSimulation of ductile fracture in aluminium alloys with random or strong texture using heuristic extensions of the Gurson model
2022, Engineering Fracture MechanicsCitation Excerpt :For anisotropic metals, both quadratic and non-quadratic anisotropic yield criteria have been proposed, e.g., Hill [13], Barlat et al. [14,15], Karafillis and Boyce [16], Bron and Besson [17], and Cazacu [18]. The Yld2004-18p yield criterion proposed by Barlat et al. [15] has been shown to be particularly suitable for aluminium alloys with strong anisotropy, e.g., [5,19]. The cost of adopting an advanced non-quadratic anisotropic yield criterion is the high number of anisotropy parameters which have to be determined either from experiments or crystal plasticity simulations, but these parameters are needed to describe the often complex shape of the anisotropic yield surface of a strongly textured material.