Energy components in rock blasting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.05.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Ten production blasts and one single-hole confined blast have been monitored in two quarries in order to assess the measurable forms of energy in which the energy delivered by the explosive is transformed in rock blasting. The seismic field from seismographs readings, the initial velocity of the blasted rock face obtained from high-speed video camera records, and the fragment size distributions from image analysis of the muckpile material are used to determine the seismic wave energy, the kinetic energy and the fracture energy, respectively, transferred in the blasting process. The blasting data and the methods of calculation of the energy terms from those are described in detail. Heat of explosion and useful work to 100 MPa have been used as descriptions of the energy of explosives. The maximum total energy measured accounts for not more than 26% of the available explosive energy if this is rated as the heat of explosion, though lower figures are usually obtained. The values measured for each of the energy components range from 2% to 6% of the total energy available for the fragmentation energy, 1–3% for the seismic energy and 3–21% for the kinetic energy. For the confined shothole, the seismic energy was 9% of the heat of explosion. The uncertainty of the calculated energies is analyzed from the variability of the measured data. Particularly important influential parameters are the treatment of the fines tail of the fragment size distribution in the determination of the fragmentation energy, and the use of P or S wave velocity values, and whether these are determined from in situ or from laboratory measurements, in the calculation of the seismic energy.

Introduction

Explosives are the primary source of energy for rock breaking in the mining, quarrying and construction industries. The work into which the energy is converted transforms rock into a distribution of fragments and displaces them so that they can be conveniently loaded and hauled for further comminution and processing. Although the energetic qualification of explosives is not particularly high (any fuel/oxygen mixture used in the power industry delivers more energy per unit mass than do explosives), they are compact sources, which are able to deliver their energy in an autonomous form at a very fast rate. This results in reaction products at high pressure that can perform mechanical work in deforming and breaking the material in their vicinity. This is what makes explosives useful and in many cases irreplaceable for rock excavation. This fast energy delivery, in the form of a large amount of reaction products at high pressure and high temperature, is inseparable of a number of transformations other than the desired fragmentation and throw, such as the seismic wave into the rock.

Any explosive data sheet or commercial brochure quotes some type of energetic description. Explosives energy is rated in a variety of ways, obtained either from calculation or from experimental tests. However, the questions of what amount of that explosive energy is transferred to the rock and what fraction of it is converted into efficient work in the usual civil application of rock blasting remains largely undefined. Although the measurement of some of the effects of the explosive in rock is customary (vibration, fragmentation and, to a minor extent, rock movement), they are usually conducted for blast control purpose and the results are rarely cast in terms of their energy content. The reason for this may be that it is not the energy consumption in this or that phenomenon that matters, but rather the end effects, i.e., degree of fragmentation, throw and vibration levels. Data and estimations on energy components in rock blasting are thus limited to a few researchers. Berta [1], Spathis [2] and Ouchterlony et al. [3] calculate the amounts of energy transformed in kinetic energy of the rock, fracture generation and seismic wave. Seismic energy has received special attention since earlier times; calculations of seismic energy and its comparison with explosive energy have been reported by Howell and Budenstein [4], Fogelson et al. [5], Berg and Cook [6], Nicholls [7], Atchinson [8], and more recently by Hinzen [9].

Berta [1] attempted to use some of the energy concepts in his principles of blast design, though this is seldom used in practice. Spathis [2] suggested, as a recommendation for future work, the practical use of the energy balance to enable blast designs which direct the available energy into the desired work and hence control the energy split between fracture energy, kinetic energy and radiated seismic energy, resulting in a more efficient use of the explosive energy. The present work assesses to some extent the feasibility of this energy approach, aiming at establishing, through new data and a thorough revision of the published work on the matter, the fraction of explosive energy transferred to the rock in its various components, with particular attention to their variability and the reasonable ranges that could be expected in quarry blasting.

The basic theory and experimental background for the determination of some of the energy components in rock blasting are described first. These are then applied to ten production blasts and one single, confined (without rock movement) blasthole. Eight of the production blasts and the confined shot were conducted in a limestone quarry (El Alto, Spain); two more production blasts were monitored in an amphibolite quarry (Eibenstein, Austria). Seismographs, high-speed video camera and fragmentation monitoring systems were used to measure the seismic field, the initial velocity of the blasted rock face and the fragment size distribution curve, respectively, from which the various energy terms are calculated. Vibrations were measured in the single confined hole.

Section snippets

The energy balance of blasting

The energy released by the explosive, borne in the detonation products upon completion of the chemical reaction, is converted into heat and work to the surroundings according to the first principle of thermodynamics. Some of these forms become apparent during the blast, namely: (a) the fracture work, that ultimately appears as new surface in the rock fragments; (b) the work transferred as shock wave into the rock, that propagates as plastic and ultimately elastic waves, appearing as seismic

Description of the blasts

El Alto quarry belongs to Cementos Portland Valderrivas, a cement and aggregate producer located in the province of Madrid, Spain. The quarry produces 2.25 Mt/yr of limestone and marl. The deposit is of Miocene age and lacustrine origin. The geology is simple and essentially uniform. In the upper 2–6 m, there is an overburden of weathered clayey marl of sandy nature (with a maximum particle size of 14 mm) and low cohesion, underlying a clayey soil of some tens of centimeters. The limestone

Discussion

Table 11 summarizes the fragmentation, kinetic and seismic efficiencies obtained. Values of seismic energy, for each blast, are the average of the averages in the top and floor levels. Considering that the heat of explosion is the energy available in the blast, only 8–26% of it has been measured through rock fragmentation, seismic wave and rock movement in bench blasting. The useful work already discards a portion of the total energy, so that the efficiency ranges with respect to it result in

Conclusions

The basic measurable energy components of the blasting process have been determined from production blasts data. Emphasis has been put on describing in detail the calculations and simplifying assumptions required to derive the energy values from the raw data measured. The following ranges of energetic efficiency (given as the 95% confidence intervals of the means of lognormal distributions) have been obtained for bench production blasts. For each energy component, the first range applies to

Acknowledgements

The experimental work has been partially funded by the European Union under contract no. G1RD-CT-2000-00438, “Less Fines Production in Aggregate and Industrial Minerals Industry”. We would like to thank our colleagues in the project for the fruitful research cooperation; especial recognition is due to the technical staff at the quarries of El Alto and Eibenstein for their enthusiastic involvement and valuable assistance in the measurements. Finally, we are indebted to Finn Ouchterlony, of

References (51)

  • K.G. Hinzen

    Comparison of seismic and explosive energy in five smooth blasting test rounds

    Int J Rock Mech Min Sci

    (1998)
  • E. Hamdi et al.

    A methodology for rock characterization and classification to improve blast results

    Int J Rock Mech Min Sci

    (2005)
  • G. Berta

    L’esplosivo strumento di lavoro

    (1990)
  • A.T. Spathis

    On the energy efficiency of blasting

  • F. Ouchterlony et al.

    The energy balance of production blasts at Norkalk's Klinthagen quarry

  • B.F. Howell et al.

    Energy distribution in explosion-generated seismic pulses

    Geophysics

    (1955)
  • D.E. Fogelson et al.

    Propagation of peak strain and strain energy for explosion-generated strain pulses in rock

  • J.W. Berg et al.

    Energies, magnitudes and amplitudes of seismic waves from quarry blasts at Promontory and Lakeside, Utah

    Seismol Soc Bull

    (1961)
  • H.R. Nicholls

    Coupling explosive energy to rock

    Geophysics

    (1962)
  • T.C. Atchinson

    Fragmentation principles

  • D.E. Grady

    Fragmentation under impulsive stress loading

  • E. Hamdi et al.

    Evaluation of the part of blasting energy used for rock mass fragmentation

    Int J Blast Fragment

    (2001)
  • J.D. Achenbach

    Wave propagation in elastic solids

    (1975)
  • J.S. Rinehart

    Stress transients in solids

    (1975)
  • R.F. Chiappetta et al.

    Analytical high-speed photography to evaluate air decks, stemming retention and gas confinement in presplitting, reclamation and gross motion applications

  • D. Goetz et al.

    Mechanical behaviour of rocks. Technical report 35, EU project GRD-2000-25224

    (2002)
  • A. Böhm et al.

    Mechanical fragmentation tests. Technical report 10, EU project GRD-2000-25224

    (2002)
  • J.A. Sanchidrián et al.

    Blasting performance in El Alto quarry (Cementos Portland). Technical report 43. EU project GRD-2000-25224

    (2003)
  • J.A. Sanchidrián et al.

    Blasting performance in Eibenstein (Hengl Bitustein). Technical report 42. EU project GRD-2000-25224

    (2003)
  • G. Bjarnholt et al.

    Explosive expansion work in underwater detonations

  • B. Mohanty

    Explosives performance—the underwater test revisited

  • U. Nyberg et al.

    Large size cylinder expansion tests on ANFO and gassed bulk emulsion explosives

  • J.A. Sanchidrián et al.

    Calculation of the explosives useful work-comparison with cylinder test data

  • J.A. Sanchidrián et al.

    Calculation of the energy of explosives with a partial reaction model

    Propell Explos Pyrotechn

    (2006)
  • M.L. Hobbs et al.

    Nonideal thermoequilibrium calculations using a large product species data base. Report SAND92-0482

    (1992)
  • Cited by (206)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text