The entrepreneurial journey as an emergent hierarchical system of artifact-creating processes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The entrepreneurial journey should be a key unit of analysis in process explanations of entrepreneurial events.

  • Entrepreneurship is an emergent hierarchical system of artifact-creating processes.

  • Entrepreneurial journey is Levels 1–3 within hierarchical system.

  • Levels 1–3 operationalized as unit of analysis to explain events in empirical case.

  • Research implications discussed for process inquiry.

Abstract

Entrepreneurial ‘process’ perspectives explain the events of an entrepreneurial journey in terms of mechanisms, such as ‘effectual logic’, ‘bricolage’, ‘dynamic creation’, ‘opportunity tension’ and ‘enactment’. Process theorists, however, have not as yet developed an analytical framework that explains an entrepreneurial event in relation to the entrepreneurial journey as the unit of analysis. Building on Sarasvathy's (2003, 2008) and Venkataraman et al.'s (2012) conception of entrepreneurship inquiry as a ‘science of the artificial’ (Simon, 1996), we explain how this research gap can be addressed by conceptualizing the entrepreneurial journey as an ‘emergent hierarchical system of entrepreneurial artifact-creating processes’. From this perspective, entrepreneurial events can be explained in relation to the endogenous dynamics of prior patterns of artifact emergence. We discuss some research implications of focusing on artifact emergence as a key unit of analysis in process theory development.

Section snippets

Executive summary

The covering law principle that causal relationships are deducible from timeless and context-free laws is the underlying assumption of ‘variance’ theory — the received view in entrepreneurship inquiry (Van de Ven and Engleman, 2004). In recent years, however, there has been a growing momentum behind the ‘process’ view (Steyaert, 2007, Van de Ven and Engleman, 2004) that variance theory does not adequately account for what entrepreneurs actually do under conditions of genuine uncertainty (

The emergent hierarchical system of entrepreneurial artifact-creating processes

According to Simon, 1962, Simon, 1973/1977, Simon, 1996, a science of the artificial studies the creation of human artifacts, which are those “objects and phenomena in which human purpose as well as natural law are embodied” (Simon, 1981: 6). Human artifacts are emergent outcomes of practical activities, such as engineering, medicine, business, architecture and painting, which are purposefully designed for an uncertain future in the context of uncertain contingencies. In other words, a science

Explaining critical events in the entrepreneurial journey

In this section, we operationalize the venture emergence system in order to explain critical events in the emergent path of an entrepreneurial journey. In particular, we focus on the events of phase transitions into new patterns of artifact emergence associated with the transformation of means–end relationships. We understand transformation here to refer to either (1) redefining means–end relationships in the sense of initiating a new pattern of emergence by altering the business idea, or (2)

Research implications

The notion of the entrepreneurial journey as an emergent hierarchical system of artifact-creating processes has important research implications for future directions in process research. Our primary concern in this article is the significance of the emergent hierarchy for our understanding of the entrepreneurial journey as a unit of analysis. In variance theory a unit of analysis is an entity, such as an entrepreneur, network, firm or market, and the causal properties of entities are the focus

Conclusion

In this article, we have taken up Venkataraman et al.'s (2012) proposal that entrepreneurship inquiry should move forward as a science of the artificial by considering the significance of hierarchically organized artifact-creating processes for process theory development. We have argued that the ability to conceptualize the entrepreneurial journey in terms of hierarchically organized patterns of artifact emergence contributes to our understanding of the endogenous, self-causing,

References (70)

  • T. Baker et al.

    Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (2005)
  • R. Bauman et al.

    Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life

    Annu. Rev. Anthropol.

    (1990)
  • H. Berglund

    Researching entrepreneurship as lived experience

  • Y. Cheng et al.

    The innovation journey: order out of chaos?

    Organ. Sci.

    (1996)
  • T.H. Chiles et al.

    Organizational emergence: the origin and transformation of Branson Missouri's musical theatres

    Organ. Sci.

    (2004)
  • T.H. Chiles et al.

    Dynamic creation: extending the radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship

    Organ. Stud.

    (2010)
  • J. Crutchfield

    Is anything ever new? Considering emergence

  • P. Davidsson et al.

    Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (2001)
  • T. De Wolf et al.

    Emergence versus self-organization: different concepts but promising when combined

  • N. Dew et al.

    On the entrepreneurial genesis of new markets: effectual transformation versus causal search and selection

    J. Evol. Econ.

    (2010)
  • D. Dimov

    Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (2007)
  • D. Dimov

    Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (2011)
  • D.E. Fletcher

    Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity

    Entrep. Reg. Dev.

    (2006)
  • J.W. Forrester

    Industrial Dynamics

    (1961)
  • N.J. Foss et al.

    Entrepreneurial alertness and opportunity discovery: origins, attributes, critique

  • T. Fuller et al.

    Sustaining entrepreneurial business: a complexity perspective on processes that produce emergent practice

    Int. J. Entrep. Manag.

    (2008)
  • W.B. Gartner

    A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation

    Acad. Manag. Rev.

    (1985)
  • An Issue about The Republic of Tea, Entrepreneurial Narrative Theory

    Ethnomethodology and Reflexivity

    (2010)
  • W.B. Gartner et al.

    Acting as if: differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behaviour

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (1992)
  • H. Haken

    Synergetics, an Introduction: Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology

    (1977)
  • J. Holland

    Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems

    (1975)
  • A. Juarrero

    Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system

    Emergence

    (2000)
  • P.G. Klein

    Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action and economic organization

    Strateg. Entrep. J.

    (2008)
  • F. Knight

    Risk, Uncertainty and Profit

    (1921)
  • Cited by (97)

    • The entrepreneurial journeys of digital start-up founders

      2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: + 44 1673 818 479.

    View full text