Enzymatic degradation of model cellulose films

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.041Get rights and content

Abstract

Enzymatic degradation of model cellulose films prepared by a spin-coating technique was investigated by ellipsometry. The cellulose films were prior to degradation characterized by ellipsometry, contact angle measurements, ESCA (electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis) and AFM (atomic force microscopy). At enzyme addition to preformed cellulose films an initial adsorption was observed, which was followed by a total interfacial mass decrease due to enzymatic degradation of the cellulose films. The degradation rate was found to be constant during an extended time of hours, whereafter the degradation leveled off. In parallel to the decreased interfacial mass, the cellulose degradation resulted in a thinner and more dilute interfacial film. At long degradation times, however, there was an expansion of the cellulose film. The enzyme concentration affected the degradation rate significantly, with a faster degradation at a higher enzyme concentration. The effects of pH, temperature, ionic strength and stirring rate in the cuvette were also investigated.

Introduction

With the development of protein engineering, new enzymes are discovered and developed at an increasing rate. Today, enzymes are used in several industrial contexts, and new applications are constantly being investigated and developed in such a wide variety as wound healing, removal of dental plaque, detergency, food processing, high throughput in biotechnical analysis systems and as a tool for specific organic synthesis [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Cellulases, investigated in the present study, are interesting for paper and fiber applications, e.g., in the retention step or in deinking for paper recirculation as well as textile treatment and detergency [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].

The controlled use of enzymes in these and other applications relating to surface modifications requires knowledge of the different processes occurring when an enzyme is put in contact with a substrate surface/film to be degraded or otherwise modified. Parallel to the degradation, there may also be adsorption of both the enzyme and the reaction products. Both the degradation and the adsorption may also affect the accessibility of the substrate to enzymatic degradation. These and other effects call for investigations of enzymatic degradation of interfacial substrates, and although there has been an increased interest in the area during recent years [3], [9], [10], [13], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], there is still a great challenge to employ and improve these processes in a controlled way. Ellipsometry has been shown to be a useful technique in such explorations [19], [26], [27]. With this as a background, we therefore initiated the present investigation, focusing on ellipsometric investigations of the degradation of interfacial cellulose films. In this first investigation, a mixed enzyme system extensively used in practical and industrial applications [24] was studied, whereas more mechanistic studies of the role of different enzyme structure elements are summarized in a separate publication [28].

Section snippets

Materials

Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel), N,N-dimethylacetamide (for synthesis) and lithium chloride (pro analysis) was purchased from Merck, Germany, and used as delivered. Cationic polyacrylamide (AM-MAPTAC) from Allied Colloids, UK, was used as an “adhesion promotor” in the spin-coating procedure. This polymer consists of acrylamide (AM) and (methacrylamidopropyl)trimethylammonium chloride (MAPTAC) monomers, and has a molecular weight of 106 g mol−1 and 50.5 mol% charged MAPTAC units.

The

Cellulose films in dry state

The films obtained by spin coating from a 1 wt% cellulose solution displayed an ellipsometric mean thickness and refractive index, in the dry state, of 28±3nm and 1.56±0.01, respectively. Particularly within each batch of substrates the standard deviation was low (±1), while the batch-to-batch variation was found to be somewhat larger, up to ±3nm difference in mean thickness. Using a lower cellulose concentration in the coating solution was found to result in thinner layers, as also found by

Summary

The model cellulose films produced and investigated were found to be easy to prepare, relatively smooth, pure, and pinhole-free. They are also sufficiently stable in aqueous solutions after an initial equilibrium time, and also when exposed to polyelectrolytes and surfactants. At the same time, they are accessible to enzymatic degradation. Hence, the surfaces prepared offer a range of opportunities in relation to model investigations of interfacial processing of cellulose. Using these model

Acknowledgments

Dr. Andrew Fogden is gratefully acknowledged for helpful discussions, while Marie Ernstsson and Mikael Sundin are thanked for support with the ESCA analysis. Jonny Eriksson acknowledges the support from the Colloid and Interface Technology Programme, financed by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF). Sponsorship from Novozymes A/S is also gratefully acknowledged.

References (56)

  • M. Malmsten et al.

    Colloid Surf. B Biointerfaces

    (2000)
  • P. Villeneuve et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym.

    (2000)
  • S.D. Mansfield et al.

    J. Biotechnol.

    (1997)
  • M.K. Bhat

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2000)
  • I. Lee et al.

    Ultramicroscopy

    (2000)
  • G. Henriksson et al.

    J. Biotechnol.

    (2000)
  • M. Schülein

    J. Biotechnol.

    (1997)
  • M. Linder et al.

    J. Biotechnol.

    (1997)
  • P.A. Cuypers et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • E. ten Grotenhuis et al.

    Colloid Surf. B Biointerfaces

    (1996)
  • M. Holmberg et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1997)
  • E. Kontturi et al.

    Polymer

    (2003)
  • P.J. Gerber et al.

    J. Biotechnol.

    (1999)
  • J.W. Corsel et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1986)
  • C. Boisset et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1995)
  • M. Griffin et al.

    Biochem. J.

    (2002)
  • L. Hellgren et al.

    Int. J. Dermatol.

    (1991)
  • I.C. Hahn Berg et al.

    Eur. J. Oral Sci.

    (2001)
  • S. Ito et al.

    Extremophiles

    (1998)
  • A. Doucette et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2000)
  • P. Skagerlind et al.

    J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.

    (1997)
  • I. Levy et al.

    Cellulose

    (2002)
  • L. Viikari et al.
  • A. Crutzen et al.
  • P. Väljamäe, Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden,...
  • M.L. Rabinovich et al.

    Biochemistry (Moscow)

    (2002)
  • J. Karlsson et al.

    Biopolymers

    (2002)
  • J.H. Kim et al.

    Langmuir

    (2002)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Cellulose-polyethyleneimine blend membranes with anomalous nanofiltration performance

      2018, Journal of Membrane Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cellulose on the other hand is a hydrophilic polymer; a WCA of around 30° was observed for the crosslinked RC membrane. This value is a typical WCA for cellulose films as reported in the literature [38–41], but is slightly higher than the WCA of our previously reported uncrosslinked cellulose membrane [17], indicating the low degree of the crosslinking. In the case of blend RC-PEI membranes, the contribution of the strong hydrophilicity of the cellulose on the membrane surface explains their lower WCA than that of the PEI membrane.

    • Hydrolysis of model cellulose films by cellulosomes: Extension of quartz crystal microbalance technique to multienzymatic complexes

      2017, Journal of Biotechnology
      Citation Excerpt :

      AFM in non-contact mode was used to measure the topography of the prepared cellulose films (Fig. 3). The LiCl/DMAc films have uniform structured features in the micrometer scale, exhibiting non-fibrillar structure without preferential orientation, which is consistent with the observations reported in the literature (Aulin et al., 2009; Eriksson et al., 2005). Small incidence angle X-ray diffraction measurements also indicate that LiCl/DMAc films are amorphous cellulose substrates (Aulin et al., 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text