Developing marketing capabilities for customer value creation through Marketing–Sales integration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.06.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The capacity to create superior customer value stems from the marketing capabilities a company possesses. A considerable body of research has indicated that market oriented companies have distinctive marketing capabilities which lead to superior organizational performance. Although it has been widely recognized that the development of marketing capabilities requires the joint effort of Marketing and Sales departments, almost no attention has been devoted to investigating the integration of these two functions. This study reports on an exploratory effort to use the means–end theory in explaining Marketing–Sales integration. Findings show that Marketing–Sales integration is a multi-faceted construct made up of different components that impact different marketing capabilities and highlight its antecedents and consequences.

Introduction

One of the cornerstones of modern marketing thought is that market oriented companies are better equipped to meet the generation of superior customer value and, as a consequence, to attain sustainable competitive advantage. Several studies show that market orientation is positively related to organizational performance (Jaworski and Kohli, 1993, Narver and Slater, 1990, Ruekert, 1992, Slater and Narver, 1994). The ability to generate superior customer value is dependent on the availability of distinctive marketing capabilities (Day, 1994a, Hult and Ketchen, 2001, Slater and Narver, 1995, Slater and Narver, 2000).

Inter-functional relationships are at the basis of the market orientation construct. Narver and Slater (1990) consider inter-functional coordination as a component of the construct, whereas Kohli and Jaworski (1990) suggest that interdepartmental dynamics are an antecedent of market orientation. In short, market oriented companies are characterized by a high level of integration of market-related knowledge and skills.

Prior research shows that knowledge and skills regarding market-related activities are spread throughout the organization, the highest concentration, as one would expect, in the two departments traditionally responsible for managing market relationships: Marketing and Sales (Homburg et al., 2000, Homburg et al., 1999, Krohmer et al., 2002, Rouziès et al., 2005, Zoltners, 2004). Despite the fact that Marketing and Sales often share responsibility for many common activities, their rapport is not without problems (Anderson, 1996, Carpenter, 1992, Shocker et al., 1994, Strahle et al., 1996). As a result, opportunities for a company to create superior customer value risk being seriously challenged. Even though the existing literature (Dewsnap and Jobber, 2000, Dewsnap and Jobber, 2002, Rouziès et al., 2005) has contributed to enhancing our knowledge on Marketing–Sales integration, research in this area is still scarce.

The purpose of this study is to explore the contribution of Marketing–Sales integration to the development of marketing capabilities, and, as a consequence, to the creation of superior value for the customer. In particular, our objectives are to better clarify and detail the integration construct; to investigate how Marketing–Sales integration can impact different marketing capabilities; and, finally, to identify potential antecedents which may foster Marketing–Sales integration.

The article, therefore, is structured as follows. Firstly, a literature review on marketing capabilities and Marketing–Sales integration highlights the limitations of prior research regarding the contribution of the two departments (and their integration) to the creation of superior customer value. Secondly, our methodological approach is described and findings of the exploratory research on Marketing–Sales integration are presented and discussed. Lastly, a discussion of theoretical and managerial implications and possibilities for future research on the topic conclude the paper.

Section snippets

Marketing capabilities and the contribution of Marketing and Sales departments

Over the last decade, a growing number of studies have highlighted the role of marketing capabilities in the attainment of a firm's competitive advantage. Leveraging on the resource-based view of the firm (Barney, 1991, Grant, 1991, Peteraf, 1993, Wernerfelt, 1984) and on the capability-based view of the firm (Grant, 1996, Prahalad and Hamel, 1990, Teece et al., 1997), marketing researchers demonstrated that marketing resources and capabilities can contribute to the creation of a competitive

The study

Due to the lack of robust conceptual and empirical foundations for our topic, we adopted an exploratory approach with a qualitative research design. We are interested in exploring the relationship between Marketing–Sales integration with its antecedents and consequences, hence the method we selected was the laddering technique based on means–end theory.

As pointed out by Foote and Lamb (2002), laddering provides for an opportunity to clarify meanings, explanations, goals and values beyond that

Preliminary interviews

Regarding the meaning of Marketing–Sales integration, many different interpretations emerged. Integration was described by executives in terms of coordination, collaboration, communication, working relationships, level of conflict, distribution of power. Many respondents provided different definitions of the integration concept during the interview, pointing out that integration can refer to different levels: integration of goals, resources or activities carried out by the two departments in

The nature of Marketing–Sales integration

Previous research suggests that integration is a combination of interaction and collaboration (Kahn, 1996, Kahn, 2001). In keeping with Dewsnap and Jobber (2000) and Rouziès et al. (2005) our findings highlight a more articulated nature of the integration construct. Communication and collaboration emerge as two components of the construct, whereas trust, motivation, commitment, mutual help, reduced inter-group conflict and positive organizational climate play a role as well. Communication

Theoretical implications

The present study is one of the very few empirical investigations on Marketing–Sales integration. As such it makes a number of theoretical contributions. The first contribution is to better specify the nature of the Marketing–Sales integration construct. Our findings may be used in future research on how to better implement and measure the integration construct, or on how to improve model causal paths between different facets of integration. In fact, the result that emerges from our data is

Acknowledgement

This study was partially supported by the Department of Marketing and the Research Division of SDA Bocconi School of Management. The authors thank the anonymous IMM reviewers for their help in greatly improving the article. They are also grateful to Prof. Sandro Fazzolari for his help in editing the final version of the article.

Paolo Guenzi is an Associate Professor of Marketing at Università L. Bocconi and SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy. His main research interests include sales management, relationship marketing and services management. His research has been published in the International Journal of Service Industry Management, European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management and International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship.

References (89)

  • K.B. Kahn

    Market orientation, interdepartmental integration and product development performance

    Journal of Product Innovation Management

    (2001)
  • K.B. Kahn et al.

    Marketing's integration with other departments

    Journal of Business Research

    (1998)
  • H. Krohmer et al.

    Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence

    Journal of Business Research

    (2002)
  • F. Langerak

    Effects of market orientation on the behaviors of salespersons and purchasers, channel relationships, and performance of manufacturers

    International Journal of Research in Marketing

    (2001)
  • F. Langerak et al.

    A laddering approach to the use of methods and techniques to reduce the cycle time of new-to-the-firm products

    Journal of Product Innovation Management

    (1999)
  • M.A.A.M. Leenders et al.

    The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D

    Journal of Product Innovation Management

    (2002)
  • P.M. Podsakoff et al.

    Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research

    Journal of Management

    (2000)
  • W. Ulaga

    Customer value in business markets—an agenda for inquiry

    Industrial Marketing Management

    (2001, May)
  • W. Ulaga et al.

    Measuring customer-perceived value in business markets

    Industrial Marketing Management

    (2001, August)
  • A. Walter et al.

    Value creation in buyer–seller relationships

    Industrial Marketing Management

    (2001, May)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Discursive psychology: An alternative conceptual foundation to means–end chain theory

    Psychology and Marketing

    (2000)
  • J.B. Barney

    Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage

    Journal of Management

    (1991)
  • G. Botschen et al.

    Using means–end structures for benefit segmentation—an application to services

    European Journal of Marketing

    (1999)
  • H. Bourne et al.

    Eliciting managers' personal values: An adaptation of the laddering interview method

    Organizational Research Methods

    (2005)
  • T. Burns et al.

    The management of innovation

    (1961)
  • P. Carpenter

    Bridging the gap between marketing and sales

    Sales and Marketing Management

    (1992, March)
  • F.V. Cespedes

    Co-ordinating sales and marketing in consumer goods firms

    Journal of Consumer Marketing

    (1993)
  • J. Cross et al.

    Sales force activities and marketing strategies in industrial firms: Relationships and implications

    Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management

    (2001)
  • G.S. Day

    The capabilities of market-driven organizations

    Journal of Marketing

    (1994)
  • G.S. Day

    Continuous learning about markets

    California Management Review

    (1994, Summer)
  • B. Dewsnap et al.

    The sales–marketing interface in consumer packaged-good companies: A conceptual framework

    Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management

    (2000)
  • B. Dewsnap et al.

    A social psychological model of relations between marketing and sales

    European Journal of Marketing

    (2002)
  • S. Dutta et al.

    Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?

    Marketing Science

    (1999)
  • R.J. Fisher et al.

    Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: The moderating role of relative functional identification

    Journal of Marketing

    (1997)
  • D. Foote et al.

    Eliciting information about the values of HRM practitioners using laddering interviews

    Business Ethics

    (2002)
  • C.E. Gengler et al.

    Consumer understanding and advertising strategy: Analysis and strategic translation of laddering data

    Journal of Advertising Research

    (1995, July/August)
  • R.M. Grant

    The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation

    California Management Review

    (1991)
  • R.M. Grant

    Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration

    Organization Science

    (1996)
  • J. Greenberg

    The social side of fairness. Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice

  • A.K. Gupta et al.

    A model studying R&D–Marketing interface in the product innovation process

    Journal of Marketing

    (1986)
  • J. Gutman

    A means–end chain model based on consumer categorization processes

    Journal of Marketing

    (1982)
  • C. Homburg et al.

    Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure

    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    (2000)
  • C. Homburg et al.

    Marketing's influence within the firm

    Journal of Marketing

    (1999)
  • T.G. Hult et al.

    Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance

    Strategic Management Journal

    (2001, September)
  • Cited by (0)

    Paolo Guenzi is an Associate Professor of Marketing at Università L. Bocconi and SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy. His main research interests include sales management, relationship marketing and services management. His research has been published in the International Journal of Service Industry Management, European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management and International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship.

    Gabriele Troilo is an Associate Professor of Marketing at Università L. Bocconi and SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy. His main research interests include marketing knowledge management, marketing capabilities and cross-functional integration. He is Vice President of the European Marketing Academy.

    View full text