Cultural influences on consumer satisfaction with impulse and planned purchase decisions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.006Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examines factors thought to influence consumers' planned and impulse purchase decisions including subjective culture (individualist or collectivist consumers) and the presence of another person at the time of purchase. Data was collected in four countries — the USA, Australia, Singapore, and Malaysia. The results indicate that overall, consumers are differentially influenced by others in planned and impulse purchase situations, even after controlling for price. These differential influences can be explained by culture. Compared to more individualist consumers, more collectivist consumers are likely to be more satisfied with an impulse purchase when another person is present at the time of purchase.

Introduction

Impulse purchasing has been recognized as a significant phenomenon in the United States. In 1997 alone, it was estimated that consumers spent $4.2 billion on impulse items, including candy and magazines (Mogelonsky, 1998). Traditional retailers use techniques such as store design, product displays and package design to try to increase the number of impulse purchases (Hoyer and MacInnis, 1997). Furthermore, technologies such as television shopping channels, mobile phones and the Internet expand consumers' impulse purchasing opportunities, increasing both the accessibility to products and services and the ease with which impulse purchases can be made.

Previous research has shown that numerous factors influence impulsive purchasing behavior, including the presence of others (Luo, 2005), the consumer's mood (e.g., Beatty and Ferrell, 1998, Rook and Gardner, 1993), trait impulsiveness (e.g., Jones et al., 2003, Rook and Fisher, 1995, Weun et al., 1998), product category impulsiveness (Jones et al., 2003), evaluation of the appropriateness of engaging in impulse buying (e.g., Rook and Fisher, 1995), individual and environmental touch (Peck and Childers, 2006), self-identity (e.g., Dittmar et al., 1995, Lee and Kacen, 1999), cultural orientation (e.g., Kacen and Lee, 2002, Lee and Kacen, 1999), as well as demographic characteristics such as gender (e.g., Dittmar et al., 1995, Rook and Gardner, 1993) and age (e.g., Helmers et al., 1995, Wood, 1998). While some research has focused on the consequences of impulse purchasing to the individual and society, including the appropriateness of impulse purchasing and potential negative effects like financial problems, guilt, or social disapproval (e.g., Rook, 1987, Rook and Fisher, 1995, Rook and Hoch, 1985, O'Guinn and Faber, 1989), few studies have examined potential consequences to a firm, in terms of consumer satisfaction (e.g., Ariely and Levav, 2000).

Research illustrates that impulsive purchases are a significant phenomenon in the United States (e.g., Mogelonsky, 1998), yet little is known about the phenomenon in other countries. A few studies have examined aspects of impulse purchasing in other countries, including Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore (Kacen and Lee, 2002), China (Li et al., 2004), Great Britain (Bayley and Nancarrow, 1998, Dittmar et al., 1995, McConatha et al., 1994), Singapore (Shamdasani and Rook, 1989), South Africa (Abratt and Goodey, 1990) and Vietnam (Mai et al., 2003). To date, no studies have been found to examine influences on customer satisfaction with impulse purchasing across cultures.

This study develops and tests the normative influences on consumers' satisfaction with their impulse and planned purchases across two Individualist (USA and Australia) and two Collectivist (Singapore and Malaysia) countries. This cross-cultural comparison is especially important as shopping is a major leisure activity in many Asian countries (Wong and Ahuvia, 1998).

The objective of this research is to investigate (1) whether impulsive purchasing behavior is more susceptible to normative situational influences than planned purchasing behavior and whether this susceptibility has implications for post-purchase product evaluation, and (2) whether culture moderates the influence of normative situational factors in an impulse purchase situation.

Section snippets

Impulse versus planned purchases

Impulse buying is defined as “an unplanned purchase” that was not anticipated or planned before the shopper entered the store (see Kollat and Willett, 1967, Prasad, 1975). It is characterized by “(1) relatively rapid decision-making, and (2) a subjective bias in favor of immediate possession” (Rook and Gardner, 1993, p. 3; see also Rook, 1987, Rook and Hoch, 1985). It is less deliberate, more arousing, and more irresistible buying behavior compared to planned purchases. Highly impulsive buyers

Individualism and collectivism

The theory of individualism and collectivism is likely to impact the relative influence of important others on a consumer's shopping behavior. Triandis (1995) defines collectivism as a social pattern that consists of individuals who see themselves as an integral part of one or more collectives, such as family and friends, and individualism as a social pattern that consists of individuals who see themselves as autonomous and independent of collectives. These social patterns manifest themselves

Methodology

A survey was designed to elicit information from consumers about a recent impulse and a recent planned purchase decision. The study used a 2 (purchase type: impulse versus planned) × 2 (purchase situation: alone versus with an important other) × 2 (cultural region: individualist versus collectivist) × 2 (order: impulse first versus planned first) mixed-factorial design. Purchase type was a within-subjects factor and purchase situation, cultural region and order were between-subjects factors.

Results

A repeated-measures ANOVA was run to assess the impact of the within-subjects factor (type of purchase) and three between-subjects factors (purchase situation, culture and order) on satisfaction. As the order effects were non-significant, the analysis was repeated without the order factor. In addition, price paid was added as a covariate, but was not found to be significant. As such the analysis was repeated without the price covariate.

First, support was found for Hypothesis 1. The

Discussion and limitations

Our research supports earlier studies indicating that normative social influences are more influential for people from collectivist cultures than those from individualist cultures. While normative influences have been shown to be more important for collectivist consumers by other researchers (e.g., Lee and Green, 1991, Bagozzi et al., 2000, Lee, 2000), most of the research has focused on the influence of others on purchase intentions, rather than behaviors or post-purchase evaluations. This

Conclusion

Our research focused on cultural differences in consumers' satisfaction with their planned and impulse purchases. An impulse purchase is an unplanned purchase that is not anticipated before the consumer enters the store (Kollat and Willett, 1967). This type of purchase behavior involves rapid decision-making and a desire for immediate possession (Rook and Gardner, 1993). Surprisingly, cultural differences leading to consumers' satisfaction with their impulse purchases has not been widely

References (58)

  • J Peck et al.

    If I touch it I have to have it: individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing

    J Bus Res

    (2006)
  • M Wood

    Socio-economic status, delay of gratification, and impulse buying

    J Econ Psychol

    (1998)
  • J Aaker et al.

    Culture-dependent assimilation and differentiation of the self: Preferences for consumption symbols in the United States and China

    J Cross-Cult Psychol

    (2001)
  • B Abrahams

    It's all in the mind

    Marketing

    (1997)
  • R Abratt et al.

    Unplanned buying and in-store stimuli in supermarkets

    Manag Decis Econ

    (1990)
  • LS Aiken et al.

    Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions

    (1991)
  • JJ Argo et al.

    The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context

    J Consum Res

    (2005)
  • D Ariely et al.

    Sequential choice in group settings: taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed

    J Consum Res

    (2000)
  • RP Bagozzi et al.

    Multiple routes for social influence: the role of compliance, internalization and social identity

    Soc Psychol Q

    (2002)
  • G Bayley et al.

    Impulsive purchasing: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenon

    Qual Mark Res

    (1998)
  • WO Bearden et al.

    Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence

    J Consum Res

    (1989)
  • ER Cadotte et al.

    Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction

    J Mark Res

    (1987)
  • JS D'Antoni Jr et al.

    Impulse buying revisited: a behavioral typology

    J Retail

    (1973)
  • PR Darke et al.

    The importance and functional significance of affective cues in consumer choice

    J Consum Res

    (2006)
  • GR Dowling et al.

    A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity

    J Consum Res

    (1994)
  • R Fischer

    Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: a classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP

    J Cross-Cult Psychol

    (2004)
  • MC Gilly et al.

    A dyadic study of interpersonal information search

    J Acad Mark Sci

    (1998)
  • SJ Hoch et al.

    Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self control

    J Consum Res

    (1991)
  • G Hofstede

    Cultures and organizations: software of the mind

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: +1 713 743 4174.

    View full text