Analysis of flight-operating costs and delays: The São Paulo terminal maneuvering area

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.04.013Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper considers aircraft in-flight delays and their costs in the São Paulo terminal maneuvering area, Brazil's busiest region for airborne operations. Different flow scenarios were constructed representing these operations based on simulations. Economic evaluation is based on average flight-operating costs and focuses on ground and in-flight operations originating or ending at Congonhas, São Paulo, and Viracopos international airports, the three busiest facilities in the region. Five scenarios are analyzed; two of which, one considering Guarulhos Airport's third runway and another the removal of slow airplanes from Congonhas Airport, result in considerable congestion and delay reductions. Three scenarios involving 10%, 20%, and 30% traffic reallocations from Congonhas to Guarulhos Airport were also analyzed and these suggest small delays in arrival and departure procedures are possible that would reduce airline-operating costs and increase the region's capacity.

Introduction

Brazil's air transport infrastructure is under constant and growing pressure as demands increase on its services (Comando da Aeronáutica, 2005). This growth in traffic is not being matched by an appropriate increase in capacity. Two possible macro-solutions are being considered, an increase in capacity and more effective management of demand, with several variants on each being mooted. In practice, it seems that some combination is inevitable to cope with the long- and short-term problems. Short- and medium-term alternatives are more focused on management of demand. One example is better management of the air traffic flow and another involves changes in the way airport slots are allocated. Such measures are attractive because they can be introduced quickly and have a direct and easily measured impact. They are also low cost. On the other hand, long-term measures tend to focus on increasing capacity and include the construction of new airports, of additional runways at existing facilities, and investment in new technologies. These policies are costly and their benefits only materialize after 5 to 10 years.

This is a standard economic problem affecting all industries that involves assessing the best way to use existing resources while at the same time developing and implementing an optimal investment strategy to enhance that capacity. Kostiuk (2001) has, for example, suggested the methodology summarized in Fig. 1 as one way of doing this in the aviation context.

Analytical and simulation models of capacity and delays have been developed, for example by Santana and Érico (2002), that seek to quantify disparities between capacity and demand. These models enable analysis of capacity/demand and capacity/delay relationships, and the effectiveness of airports and air traffic control (ATC) resource utilization.

In Brazil, the terminal maneuvering area-São Paulo (TMA-SP) has experienced significant congestion (Pereira et al., 2001; Hupalo, 2003 and INFRAERO, 2007) that the aeronautical authorities have found difficult to mitigate. Its difficulties partly stem from a lack of planning, scarcity of resources, poor preservation of the area around the airport that could be used for expansion, bad management of other means of transport, and an inadequate focus on the problem.

At the beginning of 2000, the arrival and departure routes for the TMA-SP, and their control, were changed (MITRE Co., 2001). Aircrafts that had previously been vectored began to follow standardized descent profiles from entering the area until landing. While this reduced traffic controllers’ workload, it did little to increase the effective capacity of the airport and airspace.

São Paulo (SBGR) and Congonhas (SBSP) international airports, the busiest in Brazil (INFRAERO, 2007), are the main facilities in the TMA-SP. They are about 20 km apart and unfortunately have convergent runway position pattern (a 09–27 orientation for Guarulhos and 17–35 for Congonhas) that hampers defining of flight paths with the necessary segregation. Furthermore, they have both been engulfed by their parent cities making any growth in their physical runway capacity almost impossible without huge investments.

Section snippets

Simulation as an analytical tool

Simulation has been widely used to study airport and airspace systems and can be done in a variety of ways1 (Fig. 2). Compared with experiments, simulations are often seen to have advantages (Pidd, 1992). They are often cheaper and can be done more quickly. They are also generally easily repeatable and can estimate the effects of extreme conditions without the risks that live experiments may entail.

São Paulo terminal maneuvering area

Terminal airspace is made up of ATS routes and the areas around airports. Fig. 3 shows the TMA-SP divided into traffic control sectors and the location of the omni-directional radio range (VOR). The TMA-SP can be characterized as two circles, one centered in Congonhas with a radius of 42 nm, and the other centered in Campinas with a radius of 27 nm. It extends vertically from 5500 ft to flight level 195 (approximately 19,500 ft). There are three major airports in the area: Congonhas, Viracopos, and

Scenarios

To solve the growing traffic problems in the TMA-SP, and in particular at Guarulhos and Congonhas, INFRAERO (the Brazilian Airport Infrastructure Company) initially proposed the construction of a new passenger terminal (TPS3) and a third runway (3rd RWY) at Guarulhos, that would simultaneously cope with the issue posed by aircraft operations. In the wake of events that took place in 2007 and at the beginning of 2008, INFRAERO made the decision to abandon the third runway proposal focusing only

Conclusions

Given the congestion at the airport, allowing only jets at Congonhas and constructing a third runway in Guarulhos, as suggested in studies, are the best options for reducing delay in the TMA-SP. Furthermore, additional measures that redistribute traffic from Congonhas to Guarulhos show even more potential for reducing flight and overall delays in the TMA-SP. However, a recent decision by INFRAERO not to build a third runway at Guarulhos will make it difficult to achieve in the TMA-SP the

References (12)

  • Comando da Aeronáutica, 2005. Demanda detalhada dos Aeroportos Brasileiros. Instituto de Aviação Civil, Rio de...
  • Hupalo, M. F., 2003. Análise da Área de Controle Terminal São Paulo (TMA-SP) por Meio de Simulação (Fast-Time...
  • INFRAERO, 2007. Movimento operacional acumulado da rede INFRAERO, at...
  • International Civil Aviation Organisation, 2000. Aircraft Base-Line Operating ALLPRIG Council,...
  • Kostiuk, P.F., 2001. Demand Management Versus Capacity Enhancement: Which Direction for Air Transportation? ATM 2001,...
  • A.M. Law et al.

    Simulation Modeling and Analysis

    (1992)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text