Regular Article
Efficacious separation of electron–hole pairs in CeO2-Al2O3 nanoparticles embedded GO heterojunction for robust visible-light driven dye degradation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.058Get rights and content

Abstract

Herein, we have developed a facile and one pot synthesis of ternary CeO2-Al2O3@GO nanocomposite via wet chemical method. The structural and morphological characteristics of the synthesized nanocomposite was investigated using UV–DRS, FT-IR, XRD, FE-SEM, HR-TEM, EDX and TGA analysis. The CeO2-Al2O3@GO composite was tested for its ability to photocatalytically degrade Rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light illumination. The influence of various operational parameters such as pH, catalyst dosage and initial dye concentration on the photo degradation was investigated in detail. The synthesized CeO2-Al2O3@GO composite shows greater photocatalytic degradation of RhB (99.0%) under visible light irradiation than the raw CeO2, Al2O3, and GO catalysts and any other reported nanocomposite materials. The recyclability results also demonstrate the excellent stability and reusability of the CeO2-Al2O3@GO nanocomposite. This work will be beneficial in the field of industrial and engineering applications in the degradation of organic pollutants. Also, a study of this kind will definitely stimulate many researches in the recently emerging field of solar-driven water splitting.

Introduction

An extensive research on the elimination of hazardous chemical compounds has become worldwide issue for years due to the severe risks to human health and environment [1], [2]. More importantly, synthetic dyes are the major part of our life as they are found in the various products ranging from cosmetics, textile, painting, leather accessories, furniture, pharmaceuticals, denim industries and food stuffs [3]. Especially the dye under consideration, Rhodamine B (RhB) which contains four N-ethyl groups at either side of the xanthene ring, was chosen as the target pollutant. It is highly soluble in water, ethanol, and chemically stable [4]. This dye causes carcinogenicity, toxicity, neurotoxicity and irritation of skin and eyes for humans and animals [5], [6]. Hence the hazardous nature and harmful effects of RhB is necessary to be degraded. The treatment of effluent containing RhB is usually difficult, inconvenient and not cost-effective and generates secondary toxic pollutants during the treatment process [7]. Photocatalytic technology has been used widely in environmental protection because it represents an easy way to utilize the energy of light and is a promising, environmental, and cost-effective method [8], [9]. Semiconductor photocatalysis technique has received considerable attention as an attractive strategy to deal with the removal of dye pollutants [10]. To date, the researchers are very much keen to develop various semiconductor materials such as TiO2 [11], ZnO [12], SrTiO3 [13], WO3 [14], CdS [15], GaN [16], BiVO4 [17], NaBiO3 [18], Ag3PO4 [19], CeO2 [20], Bi2S3 [21] and Fe2O3 [22], for dedyeing of various dyes [23]. There are still some drawbacks such as easy loss of photocatalytic activity, long reaction time, agglomeration and difficulty in recovery of the catalyst materials [24]. Alternatively, the combination of semiconductor with graphene oxide (GO) to form a heterostructure is a feasible route to promote the separation of photogenerated charge carriers [25]. The incorporation of two or more active components onto graphene with excellent particle dispersivity is expected to facilitate wider applications of graphene based nanocomposites. The unique mechanical properties of GO include very large specific surface area, two dimensional monolayer structure, interesting electric, thermal, optical properties and GO exhibits superior performance as catalysts, electrocatalysts and photocatalysts [26]. GO shows extremely high electron mobility, which can be used to reduce h+–e recombination in semiconductor metal nanoparticles [27], [28]. Metal nanoparticles are highly stabilized when supported on ceria and has been attracting a growing attention towards applications [29], [30]. Among other catalysts, cerium dioxide (CeO2) has received much attention because it is non-toxic, non-photocorrosive and has strong oxidation ability together with high chemical stability. At high temperatures the surface of CeO2 considerably gets reduced drastically [31]. Many studies have described the processes to enhance charge separation and increase the photocatalytic activity of CeO2 by many routes, such as metal doping or coupling with other metal oxide materials [32]. The combination of ceria and alumina gives the catalyst better properties compared to the two pure individual oxides [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]. Many studies have demonstrated that most of the metal oxide-covered adsorbents are more efficient than the metal oxide alone. Preparing CeO2-Al2O3 on the surface of GO can still efficiently enhance the photocatalytic performance of CeO2-Al2O3 due to the super high electron migration rate of GO and the hetero junction electric field formed on the interface of GO and CeO2-Al2O3.

Herein, for the first time, a new type of hybrid architecture, CeO2-Al2O3@GO has been successfully synthesized via one-pot wet chemical method. The GO being electron acceptor and CeO2-Al2O3 electron donor make CeO2-Al2O3 to adsorb on the surface of GO sheets via electrostatic interactions, π–π stacking or hydrogen bonding, which promotes photogenerated electron-hole pairs separation, thus improving the photocatalytic efficiency. To accommodate these concerns, a particular adsorption mechanism based on the electrostatic interaction between GO and Ce-Al flakes is considered. The approach was optimized and employed to synthesize CeO2-Al2O3@GO nanocomposite, which exhibits an excellent performance on photocatalytic degradation of RhB under visible light illumination (λ > 554 nm), when compared to pure GO, CeO2, Al2O3 and CeO2-Al2O3 counterparts and other nanocomposite materials reported elsewhere.

Section snippets

Reagents

All the chemicals used in the present study were of high purity, commercially available Analar grade (Merck, India). Doubly deionized water was used to carry out all the processes throughout the synthesis.

Synthesis of CeO2-Al2O3@GO nanocomposite

GO was prepared from natural graphite powder following modified Hummers’ method [38]. In a typical preparation, 0.1 M of each cerium nitrate and aluminium sulphate was added to 0.2 mg of GO dispersed in 30 ml water and the solution was maintained at 7.0 pH by the dropwise addition of 2 M

UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectra and band gap energy

UV–Vis reflectance spectroscopy was used to measure the absorbing capacities of the newly prepared GO, CeO2, Al2O3, CeO2-Al2O3 and CeO2-Al2O3@GO with the results as shown in Fig. 1a (curve (I-V)). The characteristic absorption edge at 270 nm indicates the presence of GO in its purest form as shown in Fig. 1a (curve (I)) [39]. As noted, the metal oxide curves (CeO2-II, Al2O3-III and CeO2-Al2O3 -IV) shows two absorption bands in the UV region between 280 and 380 nm [40]. Existence of highly

Conclusion

In summary, a novel CeO2-Al2O3@GO ternary nanocomposite was synthesized by wet chemical method. The photocatalytic activity of the synthesized CeO2-Al2O3@GO exhibits better performance than bare CeO2, Al2O3 and CeO2-Al2O3 catalyst together with any other nanomaterials ever reported. The photocatalytic decomposition of RhB is achieved by the action of adsorbed hydroxyl radicals. The present methodology does not require air or oxygen purging to achieve maximum degradation. In addition, CeO2-Al2O3

References (75)

  • K. Shakir et al.

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • R. Jain et al.

    J. Environ. Manage

    (2007)
  • Z. Zhang et al.

    Catal. Communi.

    (2010)
  • S. Damyanova et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2002)
  • K.M.S. Khalil

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2007)
  • T.A. Maia et al.

    Fuel Prosess Technol.

    (2014)
  • M.H. Jiang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2013)
  • H.-J. Sedjame et al.

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2014)
  • G. Sharma et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2014)
  • L.S.F. Feio et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2008)
  • T. Wang et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2008)
  • D. Andreescu et al.

    Colloids Surf. A. Phys. Eng. Aspects

    (2006)
  • Y. Shen et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2009)
  • C. Wu

    Mater. Lett.

    (2015)
  • J. Qian et al.

    Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process

    (2014)
  • V. Balakumar et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2016)
  • S.K. Jha et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2014)
  • S. Filice et al.

    Material. Sci. Semicond. Process.

    (2016)
  • H. Lachheb et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2002)
  • Y. Guo et al.

    Dyes Pigm.

    (2005)
  • M.L. Huang et al.

    Dyes Pigm.

    (2008)
  • M. Asilturk et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2006)
  • X. Lv et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2017)
  • Z. Zhang et al.

    J. Alloys. Compd.

    (2016)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • J.E. Elliott et al.

    Science

    (2013)
  • B. Vellaichamy et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2016)
  • Y.-Y. Cheng et al.

    Agric

    Food Chem.

    (2017)
  • S.D. Richardson et al.

    Ground Water

    (2004)
  • L. Jing et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2013)
  • Q. Xiang et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2012)
  • P. Zhou et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2014)
  • X. Wang et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2014)
  • Y.T. Liang et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2011)
  • Q.P. Luo et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2012)
  • F. Cai et al.

    RSC Adv.

    (2015)
  • C.A. Bignozzi et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (44)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text