Microstructure and mechanical properties of in-situ nano γ-Al2O3p/A356 aluminum matrix composite
Introduction
Since the beginning of the 21st century, people have started to pay attention to the automobile lightweight, due to the critical problems as climate change and energy crisis. Usage of MMCs(Metal matrix composites), such as aluminum alloy composites and magnesium alloy matrix composites, has been enormously increasing because of its high strength to weight ratio, light density and high specific stiffness [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. In comparison to the pure metal and alloy, MMCs possess a higher strength to weight ratio, wear resistance, lower shrinkage, lower coefficient of thermal expansion, enhanced mechanical and thermal properties [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. MMCs have become really attractive for automotive and aerospace applications. The particle form reinforcement presents in the composites exhibits an isotropic property when compared with other geometries of reinforcement such as fiber and whisker. Fiber and whisker composites are generally anisotropic. Besides this, the advantages of particulate composites further include mechanical strength improvement, operating temperature increase, oxidation resistance enhancement, easy production and so on [[10], [11], [12]].
In conventional fabrication processes of AMCs (Aluminum Matrix Composites), the reinforcements have been added in the two modes of external or in-situ and formed as ex-situ or in-situ composites. A variety of hard ceramic particles have been introduced to be the reinforcements, such as SiC [13], TiC [14], ZrB2 [4,[7], [8], [9], [10],15], TiB2 [16], AlN [17] and Al2O3 [3,[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]], some of which also can act as the nucleating sites for grain refinement, and as the propeller in strength, hardness, and wear resistance [12]. These reinforcements have exhibited several classic characteristics as high melting points, high hardness, high modulus of elasticity, and low coefficient of thermal expansion.
As for the efficiency and productivity of the ex/in situ methods, there are some defects and difficulties to fabricate composites by ex-situ methods. For example, the particulate morphology, is difficult to be controlled at nanoscale, the fine particles are difficult to add, the interfacial reactions are likely to occur between the reinforcement and the matrix during the fabrication process [23]. The weak matrix/reinforcement interface, inhomogeneous distribution of reinforcement particles, low wettability between particle and matrix, in most cases, make a deadly effect on material properties. In the in-situ process, the reinforcement phases are formed in metallic matrix through the salt reaction or oxidation-reduction reaction between the additive particles and matrix during composite fabrication process. There are many advantages for AMCs synthesized by in-situ process. For example, the in-situ formed reinforcements are thermodynamically stable, free of surface contamination and homogeneous distribution in matrix and strong particle–matrix bonding.
For aluminum matrix composites, the problem of reinforced particles agglomeration has always existed since the invention of composite and is difficult to be solved. The agglomeration phenomenon is affected by many factors. The most important factors are the particulate sizes and the wettability of the interface between the particles and the matrix. When the particulate size is less than eighty percent of critical radius, the particle can be engulfed by the grain during the solidification process [24]. The approaches to improving the wettability included: (i) increasing the surface energies of the solids, (ii) decreasing the surface tension of the liquid matrix alloy, and (iii) decreasing the solid/liquid interfacial energy [24]. Till to now, Mg element can decrease the Al alloy surface tension and the effect of Si element is not as effective as Mg [25]. Therefore, A356 was selected as the matrix alloy in this study because of its components.
In the previous study, it was found that many metallic oxides CuO, SnO2, ZnO, Cr2O3 had been used for producing Al2O3 [26]. They found that in order to produce adequate Al2O3 the metal produced frequently exceeded the dissolution limit of the metal in aluminum [20]. Thus superfluous amount of intermetallic compounds such as CuAl2 will form in matrix. Intermetallic compounds are brittle phrase, which often result in the decline of mechanical properties. Most of the metal oxides can react with aluminum by means of oxidation-reduction reaction, but Co3O4 is hopeful to affect the morphology of silicon after being reduced. Therefore, in this study A356 and Co3O4 were selected as raw materials to investigate the synergistic effect of in-situ γ-Al2O3 and cobalt element on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 alloy.
A356 is a hypoeutectic aluminum alloy, consisting of plate-like eutectic silicon and α-aluminum dendrite. With trace additions of certain chemical modifiers, like Na and Sr, the eutectic Si phase can be refined from coarse plate-like to fine fibrous [27]. The morphological change of Si, which is induced by impurity atom modification, can make an improvement of the mechanical properties of Al–Si alloys. S. Lu implied many elements had similar functions as sodium and strontium [28]. Eu [29] and Sc [30] have been proved to be effective modifier, however, others have not been researched, for example cobalt. Layer growth [28] and twin plane re-entrant edge (TPRE) growth [31] are the two postulations, which have been widely accepted by publication, of the growth model of eutectic Si. For the layer growth, the driving force is entropy of fusion per atom [28]. For the twin plane re-entrant edge (TPRE) growth, the re-entrant corners are consisted of the {111} twin planes intersect surfaces of silicon phase [32]. Atoms attach preferentially to the kink sites of steps in layer growth and re-entrant corners in TPRE growth [33]. Therefore, both of the two models can explain the morphology of Si phase. Si crystals grow preferentially in<110> directions, and present anisotropy.
There are two main mechanisms of chemical modification eutectic Si phase in Al–Si alloys which are widely accepted. In the Al–Si alloys without modifier added condition, there are three possible sites for Si phase to nucleate [34]. Almost all of commercial cast aluminum alloys contain the Fe element more or less, the Fe can form intermetallic β-Al5FeSi with aluminum and silicon during solidification [35]. This is the first site that can be the nucleation site of Si phase. In the former researches, some foundry added phosphorus reacted with aluminum form AlP, which was the second site for Si phase nucleation [36]. During the smelting process, aluminum melt sucked the oxygen in the air to react to form an oxide film. The oxide films presented in front of the solidifying Al dendrites was regarded as the third site that Si may nucleate [37]. For β-Al5FeSi phase, regarding as the Si nucleation site, the addition of Sr can decrease the forming temperature of β-Al5FeSi phase and Al-Si phase, result in a significant undercooling of the inter-dendritic liquid compare with the eutectic temperature [36,38]. The eutectic phase presents a refined morphology. For the AlP phase, after the addition of Sr, they will react with Al and Si to form Al2Si2Sr which precipitates on the pre-existing AlP compound, result in a condition of that the nucleate site of Si phase decrease, forcing the eutectic Si to nucleate at larger undercooling [36]. Sr and Na can react with P by forming Sr3P/Na3P [38,39]. The effect of Sr/Na addition on the two nucleation sites belongs to the constitutional undercooling mechanism.
For the layer growth model, the large impurity atoms displace {111} monolayer atoms to the change the Si atoms stacking sequence to form Si twins. This twin generation mechanism by introducing impurity atoms is named impurity-induced twinning (IIT) mechanism [40]. For the TPRE mechanism, with sodium or strontium addition, Sr/Na atoms concentrate at the re-entrant edges, which remove the growth advantage of the TPRE mechanism, the anisotropic growth habit of silicon on specific crystallographic planes is reduced as well [41]. A recent research by electron back-scattered diffraction(EBSD) revealed that the TPRE growth in unmodified Al–Si alloys was on the <110> direction, and the exposure of Si-{111} planes to the melt to reduce interfacial energy. The microscopic <01>growth direction is realized by a paired <11> zigzag growth at atomic scale [42].
The present paper is to fabricate in-situ Al2O3 particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites and investigates the effect of in-situ γ-Al2O3 particles and reduced cobalt on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 alloy.
Section snippets
Experimental procedure
A356 aluminum alloy ingot was used as matrix material and cobalt (II, III) oxide was employed to react with aluminum to produce in-situ Al2O3 particles as reinforcement. Table 1 showed the chemical composition of the above-mentioned raw materials. The cobalt (II, III) oxide powder was preheated to dehydrate and improve activity in tube furnace at 800 °C for 1 h. The A356 ingot was melt at 750 °C and held for 10min in a clay-bonded graphite crucible under argon atmosphere in an electrical
Silicon phase in γ- Al2O3p/A356 composite
Fig. 2 shows the SEM images of as-cast A356 alloy matrix and composite with different content of in-situ γ-Al2O3 particles.
The microstructure of A365 alloy without Co3O4 powder addition is composed of α-Al and eutectic Si, as shown in Fig. 2a. For the A356 alloy, the coarse dendritic α-Al grains that are surrounded by the coarse acicular eutectic Si particles will greatly deteriorate the mechanical properties. The secondary dendrite arm space (SDAS) of α-Al dendrites is about 33 μm. Fig. 2b
Uniform dispersion mechanism of endogenous particle
The in-situ chemical reaction involved in the process can be expressed by the following formulas:8Al + 3Co3O4 → 4Al2O3 + 9Co (800–900 °C)
At hyperthermia condition the gibbs free energy of reaction (1) can be expressed as:
Here Q means the comprehensive activity of the reaction system and the value of Q equal 1. It implies that the following equation is right:
Conclusion
In the present work, the in-situ γ-Al2O3 particles reinforced A356 aluminum matrix composites have been fabricated in the A356 aluminum alloy and cobalt (II, III) oxide components by means of direct melt reaction method. The effect of volume fraction of in-situ γ-Al2O3 particles and cobalt element on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 alloy was studied. Based on the results obtained, the main conclusions can be summarized as follows:
- (1)
The γ-Al2O3 particles can be engulfed by the
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1664254, 51701085, 51371091).
References (50)
- et al.
In situ fabrication and microstructure of Al2O3, particles reinforced aluminum matrix composites
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2010) - et al.
Effects of ultrasonic vibration on the microstructure and tensile properties of the nano ZrB2/2024Al composites synthesized by direct melt reaction
J. Alloys Compd.
(2016) - et al.
Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of in situ metal matrix composite
Mater. Sci. Eng. R
(2000) - et al.
Formation and growth mechanism of ZrC hexagonal platelets synthesized by self-propagating reaction
J. Cryst. Growth
(2008) - et al.
In situ fabrication of (α-Al2O3+Al3Zr)/Al composites in an Al–ZrO2 system
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2010) - et al.
Effects of in situ generated ZrB2 nano-particles on microstructure and tensile properties of 2024Al matrix composites
J. Alloys Compd.
(2014) - et al.
Hot deformation behavior of in situ nano ZrB2 reinforced 2024Al matrix composite
Compos. Sci. Technol.
(2015) - et al.
Microstructures and properties of in situ ZrB2/AA6111 composites synthesized under a coupled magnetic and ultrasonic field
J. Alloys Compd.
(2018) - et al.
Tensile and wear behaviour of in situ Al–7Si/TiB2 particulate composites
Wear
(2008) Preparation and some properties of SiC particle reinforced aluminium alloy composites[J]
Mater. Des.
(2003)
In situ reacted titanium carbide-reinforced aluminum alloys composite
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
The effects of Er addition on the microstructure and properties of an in situ nano ZrB2-reinforced A356.2 composite
J. Alloy. Comp.
Effects of in-situ γ-Al2O3 particles and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminium alloy
J. Alloys Compd.
Effect of glass in aluminum matrix on workability and strain hardening behavior of powder metallurgy composite
Mater. Des.
Fabrication of in situ aluminum–alumina composite with glass powder
J. Alloys Compd.
Structural and mechanical characterization of Al-based composite reinforced with heat treated Al2O3 particles
Mater. Des.
Microstructure and hardness of Al2O3, nanoparticle reinforced Al–Mg composites fabricated by reactive wetting and stir mixing
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
A Hellawell. Growth mechanisms of silicon in Al-Si alloys
J. Cryst. Growth
The role of trace element segregation in the eutectic modification of hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys
J. Alloys Compd.
Modification of hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys with scandium
J. Alloy. Comp.
Crystal morphology of unmodified aluminium-silicon eutectic microstructures
J. Cryst. Growth
Effect of strontium on liquid structure of Al–Si hypoeutectic alloys using high-energy X-ray diffraction
Acta Mater.
Nucleation kinetics of entrained eutectic Si in Al–5Si alloys
Acta Mater.
Heterogeneous nucleation of solidification of Si in Al–Si and Al–Si–P alloys
Acta Metall. Mater.
Twin-controlled growth of eutectic Si in unmodified and Sr-modified Al–12.7%Si alloys investigated by SEM/EBSD
Acta Mater.
Cited by (44)
Exceptionally low ablation rates realized in the cellular-structured MCMB@WC composites via biomimetic design
2024, Composites Part A: Applied Science and ManufacturingEffects of submicron-sized TiC particles on the microstructure modification and mechanical properties of Al-Si-Mg alloy
2023, Journal of Alloys and CompoundsMicrostructure features and mechanical properties of non-heat treated HPDC Al9Si0.6Mn–TiB<inf>2</inf> alloys
2023, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyPreparation and mechanical behavior of Co-based hard particles reinforced aluminum matrix composites
2023, Journal of Alloys and CompoundsSynergistic effects of Cr and Sr addition on the mechanical and corrosion properties of A356.2 alloy
2022, Materials CharacterizationDeformation behavior of an A356 alloy containing small sub-grains with wide low-angle boundary
2022, Journal of Alloys and Compounds