Transport properties of ceria–zirconia–yttria solid solutions {(CeO2)x(ZrO2)1−x}1−y(YO1.5)y (x = 0–1, y = 0.2, 0.35)
Introduction
Ceria–zirconia solid solutions have been investigated from viewpoints of interesting catalytic activity and mixed conductivity. Ozawa et al. reported the application of CeO2–ZrO2 solid solutions to the three-way catalysts for automobiles [1]. Moreover, the CeO2–ZrO2–YO1.5 solid solution is investigated as a promising material for oxygen permeable membranes, which can be applied to electro-catalytic reactors or oxygen gas separators. The temperature and oxygen partial pressure dependence of total and ionic conductivity of {(CeO2)1−x(ZrO2)x}0.9(Y2O3)0.1 have been reported by several researchers [2], [3], [4].
We have investigated the transport properties of the system {(CeO2)x(ZrO2)1−x}0.8(YO1.5)0.2, such as oxygen isotope diffusivity () and surface exchange rate (k) [5] or electron/hole conductivity (σe, σh) [6] because we think such transport properties in the oxides may affect the anode reactions of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) in which the fuel reacts with oxide ions come through the electrolyte. The electron conductivity (σe) of {(CeO2)x(ZrO2)1−x}0.8(YO1.5)0.2 drastically increased with cerium content (x) and had a maximum around x = 0.5 [6]. Concerning the oxygen transport properties, the oxygen isotope diffusivity has a minimum at x = 0.5 [5], however, the oxygen surface exchange rate constant (k) has a maximum around x = 0.4, which is similar to the compositional dependence of electron conductivity.
However, in the electron conductivity measurement of {(CeO2)x(ZrO2)1−x}0.8(YO1.5)0.2, it was difficult to obtain the precise data in lower oxygen partial pressures, the oxygen partial pressures lower than 10−8 Pa at T = 973–1273 K. The data exhibited some scattering and their reproducibility was poor. It indicates the phase transition from fluorite to pyrochlore structure. This phase transition has been reported for CeO2–ZrO2 solid solutions by several researchers including complicated metastable phases [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Ikryannikova et al., reported that 10 mole% YO1.5 addition to CeO2–ZrO2 solid solution may stabilize the cubic phase, however, it does not suppress the formation of pyrochlore phase in reducing atmosphere at high temperatures [8].
In this paper, we investigated ceria–zirconia–yttria solid solution with higher yttria content, {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.65(YO1.5)0.35, in order to suppress the phase transition. The hole and electron conductivity, and oxygen isotope diffusivity was measured and compared with the results of samples with lower yttrium content. Since we have been interested in this material as a candidate of anode support materials in SOFC, the thermal expansion behavior was also checked in air and in reducing atmospheres.
Section snippets
Experimental
The sample was prepared by solid-state reaction of CeO2 (Wako), Y2O3 (Wako) and ZrO2 (TOSOH TZ-0). The powders in appropriate amounts were mixed in TZP ball mill with ethanol as solvent. The dense polycrystalline body of the solid solution was prepared by pressing the powder mixture into pellets by one-axial press under 150 MPa and cold iso-static press (CIP) at 300 MPa, and then sintered in air at T = 1873 K for 10 h. Over 99% of theoretical density was obtained. The phase purity of sintered sample
Results and discussion
The electronic and hole conductivities of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.65(YO1.5)0.35 measured by Hebb–Wagner method were shown in Fig. 1, and they are compared with the data of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.8(YO1.5)0.2 reported in our previous paper [6]. The electronic conductivity data of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.65(YO1.5)0.35 are ca. one-tenth of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.8(YO1.5)0.2. The hole conductivity was detected for {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.65(YO1.5)0.35 at p(O2) > 102 Pa, whereas no hole conductivity was
Summary
The present investigation clarified some physico-chemical properties of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.65(YO1.5)0.35. Considering these materials as a SOFC component, the following facts should be emphasized.
The electron conductivity of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.65(YO1.5)0.35 was one-tenth of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)0.5}0.8(YO1.5)0.2, which indicates that the increase of yttrium content may stabilize the tetravalent cerium ion (Ce4+) in the fluorite structure. Furthermore, the fluorite structure of {(CeO2)0.5(ZrO2)
References (12)
- et al.
J. Alloys Compd.
(1993) - et al.
Solid State Ionics
(1995) - et al.
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(1990) - et al.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
(2001) - et al.
Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater.
(2001) - et al.
Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater.
(2001)