Effects of minor Fe, Co, and Ni additions on the reaction between SnAgCu solder and Cu

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.052Get rights and content

Abstract

The reactions between Cu and the Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu solders doped with 0.03 wt.% Fe, Co, or Ni were studied. Reaction conditions included multiple reflows for up to 10 times and solid-state aging at 160 °C for up to 2000 h. In the multiple reflow study, Cu6Sn5 was the only reaction product noted for all the different solders used. Reflows using the solder without doping produced a thin, dense layer of Cu6Sn5. Adding Fe, Co, or Ni transformed this microstructure into a much thicker Cu6Sn5 with many small trapped solder regions between the Cu6Sn5 grains. In the solid-state aging study, both Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn formed, but adding Fe, Co, or Ni produced a much thinner Cu3Sn layer. Because the Cu3Sn growth had been linked to the formation of micro voids, which in turn increased the potential for a brittle interfacial fracture, thinner Cu3Sn layers might translate into better solder joint strength.

Introduction

In the past few years, the SnAgCu family of solders has obtained a wide acceptance as a replacement for the PbSn eutectic solder in electronic applications. At present, relatively fewer activities are undertaken by researchers worldwide to develop another solder family to replace the PbSn eutectic solder. Instead, the current main research thrust in lead-free solder alloy development is on enhancing or fine-tuning the various properties of SnAgCu through adding minor alloying elements. For example, Ni was evaluated for its potential as a minor alloying element to Sn-based lead free solders [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], and so were Ge [2], [5], Fe [9], Co [6], [8], [9], Zn [5], [10], [11], Bi [12], Mn [5], Ti [5], Si [5], and Cr [5]. These previous studies point out minor alloy additions can strengthen the solder performance in many different respects. One of the more noteworthy alloying elements is Ni. It was shown Ni addition to Sn3.5Ag (3.5 wt.% Ag, balance Sn) in amounts as minute as 0.1 wt.% could substantially hinder the Cu3Sn growth during soldering as well as during the following solid-state aging [1], [7]. The Cu3Sn growth had been linked to the formation of micro voids, which in turn increased the potential for brittle interfacial fracture [13]. Recently, it was shown that drop test performance increased for solders joints with just a small amount of Ni addition (<1 wt.%) [14].

The objective of this study is to examine whether Fe and Co additions have a similar effect as Ni does. Emphasis is placed on a systematic comparison study on the effect of Fe, Co, and Ni additions. Further, the level of alloy addition is reduced to as low as 0.03 wt.% so the minimum effective addition of each element can be assessed. Solders with simultaneous Fe and Ni addition as well as simultaneous Co and Ni addition are also prepared to examine whether there is any interaction between the alloying elements.

Section snippets

Experimental

Solder balls with six different compositions, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Fe, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Co, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Ni, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Fe0.03Ni, and Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Co0.03Ni (all compositions in weight percentage), were prepared from 99.999% purity elements. The solder ball compositions were verified using ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy), and it was estimated the reported compositions had a maximum 0.005 wt.% uncertainty. For a given solder ball composition,

Reaction during reflow

Fig. 1 shows the backscattered electron micrographs for the samples with different alloy additions that were reflowed for one time. The Cu6Sn5 phase is clearly visible in all cases. At this stage, the Cu6Sn5 phase was the only phase noted at the interface, and Cu3Sn was not observed. In the following, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu will be denoted as SAC, and Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Fe will be denoted as SAC0.03Fe, etc. Comparing Fig. 1(a) to Fig. 1(b–f), one notes adding Fe, Co, or Ni to SAC made the amount of Cu6Sn5

Reaction during reflow

This study showed doping the SAC with a small amount of Fe, Co, or Ni would not change the type of the reaction product with the Cu substrates. The reaction product was always Cu6Sn5 during a typical reflow. The Cu3Sn phase only formed when the reflow time became very long [1] or during the solid-state aging. This differed from the reaction between Ni and the Cu-doped Sn-based solders, which was very sensitive to the Cu concentration [19], [20], [21], [22]. Under this situation [19], [20], [21]

Summary

  • (1)

    In the study of multiple reflow using the Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Fe, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Co, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Ni, Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Fe0.03Ni, and Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.03Co0.03Ni solder over Cu substrate, Cu6Sn5 was the only reaction product for all the different solders used.

  • (2)

    Reflows using the solder without doping produced a thin, dense layer of Cu6Sn5. Adding Fe, Co, or Ni transformed the microstructure into a much thicker Cu6Sn5 with many small trapped solder regions between the grains.

  • (3)

    The amount of

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Council of R.O.C. through grant NSC-95-2221-E-002-443-MY3. The EPMA analysis performed by Ms. S. Y. Tsai of National Tsing Hua University is also acknowledged.

References (24)

  • F. Gao et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2006)
  • J.Y. Tsai et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2003)
  • C.M. Chung et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2003)
  • H. Nishikawa et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2006)
  • H. Yu et al.
  • I.E. Anderson et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2006)
  • F. Gao et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2006)
  • C.E. Ho et al.

    J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.

    (2007)
  • F. Gao et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2008)
  • I.E. Anderson et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2004)
  • S.K. Kang et al.

    J. Electron. Mater.

    (2006)
  • S.C. Yang et al.

    J. Mater. Res.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (170)

    • Experimental investigation and thermodynamic calculation of the Co–Sn–Bi ternary system

      2022, Calphad: Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry
    • Improving tensile strength of SnAgCu/Cu solder joint through multi-elements alloying

      2021, Materials Today Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, although there is a little difference in thickness, the interfacial IMC layers in the multi-alloyed solder/Cu joints are thicker but show a loose porous structure (see Fig. 8(b)-(e)), and the Ni and Sb elements can be detected in the IMC layers, because Ni can replace some Cu atoms in the Cu6Sn5 and Sb can dissolve into the interfacial IMCs [3,10,19]. Formation of a porous interfacial IMC structure should be related with the addition of Ni, and similar phenomenon has been reported at the interfaces between Cu and Ni-containing solders by early literatures [20,21]. The rough IMC/solder interface will increase the mechanical bonding between the solder and the IMC layers, which will further affect the fracture behavior of the solder joint.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text