Social networking and the risk to companies and institutions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istr.2010.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Social networks open up new business opportunities for customer acquisition and retention, facilitate knowledge transfer within the company, and can positively influence work climate. However, they can also quickly destroy a company image that took years to build, while the use of social networks at work not only risks a loss in productivity but may also undermine legal obligations. Eager networkers might also divulge company internals to competitors or the public at large. And last but not least, “friendships” open up completely new attack vectors for professional hackers, thus significantly increasing company exposure to online break-ins. This article briefly summarizes the opportunities and dangers that this development poses for business. This contribution is based on an earlier article by the same authors (in German) (Langheinrich and Karjoth, 2010).

Introduction

By the last count (July 2010), the popular online social networking site (SNS) Facebook featured not less than half a billion users (Ostrow, 2010) – that is a few million more than, say, the population of all 27 EU member states together. In the US alone, Facebook’s user base grew more than 350% in the last 24 months – from 27 million users in July 2008 to more than 125 million in July 2010 (Burcher, 2010), representing 40% of the country’s population.

While much has been written about the benefits and risks of SNSs for individuals (e.g., Bilge et al., 2009, Fogel and Nehamad, 2009, Boyd and Ellison, 2007), their widespread use also increasingly affects companies and public institutions, even though such “legal persons” hardly seem to be in need of finding friends. However, today’s SNSs have become a powerful tool for customer acquisition and retention, employee recruiting, for intra-company knowledge transfer, and for creating a positive workplace atmosphere.

At the same time, the ability of SNSs to quickly destroy a highly profitable brand image that took years to build up, using nothing more but a low-cost grassroots campaign, is equally powerful. Also, Facebook-enabled employees risk neglecting their actual work over extensive networking (as of April 2010, almost 7% of all corporate Internet traffic is said to have come from accessing Facebook pages (See http://www.network-box.com/node/533)), or unknowingly spilling company secrets to “friendly” competitors. Firing employees that are “friends” with their managers might risk lawsuits that stipulate the improper use of private information, while hacking the SNS accounts of management can significantly improve the success rate of phishing attacks. Should companies avoid or embrace SNSs?

Section snippets

Social networks and social selling

The future of advertising is personal. This not only means “personalized” in the sense that companies can prepare custom messages to individual customers, but also “personal” in the sense that product endorsements and tips come directly from friends, for friends.

Early examples of this new type of advertising are the so-called “viral marketing “ campaigns on the Web: A company might leak some apparently unauthorized pictures, videos, or specs of a soon-to-be released product to a well-known

Social networks as a leadership tool

Social networks can not only improve communication with existing and potential customers, it can also positively affect the communication within an organization.

Even without an official adoption of Facebook by management, many employees probably already spend considerable amounts of company time to “quickly” check their profile and update their status while at work. A good example is the case of the city administration in Zurich, Switzerland. After their 24,000 employees had a combined daily

Recruitment and screening

In a study published December 2009, Microsoft surveyed more than 1200 recruiters about their use of networked media for recruitment (Research Shows Online Reputations Matter, 2009). While classical search engines were still used in the large majority of cases (78%), SNSs followed not far behind (63%), indicating that they have become an integral part of employee screening. Equally popular were SNS-influenced sites such as photo-sharing platforms (e.g., Flickr) with 59% and professional business

Dangerous liaisons – employees in social networks

The participation of employees in SNSs may not only reduce their productive working time and allow headhunters to woo them away to a competitor, but it can also quickly and significantly complicate corporate security.

Conclusions

With the many advantages of embracing SNS and other social media communication channels, companies need to carefully evaluate not only the opportunities of such a move, but also face the risks. In 2007, ENISA – the European Network and Information Security Agency – published 19 recommendations for operators and users of social networks (Hogben, 2008). Today, similar recommendations exist for public authorities, for example those set up by the British government to improve administrative

References (33)

  • J. Fogel et al.

    Internet social network communities: risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns

    Comput Hum Behav

    (2009)
  • Amazon modifies purchase circles following controversy

    InternetNews.com

    (August 27, 1999)
  • T. Baldas

    Lawyers warn: bosses who ‘friend’ are begging to be sued

    Law.com Website

    (October 23, 2009)
  • Bilge L, Strufe T, Balzarotti D, Kirda E. All your contacts are belong to us: automated identity theft attacks on...
  • D. Boyd et al.

    Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship

    J Computer-Mediated Commun

    (2007)
  • C.H. Bryant

    ‘Twittergate’ over German poll results

    Financial Times Europe

    (May 27, 2009)
  • N. Burcher

    Facebook usage statistics by country – July 2010 compared to July 2009 and July 2008

    nickburcher.com Personal Blog

    (July 2, 2010)
  • Facebook

    The privacy challenge

    Sophos.com

    (June 2, 2010)
  • D. Fahmy

    Professor suspended after joke about killing students on Facebook

    ABC News

    (March 3, 2010)
  • Few companies have policy for employee use of social networks

    eMarketer.com

    (February 3, 2010)
  • D. Froomkin

    Google Buzz exposes White House internet policy advisor Andrew Mclaughlin’s email list; congressman has questions

    The Huffington Post

    (April 8, 2010)
  • U. Gattiker

    Five reasons not to seal your social media borders

    ComMetrics Blog

    (March 31, 2010)
  • E. Hansen

    Google blogger has left the building

    CNET News

    (February 8, 2010)
  • L. Heron

    Facebook accounts hacked; 1.5 million login IDs for sale?

    ABC News Website

    (April 23, 2010)
  • G. Hogben

    Best practices for social networks

    digma - Zeitschrift für Datenrecht und Informationssicherheit

    (2008)
  • C. Hopkins

    Facebook’s new policies make harassment easy

    ReadWriteWeb Online News

    (May 5, 2010)
  • Cited by (28)

    • The role of customer awareness in promoting firm sustainability and sustainable supply chain management

      2019, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In 2011 the Brazilian government charged Zara's parent company, accusing it of “sweatshop-like working conditions in a subcontractor's facilities of Zara's main supplier, AHA” (Wilhelm et al., 2016b). At the beginning of 2010 Nestlé changed its palm oil sourcing because an Indonesian sub-tier supplier engaged in illegal deforestation (Langheinrich and Karjoth, 2010). The greater is the extent to which firms rely on supply chains partners, the greater is the extent to which their environmental and social sustainability depends on their supply chain partners.

    • Do organizations use a formalized risk management process to address social media risk?

      2018, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Social media use increases the risk of intentional or unintentional leakage of confidential information, such as employee or customer data or proprietary intellectual property. Information leakage may lead to regulatory, compliance, or legal issues if employees disclose confidential organizational information via posting comments on their personal social media pages (Ernst and Young, 2014b; Greene and O'Brien, 2013; Langheinrich and Karjoth, 2010). For example, in June 2012, Netflix CEO W. Reed Hastings announced on his personal Facebook page that the company had just streamed more than 1 billion hours of Internet Video (ElBoghdady, 2013; Katz and McIntosh, 2013).

    • Managing millennials’ personal use of technology at work

      2018, Business Horizons
      Citation Excerpt :

      With unbounded discretion over their time, millennials could engage in more serious forms of personal use of technology that may jeopardize their colleagues and entire organization (Eivazi, 2011). For instance, inappropriate use of social networking sites could damage the company’s reputation (Langheinrich & Karjoth, 2010). Millennial workers may unknowingly spill company secrets to their friends, and these could quickly travel to their competitors and the public.

    • Integrated sustainable supply chain management and firm performance in the Indian textile industry

      2021, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal
    • An evaluation of the effects of social media on client: Advertising agency relationships in the UK

      2021, Research Anthology on Strategies for Using Social Media as a Service and Tool in Business
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text