Study on the influence of annealing temperature and ferrite content on the structural and magnetic properties of x(NiFe2O4)/(100  x)SiO2 nanocomposites

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.01.128Get rights and content

Abstract

Magnetic nanocomposites of nickel ferrite nanoparticles uniformly dispersed in the silica matrix have been synthesized successfully by a sol–gel process using tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) and metallic nitrates as precursors. In addition, the influence of the annealing temperatures, varying from 400 to 900 °C, and NiFe2O4 contents, x(NiFe2O4)/(100  x)SiO2 (10  x  60 wt.%), on the structural and magnetic properties of the nanocomposite samples have been investigated. The studies carried out using XRD, FT-IR, TEM, STA (TG–DTG–DTA) and VSM techniques. The results indicated that the structural and magnetic properties of the samples showed great dependence on the variation of the particle size caused by the annealing temperature and NiFe2O4 content. The crystallization, saturation magnetization Ms and remenant magnetization Mr increased as the annealing temperature and NiFe2O4 content increase. But the variation of coercivity Hc was not in accordance with that of Ms and Mr, indicating that Hc is not determined only by the size of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles. TEM images showed spherical nanoparticles homogeneously dispersed in the silica network and were uniform in both morphology and particle size distribution with sizes of 10–15 nm. The results showed that the well-established silica network provided nucleation locations for NiFe2O4 nanoparticles to confinement the coarsening and aggregation of nanoparticles. The synthesized nanocomposites with adjustable particle sizes and controllable magnetic properties make the applicability of nickel ferrite even more versatile.

Introduction

Magnetic nanocomposites consisting of nanometric spinel ferrites embedded in an insulating matrix such as silica have attracted much attention in recent years due to their new magnetic properties [1] and their applicability in a variety of areas such as magnetic recording media, high-density information storage, ferrofluid technology, bioprocessing, magnetic drug delivery, catalysts, magnetic resonance imaging enhancement, gas sensors and magneto-optical devices [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

Among spinel ferrites, nickel ferrite is one of the most versatile and technologically important ferrite materials because of its magnetic properties, high electrochemical stability, catalytic behavior, abundance in nature, low conductivity and thus lower eddy current losses [10]. In addition, NiFe2O4 is the most suitable material for device applications in the upper microwave and lower millimeter wave ranges. Apart from its technological importance in the electronic and magnetic industries, NiFe2O4 has been used as a highly reproducible gas [9], [11] and humidity [12] sensor material.

Various synthetic routes have been reported in the literature for the preparation of nanoscale ferrites such as ceramic method [13], sol–gel [14], co-precipitation [15], solvent evaporation [16], hydrothermal [17], combustion [18], microemulsion [19] and citrate methods [20]. In the previous report, spinel cobalt ferrite nanoparticles have been synthesized by the polymeric precursor method [21]. While the nanoparticles obtained usually have a strong tendency to aggregate; this makes it very difficult to exploit their unique physical properties [22]. The preparation of magnetic nanocomposites through the dispersion of ferrite nanoparticles in a suitable matrix represents a route to obtain very fine nanoparticles by reducing particle agglomeration [23] leading to a narrow distribution of the dimensions. Also this technique allows one to stabilize the particles and study their formation reactions.

The interest in the preparation of magnetic nanocomposites has increased in the last years due to the properties presented by these materials, which are dependent on particle sizes, component ratio and distribution in the matrix. Magnetic nanocomposites showed considerable differences in the magnetic properties when compared with their equivalent pure and bulk materials. Different nanoparticles such as Fe [24], Ni [25], Fe2O3 [26], and NiZn-ferrite [27] dispersed in the silica matrix with applications in areas such as catalysis, sensors and electronic devices have been studied. Magnetic nanocomposites of nickel ferrite nanoparticles dispersed in the silica matrix have been studied [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35] revealing behavior different from that of bulk systems and as a model for the study of small particles.

Among various synthetic routes, the sol–gel process offers some advantages in making inorganic composite materials containing highly dispersed magnetic particles. The process facilitates a good and homogeneous dispersion of the particles into the inorganic matrix. The porous nature of the sol–gel derived amorphous silica matrix is an excellent host for supporting different types of guest nanoparticles which provides nucleation sites for magnetic nanoparticles and minimizes the aggregation imposing an upper limit to the size of the particles. This method makes possible the introduction of various concentrations of different components in a matrix with molecular homogeneity, which can be vitreous or crystalline, either porous or densified.

In this paper, the influence of annealing temperature and NiFe2O4 content on the structural and magnetic properties of x(NiFe2O4)/(100  x)SiO2 (x = 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 wt.%) nanocomposites prepared by sol–gel method has been reported aiming at tuning the magnetic properties of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles dispersed in a silica matrix and greatly expanding the range of applications by adjusting the annealing temperature and NiFe2O4 content. Also, the alcogel precursors with different weight percents of components have been investigated. Therefore, special attention is given to the correlation between the structural and magnetic properties of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles embedded in a silica matrix, for different annealing temperatures and component ratios.

Section snippets

Experimental

All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used without any further purification. Nanocomposites of nickel ferrite dispersed in a silica matrix were prepared by sol–gel process using tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) as a precursor of silica and metallic nitrates as precursors of the ferrite. The TEOS:EtOH:H2O and Fe:Ni molar ratios were controlled at 1:4:8 and 2:1, respectively. The weight ratios of the nanocomposites were x(NiFe2O4)/(100  x)SiO2 (x = 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 wt.%). The sols were

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis

The XRD patterns of the 30 wt.% NiFe2O4/SiO2 samples annealed at different temperatures varying from 400 to 900 °C were shown in Fig. 1 to investigate the influence of the annealing temperature on the structure. The weak diffraction peaks assigned to NiFe2O4 appeared at 400 °C suggesting that the particles of NiFe2O4 had been nucleated in the silica matrix.

Our results showed that with increasing the annealing temperature, the intensity of peaks increases and the diffraction peaks become sharper

Conclusions

In summary, the influence of the annealing temperature and Ni-ferrite content on the magnetic properties and crystallite size of the x(NiFe2O4)/(100  x)SiO2 (10  x  60 wt.%) nanocomposites with tunable magnetic properties which successfully synthesized by sol–gel route were investigated with the aim of tuning the magnetic properties and greatly expanding the range of applications. The silica matrix network provides an ideal nucleation environment to uniformly disperse NiFe2O4 nanoparticles and thus

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the Research Council of Institute for Color Science and Technology for their financial support.

References (47)

  • I. Anton et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1990)
  • J. Popplewell et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1995)
  • R.S. Molday et al.

    J. Immunol. Methods

    (1982)
  • H.H. Kung et al.

    Adv. Catal.

    (1985)
  • C.W. Jung et al.

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1995)
  • G. Dube et al.

    J. Mol. Catal.

    (1993)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2009)
  • P. Priyadharsini et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2009)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (1997)
  • V. Pillai et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1996)
  • M. Gharagozlou

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2009)
  • K.H. Wu et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2004)
  • Z.H. Zhou et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2002)
  • W. Jian-Ping et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1994)
  • E. Manova et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2007)
  • L. Guang-She et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (2001)
  • X.M. Liu et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2004)
  • S. Mitra et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2006)
  • H. Wang et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2008)
  • H. Wang et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2006)
  • X. Huang et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2004)
  • X. Huang et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2005)
  • H. Izutsu et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Correlation between structure, morphology and magnetic properties in Zn<inf>x</inf>Co<inf>0.8−x</inf>Ni<inf>0.2</inf>Fe<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf> @SiO<inf>2</inf> (0.1÷0.7) nanocomposites

      2023, Journal of Alloys and Compounds
      Citation Excerpt :

      A conceivable explanation could be the nature of the electronic configurations Co2+ and Zn2+ ions that result in greater intensity in Fe3+–O2-–Ni2+, Fe3+–O2-–Co2+ and Co2+–O2-–Ni2+ at high Co2+ content [11]. During annealing, the solid–vapor surface of the crystals was replaced by a solid–solid interface via solid-state diffusion and led to the decrease of overall surface energy [20]. Generally, the magnetization direction varies in the same direction owing to the energy confined by the anisotropy energy barrier.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text