Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Several global corporations have been severely criticized by different lobbying groups for the impact of their operations on the natural environment and on the local communities. Because corporate operations cannot be studied in isolation but rather as a part of a large network often referred to as a supply chain, this paper investigates the potential link between supply chain characteristics and sustainable development at the country level. In particular, the linkage between supply chain strength, generally defined as the number and quality of the suppliers and customers in a country, and the three dimensions of sustainable development namely environmental performance, corporate environmental practices, and social sustainability is assessed. Using archival data from The Global Competitiveness Report (2004–2005) and the 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index, a statistical assessment of the linkage was conducted. The results indicate that supply chain strength is positively linked to all three dimensions of sustainable development.

Introduction

Both the natural environment and social equity are now recognized as major pillars of sustainable development. Over the last decade, increasing concern about the threats from climate change and natural resource depletion has been evident across several industries and in the global population. Besides being asked to contribute to the safeguard of the natural environment, corporations are also required to include social equity aspects in their day-to-day operations. For example, the anti-globalization movement condemns the creation of wealth without an extensive redistribution of that wealth throughout the world. Hence, production capabilities around the globe must/should be more efficient in using both natural and human resources in order to provide optimal environmental and social development. Consequently, all industries will be challenged to reorganize their supply chains while preserving the natural environment and respecting local communities.

One consequence of this general concern for sustainable development is the greater scrutiny of manufacturing organizations' practices by different stakeholders. Over recent decades, increasing attention from different lobby groups regarding worldwide manufacturing organization's supply chain management has been observed [1], [2]. For instance, academic research acknowledges that the impact of manufacturing organizations on the natural environment and social equity should not be studied from an isolated perspective but rather by explicitly recognizing upstream and downstream organizations in the supply chain [3], [4]. Although several studies linking supply chain management to the natural environment have been published in recent years [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], very few have focused on corporate social behavior.1 Most of these studies have considered the manufacturing plant or firm as the unit of analysis and rarely have they made an assessment of the entire supply chain, particularly when survey methodology was adopted. This paper departs from the usual supply chain studies by considering aggregate data at the country level. It contributes to the existing literature in two ways. First, it develops the concept of a country's supply chain strength. Supply chain strength is defined as the availability and quality of local organizations that compose the supply chain. The development and measurement of such a concept allow assessing, from a holistic and more macro perspective, the potential influence of supply chain design.

Second, it empirically tests the relationship between a country's supply chain strength and different dimensions of sustainable development namely: (i) environmental performance, (ii) corporate environmental practices, and (iii) social sustainability. Given the perception of a trade-off between industrial development and sustainability, such an empirical analysis becomes insightful for economic developers around the world and for analysts of international agencies (e.g., the World Bank). From a theoretical and conceptual standpoint, this empirical analysis fits well with the early stage of research on the link between supply chain and environmental management.

There are five additional sections to this paper. Next, in Section 2, the literature is reviewed and the concept of supply chain strength is developed. Section 3 presents the theoretical link between supply chain strength and sustainable development and proposes a series of three hypotheses. The methodology, which includes the presentation of the data employed and the construction of the variables needed for the analysis, is found in Section 4. In Section 5, statistical results from the analysis are presented. The discussion of the results and concluding remarks form Section 6, the last section of this paper.

Section snippets

The notion of supply chain strength

The relationship between supply chain management and sustainable development has emphasized research associated with environmental management under different terminologies such as green purchasing [10], reverse logistics and reverse supply chain [11], product stewardship [12], and green supply chain [13]. Accumulated knowledge from this segment of the literature supports the fact that inter-organizational activities, whether upstream with the suppliers or downstream with the customers, can be

Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development

The notion of sustainable development has attracted a lot of attention over the last few decades particularly since the publication of the Brundtland report in 1987. One major criticism of sustainable development research is the lack of clarity regarding its definition and its applicability. A wide range of issues are covered under the umbrella of sustainable development including public policies, political systems, corporate citizenship, international trade, social equity/justice, economic

Methodology

The hypothesized relationships were tested using archival data coming mainly from two international sources: (i) The Global Competitiveness Report: 2004–2005 [42], and (ii) the 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index [43]. The Global Competitiveness Report 20042005 is an annual publication of The World Economic Forum (WEF) which provides the most up-to-date data source for 104 countries on their comparative strengths and weaknesses. The dataset comprises data that are publicly available and

Empirical results

Bivariate correlations presented in Table 4 reveal that supply chain strength has a strong correlation with GDP per capita (Table 4: 0.74, p < 0.01). This correlation between two independent variables, including the variable of interest for this study, can be problematic for the regression analysis as it might render the coefficient estimates unreliable. However, all the variance-inflation-factors (VIF) were not larger than 3.2 below the recommended threshold of 5 [62] suggesting that

Discussion and conclusions

Supply chain strength was defined in this paper as the availability and quality of the organizations along the supply chain, as well as the value added by the interaction among them. One key finding was to establish a link between such an industrial structure and sustainability indicators at the country level. Supply chain strength, which can be viewed as an outcome of cluster development in a country, is known to favor economic growth and wealth. As such, concerns regarding the potential

References (67)

  • E.D. Rosenzweig et al.

    The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers

    Journal of Operations Management

    (2003)
  • J. Furman et al.

    The determinants of national innovation capacity

    Research Policy

    (2002)
  • P. Rao

    Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2002)
  • P. Rao

    Greening production: a South-East Asian experience

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2004)
  • R.D. Klassen et al.

    Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: their impact on plant-level environmental investment

    Production and Operations Management

    (2003)
  • F.E. Bowen et al.

    The role of supply management capabilities in green supply

    Production and Operations Management

    (2001)
  • S. Vachon et al.

    Customers as green suppliers: managing the complexity of the reverse supply chain

  • E.M. Snir

    Liability as a catalyst for product stewardship

    Production and Operations Management

    (2001)
  • S. Vachon et al.

    Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2006)
  • K.E. McKone-Sweet

    Lessons from a coffee supply chain

    Supply Chain Management Review

    (2004)
  • J.R. Meredith et al.
  • M.E. Porter

    The Adam Smith address: location, clusters, and the ‘new’ microeconomics of competition

    Business Economics

    (1998)
  • M.E. Porter

    The competitive advantage of nations

    (1990)
  • M.E. Porter

    Clusters and the new economics of competition

    Harvard Business Review

    (1998)
  • G. Ahuja

    Collaborative networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (2000)
  • J.K. Liker et al.

    Japanese automakers, U.S. suppliers and supply-chain superiority

    Sloan Management Review

    (2000)
  • A.A. King et al.

    Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance

    Production and Operations Management

    (2001)
  • M.E. Porter et al.

    Green and competitive: ending the stalemate

    Harvard Business Review

    (1995)
  • S.L. Hart

    A natural-resource-based view of the firm

    Academy of Management Review

    (1995)
  • R.D. Klassen et al.

    The impact of environmental management on firm performance

    Management Science

    (1996)
  • A. King et al.

    Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction

    Management Science

    (2002)
  • C.A. Geffen et al.

    Suppliers and environmental innovation: the automotive paint process

    International Journal of Operations and Production Management

    (2000)
  • R.E. Wokutch

    Nike and its critics

    Organization and Environment

    (2001)
  • Cited by (250)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text