Relationships between human resource dimensions and environmental management in companies: proposal of a model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.025Get rights and content

Abstract

This work deals with the main contributions of human resource dimensions for the environmental management in a company. While the specialized literature concerning the technical aspects of environmental management expands, there is a gap in the bibliography: integrated approaches between human resource dimensions and environmental management. An extensive bibliographical review was undertaken in order to systematize the human resource dimensions and their contributions concerning the effectiveness of the environmental management system. A model that analyses the relationships between these dimensions and the typical phases of an environmental management system is presented, within a perspective of application for academicians and managers.

Introduction

Environmental degradation has increased with the expansion of the levels of production and consumption in the world, which were intensified by the consolidation of the Industrial Revolution [1]. Thus, as the work of companies and the global environmental conditions are interlocked [2], companies have to change their posture in order to deal with the ecological dimension towards proactive environmental management [3], which is developed by a course of action guided by the management of products, productive processes and strategies which prevent the emergence of environmental problems [4]. At the core of this strategic management, the environmental issue becomes the responsibility of all management areas of an organization [5], including its suppliers [6].

Sustainable Development, which may be understood as meeting the needs of the current generations without impeding future generations to meet theirs [7], cannot be solved without the effective implementation of environmental management in companies. Considering that the environmental management has become essential for the survival of companies [8], researchers have to investigate the organizational factors that favour the internal decisions of companies [9].

Within the multiple tools that aim at implementing the process of environmental management in companies, environmental management systems (EMS) must be highlighted. The term “system” means an integrated set of elements, which operate in a synchronized and non-chaotic way aiming to achieve a common objective [10]. Thus, the environmental management system consists of the organizational totality of its actions which are carried out in a systematized way in order to monitor the environmental impacts of its activities, and to manage issues related to the ecological dimension [11].

The adoption and maintenance of an EMS requires aligning human resource management with environmental management [12]. Zutshi and Sohal [13] and Wee and Quazi [14] reinforce the necessity of human resources to make EMS effective. However, this interaction between practices of human resources and environmental strategy is considered as a secondary theme, not only in the scientific production concerning human resource management [15], [16], [17], [18], but also in the classic papers related to environmental management [3], [19], [20]. At the same time that researchers deal with the integration of the ecological dimension in the context of management areas, such as marketing [21], production [22], [23], [24] and finance [25], little is known about the dynamics of the interaction between human resource dimensions and environmental management in a company [26]. It is important to highlight that this deficiency is broader because it is symptomatic to observe that the international bibliography on management and organizational change practically does not mention the functional area of human resource management [27].

For this reason, the main aim of this article is: in view of an integrated perspective, what are the main contributions of the human resource dimensions to implement and maintain an EMS? Based on this problem, the objectives of this article are presented as follows: (a) to present the various phases which constitute an EMS; (b) to analyse in detail the main contribution of the human resource dimensions for the modus operandi of EMS, taking into account practical examples of this interaction; and (c) to present a model which integrates these elements. This proposal complements the models presented in [9] and [12].

Section snippets

Environmental management systems

Gupta and Piero [28] state that an EMS integrates the environmental issue with all organizational activities, by establishing principles which attempt to search for continuous improvement in the relationship between the company and its natural environment. In other words, an environmental management system is a set of intensive managerial processes, which require a company to identify measure and control its environmental impacts [29]. Barbieri [6] clarifies that the execution of punctual,

Contribution of human resources for environmental management in companies

Despite the fact that the involvement in the area of human resources is usually pointed out as being vital to carry out proactive environmental management, the bibliography that covers human resource management and environmental management in companies, and could be used by researchers and managers as well, is scarce. In fact, papers that develop integrated models involving human resources and environmental management in companies are rare [12].

Within the organizational scope, this reality is

Proposal of a model

The environmental management system, as an administrative instrument that is spread in companies, requires support from human resource management [9]. Thus, the main aim of this article is not only to relate the main human resource dimensions presented by the specialized literature, but also to link them to the phases of an EMS proposed by ISO 14001 (Fig. 1). This proposal complements the models presented in [9] and [12]. Human resources are totally related to the EMS phases, which show the

Conclusions

Improving environmental conditions is fallacious without the real involvement of companies in this process. Companies that were historically considered responsible for the current environmental degradation now have to transform themselves into agents of change and promoters of environmental sustainability. What is defended is not only the adoption of a preservationist posture, but also the development of a socio-environmental perspective which aims at using resources efficiently, and

Acknowledgements

Thank you to The State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for the scholarship and aids granted.

Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour is a Master's degree candidate in Production Engineering from the Engineering School of São Carlos (EESC), the University of São Paulo (USP). He has a Bachelor's degree in Public Administration from São Paulo State University (UNESP/Araraquara). Areas of interest include management of science and technology, and integration of the strategies of human resources and environmental management in companies.

References (69)

  • R.I. Corazza

    Gestão ambiental e mudanças da estrutura organizacional

    Revista de Administração de Empresas

    (2003)
  • J.C. Barbieri

    Gestão ambiental empresarial

    (2004)
  • A. Wilkinson et al.

    The sustainability debate

    International. Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2001)
  • L. Preston

    Sustainability at Hewlett-Packard: from theory to practice

    California Management Review

    (2001)
  • B.F. Daily et al.

    Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2001)
  • R.S. Marshall et al.

    The strategy of sustainability: a systems perspective on environmental initiatives

    California Management Review

    (2003)
  • P. Elefsiniotis et al.

    ISO 14000 environmental management standards: their relation to sustainability

    Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    (2005)
  • N. Govindarajulu et al.

    Motivating employees for environmental improvement

    Industrial Management and Data Systems

    (2004)
  • A. Sushi et al.

    Adoption and maintenance of environmental management systems

    Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

    (2004)
  • Y.S. Wee et al.

    Development and validation of critical factors of environmental management

    Industrial Management and Data Systems

    (2005)
  • S.C. Vergara

    Gestão de Pessoas

    (2005)
  • G. Bohlander et al.

    Administração de recursos humanos

    (2003)
  • G.T. Milkovich et al.

    Administração de recursos humanos

    (2000)
  • J.M. Ivancevich

    Human resource management

    (1995)
  • S.L. Hart

    A natural-resource-based view of the firm

    Academy of Management

    (1995)
  • P. Shrivastava

    Ecocentric management for a risk society

    The Academy of Management Review

    (1995)
  • J.M. Ginsberg et al.

    Choosing the right green marketing strategy

    MIT Sloan Management Review

    (2004)
  • R. Florida

    Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing

    California Management Review

    (1996)
  • A.K. Reichert et al.

    Corporate support for ethical and environmental policies: a financial management perspective

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2000)
  • S. Rothenberg

    Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental managament at NUMMI

    Journal of Management Studies

    (2003)
  • J.E.L. Gonçalves

    Os novos desafios da empresa do futuro

    Revista de Administração de Empresas

    (1997)
  • M. Gupta et al.

    Environmental management is good business

    Industrial Management

    (2003)
  • P. Bansal et al.

    Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2003)
  • S. Kitazawa et al.

    The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2000)
  • Cited by (255)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour is a Master's degree candidate in Production Engineering from the Engineering School of São Carlos (EESC), the University of São Paulo (USP). He has a Bachelor's degree in Public Administration from São Paulo State University (UNESP/Araraquara). Areas of interest include management of science and technology, and integration of the strategies of human resources and environmental management in companies.

    Fernando César Almada Santos has a PhD in Business Management from the Business Management School of São Paulo from the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV). He is currently Assistant Professor of the Production Engineering Department at the Engineering School of São Carlos (EESC), University of São Paulo (USP). His areas of interest include integration of the strategies of human resources and production, human resource management and production management.

    View full text